Dailymaverick logo

South Africa

GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL DISUNITY

Presidency condemns DA’s ‘latest effort to embarrass’ special envoy Mcebisi Jonas

The Presidency defends Mcebisi Jonas against DA claims of disinformation regarding his role as special envoy to the US.
Presidency condemns DA’s ‘latest effort to embarrass’ special envoy Mcebisi Jonas Mcebisi Jonas. (Photo Thulani Mbele/Gallo Images)

The Presidency has hit back at the Democratic Alliance (DA) for what it calls “disinformation” and “harassment” targeting President Ramaphosa’s special envoy to the US, Mcebisi Jonas.

“The Democratic Alliance’s latest effort to embarrass President Ramaphosa’s Special Envoy to North America, Mr Jonas Mcebisi, involves claims — in the DA’s framing — that the United States has rejected Mr Jonas’s ‘credentials’ and that Mr Jonas is therefore unable to perform his role as special envoy.

“The DA seeks to add sensationalism to its claim by suggesting President Ramaphosa and Mr Jonas face a crisis in view of the United States’ pending implementation of trade tariffs announced several days ago by President Donald Trump.

“The facts around this matter include the reality that special envoys do not present diplomatic credentials to host countries in the way designated heads of mission or other diplomats are,” said Presidency spokesperson Vincent Magwenya in a statement on Tuesday, 15 July.

Magwenya’s statement comes after the DA claimed Ramaphosa had for months been concealing the fact that his special envoy to the United States “is not welcome in Washington”.

Emma Powell, the DA spokesperson on international relations and cooperation, claimed in a statement on Tuesday that the US had denied Jonas a diplomatic visa in May.

She said the Presidency “continued to mislead the public by insisting that Jonas remained the president’s special envoy” to the US.

Powell said these facts were coming to light with just two weeks to go before devastating 30% trade tariffs on SA exports to the US were to take effect, a result which Jonas was supposed to help prevent. The Department of International Relations and Cooperation (Dirco) has rejected her claim and accused her of working against SA’s interests.

Read more: Trump’s 30% tariff on SA based on inaccurate trade data — Ramaphosa 

“The US government has formally rejected Jonas’ credentials and has informed the Presidency that he would not be recognised as South Africa’s official interlocutor. The Ramaphosa administration was explicitly advised on multiple occasions that Jonas was not acceptable to Washington and was urged to appoint an alternative envoy,” said Powell.

“This week, when confronted with the DA’s announcement that it would submit a Promotion of Access to Information (PAIA) request detailing Jonas’ official engagements over the past 90 days, instead of coming clean with the truth … Magwenya lashed out on social media, accusing the DA of ‘encroaching’ on the President’s powers,” she added.

Powell called on the Presidency to explain why it continued to back Jonas as SA’s envoy when his “credentials have been officially rejected by the host government”.

Read more: Mcebisi Jonas is a deeply principled man and a good choice as envoy to the US

Powell said that following the expulsion of Ebrahim Rasool as SA’s ambassador to the US, Ramaphosa was more concerned about “saving face than safeguarding livelihoods”. She said the DA would ask Parliament to request an urgent briefing from the Presidency on Jonas’ appointment.

Daily Maverick approached Jonas and his spokesperson, Ranjeni Munusamy, for comment, but Munusamy referred us to the Presidency.

‘Right-wing nexus’ 

In a statement on Monday, Powell said that more than 90 days after his appointment as Ramaphosa’s special envoy to the US, Jonas was “nowhere to be seen”.

She noted that Jonas’ appointment came on the back of the expulsion of Rasool, “and was billed as a critical intervention to stave off the impending collapse of vital export industries under punitive liberation day tariffs.

“With just over two weeks to go before the 30% tariffs come into effect on 1 August, industries that support hundreds of thousands of jobs — from citrus to automotives — remain on a knife’s edge,” said Powell.

Read more: US tariff uncertainty casts shadow over South Africa's citrus lifeline

Magwenya said that Jonas’ role did not “supersede the leading role” of the Department of Trade, Industry and Competition (DTIC) and Dirco in SA’s “difficult but constructive” trade negotiations with the US.

“Mr Jonas has, however, played an important role in working with the DTIC to develop the trade proposals in which South Africa is currently engaging the United States in good faith and with the expectation of mutually beneficial terms.

“Similarly, he has been assisting Dirco in government’s efforts to reset diplomatic relations and all areas of cooperation between South Africa and the United States,” said Magwenya.

He said that while these processes were underway, Ramaphosa had not required Jonas to visit the US on urgent business.

“The Presidency is therefore concerned about the Democratic Alliance’s persistent campaign against South Africa’s national interest and its posture of trying to embarrass and belittle our country, and in this specific circumstance, Mr Jonas. This campaign has its origins in a Democratic Alliance visit to the United States earlier this year, to advance an ideological agenda rather than our national interest,” he said.

“The DA has positioned itself as part of a right-wing nexus that seeks to use a foreign state to effect changes to democratically developed national policies in our own country.

“The DA is trying cheaply but dangerously to exploit a critical engagement between South Africa and the United States to protest President Ramaphosa’s removal of Mr Andrew Whitfield as deputy minister of trade, industry and competition.”

Andrew Whitfield. (Photo: Fani Mahuntsi / Gallo Images)
Andrew Whitfield. (Photo: Fani Mahuntsi / Gallo Images)

Read more: ‘Clear violation of the rules’ — Ramaphosa breaks silence on Whitfield debacle

Last week, Trump sent Ramaphosa a letter confirming that the US would impose a 30% tariff on all imports of South African goods from 1 August — “separate from all sectoral tariffs”.

He originally announced the “reciprocal” tariffs on SA and almost all other countries in April and said the new tariffs would kick in after 90 days, on 9 July.

This was supposed to give countries time to lower their tariffs on US imports. But although the DTIC said it had presented a draft Framework Deal to the US on 20 May, and requested an extension of the 90-day pause for further negotiation, Trump confirmed the 30% tariffs last week.

He again said that if SA eliminated its trade barriers, the US would “consider” adjusting the 30% tariffs. DM

Comments (6)

Fanie Rajesh Ngabiso Jul 15, 2025, 09:52 PM

What the DA is saying is very likely completely accurate, but regardless, if the ANC don't play nice, it is completely unreasonable to expect the DA or any other parties to.

Derek Taylor Jul 16, 2025, 08:19 AM

Please confirm what the DA did that is being referred to as disinformation, in other words what was not true? If this cannot be confirmed how is it harassment? Consequence management is apparently not part of the ANC vocabulary.

Fanie Rajesh Ngabiso Jul 16, 2025, 12:01 PM

Mr Ramaphosa - you really should read some articles on how Johannesburg is imploding and focus on doing something useful rather than wasting our time and our money in a futile effort to obfuscate and deflect from accusations you know to be true.

Hidden Name Jul 16, 2025, 06:28 AM

So, actually, Jonas does have a visa to the US? Apart from the DA bashing, I get no sense that anything the DA has asserted is actually false. So government is once again lying.

Maria Janse van Rensburg Jul 16, 2025, 07:29 AM

A bit of hypocrisy on the side of the DA. President Trump's administration in particular, is violating the rights of foreigners and the LGQBT community by ignoring due process and the rule of law. And yet the DA, Solidariteit and Afriforum conclude that our laws cause the US to impose tariffs. Their President is the problem. Would tariffs have been an issue if Kamala Harris was the President? What has Japan and Korea done wrong? And the EU? I would like to see more loyalty to SA from the DA.

Karl Sittlinger Jul 16, 2025, 08:29 AM

Uh what? The ANC has now squandered billions of rands by lying to the entire country. Tens of thousands of jobs are on the line because of their lie and arrogance, and you blame the DA? What does this have to do with the ANC lying to the entire country again? It's the ANC that has yet again shown its loyalty is only to itself.

John Kannemeyer Jul 16, 2025, 08:37 AM

Since when does loyalty to SA equate to loyalty to the ANC, the President and his spokesperson are being somewhat loose with the truth, especially with the looming tariffs from our second largest trading partner.

Penny Philip Jul 16, 2025, 09:31 AM

What really makes me laugh is how white South Africans are utterly convinced that the DA are paragons of virtue & can do no wrong. Just read Helen Zille's book to see how ruthless the DA's inhouse politics are. You are delusional if you think the DA politicians are not in it for the same reasons the ANC politicians are.

Karl Sittlinger Jul 16, 2025, 10:47 AM

Ruthless is not the same as corrupt and criminal. There is no equivalency between the ANC and the DA in this regard. How else do you treat a party that lies and cheats in bad faith at every opportunity than being ruthless? No political party is "a paragon of virtue", and it's quite prejudiced to assume that support is somehow connected to race. Blame the DA for bring time deafness or neoliberal if you must, but there is no comparison here to the ANCs failures and crimes. Not even close.

Fanie Rajesh Ngabiso Jul 16, 2025, 11:31 PM

When you are unable to read or post due to lack of power, feel free to pop down to Cape Town and get some. (oh, and no need to come in 4 wheel drive)

Mark Schaufelbuehl Jul 17, 2025, 03:50 PM

...no pot holes in CTN???? or.... no need to show-off ??? ;)

keith.ciorovich Jul 17, 2025, 04:33 PM

Oh boy not many people have such lovely stuffed couches. Helen Zille is disliked by dishonest people as she is honest and calls a spade a spade and has never been accused of fraud.

District Six Jul 16, 2025, 10:36 AM

Read her comments. No where does she mention ANC. These "looming" tariffs exist purely in the rancid mind of trump. Even if Washington is blocking Jonas, how is that remotely SA's ability to reverse with 8647 TACO-man? Her question is, would this tariff madness have happened with Harris/Walz? NO.

Karl Sittlinger Jul 16, 2025, 10:54 AM

Yet she is blaming the DA, which has no say in foreign policy (because of ANC arrogance), nor who was deployed there. It also doesn't change the fact that the ANC lied about this. Yes Trump and his tarrifs are a catastrophe, and it would not have happened had he lost, but that changes nothing about the situation we are in now. Whether we like it or not, Trump is sadly here to stay for a while longer and sending a diplomat that is accepted in the USA is the first basic step.

Rae Earl Jul 16, 2025, 08:53 AM

The ANC is misreading the US and Donald Trump at every turn. Ramaphosa stumbles and bumbles in the face of this. Trying to cast he DA as the fall party is simply stupid. They understand the politics of this situation while Ramaphosa and his cohorts patently do not.

Hidden Name Jul 16, 2025, 05:04 PM

LGBTQ is an irrelevance. The group referenced is simply too small to be significant in any way. They were/are, however, a convenient trojan horse for the spread of identity politics. We are well shot of that foolish experiment. As to the rest of your diatribe, I must admit confusion as it seems unrelated to the matter at hand...straw man, anyone?

D Dog Jul 16, 2025, 05:11 PM

Your logic is flawed with a dash of whataboutism thrown in. Kamala Harris would be the president if she was elected by US voters. But she's not. Conversely one could say that our problems would be solved if the ANC was voted out in favour of a more principled party. Lastly, I'd like to point out that renaming Sandton Drive where the US Embassy is located to the name of some terrorist isn't exactly not antagonising.

Mark Schaufelbuehl Jul 17, 2025, 03:53 PM

Agreed: 'our problems would be solved if the ANC was voted out in favour of a more principled party.' And that should be the priority to get SA to grow!

Patterson Alan John Jul 16, 2025, 08:15 AM

Nothing has changed for the ANC. Their prevarications, ineptitude and slight of hand are all supported by the old game of using attack as the best form of defense. A simple question about the activities of a 'special envoy' are immediately turned into an attack on the DA - "The DA has positioned itself as part of a right-wing nexus that seeks to use a foreign state to effect changes to democratically developed national policies in our own country." Sounds like a Communist Party statement.

Robinson Crusoe Jul 16, 2025, 08:37 AM

Is the ANC seeking to position South Africa as the new Cuba? With only 40% of the last national vote they are on thin ice. We want proper dialogue Mr Ramaphosa!

Rod MacLeod Jul 16, 2025, 12:27 PM

The only embarrassment here is not acknowledging that Mcebisi is not "special" in the eyes of the US administration. And he sure isn't an "envoy", that much clear. Hell, Ramaphosa "had not required Jonas to visit the US on urgent business" - like, this tariff thing is not "urgent". What a sh!tshow. Thoroughly embarrassing.