Defend Truth

LEAVE TO APPEAL DISMISSED

Constitutional Court ruling finally slams door on SARS ‘rogue unit’ saga

Constitutional Court ruling finally slams door on SARS ‘rogue unit’ saga
Suspended Public Protector Busisiwe Mkhwebane during the inquiry into her fitness to hold office at Parliament on 2 November 2022 in Cape Town, South Africa. Busisiwe Mkhwebane was suspended by President Cyril Ramaphosa with immediate office on 9 June. (Photo: Gallo Images / Brenton Geach)

Allegations surfaced in the media eight years ago about a ‘rogue unit’ within the SA Revenue Service. The controversy plagued top-rated senior SARS officials and led to a number of court cases and inquiries. Now, the Constitutional Court has finally made a ruling against suspended Public Protector Busisiwe Mkhwebane that should put the saga to rest.

On Thursday, 10 November, the Constitutional Court banged the last nail in the coffin of the infamous and discredited report into the SARS “rogue unit”, dismissing suspended Public Protector Busisiwe Mkhwebane’s application for leave to appeal. 

The highest court in South Africa refused Mkhwebane’s leave to appeal application, concluding that “it bears no reasonable prospects of success”.

The court ordered Mkhwebane and her office to jointly and severally pay for the legal costs of Minister Pravin Gordhan and former SARS deputy commissioner Ivan Pillay, who she implicated in wrongdoing linked to the establishment of SARS’ High-Risk Investigations Unit in her July 2019 report.

Former SARS official Ivan Pillay. (Photo: Gallo Images / Netwerk24 / Deaan Vivier)

Then Finance Minister Pravin Gordhan. (Photo: Guillem Sartorio / Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Johann van Loggerenberg during an appearance at the Pretoria Magistrates’ Court on 9 April 2018 in Pretoria, South Africa. (Photo: Gallo Images / Netwerk24 / Deaan Vivier)

Mkhwebane found that the setting up of the unit, which was approved by Gordhan, the SARS commissioner at the time, was in violation of the Constitution.

The controversy had followed Pillay and others – including  former High-Risk Investigations Unit head Johann van Loggerenberg, who was also implicated in the report. 

*Speaking to Daily Maverick after the ruling on Thursday, Pillay’s lawyer, Bernard Hotz, described the ruling as bittersweet. “It’s very sweet because justice has been served, but it’s very bitter when one realises the toll that State Capture has taken on this country and especially how SARS… was decimated through the process of State Capture, and how [Pillay] and Gordhan’s lives were turned into torturous nightmares for years – simply because they were doing their jobs.”

Mkhwebane has consistently maintained that the then inspector-general of intelligence Faith Radebe’s 2014 report – on which Mkhwebane based her SARS “rogue unit” report – had been anonymously dropped off in the foyer of her offices. However, in August this year, it was revealed at the impeachment inquiry into the suspended Public Protector that it was the EFF’s Floyd Shivambu who had attached it to an email complaint to the Public Protector in 2019. 

EFF’s Floyd Shivambu gave Mkhwebane classified SARS ‘rogue unit’ report, hearing told

In 2014, the SARS so-called intelligence unit hit headlines first in Sunday Times, with claims that the “rogue unit” was set up as an illegal spying unit under former commissioner Gordhan. Three years later, in April 2016,  Sunday Times retracted its series of articles on the “rogue unit” in line with a ruling by the Press Ombud. 

Sanef inquiry

The South African National Editors’ Forum (Sanef) launched an inquiry, led by retired judge Kathleen Satchwell in October 2018, following the newspaper retraction and apologies for its reports on the “rogue unit” and also the so-called “Cato Manor Death Squad”.

Read more in Daily Maverick: Former Sars executive slams press over rogue unit stories

In December 2020, Gordhan successfully challenged Mkhwebane’s SARS “rogue unit” report in the Gauteng High Court in Pretoria, where judges Selby Baqwa, Annali Basson and Leonie Windell ruled that her report  could not stand “and must be set aside”.

The court found her report was without foundation and based on “discredited reports and unsubstantiated facts” and was “the product of a wholly irrational process, bereft of any sound legal or factual basis”.

Despite mounting personal cost orders, Mkhwebane remained undeterred by the Pretoria High Court’s findings, and approached the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) in October 2021. In January this year, Mkhwebane again lost her application for reconsideration of her petition for leave to appeal, when the SCA dismissed it.  

Mkhwebane’s conduct in the course of her investigation into Gordhan and the so-called SARS “rogue unit”, as well as the wave of litigation that followed, are at the core of the Section 194 parliamentary impeachment inquiry that is investigating Mkhwebane’s fitness to hold office. DM

This is a developing story and was updated to add in the reaction from Pillay’s lawyer. It may be updated further.

Gallery

Comments - Please in order to comment.

  • Glyn Morgan says:

    The sooner she goes the better for South Africa. Next time, maybe, the selection committee will listen to the Democratic Alliance!

  • Nic Campbell says:

    Tragic waste of taxpayers resources yet again. When will this ridiculous circus end. Watching the PP impeachment proceedings is so disheartening. SC that are inept and quite frankly an embarrassment to the profession.

  • Manfred Hasewinkel says:

    What about a rescission application?

  • NICK GREENE says:

    Simple way to stop her irrational legal moves is to insist that she lodges a deposit with the court, which will be forfeited when she loses the case. Pity that the bar council is toothless in upholding the integrity and principles of the profession.

  • Sandra McEwen says:

    Will the politicians please stand up and fulfill their mandate and get rid of this waster of tax payers money. Oh if only Thuli could get in to this! Our true protector.

  • Josie Rowe-Setz says:

    The hope is that the current enquiry is not delayed so long that it passes the final date for impeachment. And that the process of collection from her for costs is fast and effective.

  • Confucious Says says:

    Yet another court battle lost! She is without doubt in a job that she has no clue about, and is completely and utterly incompetent! What a joke!

  • Colleen Dardagan says:

    In one way you have to admire this woman’s tenacity and determination, she certainly doesn’t give up even if, by now, it must have dawned on her that she is totally incompetent.

  • Tess Fairweather says:

    One has to wonder who is paying all the costs she has to pay – both her own and those of her victims.

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted

X

This article is free to read.

Sign up for free or sign in to continue reading.

Unlike our competitors, we don’t force you to pay to read the news but we do need your email address to make your experience better.


Nearly there! Create a password to finish signing up with us:

Please enter your password or get a sign in link if you’ve forgotten

Open Sesame! Thanks for signing up.

Make your taxes work for you

Donate to Daily Maverick’s non-profit arm, the Scorpio Investigative Unit, by 29 February 2024 and you’ll qualify for a tax break.

We issue Section 18A tax certificates for all donations made to Daily Maverick. These can be presented to SARS for tax relief.

Make your donation today

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options

Become a Maverick Insider

This could have been a paywall

On another site this would have been a paywall. Maverick Insider keeps our content free for all.

Become an Insider
Otsile Nkadimeng - photo by Thom Pierce

A new community Actionist every week.

Meet the South Africans making a difference. Get Maverick Citizen in your inbox.