South Africa

Days of Zondo

‘Chaos’ at Eskom allowed tenderpreneurs to become instant billionaires

Former Public Enterprise Minister Lynne Brown (Photo by Gallo Images / Sowetan / Esa Alexander)

The former public enterprises minister on Friday told the Zondo Commission that she had always been viewed as a corruption-buster, but was powerless to stop the corruption at Eskom because the model was flawed.

“I have always been viewed as a corruption-buster,” Brown told the commission, referencing her time in local government, near the start of her testimony, which was given via video link, on Friday.

“I hope the [commission] process can set the record straight again. This is a time for me to clear my name. I am grateful for the opportunity to appear before the commission, and I support it,” she said.

Prior to this, she had told Justice Zondo and evidence leader advocate Pule Seleka that if they had “read everything about me in the papers”, she “would not be surprised” if they thought she lived a lavish lifestyle, ostensibly the proceeds of corruption.

Brown implied she had been ridiculed because of Eskom’s inability to keep the lights on, even though the rolling blackouts started in 2008, years before she was appointed in May 2014.

“Nobody is blamed at the moment for any of the load shedding. I was called the minister of load shedding. I would like you to reflect on that.”

Shortly after Brown’s appointment, she recommended the appointment of a new Eskom board to Cabinet, which was accepted by December 2014.

These appointees included numerous individuals with personal or business relationships with the infamous Gupta family:

  • Dr Ben Ngubane, who became chairman and who served as a co-director with Salim Essa in the natural resources exploration company, Gade Oil and Gas (Pty) Ltd from May 2013 to November 2014;
  • Romeo Khumalo, who was a co-director with Essa at Ujiri Mining Technologies (Pty) Ltd until Essa resigned in August 2015;
  • Mark Pamensky, who was on the board of the Gupta-controlled Oakbay Resources and Energy (Pty) Ltd until May 2017; 
  • Nazia Carrim, who is married to a first cousin of Essa; 
  • Muhammad Noor Hussain; and
  • Viroshni Naidoo, a friend and business associate of the Guptas and Essa.

Brown then brought in Brian Molefe and Anoj Singh from Transnet to Eskom. They first served in acting positions as CEO and CFO respectively, before their positions became permanent in October 2015. 

Under their collective control, Eskom entered into a myriad controversial deals, which have been the subject of the State Capture inquiry and a parliamentary investigation.

Asked by Justice Zondo on Friday about the state of the power utility when she was first appointed minister, Brown described it as being laden with “chaos”. 

“But if you had a tender [with Eskom] you were a millionaire or billionaire overnight. So there are a lot of questions about that too”.

Responding to a monologue by Justice Zondo about possible failures of oversight creating grounds for corruption, and the entity’s inability to arrest its massive debt, Brown said: “In my time I couldn’t get rid of corruption, nor could the people before me. I think the answer has nothing to do with the company, but with the model.”

She said that although oversight was practised at Eskom, it was done “through a department that has to interrogate the documentation that Eskom brings. Anything else to be interrogated goes to the relevant authorities, the Special Investigating Unit [SIU] or National Prosecuting Authority [NPA], and so on.”

 During the second year in her ministerial post, she said, she had started to “engage” the SIU on Transnet, Denel and Eskom. “We spent six months deliberating terms with the SIU.”

There was a “culture” in SOEs of contracts not being put to tender, and procurement being decentralised. There was also no “step-in clause”, she said, which meant the company had to be left to run itself. “The PFMA [Public Finance Management Act] doesn’t make provision for you to step in and stop a tender.”

Returning to load shedding, she said: “We were told at some stage that load shedding had been solved, but it’s back. Maybe we have to look at who is effective, and people who have better expertise can be brought in.”

Brown said that in other countries, state-owned-entities were run as commercial businesses, which were catalysts for economic growth. She said she believed that all 720 of South Africa’s SEOs should be taken out of government’s control, but should not be privatised.

“Some can be merged, others can be closed. We must decide which are strategic, like has been done in Singapore, Norway, China and the US. Its greatest shareholder must be government, but it must be structured like a company, so it isn’t accountable to some politician somewhere, but to a board and a state that can get dividends.”

Continuing on the theme of oversight later in the session, Brown was asked by Seleka about Eskom pulling out of the War Room – established in December 2014 and chaired by then deputy president Cyril Ramaphosa – which had been appointed to deal with the load shedding crisis.

Seleka had asked if the War Room was not a good idea in pursuing an oversight role.

 “You were part of the ministerial committee assigned to the War Room. After Mr Brian Molefe was appointed as CEO, the [then] board chairman Mr Ben Ngubane wrote to you saying Eskom would no longer be participating in or responding to the War Room. That [took] away government’s efforts at oversight. Why was the War Room terminated?”

“You will have to ask then president [Jacob Zuma] that,” replied Brown.

“At the time there was a huge debate [over whether] independent power producers [IPPs] were preferable. IPPs were largely foreign businesses, about 10% were South African-owned. [IPPs worked] on a take-and-pay basis, so even if we didn’t need solar for the day, we had to pay for it.”

She said the War Room was “too big and focused on technical matters”, and while she did not recall receiving Ngubane’s official letter about Eskom pulling out of the War Room, he had said it was “taking up too much of their time”, and that the Eskom CEO should instead be working on a turnaround plan.

In November 2018, the National Assembly’s portfolio committee on public enterprises adopted the Eskom Inquiry Committee Report, which probed multiple allegations made against Eskom.

It found there was an urgent need for the Treasury to strengthen state-owned company regulations on procurement. It also further recommended criminal investigations be opened into possible fraud, corruption and other unlawful conduct.

Also among the recommendations were that the State Capture Commission summon Brown and Malusi Gigaba, both former ministers of the Department of Public Enterprises and state’s shareholder representative in Eskom during the period under investigation. 

The committee asserted that the two ministers had been “grossly negligent” in the carrying out of their duties as the shareholder representative.

Brown’s tenure as minister was marred by multiple incidents such as her failure to intervene in the re-appointment of Molefe as CEO shortly after he resigned with a massive pension pay-out, later deemed illegal, as well as her failure to attend to any of the serious allegations made against several SEOs in the Public Protector’s State of Capture Report.

Brown’s testimony continues.DM


Comments - Please in order to comment.

  • Sergio CPT says:

    Nothing but a key cog and enabler of state capture and a typical zuma poodle, who couldn’t trip fast enough over herself to do his evil bidding. One would have to be a brain-dead moron not to realise what was at play, and you have ZERO credibility. You are as crooked and depraved as your masters!

  • John Cartwright says:

    Can we – without hobbling robust debate – find a way of reining in some of the un-useful vulgar name-calling that tends to pop up in the Comments space? It simply doesn’t fit well with the DM’s own vigorous but reasoned approach.

    • Rod H MacLeod says:

      Emotion runs high especially when one so trusted turns out to be a Judas to the people and thus invites harsh name-calling. And for such a highly paid person to say “SEOs (sic) should be taken out of government’s control, but should not be privatised” … ? What does that actually mean? Deary me.

  • Derek Hebbert says:

    Lynn Brown has no clue in my opinion (dont want to get sued here!). How anyone so unqualified could be Minister is beyond belief. I suppose its the same principle as appointing Zuma. Put someone who has no idea in charge and you can get away with anything.

    • Gerhard Pretorius says:

      Agree. This woman is out of her depth and it is evident that she was at hand to be put to use by her masters. It is difficult to refrain from name calling. Suffice to say she has never been worthy of the position she held – and all of this after swearing an oath of loyalty and service to S.A.

  • Johan Buys says:

    We have 720 State Owned Entities????!!!

    • Ian Gwilt says:

      My view swings between totally incompetent or crooked or a mix of the two
      was not her partner implicated in some deal ?
      so many deals
      would this individual have been employed at any company as an executive with the zero skills she seems to have, I doubt it

  • Bryan Macpherson says:

    The evidence is stark – Brown recommended the appointment of the Gupta allies who subsequently looted and destroyed Eskom. She cannot absolve herself of that responsibility and should be on the long list of ANC cadres charged for her actions.

  • Sergio CPT says:

    John, I call like it is. I am incensed and have lost complete patience with these vile scumbags and thieves, who have all but destroyed and bankrupted this beautiful country and stolen our futures. This could be a happy functioning country with a place in the sun for all. If I offend you, tough.

    • Glyn Morgan says:

      Sergio – My thoughts exactly! Names need to be called!

    • Geoff Young says:

      Well said Sergio. The time for hand-wringing and concerned intellectual debate has come and gone. Now is the time for the rule of law to assert itself and for the hammer of prosecutions and convictions to slam down on all the greedy, selfish and patently guilty scumbags in positions of power.

      • Andrew Blaine says:

        Way past Orange overall time, they remain in the cupboard waiting for low powered occupants. The marines will get off Scot free

  • MIKE WEBB says:

    Orange Please!

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted


This article is free to read.

Sign up for free or sign in to continue reading.

Unlike our competitors, we don’t force you to pay to read the news but we do need your email address to make your experience better.

Nearly there! Create a password to finish signing up with us:

Please enter your password or get a sign in link if you’ve forgotten

Open Sesame! Thanks for signing up.

Daily Maverick The Gathering 2024 banner

Daily Maverick has secured an esteemed speaker line-up...

to help make sense of Elections 2024.

Trevor Manuel, Prof Thuli Madonsela and Minister Ronald Lamola are among the latest panellists confirmed for Daily Maverick The Gathering Twenty Twenty-Four.

Join us, on Thurs 14 March 2024 at CTICC Cape Town or online wherever you are, for an event that will put the election in perspective.

Make your taxes work for you

Donate to Daily Maverick’s non-profit arm, the Scorpio Investigative Unit, by 29 February 2024 and you’ll qualify for a tax break.

We issue Section 18A tax certificates for all donations made to Daily Maverick. These can be presented to SARS for tax relief.

Make your donation today

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options

Otsile Nkadimeng - photo by Thom Pierce

A new community Actionist every week.

Meet the South Africans making a difference. Get Maverick Citizen in your inbox.