NPA files forfeiture application against McKinsey but hunt for Trillian assets came up dry

By Jessica Bezuidenhout 24 May 2018

The National Prosecuting Authority has applied for a forfeiture order in terms of the Prevention of Organised Crime Act against global consulting firm, McKinsey & Co but the Trillian kitty is empty so investigators will have pull a fresh maneuver to extract cash from the embattled Gupta-linked company.

The National Prosecuting Authority rushed to court at the 11th hour to prevent a preservation order it obtained against global consulting firm, McKinsey & Co, from lapsing on Wednesday.

McKinsey is scheduled to repay just over R1-billion that it allegedly unlawfully received from Eskom following a controversial deal involving the Gupta-linked financial advisory firm, Trillian Capital Partners. Salim Essa, a kingpin in the Gupta empire, owned 60% of Trillian during that time.

The State seeks to recover a total of R1.6-billion from the two companies. However, the forfeiture application is specifically against McKinsey and does not include Trillian from which the State seeks to recover a further R595-million.

Advocate Knorx Molelle, acting head of the NPA’S Asset Forfeiture Unit, in an affidavit filed, said that notwithstanding efforts by curators, they were unable to locate any recoverable Trillian assets at this stage.

Trillian had previously told Daily Maverick that it’s understanding of developments in the case was that the AFU matter against it may have been “withdrawn”.

The NPA emphatically denied this, however the order it secured against Trillian on December 14 did in fact lapse on Wednesday, May 24.

The NPA confirmed that it will proceed with recovery efforts against Trillian although it was not able to provide details of what those may entail.

The forfeiture application filed at the High Court in Pretoria was brought amid settlement negotiations between McKinsey, Eskom and the National Director of Public Prosecutions.  Eskom is now recognised as the “victim” of the alleged unlawful activity and the court application states that the NPA seeks to harmonise its interests along with those of Eskom.

The payments to the two companies had caused severe reputational harm, particularly to McKinsey. The scandal prompted McKinsey to tell Members of Parliament that it did not want tainted money during a parliamentary enquiry last year when the firm also committed to repaying its R1-billion portion.

The repayment though was held up various issues, including the company’s efforts to secure indemnity from further legal action or from being punished twice. It feared that it may hand over the cash to the AFU and then potentially face another claim from Eskom which at that stage had not brought any formal proceedings to recover the money.

That dilemma has now been somewhat resolved as the NPA confirms that it seeks to harmonise its interests with those of Eskom as the victim and rightful owner of the money. The application the forfeiture order is scheduled to be heard later this year.

It is unclear precisely what the cause of the “impasse” was during the settlement negotiations between McKinsey and the NDPP. Daily Maverick understands that those were at an advanced stage when the NPA headed to court with its forfeiture application.

Eskom paid McKinsey and Trillian over the course of several months between August 2016 and February 2017 without any valid contract.

In the initial application for the preservation order, the AFU described the Eskom deal between the two companies as “patently corrupt” and “collusive” and accused McKinsey of having played an instrumental role in siphoning the R1.6-billion out of Eskom.

It said that Eskom had released the staggering payments to the companies in the absence of a valid contract and in some instances, without proof of services having been rendered. Those payments followed a series of alleged irregularities in contravention of the Public Finance Management Act which included among others, the deliberate and fraudulent circumvention of Eskom supply chain process and in the circumstances certain acts of alleged theft, fraud and money laundering in contravention of the Prevention and Combatting of Corrupt Activities Act. DM

See earlier articles here and here and here


In other news...

South Africa is in a very real battle. A political fight where terms such as truth and democracy can seem more of a suggestion as opposed to a necessity.

On one side of the battle are those openly willing to undermine the sovereignty of a democratic society, completely disregarding the weight and power of the oaths declared when they took office. If their mission was to decrease society’s trust in government - mission accomplished.

And on the other side are those who believe in the ethos of a country whose constitution was once declared the most progressive in the world. The hope that truth, justice and accountability in politics, business and society is not simply fairy tale dust sprinkled in great electoral speeches; but rather a cause that needs to be intentionally acted upon every day.

However, it would be an offensive oversight not to acknowledge that right there on the front lines, alongside whistleblowers and civil society, stand the journalists. Armed with only their determination to inform society and defend the truth, caught in the crossfire of shots fired from both sides.

If you believe in supporting the cause and the work of Daily Maverick then take your position on the battleground and sign up to Maverick Insider today.

For whatever amount you choose, you can support Daily Maverick and it only takes a minute.

Support Daily MaverickPayment options

Comments - share your knowledge and experience

Please note you must be a Maverick Insider to comment. Sign up here or if you are already an Insider.


Gravy Trains, always on time: Cash from Prasa’s R3.5bn locomotives deal also flowed to Jacob Zuma Foundation

By Pieter-Louis Myburgh and Sikonathi Mantshantsha