Defend Truth

GROUNDUP

Relocation of Cape Town’s Central Line occupiers hits a snag with water and sanitation supply problems

Relocation of Cape Town’s Central Line occupiers hits a snag with water and sanitation supply problems
About 100 of 891 households occupying the railway line in Philippi have now been moved to a temporary relocation site next to Stock Road station. (Photo: Sandiso Phaliso)

Some people occupying the railway line are now refusing to be moved until service issues are resolved.

Scores of families who have been relocated from the railway line in Philippi to a temporary site next to Stock Road station say they have had to endure days without adequate provision of water or working toilets. As a result, many families are now refusing to move until the issue is resolved.

The 891 households being relocated are part of Operation Bhekela, a joint operation between Prasa, City of Cape Town, the Housing Development Agency, national departments of transport, human settlements, and public works, and their provincial departments, to clear Cape Town’s Central Line of the 5,195 shacks built along the railway at Langa, Nyanga, and Philippi.

People settled on the railway line and rail reserve during the Covid lockdown in 2020, when many of them could no longer afford to pay rent as backyarders.

Trains had already stopped running on the line in October 2019 because of theft and vandalism. This situation was exacerbated by Prasa’s cancellation of security contracts.

Now the line has been partially cleared up until Nyanga station, with the latest relocation, which began a week ago (Thursday), as part of the plan to reinstate the remainder of the line — to Khayelitsha and Mitchells Plain — by March next year.

Read more in Daily Maverick: Conflict erupts over Prasa plan to relocate shack dwellers from Central Line to land used for traditional practices

However, due to problems with water and sanitation at the Stock Road station temporary relocation site, many of the families are refusing to move until services are provided. (There are taps and chemical toilets at the Stock Road station itself, where the occupation has taken place.)

While the land belongs to Prasa, Parliament’s Standing Committee on Public Accounts (Scopa) was told that the City of Cape Town would be responsible for the provision of water, sanitation and waste removal.

Chemical toilets have been placed on-site, but GroundUp observed they were not connected to the necessary containers to make them functional.

Discontent

People we spoke to said Prasa had instructed them not to speak to the media, and they asked to remain anonymous.

“I am not moving there because there are no services such as water and toilets,” a 39-year-old mother of two daughters told GroundUp on Monday.

A 30-year-old mother, who moved to the Stock Road station site, said that without running water and working toilets, people were relieving themselves in the bush.

“We can’t be expected to live a normal life under these circumstances,” she said. “For now we have to go to the nearest settlement, which is Heinz Park and Acacia, to ask the people there to assist us with water. They have been helpful, but we don’t know for how long will they help us.”

Precast concrete blocks have been placed as foundations for relocated shacks, but some families said their size is too small to accommodate their structures. A 55-year-old father of five children said he would not move to the site because it was too small and there was no space in the yard to park his two cars.

“I can’t go there with the current arrangements because it is not viable … I have a bigger family and have a lot of furniture,” he said.

Prasa spokesperson Andiswa Makanda said the provision of water and sanitation was the City’s mandate, and that 50 toilets had been delivered to the site.

When we visited the site on Tuesday, these toilets were not connected for use.

City of Cape Town spokesperson Luthando Tyhalibongo said a water tanker was providing water twice a week.

We found that the approximately 100 families at the site, some of whom had been there for a week, were having to approach neighbouring communities for water.

Tyhalibongo said 40 chemical toilets had been delivered so far, with “container toilets” also being constructed at the site. He said a “partial handover of approximately 55 toilets” was taking place on Thursday. DM

First published by GroundUp.

Gallery

Comments - Please in order to comment.

  • Samuel Ginsberg says:

    So the dude has two cars and a lot of furniture and somehow still qualifies for free stuff? There’s something very wrong there.

  • Ian Gwilt says:

    He has two cars and 5 kids with lots of furniture !! what are they moving him from ?
    I support the fact that toilets and water should be available, but what water and toilets were there on a railway track ?

    • Greeff Kotzé says:

      I was curious about the latter as well — could a *railway line* really have been better provisioned? Still, I suppose it’s only natural that one would try to leverage whatever little power one can to at least have access to the most basic of services/facilities that other people take for granted. No-one had asked to have their livelihoods decimated by a haphazard government response to a global pandemic, after all.

      While it’s certainly eyebrow-raising that someone with “lots of” possessions should require such extensive government assistance, let’s keep in mind that “lots” is not exactly quantified here, and what may be lots to him might count as almost nothing to the more privileged among us. Two (working?) cars are certainly something, but in the absence of fast and reliable public transport in our cities, that can make the difference between finding/keeping employment or not. In fact, the cars themselves might be the source of income. And replacing assets tend to cost significantly more than one would get in by selling them off; should we insist that those already in a precarious position compound the problem by making poor financial decisions?

      I suppose the real problem is that one can be working full-time and still not be able to make ends meet or afford formal housing in our economy. I’m not quite sure that these strategies are the way to go about fixing that, though — it’s a band-aid solution at best.

  • Ben Harper says:

    They didn’t have services when they illegally occupied the railway line – they have no right to demand anything

  • Ben Harper says:

    I suppose they also want electricity connections for their DSTV Satellite TV

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted

X

This article is free to read.

Sign up for free or sign in to continue reading.

Unlike our competitors, we don’t force you to pay to read the news but we do need your email address to make your experience better.


Nearly there! Create a password to finish signing up with us:

Please enter your password or get a sign in link if you’ve forgotten

Open Sesame! Thanks for signing up.

We would like our readers to start paying for Daily Maverick...

…but we are not going to force you to. Over 10 million users come to us each month for the news. We have not put it behind a paywall because the truth should not be a luxury.

Instead we ask our readers who can afford to contribute, even a small amount each month, to do so.

If you appreciate it and want to see us keep going then please consider contributing whatever you can.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options

Premier Debate: Gauten Edition Banner

Join the Gauteng Premier Debate.

On 9 May 2024, The Forum in Bryanston will transform into a battleground for visions, solutions and, dare we say, some spicy debates as we launch the inaugural Daily Maverick Debates series.

We’re talking about the top premier candidates from Gauteng debating as they battle it out for your attention and, ultimately, your vote.

Daily Maverick Elections Toolbox

Feeling powerless in politics?

Equip yourself with the tools you need for an informed decision this election. Get the Elections Toolbox with shareable party manifesto guide.