Defend Truth


Repeat offender — Nkosazana Dlamini Zuma’s puzzling streak of defiance

Repeat offender — Nkosazana Dlamini Zuma’s puzzling streak of defiance
Illustrative image | Sources: Chief Whip of the ANC Pemmy Majodina speaks to Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma. (Photo: Shelley Christians) | Houses of Parliament. (Photo: Leila Dogan ) | President Cyril Ramaphosa. (Photo: EPA-EFE / Harish Tyagi)

On Monday, Minister in the Presidency for Women Dr Nkosazana Dlamini Zuma was absent from the National Assembly vote on whether to remove former Public Protector Busisiwe Mkhwebane. It was the second time she had defied the ANC’s leadership, which failed to act against her the first time. Dlamini Zuma’s actions raise questions about her oft-stated loyalty to the ANC.

In the days before the National Assembly vote on whether to remove former Public Protector Busisiwe Mkhwebane, ANC Secretary-General Fikile Mbalula publicly told ANC MPs the only reason they could not attend Monday’s crucial sitting was if they were dead.

And yet, as MPs stood up one by one to vote on the motion, there was no sign of Dr Nkosazana Dlamini Zuma.

Immediately after the vote, the ANC’s Chief Whip, Pemmy Majodina, could not hide her frustration. She told Newzroom Afrika: “Her absence today was a shock to me. She has no apology; she has no permission to be absent. I can account for others; I know their whereabouts. I don’t know the whereabouts of Mama Nkosazana Dlamini Zuma. As I usually do, I’m packaging the report to the secretary-general’s office. It’s high time that they act once and for all; it’s enough now.”

Dlamini Zuma also defied ANC instructions last year, in the vote on whether to adopt the Parliamentary panel’s findings on the Phala Phala saga.

In that case, she stood up during the voting session and said, “As a disciplined member of the ANC, I vote yes”, when ANC MPs had been instructed to vote “no”.

Party at the crossroads — just 24 hours before the ANC’s pivotal conference, questions abound


She was joined by a few other ANC MPs, including Mosebenzi Zwane and Supra Mahumapelo.

This time, both Zwane and Mahumapelo voted according to instructions, making Dlamini Zuma the sole outlier.

There has been no public explanation from her for her actions. Her Twitter account was last active in June and no spokesperson has made any comment for her.

This vacuum, surely deliberate on her part, seems designed to invite speculation and follows several public comments by Dlamini Zuma.

Speaking at the BRICS Youth Summit in June, she claimed that South Africa has to “kneel before the five big banks”. As Business Maverick’s Tim Cohen has noted, this is not factually correct.

Business Day reported that she also said, “The history of BRICS is fundamentally a history of resistance against colonial conquest and imperial abuse… It is in the DNA of every single BRICS nation, historically and today, to be anti-imperialist at every turn.”

While anti-imperialism may well be in the DNA of Brazil, India, China and our nation, it may be hard to find that double helix in the history of Russia. With a rich history of repeated invasions, including the most recent attack on Ukraine to claim that country’s territory, Russia surely fits the very definition of imperialism.

What’s her motive?

It is hard to determine the true motive of Dlamini Zuma in consistently defying the ANC’s leadership.

It should be remembered that when she does this, she is not just defying President Cyril Ramaphosa, but all of the ANC’s leadership.

That said, this must be deliberate, even just because it is so public.

One of the first suspicions is that she wants to be fired from the Cabinet.

Before the Phala Phala vote, she was the Cogta minister, a position that holds important power.

Then, in his latest reshuffle, Ramaphosa moved her to the position of minister in the Presidency for women, children and people living with disabilities.

While still technically a member of the Cabinet, and despite Ramaphosa’s repeatedly stated claim that he prioritises the fight against gender-based violence, this was clearly a demotion — the position has very little formal and legal power. In the past, the holder of this post has been almost silent in major debates in our society, with the minister of sport, arts and culture (the deputy position of which was long considered the equivalent of a political Siberia).

But even if her intention was to be fired, it is not clear what this would achieve. She is unlikely to garner sympathy within the ANC because she has defied the party’s leadership twice.

No publicly visible constituency within the party supports her.

From what can be seen, her power and influence in the ANC have declined significantly since she lost the leadership contest to Ramaphosa so narrowly in December 2017.

Her loss of political power mirrors the loss of power of former president Jacob Zuma — the ripples and ebbs of power flowing from him appear to match the ripples and ebbs of power flowing from her.

This may well have much to do with her own conduct. Even during her ANC leadership campaign, there were signs she and her team were misreading the political temperature.

Famously, she went to Marikana in what appeared to be an attempt to gather support for her ANC leadership campaign. But she was forced to withdraw very quickly, as members of that community still harboured deep resentment against the ruling party’s role in the Marikana massacre.

More recently, during the lockdown period of the pandemic, she was often seen as the person most responsible for the government’s decision to ban the sale of tobacco products. This aspect of the lockdown was eventually ruled unconstitutional.

While she was implementing Cabinet decisions (as Cogta minister, it was she who signed the regulations agreed to by Cabinet following advice from the National Coronavirus Command Council), she also defended the regulations and was often their public face.

All of this may have lost her the support of much of the public.

This could make it easier for the ANC’s disciplinary machinery to heed Majodina’s plea and move against her.

Technically, it would be a simple case. She would be charged, given a chance to defend or explain herself, and then, on the facts, a determination would be made. Because of her actions, there seems to be no strong political reason not to act against her.

The main reason the ANC may have to be serious this time is that she is a repeat offender.

But even if she is disciplined, or removed from Cabinet, or removed as an MP, it is still puzzlingly unclear what her real agenda is.

Dlamini Zuma may feel that she cannot be part of an ANC that is led by Ramaphosa, or some of the other people in the leadership. But she can only communicate this message by saying it.

This matter is vitally important for the ANC. In an era where our politics is fracturing and some politicians try to create personal constituencies, it must maintain discipline to retain any coherence.

This may be an existential issue for the party. If it fails to maintain discipline, to act against Dlamini Zuma, the party itself could fracture. DM


Comments - Please in order to comment.

  • Ben Harper says:

    A waste of oxygen

  • Beyond Fedup says:

    It is pretty obvious to all except the dimwitted anc and for ages now, that this dour, sour, arrogant, destructive and highly repugnant individual is part of the RET faction. Instead of sending her packing for all the harm she has done to this country and Zimbabwe (foreign minister who rubber stamped the 1st stolen election) Cyril the spineless and useless, in the interests of unity in the vile anc, retains this snake even though she makes him look like a pathetic indecisive fool. Such is the character of our “leader”. Get rid of the NDZ wrecking ball. In fact Cyril too and his revolting anc – this country will thrive without these thieves, criminals, parasites and predators!!

  • Alley Cat says:

    But this is typical of everything the so-called government does. Defying instructions, feeding at the trough, being incompetent bears no consequences so why should she bother?

  • Steve Davidson says:

    “ANC Secretary-General Fikile Mbalula publicly told ANC MPs the only reason they could not attend Monday’s crucial sitting was if they were dead.”

    Come on, people, she is dead. Brain dead. I still want to find out how Bristol University could give her a medical degree. Maybe Affirmative Action.

  • The Proven says:

    I think it is much simpler than this. She is probably set to be one of the ministers existing cabinet when Ramaphosa reduces it in line with austerity measures to curb spending in government. Her time in SA politics is basically done, and she knows it!

  • Hermann Funk says:

    She has been useless in every position she occupied including with the AU. But the spineless president will do nothing. He could use this as the first step of reducing the exorbitant numbers of ministers and deputies.

  • Stef Viljoen Viljoen says:

    “If it fails to maintain discipline, to act against Dlamini Zuma, the party itself could fracture.”…. Compared to some of the other people in the Party she is not really doing something significant. If they cannot be bothered to discipline people like Zuma or Zwane or Gwedi or Ace(before he was kicked out) I cannot see how her situation is going to create a rift.

  • Karl Sittlinger says:

    Any Nkosazana Dlamini Zuma article should mention her role in the Sarafina corruption scandal, for some the blueprint and beginning of the widespread corruption we have been seeing since then. There should also be mention of the Virodene AIDS scandal, an industrial solvent that NDZ promoted even when there was clear evidence it didn’t work for HIV. Anti virals that were working were stopped because of this stuff, costing lives. There is an excellent summary on politics web by James Myburgh, it’s truly unbelievable to what lengths this woman went to.

  • Louise Louise says:

    NDZ is guilty of crimes against humanity for her part in the ‘covid’ scamdemic. She should be prosecuted along with the rest of the complicit criminals in parliament. She doesn’t care about truth, law and people.

  • Erna Westdyk says:

    Apart from defying the leadership, I see no need whatsoever to have a minister of women, children and people with disabilities. What have any of the previous ministers, including this one, ever done for those vulnerable people?

  • Colleen Dardagan says:

    Maybe she IS dead

  • Johan Buys says:

    Her situation mirrors that of many ANC members, but it just manifests differently.

    There are normal, decent people in the party that disagree entirely with its direction and methods of operating but can’t get over that hurdle of voting for somebody else. Kopdoek is a teenager in the house and misbehaving but she is not so unhappy that she’ll run away and join Ace or Julius (at least not unless they can offer her a ministerial position)

  • Annie Conway says:

    Why wait to be fired? Retire! You are old and more of a hindrance than a help. Always have been.

  • Graeme de Villiers says:

    If I had a few bucks on every time Stephen said “This may be an existential issue for the party. If it fails to maintain discipline, to act against Dlamini Zuma, the party itself could fracture.”, I would be a rich man.

  • PETER BAKER says:

    ….. “ the party itself could fracture.” This is the best thing SG has ever written…. Bring it on … can’t be soon enough.

  • Michael Thomlinson says:

    What I cant figure out is how she managed to qualify as a medical doctor. She simply does not come across as having that kind of academic ability. Although it would seem otherwise, I think she wants to hang on to her cushy job along with it’s nice salary because, let’s be honest, who else would employ her other than the ANC??

  • Denise Smit says:

    Years ago, just after she was appointed minister of local government she had to answer questions about the number (%) of municipalities which were in financial trouble. She gave the total numbers of municipalities and the number in delinquent category and then stated the percentage. It was grossly miscalculated and shocking to think that such an simple arithmetic calculation was wrong but what was more worrying was that she was totally ignorant about it. Wonder how a doctor who has to take weight and age to work out medicine dosages – which is much more difficult can not work out a percentage. Denise Smit

  • Roelf Pretorius says:

    Well, if the ANC does it, they will do themselves a favour. In this way they can actually get rid of the whole RET bunch. The question is when they will act against Jacob Zuma.

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted


This article is free to read.

Sign up for free or sign in to continue reading.

Unlike our competitors, we don’t force you to pay to read the news but we do need your email address to make your experience better.

Nearly there! Create a password to finish signing up with us:

Please enter your password or get a sign in link if you’ve forgotten

Open Sesame! Thanks for signing up.

We would like our readers to start paying for Daily Maverick...

…but we are not going to force you to. Over 10 million users come to us each month for the news. We have not put it behind a paywall because the truth should not be a luxury.

Instead we ask our readers who can afford to contribute, even a small amount each month, to do so.

If you appreciate it and want to see us keep going then please consider contributing whatever you can.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options

Daily Maverick Elections Toolbox

Download the Daily Maverick Elections Toolbox.

+ Your election day questions answered
+ What's different this election
+ Test yourself! Take the quiz