Defend Truth


Budget austerity and parliamentary lists present Ramaphosa with a moment to make good on ANC’s promises of renewal

Budget austerity and parliamentary lists present Ramaphosa with a moment to make good on ANC’s promises of renewal
Illustrative image | Sources: ANC President Cyril Ramaphosa. (Photo: Felix Dlangamandla / Netwerk 24) | ANC election posters. (Photo: Frank Trimbos / Gallo Images) | Luthuli House, Johannesburg. (Photo: Gallo Images / Lubabalo Lesolle)

As the ANC prepares for next year’s election, a difficult dispute over government spending is coming its way too. For insiders, this could be a chance to make major changes in governance, especially when the ANC is drawing up its parliamentary lists. Together, these processes present President Cyril Ramaphosa with an opportunity to make major alterations, both to the government and to the party.

There has been consistent reporting over the past month that the government is about to make major spending cutbacks.

First Daily Maverick’s DM168 newspaper and then the Sunday Times reported that the National Treasury had told government departments they would not receive any increases next year.

At the same time, it’s also claimed that the government will have to make major spending cuts if the R350/month Social Relief of Distress (SRD) grant is to be kept.

This comes at the worst possible time for the ANC — no governing party wants to go into an election with less money for its government to spend than in previous years.

Cutting back on social spending would have a powerful impact on our society. Food costs have risen dramatically, while transport costs are higher than ever. The Budget Justice Coalition and other groups have accused the National Treasury of scare-mongering and attempting to find a way to stop the SRD grant. They point to the suffering that would be caused if there were fewer nurses and police officers on duty because there was no money to pay them.  

No matter where you stand on this, it is surely true that our crises would deepen if the government were to spend less.

Of course, there have been promises of change through a Budget before.

Back in 2020, during the intense parts of the pandemic, then finance minister Tito Mboweni claimed zero-based budgeting would be introduced, a process where the entire Budget calculation starts from scratch (rather than just basing this year’s Budget on last year’s Budget adjusted for inflation).

But this never happened, maybe simply because there was too much pushback from the great majority of departments.

And if ANC members discuss this in any way (for instance, through the National Executive Committee) any major changes may well be stopped.

This is because it is likely that ANC leaders would find it difficult to agree on any major change to the Budget to start with. As Energy Minister Gwede Mantashe once put it, “economics is the essence of politics”, and a debate in the ANC on this issue could be incredibly divisive.

A very useful crisis

However, for a small group of people, those in power in the government and the ANC, this could be a very useful crisis.

The Sunday Times has reported that President Cyril Ramaphosa is considering cutting back on the number of government departments and agencies. This would fulfil a promise Ramaphosa made several times to reduce the number of departments in government — there is much fat to cut, with an extraordinary number of institutions run by the government, including at least 700 state-owned enterprises (SOEs).

Already, it appears the government will lose the Public Enterprises portfolio and that the SOEs it administers will go to other relevant departments (Transnet to the Transport Ministry, Eskom to the Energy Department, etc).

Within this is yet another plan to reduce the number of SOEs controlled by the government. 

Again, there have been similar promises in the past.

In 2012, Riah Phiyega (before she became National Police Commissioner) presented then president Jacob Zuma with an extensive report after chairing a commission into SOEs.

As far as is known, none of the recommendations was implemented. Instead, their performance appears to have deteriorated; several were looted during the State Capture era.

Yet, this could be the moment for Ramaphosa to successfully argue that the government must be made smaller and that it must become more effective.

There may be a simple test for voters to determine if he and the ANC are serious about their commitment to making the government work for voters.

The government spends R1.7-billion a year on the VIP Protection Unit. This is the unit that protects a very small number of people, while its members feel no shame in assaulting ordinary citizens.

The government spends only R2.2-billion on the Hawks, a unit that is supposed to fight crime on behalf of everyone, everywhere in South Africa.

If Ramaphosa intends to prove to voters that his government works for them, then he could reduce, dramatically, the amount the government spends on protecting people who are supposed to represent the very same public.

This would be the best way for him to demonstrate both that he is trying to fulfil his promises and that the ANC is attempting to govern for the people.

While this process is under way, another one is quietly running behind the scenes.

The parliamentary lists

The ANC’s Electoral Committee, under former president Kgalema Motlanthe, is starting a process to determine who can represent the ANC in Parliament and the provincial legislatures — the ANC’s parliamentary lists.

Before the 2019 elections, the then ANC secretary-general, Ace Magashule, was able to control this process, with the result that Bongani Bongo, Mosebenzi Zwane and Supra Mahumapelo were elected to important positions.

This time, Motlanthe’s committee has said that it will not consider people who are facing criminal charges.

And the ANC’s Veterans League has said publicly that no ANC member against whom the Zondo Commission made findings should be considered for any position.

If this principle is accepted, a very large number of people within the ANC may suddenly not be able to be MPs after next year’s elections.

This would include ANC chair and mineral resources and energy minister Gwede Mantashe, and minister of sport, arts and culture Zizi Kodwa (Mantashe has lodged a legal application to have the findings against him set aside).

There are signs that Motlanthe and his committee are becoming more assertive.

At the weekend, Sunday World reported that Motlanthe had rejected a list of candidates presented to him by Free State ANC provincial secretary Dihelele Motsoeneng, saying it did not meet the criteria.

Also, new chair of the ANC’s Integrity Commission Frank Chikane has suggested he is prepared to act against ANC members who have not presented themselves to his commission to explain any findings or charges against them.

It may be the biggest possible electoral incentive for the ANC to ensure that these processes result in the outcomes Motlanthe and Chikane claim to want.

Many voters will want to see the proof that the ANC really is changing, that it is going through a process of what Ramaphosa claims is its “renewal”. A very different parliamentary list, excluding those with question marks against their names, may well be the best possible proof of this.

This could result in a group of MPs that are more supportive of Ramaphosa’s stated agenda.

It is clear that these processes can result in major changes in the government and in the ANC.

But the party has made promises like this many, many, many times before. Despite these new promises, in the end, there may be virtually no change at all. The question, of course, remains whether the voters’ reaction will reflect no change either. DM


Comments - Please in order to comment.

  • Jennifer D says:

    Voting for the ANC after their incredible ongoing failure and criminality demonstrates the extent of SA voters determination to justify their very existence. Voting for the ANC is not about crime, or poverty, or anything else – it is all about black and white. And that is the shame of it. Black people should be able to stand tall and vote for the party that does the most for our country but instead they vote for a party that represents them. It fails, it’s corrupt, it steals from them – none of that matters. The questions are when will they decide enough is enough, when there will be a representative party they can trust, when will they forget? The latter will be a long time coming and we can only hope starvation and total collapse of the economy doesn’t elevate the EFFs insanity and get them into power – that’s what they wait for. And then we descend further into the abyss.

  • Jeremy Stephenson says:

    There is nothing that the ANC can do that won’t result in a mass revolt on the part of its voters. A reduction in social spending? Unthinkable. A reduction in government employment figures? That would simply add to the numbers requiring social spending.
    The mythical “renewal” of the party? Oh please.
    The ANC will do and is already doing the only thing it has ever done or knows how to do, which is to blame the past for its own failures, and every day that passes will further reveal the intellectual and moral rot that has eaten away the fabric of this once-invincible political force.

  • Beyond Fedup says:

    Wishful thinking on him seizing the opportunity. Cyril the spineless and the useless hasn’t, as has been shown many times before, got it in him to act decisively and boldly for what is the best interests of the country. He misrules by consensus which in reality means unity in the anc at all costs and what is in the best interest of that hideous party. He is a sleazy conman who promises much and says the right thing to whatever audience he is addressing, but delivers nothing. I have nothing but revulsion and contempt for this false “prophet” – not quite the same as I have for Zuma, but close enough.

  • Con Tester says:

    A great host of empirical evidence concerning where his real loyalties lie, indicates that feckless Ramaposeur will do precisely nothing with this opportunity, except perhaps to disgorge more hollow promises aimed at mollifying an irate electorate, much as pointed out in this article’s last paragraph.

  • Alley Cat says:

    Stephen, we can dream! If Ramaslimy were to implement these changes, there would be no one left in government, imagine the money we could save! I just don’t believe he has the cahones to do this and, even if he did he would be thwarted at every turn. These crooks have too much to lose and they are well aware that they would never find gainful employment anywhere else.

  • Denise Smit says:

    It is clear the penny has dropped that the country is in deep financial troubles. The 3 billion per month for diesel must be funded to keep the impression that we are not going into a total blackout. What he is going to do is give options for severance packages for government workers instead of defining which services the country can do without, ie prioritising. We can do without the VIP services, all hundreds state subsidised organisations for woman and this cause and that cause. But we cant do without nurses, doctors, police officers, teachers and other essential workers. Severance packages will contribute to people in essential services leaving because they are the hard workers. The bloated top structures will not take severance packages. The government must try to do what Cilliers Brink is trying to do and that is to say that we can not afford the increase in pay of government workers and in the process take on labout. IT is better to have more people working with salaries than less with bloated salaries. The government can not do the maths. It is not within our budget to afford salary increases. Zero budgeting does not work in government because 70% of the budget is the salary of the permanent workforce. You can never start from zero, and even the rest of the 30% are consumables and maintenance that that is difficult to cut on. The unaffordable ideological objectives of the ANC gives it no space to do anything. Denise Smit

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted


This article is free to read.

Sign up for free or sign in to continue reading.

Unlike our competitors, we don’t force you to pay to read the news but we do need your email address to make your experience better.

Nearly there! Create a password to finish signing up with us:

Please enter your password or get a sign in link if you’ve forgotten

Open Sesame! Thanks for signing up.

We would like our readers to start paying for Daily Maverick...

…but we are not going to force you to. Over 10 million users come to us each month for the news. We have not put it behind a paywall because the truth should not be a luxury.

Instead we ask our readers who can afford to contribute, even a small amount each month, to do so.

If you appreciate it and want to see us keep going then please consider contributing whatever you can.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options

Daily Maverick Elections Toolbox

Download the Daily Maverick Elections Toolbox.

+ Your election day questions answered
+ What's different this election
+ Test yourself! Take the quiz