Dailymaverick logo

DM168

This article is more than a year old

LETTER FROM THE DM168 EDITOR

Stop scapegoating the innocent for the tragic Marshalltown inferno – the blame lies squarely at the City of Johannesburg’s door 

In the wake of the horrific tragedy in Johannesburg's inner city, the true culprits behind the 'hijacked' building - inept politicians and officials - have been exposed, while those who are most vulnerable to such disasters - economic refugees and the Socio-Economic Rights Institute - have been unfairly blamed.
Stop scapegoating the innocent for the tragic Marshalltown inferno – the blame lies squarely at the City of Johannesburg’s door  A police K9 unit patrols outside 80 Albert Street in Marshalltown, Johannesburg, soon after of the horrific inferno that left 77 people dead and scores more injured early on Thursday, 31 August 2023. (Photo: Felix Dlangamandla)

Dear DM168 reader,

A terrible, terrible human tragedy happened in the inner city of Johannesburg in the early hours of Thursday morning. 

A “hijacked” shelter for women and children in Marshalltown, which the city of Johannesburg had deserted to fall into disrepair, was engulfed by a devastating inferno, leading to the horrific deaths of at least 74 people, among them 12 children.

My heart goes out to the families who lost their loved ones. 

My heart also goes out to all the journalists, such as my colleagues Bheki Simelane, Naledi Sikhakhane, Nonkululeko Njilo, Michelle Banda and Felix Dlangamandla, who witnessed and reported on the unfolding tragedy.

Their stories and pictures give you a glimpse into the searing heartache that has befallen the families of all those who lost their lives. 

In his story published on Daily Maverick’s website on Friday morning, Bheki spoke to informal trader Sphiwe Ngcobo, who lived at 80 Albert Street (the building that burnt down), with her family. 

She was at her table trading outside when she heard a commotion. She rushed inside to find a man carrying her five-year-old daughter on his shoulder. He put her in an ambulance and paramedics performed CPR. The little girl started breathing again. 

Ngcobo’s brother, who also lives in the building, braved the flames and went inside and brought out her two-year-old son. In one of the saddest passages I have ever read, she said to Bheki:

“He placed him on the ground. They also [gave him CPR] in the hope that he would be okay, but suddenly I saw them removing his clothes and then they told me that he was dead.’’

Naledi wrote of a woman who had to jump down from a third floor with her four-year-old child.

In what city, country, world, lifetime is this okay? All the people who lost loved ones and homes in this fire were tenants who paid slumlords to stay in an unsafe building, “hijacked” by criminals.

Bogus landlord

As Nonkululeko explained in her story, this building, known as Usindiso Shelter for Women and Children, intended for the most vulnerable, is the same one that was run by a bogus landlord jailed for illegally collecting rent from tenants. 

More than 140 undocumented foreign nationals lived there and this number had grown to more than 200 families who were occupying the five-storey building when it was engulfed by flames on Thursday.

Why did the City of Johannesburg allow the building to be hijacked again by unscrupulous criminals who prey on desperate foreigners’ need for shelter?

It is one of 57 hijacked buildings that the Johannesburg Property Owners and Managers Association has identified and has repeatedly lobbied the City to do something about. 

The City sat on its hands and did not implement plans to tackle Johannesburg’s hijacked buildings because, as our associate editor Ferial Haffajee wrote, the new political leadership instituted an investigation into the Problematic Properties task team, which was part of an anti-corruption unit called Group Forensics and Investigation Services. 

Who is being protected by an anti-corruption unit being hamstrung? 

The people of Johannesburg? No, the slumlords who hijacked those 57 buildings are the ones who definitely get away scot-free.

Xenophobes and political charlatans are quick to lay the blame for the problem of hijacked buildings with foreigners who have fled to South Africa from neighbouring countries such Zimbabwe, Swaziland and Mozambique. This is shameful scapegoating for the incompetence of a ragtag coalition government.

Economic refugees from our neighbouring countries have fled the strangulation of their countries’ economies by self-serving political elites. 

Just last week Zimbabweans watched as another sham election legitimised the 80-year-old leader of that country’s 2017 coup, Emmerson Mnangagwa, and kept the ailing country, once known as the breadbasket of southern Africa, firmly in his ruling Zanu-PF party’s control.

It is for reasons such as this that we have thousands of economic refugees from neighbouring countries trying to eke out a living in our cities. Most are like Sphiwe Ngcobo, hard-working, decent people desperate to support their families.

Another scapegoat that city politicians from across the spectrum are blaming is the Socio-Economic Rights Institute (SERI), a human-rights legal NGO. It has been rightfully protecting the constitutional rights of the most vulnerable to safe shelter and from illegal evictions. It cannot be blamed for the dereliction of duty on the part of the city officials and politicians who are responsible for allowing hijacked buildings to proliferate and fall into disrepair. 

This is a tragedy that should not have happened. As with the recent explosion, caused by maintenance failures, that ripped up an inner-city street, callous politicians and officials have allowed Johannesburg to decline into a deathtrap — especially for the most vulnerable. 

Fighting back

Our lead story in DM168 this week focuses on a group of people who are doing something about the equally callous politicians and officials running another city.

In a previous edition, our Durban correspondent Greg Ardé wrote about the boycott of Westville ratepayers and their clash with their hapless mayor. 

There has been so much interest in this story that we sent Greg to get to know more about the people behind the ratepayers’ revolt and to find out about their impending court case against the municipality, as well as what the law says about a growing number of ratepayers around the country who have said “enough is enough”. Read and be inspired. 

Here are three of my other favourite stories in the paper: 

+ Read Marianne Thamm’s inimitable take on the bizarre attempt to get out of jail by Dr Nandipha Magudumana, who it is alleged helped her partner, convicted rapist Thabo Bester, escape from jail.

+ We have a delightful story by Chuma Nontsele, one of our Cape Peninsula University of Technology interns, about a teenager from Gugulethu and three young men who are off to Spain to learn how to work in the superyacht industry.

+ Last but not least, exclusively for newspaper readers, look out for our five-page Rugby World Cup special, with cut-out-and-keep posters that you can stick on your fridge or wall, telling you where and when each team will be playing. There are spaces for you to fill in the results as they unfold.

Don’t forget to share your views with me at heather@dailymaverick.co.za

Yours in defence of truth,
Heather

This article appears in our Daily Maverick weekly publication, DM168, which is available countrywide for R29.

DM168 front page

Comments (10)

Johan Buys Sep 2, 2023, 08:02 AM

I can’t imagine a worse way to die. The issue is complicated - when laws clash, which one wins? Health and safety review says building X must immediately be vacated for the safety of the occupants. Human rights lawyers get court to stop eviction until the occupants are given free alternate accommodation. Do lawyers regard not being evicted from a life threatening building a victory?? Does anybody think government is suddenly going to conjure the money (and the will or competence) to build accommodation for another 50,000 people or the 150,000 that will take their place? Tented refugee camps out in rural areas?

Fanie Rajesh Ngabiso Sep 2, 2023, 02:52 PM

Wake up vs Woke up. I know very clearly which one should reflect past tense.

Johann Olivier Sep 3, 2023, 04:53 PM

Woke. A nonsense word used by folks who do not have real solutions to real issues. Simply look at the politicians who like to bandy it about. Says it all.

Sipho Dlamini Sep 2, 2023, 09:40 AM

The city of JHB knows the solution. Convert each building into a proper, maintained housing block, and give free, decent housing to all these people. It's simple and well within the COJs budgetry limitations. And yes, provide for our poor immigrants too, obviously. It's only right.

Henry Henry Sep 2, 2023, 11:40 AM

"...plans to tackle.....hijacked buildings....". How? What must be done? It's so easy to be clever from a journalistic distance. The starting point would be to get the illegal occupiers out. But then step in the clever Left, with Seri and HS Foundation as vehicles, which prevents any progress. So best is to leave that mess as it is. It is way beyond repair. Rather focus energy and efforts on potholes, water, electricity, crime, etc. which are fixable.

Irene Baumbach Sep 3, 2023, 11:08 AM

Henry, do you really think the mess should be left as it is, or is this the view of the powers that be?

Rob Man Sep 2, 2023, 12:23 PM

Thank you for bein a voice saying it like it is. Parts of Joburg are turning into a dark and dangerous run down place. Time that the city stopped grand-standing, politicking and started acting: in the interests of its people…all of the people who reside and work there.

Martin Smith Sep 3, 2023, 10:10 AM

Easy to say. We can all express moral outrage but who can provide and pay for safe alternative accomodation within a ten kilometer radius of any condemned buildings as the law requires? And if someone could how many more illegal occupations would be encouraged/enabled thereby? When so far down the road to hell turning back becomes increasingly fraught with difficulty if not downright impossible...

jcdville@gmail.co.za stormers Sep 3, 2023, 09:12 AM

To me this shows what the ANC have in store for us,citizens and people can die as long as they can line there pockets

Robert Pegg Sep 3, 2023, 10:06 AM

This was a tragedy waiting to happen. It's not only Joburg that has these problems, it's most inner cities in South Africa. When Municipalities spend most of their income on salaries and benefits, service delivery has to suffer. Gone are the days when the annual Municipal budget HAD to balance the books. It's now and free for all, for the privileged few. No one can say it's the privileged whites anymore.

Keith Feldman Sep 3, 2023, 12:17 PM

This is a tragedy of immense proportions. This is the result of years of mismanagement and criminality within the COJ. I heard an interview with a survivor. He is paying R 600 for rent in this building. There were 200 residents. Someone is collecting R120 000 per month! Who is that person and how are they allowed to do it? Clearly it is with the permission of the city officials and law enforcement. If there are 57 such hijacked buildings the rental income is in the region of R 5.7 million rand a month or R68.4 million per year. We are living in a gangster state where we are held hostage by crooked politicians, officials and law enforcement. Please investigate the money trail. We owe it to the 75 departed souls, their surviving families and the citizens of Johannesburg. May God help us!

Sean Holmes Sep 3, 2023, 01:18 PM

To get to the bottom and stop the blame game! Put all so called NGO’s under the microscope and see how they are connected to politicians collecting donations from government and international donors! And collect rent illegally! Only the people can change their situation in 2024

Johann Olivier Sep 3, 2023, 05:30 PM

Well, the NYT seems to have no doubt where the blame lies. "South African officials were warned repeatedly about the dangers of a building where a fire killed 76 people, BUT DID NOTHING." (my caps)

Charles du Sautoy Sep 4, 2023, 10:37 AM

Not to say that the ultimate responsibility for enforcing city by-laws isn't with the Joburg Metro, meaning they must be ultimately to blame for the tragedy, but it is also true that whenever the Metro has tried to, they have faced resistance from many quarters, including civic organisations that must accept some responsibility. I understand that people's rights must be prioritised, but at the cost of risking their lives?