Defend Truth


ConCourt says no bias in Ramaphosa’s suspension of Mkhwebane

ConCourt says no bias in Ramaphosa’s suspension of Mkhwebane
Suspended Public Protector, Busisiwe Mkhwebane.Photo: Tebogo Letsie|Deputy Chief Justice Mandisa Maya.(Photo by Gallo Images/Daily Maverick/Felix Dlangamandla)

The Constitutional Court has found that President Cyril Ramaphosa's decision to suspend Public Protector Busisiwe Mkhwebane was lawful and rational. The Western Cape Division of the High Court had ruled the suspension illegal in September 2022, but the ConCourt has now unanimously overturned that ruling.

Deputy Chief Justice Mandisa Maya, who penned the judgment, read out the ruling during a virtual sitting of the court. 

“In this unanimous judgment, this court holds that there was a rational reason for the precautionary suspension of the Public Protector, which benefits her and her office as it allows her to centre her attention on her defence in the inquiry and safeguards the integrity of her office.”

Justice Maya also said that even if there were other rational courses of action that Ramaphosa could have taken, his decision to suspend Mkhwebane could not be said to be irrational due to the factual background and the finding made by an independent panel that had considered her conduct. The panel was headed by former Constitutional Court judge Bess Nkabinde. 

The President stood to gain nothing from the suspension of the Public Protector as the acting PP continued with the investigation.

“In coming to this conclusion, I have considered the report of the independent panel chaired by Justice Nkabinde which found that there was prima facie evidence of incompetence on the Public Protector’s part, based on a number of repeated instances including what it described as overreaching as exceeding the bounds of her powers in terms of the Constitution.” 

Nkabinde had also noted that Mkhwebane had stepped into the domain of Parliament when she directed it to amend the Constitution, had made incorrect interpretations of the law, failed to take relevant information into account and failed to provide affected people with an opportunity to reply. 

At the time of Mkhwebane’s suspension in June 2022, her office was beginning an investigation into allegations against Ramaphosa relating to the theft of money at his Phala Phala farm. 

Read more in Daily Maverick: 

Exodus: President Cyril Ramaphosa suspends Public Protector Busisiwe Mkhwebane

Ramaphosa’s Farmgate scandal – a timeline of what we know (and don’t know) so far

Mkhwebane had argued that Ramaphosa had a bias towards her due to this investigation, but the Constitutional Court ruled that the evidence does not show that he acted in a biased manner. 

“The President stood to gain nothing from the suspension of the Public Protector as the acting PP continued with the investigation,” Maya said. 

Public Protector Busisiwe Mkhwebane and President Cyril Ramaphosa. (Photos: Felix Dlangamandla / Netwerk24 / EPA-EFE / Siphiwe Sibeko / Pool)

She added that Mkhwebane was not prejudiced as a result of the suspension as she continued to receive her salary and did not suffer reputational harm since the issues leading to her suspension were being dealt with in an inquiry in Parliament. 

Read more in Daily Maverick: Unanswered questions, Part One: Evidence of secret meetings with Jacob Zuma and SSA involvement unchallenged by Mkhwebane

Maya also noted that the ConCourt had made “gravely adverse credibility findings against her” through various judgments. 

The inquiry into Mkhwebane’s conduct is still under way and Parliament has simultaneously begun the search for her replacement as her term ends in October. 

Parliament announced the nominees on Tuesday and said it would begin shortlisting candidates. DM


Comments - Please in order to comment.

  • Nick Miller says:

    Why has Parliament just started to look for the replacement PP? The current PP’s term was coming to an end and was not renewable. The need for a replacement was known seven years ago. Why wasn’t the replacement identified early enough, in order the newPP could “shadow” the retiring PP and be ready to act from day one after her retirement. As it is, the recruitment and appointment process will probably result in a period where an acting PP has to continue in office. At best p*ss poor management.

  • Confucious Says says:

    So she basically maintained her record of loosing her court cases! At least she is consistent!

  • Peter Doble says:

    It is beyond the bounds of reason that such a useless, inconsequential individual can cause the waste of so much public money.

  • Steve Davidson says:

    “Mkhwebane had argued that Ramaphosa had a bias towards her…”

    Not just Cyril! She has earned the ‘bias’ of all law-abiding people in this country for totally incompetent and effectively criminal way of blackening the name of the PP’s office that is going to take a superhero to turn around. Disgraceful and disgusting woman.

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted


This article is free to read.

Sign up for free or sign in to continue reading.

Unlike our competitors, we don’t force you to pay to read the news but we do need your email address to make your experience better.

Nearly there! Create a password to finish signing up with us:

Please enter your password or get a sign in link if you’ve forgotten

Open Sesame! Thanks for signing up.

We would like our readers to start paying for Daily Maverick...

…but we are not going to force you to. Over 10 million users come to us each month for the news. We have not put it behind a paywall because the truth should not be a luxury.

Instead we ask our readers who can afford to contribute, even a small amount each month, to do so.

If you appreciate it and want to see us keep going then please consider contributing whatever you can.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options

Become a Maverick Insider

This could have been a paywall

On another site this would have been a paywall. Maverick Insider keeps our content free for all.

Become an Insider