South Africa


A whimper that shook nothing and no one — Ace Magashule’s ANC expulsion a non-event

A whimper that shook nothing and no one — Ace Magashule’s ANC expulsion a non-event
Former ANC secretary-general Ace Magashule appears in the Bloemfontein High Court on 5 May 2023 in Bloemfontein, South Africa. (Photo: Gallo Images / Volksblad / Mlungisi Louw)

The expulsion of Ace Magashule, with a whimper rather than a bang, marks the end of a strange era in the ANC. Magashule is likely to find it very cold outside the ANC, and his mainstream political career is probably over.

Ace Magashule’s demise reveals the limitations of building a political career based on party machinery rather than on a personal constituency with people on the ground. Even if Magashule were to join another party he is unlikely to bring them a bump in support.

The ANC’s announcement, on behalf of its National Disciplinary Committee, that it had expelled Magashule is the consequence of his actions and his actions alone. It was he who attempted to suspend President Cyril Ramaphosa as leader of the ANC, based on some mythical but non-existent power to do so.

And it was Magashule who decided not to respond to the committee’s request that he write to them providing reasons he should not be expelled. This was a clear political decision — he has obviously decided he has had enough of the ANC.

This suggests that he may not appeal, despite the fact it may be possible for him to go to the ANC’s National Disciplinary Committee of Appeal or even the National Executive Committee (NEC). In other words, Magashule appears to be well and truly out.

Roots in the ANC

It can sometimes be forgotten how many parties in our political spectrum have their roots in the ANC.

IFP founder Prince Mangosuthu Buthelezi belonged to the ANC before forming his own party; Bantu Holomisa was expelled from the ANC before forming the UDM; Mosiuoa Lekota served the ANC his divorce papers on his way to forming Cope; and, perhaps most famously, Julius Malema was expelled before forming the EFF.  

This obviously leads to the question of whether Magashule will follow in their footsteps.

[Listen to Daily Maverick’s podcast series, The Highwaymen ]

For some, he may have certain advantages.

He was the premier of the Free State for years and served as leader of the ANC in that province from 1998 until 2018. 

This would surely have allowed him to build up his own constituency. And the detailed reporting about the alleged corruption he has indulged in over the years, from the asbestos tender, to a petrol station, to Estina, suggests that he must have access to immense resources.

However, most of his career success was due to his firm grip on Free State party structures. There appears to be little evidence that he has built up his own constituency of ordinary people prepared to fight for him.

This is partly through choice, in that he has simply not focused on doing this.

But it may also be because he is simply a different personality, a different type of politician than Malema, Holomisa or Buthelezi. Considering that the Free State ANC members were virtually guaranteed of being re-elected for decades, the route to power over the province’s resources was driven through power over the ANC structures.

But there is evidence that Magashule has made many mistakes in his politics and never quite mastered the art of managing the internal workings of a political party.

It is worth repeating that because of his actions, the entire Free State delegation of the ANC was not able to vote at the Mangaung conference in 2012. He repeated this remarkable feat of incompetence in 2017, when the entire provincial leadership was not able to vote in that election either.

This was entirely because of the processes that he oversaw.

The roots of his final expulsion also provide evidence of shortcomings in his political ability. He certainly made important mistakes.

He tried to oppose the decision taken by the NEC that those formally charged by the National Prosecuting Authority must step aside. Once he had lost the vote in the NEC, it was always the case that he would be suspended.

Ultimate desperation

And yet he chose to fight on. When he came under intense pressure, he made his biggest mistake, the aforementioned decision to “suspend” Ramaphosa as leader of the ANC, a move that many saw as an expression of ultimate desperation.

Along the way, Magashule displayed multiple anti-democratic tendencies.

In 2019, just as Pieter-Louis Myburgh’s book Gangster State was released, members of the Free State ANC Youth League said they would disrupt its launch events and would hold a party to burn copies of the book. 

They were clearly acting in Magashule’s name. And yet he said nothing to disavow their actions.

Later, in early 2021 he advised Newzroom Afrika reporter Pelane Phakgadi: “Don’t worry too much about the Constitution.” Despite his subsequent explanations, these actions showed that he did not respect the rule of law. 

These are but a few examples. They were widely publicised, and many people saw and heard them and formed a clear idea of Magashule’s personality and obvious lack of fitness for the job of ANC secretary-general.

It was becoming obvious that political power was leaving him behind and that there was little that he could do about it.

His court appearances saw ever smaller “crowds”, and most ANC leaders appeared to stay away from him. Few ANC leaders rocked up to support him. Those that did, did not have large constituencies themselves.

It became clear that the only people who supported Magashule were motivated by their opposition to Ramaphosa and his agenda.

From today’s point of view, it appears very difficult for Magashule to eke out any kind of successful new political career.

While he may be able to negotiate an agreement with the ATM or the EFF, perhaps even follow the path of Mzwanele Manyi, it is not clear that he would bring anything to them. He does not have a personal constituency or a group of influential people around him.

He never really stood for any particular ideology or agenda. There is little evidence of him fighting for any policy that would benefit large numbers of people.

There is much to examine in Magashule’s demise. This is almost certainly the first time that the ANC has expelled a former secretary-general — and for actions they took while secretary-general.

It is, for the ANC, a historic moment.

And yet, Magashule’s complete lack of political power is revealed by the fact that his expulsion changes virtually nothing in our politics — not even causing a ripple. DM


Comments - Please in order to comment.

  • Beyond Fedup says:

    Good riddance to bad fetid rubbish! If only the same would happen to the vile and abominable anc – the SA electorate expelling them. This country would be able to move forward instead of being shackled, deprived and stunted. Is this going to be another case of a corrupt, criminal and predatory politician allowed to “ride into the sunset” with total impunity and enjoy his ill-gotten gains?

    • shannon Maxwell says:

      I fear that you are right Sergio. Can’t see him being taken to court for the Estina Dairy scandal. Kiss another 280 million goodbye.

  • Sandra McEwen says:

    Still no orange overalls. If he dodges charges then so will they all.

  • Peter Oosthuizen says:

    Buthelezi and Holomisa were members of the ANC when it had ideals of freedom and equality as was Mandela. They went their separate ways long before it became the ANC of bottom feeders and corruption. Both Lekota and Shilowa left on principle and should not be tarred with the same brush as Malema who has none.

    • Richard Bryant says:

      It is worth noting the reasons why Holomisa was expelled. He provided an affidavit to the TRC regarding the coup he led in apartheid Transkei. This resulted in the deaths of a few security personnel when he overthrew the corrupt Matanzima government which had accepted bribes from Sol Kerzner for the development of the Wild Coast Casino. The ANC demanded that he withdraw his affidavit because of the prominence in the ANC of the Matanzima/ Sigau clans who had been implicated in that scandal. He refused. And was expelled.

  • Dee Bee says:

    His expulsion, and the announcement of investigations into bursaries awarded by his office whilst Premier of the Free State, may either a shot across the bows that Ramaphosa will launch even bigger probes should Magashule not go quietly, or it may signal that this is personal for Cyril and he’s going to open a few cans of worms to hang Magashule out to dry. Either way, it’s great news that the man who ruined the Free State is now out in the cold. Maybe him and Carl can start a new party. Pep Stores to provide the camo uniforms! Any ideas of a name for the party?

  • Rae Earl says:

    Magashule ran roughshod over the ANC’s entire disciplinary code for years without censure by the party. There are others who still retain high positions within the party despite wrong doing, simply because a sense of entitlement and impunity is inbred. Magashule lost out because he had the temerity to try and kick the boss out of office. Had he not done that he would still be in the organisation and that fact says it all about the party. Magashule was a blatant receiver of money plundered from the state in corrupt tenders and from provincial bank accounts. The people who suffered the most at his hands were destitute farmers and the unemployed. The most disgusting aspect of all this was the ANC’s retention and promotion of Magashule despite all his wrong doings being known to the party. Nothing has changed since the days when Zuma received full support from the ANC in the face of repeated No Confidence votes in parliament while he was selling South Africa to the Guptas.

  • Paddy Ross says:

    There is no way that Malema would accept Magashule into the EFF. Magashule would not accept being second-in-command to the self proclaimed ‘CIC’.

  • Thea Clifford Jackson says:

    Magashula had absolutely zero interest in a ground roots constituency. All he cared about was satisfying his greed. He has nothing to offer this country except the joy of seeing him imprisoned.

  • David Crossley says:

    The expression, “Hoist by his own petard” rings true here. There is no doubt in my mind that Magashule benefitted mightily from the corruption he wrought while the Free State Premier. Unfortunately he will be able to live well on his ill gotten gains.
    Let’s hope that a few more rotten apples fall in the same way.

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted


This article is free to read.

Sign up for free or sign in to continue reading.

Unlike our competitors, we don’t force you to pay to read the news but we do need your email address to make your experience better.

Nearly there! Create a password to finish signing up with us:

Please enter your password or get a sign in link if you’ve forgotten

Open Sesame! Thanks for signing up.

[%% img-description %%]

The Spy Bill: An autocratic roadmap to State Capture 2.0

Join Heidi Swart in conversation with Anton Harber and Marianne Merten as they discuss a concerning push to pass a controversial “Spy Bill” into law by May 2024. Tues 5 Dec at 12pm, live, online and free of charge.

A South African Hero: You

There’s a 99.8% chance that this isn’t for you. Only 0.2% of our readers have responded to this call for action.

Those 0.2% of our readers are our hidden heroes, who are fuelling our work and impacting the lives of every South African in doing so. They’re the people who contribute to keep Daily Maverick free for all, including you.

The equation is quite simple: the more members we have, the more reporting and investigations we can do, and the greater the impact on the country.

Be part of that 0.2%. Be a Maverick. Be a Maverick Insider.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options