South Africa


ANC’s policy document wish list may yet alter South Africa’s future for the better

ANC’s policy document wish list may yet alter South Africa’s future for the better
From left: Energy Minister Gwede Mantashe. (Photo: Gallo Images / Philip Maeta) | Electricity transmission pylons in the Dunoon district of Cape Town, South Africa. (Photo: Dwayne Senior / Bloomberg via Getty Images) | President Cyril Ramaphosa. (Photo: Gallo Images / Sharon Seretlo)

The documents suggest that important policy changes could be coming, that the provision of electricity could change, that the current model of state-owned enterprises is ‘dead’, that there should be less red tape for firms, and even a possible step away from the current model of black economic empowerment.

While the ANC’s policy conference in late June this year is officially about the battle of policy ideas, there are strong indications already that the power contest(s) will overshadow debates around ideology and delivery. And yet, the policy documents published by the party ahead of its conference are important, as they give an indication of what officially the future direction of the party could be.

The documents have now been published and they suggest that important policy changes could be coming, that the provision of electricity could change, that the current model of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) is “dead”, that there should be less red tape for firms, and even a possible step away from the current model of black economic empowerment. 

It should be remembered, though, that these documents are not the end of the process, rather they are just the beginning of discussions.

At the ANC’s 2017 conference, the issue that came closest to derailing the entire event was not the leadership battle, but the policy proposal to change the Constitution to enable the government to expropriate land without compensation for the purposes of land reform. 

In the end, the resolution was passed with important caveats.

However, this time around, within its policy documents, the ANC merely appears to note: 

“We have not had sufficient support to amend the Constitution to allow for land expropriation without compensation in certain circumstances, although there has been progress with the passing of expropriation legislation and strengthening of land redistribution processes.”

The Nasrec resolution calling for the nationalisation of the SA Reserve Bank gets similar treatment, saying that the “historical anomaly” that it has private shareholders has not been corrected. It then goes on to say this is because of the possible “undue enrichment of private speculators who have been lobbying for such an intervention as they hope to make massive financial gains from the process at the expense of South Africa and cost to the fiscus”.

This is a major change in the debate, as it suggests a reason why this “nationalisation” should not happen.

Of course, given the pressing need to get more electricity into the grid, the paper discusses this in some depth.

The document suggests that when it comes to embedded generation (to allow companies to produce and sell their own electricity), “the registration requirements for such projects need to be streamlined and red tape reduced”.

For those concerned about our urgent power requirement, this may be welcome, suggesting that the ANC will start the debate as fully behind the private sector generating its own power.

In fact, the document goes further, saying: “Such projects should be designated as Strategic Infrastructure Projects (SIPS) so that environmental authorisation regulated by the DFFE can be expedited.” (The DFFE is presumably the Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment).

This would suggest that it would be easier and quicker to build and run solar and wind power plants.

However, if this policy proposal is adopted, from the way it is worded, it would also make it easier for someone to build a gas-fired plant, or even, for example, to use a barge operated by Karpowership.

There is also evidence that those who wrote the document do not want to move straight into the renewable era, but want to go through what is called the “gas transition”.

They write: 

“The growing opposition to oil and gas exploration needs to be confronted politically as it is clear that South Africa’s endowments of oil and gas could be a source of wealth as well as increase our energy security options, also noting the role of gas in the energy transition.”

On the face of it, this does resonate very strongly with some of the comments made by Energy Minister Gwede Mantashe.

It also flies in the face of a recent warning by the International Institute for Sustainable Development, which said that for South Africa to pursue a gas industry could be a costly “mistake”. 

Time for rethink on SA’s natural gas dreams ‘mistake’ – global report


Certainly, it suggests that the ANC is considering and wants to press ahead with these plans.

The documents spend some time talking about social compacting, an idea that representatives from business, labour and government can reach important agreements to reset the economy. While this chimes with President Cyril Ramaphosa’s promise to enact a social compact, the deadline he set himself came and went last week.

Ramaphosa’s 100 (working) days of social compacting have come and gone, but who’s counting?


It may also miss a much bigger point. The people who really suffer from our current economic situation are the 12 million unemployed. By the very definitions that the ANC uses within this social compacting plan, they would be left out of the process. And yet they are surely the biggest constituency in South Africa.

Deep within the documents is a carefully couched question that could open the door to bigger, and always hotly controversial, discussions around the future of black economic empowerment and our employment equity laws.

The point is made in this way: 

“Given the employment crisis in the country, if the choice is between a transformed entity that does not have production capabilities locally and a nontransformed firm that can expand capabilities and jobs, then the latter should be the appropriate choice. Do existing frameworks support such a decision?”

This appears to be a serious suggestion that it is more important for a South African company to employ people than it is for it to be properly transformed in terms of its ownership. That employment may be more important than transformation for the future ANC.

While delegates have obviously not discussed this issue yet, if adopted, this could be the beginning of a major change to the ANC’s current economic policies. The discussion at the policy conference is bound to be heated.

Long before the final discussion documents were published, there had been  consistent reporting that they would say that the current SOE model is “dying”. That reporting has been borne out in the final documents. It says that the “era of bailouts for SOCs [state-owned corporations] is over. It is not sustainable. Workers whose jobs are at risk must be reskilled and redeployed to where vacancies exist.” 

This may well be the strongest indication yet that the retrenchment process the SABC went through 18 months ago could become a norm for the SOEs – and that major change is coming.

Of course, this has been promised before.

Also previously promised, is a commitment to cut red tape for smaller firms. However, it appears the party may be going further than in the past when it says the government should, “remove micro enterprises which operate best in the informal sector out of the Small Business regime[n] to remove the red tape”. It also says that municipalities should “remove the requirements for payment of permits by informal traders and provide necessary support…”

This may be the beginning of a better understanding of the needs of smaller firms by the governing party.

ANC discussion documents are often an interesting mix of honesty, imagination and, sometimes, hubris. It is entirely possible that other issues take over what is mentioned in this economic document. However, it is also possible that what the party has published here does lay an important basis for the conference discussions and possibly our future. DM


[hearken id=”daily-maverick/9472″]


Comments - Please in order to comment.

  • Craig B says:

    It seems fairly straightforward that major change is needed. The current economic policies are taking us in reverse.

  • Karl Sittlinger says:

    “Of course, this has been promised before”. The ANC is very good at creating (and then ignoring) studies, policies, commissions etc. It’s just the follow through that happens very very rarely. The optimism in this article is simply not justified.

    • Karsten Döpke says:

      “The optimism in this article is simply not justified.” Hit the nail on the head, the ANC has effectively never done the right thing.

  • Peter Dexter says:

    This is very good news and obvious to all those who have a moderate understanding of what will make the economy work. I temper my optimism because the ANC’s history of “talk with very little walk” is legendary. Hopefully Ramaphosa has enough competent supporters focused on the survival of South Africa, rather than enriching themselves. Time will tell.

  • Brian Cotter says:

    Where can we access this document as we have just had the Zondo commission issuing reports, unfortunately the last one is missing. Would like to read myself the Zondo lessons learnt if any at all. ? Have found the 2017 document.

  • Richard Baker says:

    Right thinking people have been concerned and talking about all these issues virtually since 1994 but the ANC has doggedly stuck to what were patently unworkable and ideology driven policies.
    The destruction wrought on the economy and the country is now irreversible with businesses and jobs lost for ever.
    And to seriously contemplate that the party and its cadres will give up their places at the gravy table is naive and unrealistic.
    Until the ANC is completely out of power the same story and situation will continue.

  • Stephen T says:

    I’m not holding my breath. They’re only starting to debate these things now which should have been done 20 years ago already. Remember that this is the African National Circus we are talking about here and there are many, many clowns in its ranks. Their track record shows that they can only manage to get things right by sheer accident rather than by design.

    Realistically speaking, another huge obstacle here are the labour unions because they have had far too much political clout for far too long. Even if the ANC by some miracle figures out the best policy, it will be scuppered by the Lefty labour unions at every turn.

  • Jimbo Smith says:

    Has any sane person in this country kept track of the ANC’s multiple “Policy Documents” and “Plans”? In the article above, Squirrel has already missed his deadline on a ” social compact”, whatever that might have been? Folks, these ANC leaders do not have the faintest idea of what needs to be done very urgently to save our country. Their solution rattles on ad nauseum…let’s have a conference, let’s develop another re-hash of an existing, non implemented plan and of course, let’s not let the feeding trough slip away. And so the above “policy document” will end up on the mountainous pile of other failed crap.

  • Gerrie Pretorius Pretorius says:

    Stephen, you don’t really believe that any real good will come from this discussion document, do you? There have been far too many false ‘promises’ from the anc to take any discussion serious. The only way they will ever recover lost trust is by actually DOING something to alleviate corruption. The anc needs to rid itself of all implicated cadre deployees NOW.

  • anton kleinschmidt says:

    Benefit of the doubt, I repeat BENEFIT OF THE DOUBT
    The single biggest impediment to the future wellbeing of this country.
    The media,
    Big business,
    Private sector CEOs
    The rating agencies,
    The political “analysts
    The commentariat
    The voters,
    They all persist with the profoundly destructive habit of giving the ANC the benefit of the doubt.
    This foolhardy persistence flies in the face of unfulfilled commitment to do the right thing
    It flies in the face of protracted deliberations and consultations which never see fruition
    It ignores the failure to deliver anything of value in 20 years
    It creates short term hiatus’ in an endless cycle during which the trajectory is always downwards
    This will only change when we stop giving the ANC the benefit of the doubt

  • Andre Toit says:

    Can only become a reality once the tail stops wagging the dog !!

  • Stef Viljoen Viljoen says:

    These type of actions are the things needed to get South Africa going again. If implimented – and that is a big IF – it could extend the life of the ANC as a viable political force.

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted

We would like our readers to start paying for Daily Maverick...

…but we are not going to force you to. Over 10 million users come to us each month for the news. We have not put it behind a paywall because the truth should not be a luxury.

Instead we ask our readers who can afford to contribute, even a small amount each month, to do so.

If you appreciate it and want to see us keep going then please consider contributing whatever you can.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options