South Africa

PUBLIC PROTECTOR

NPA to prosecute Busisiwe Mkhwebane on two counts of perjury for SA Reserve Bank report

Public Protector, Busisiwe Mkhwebane during her Roadshow in Thembisa. (Photos: Tebogo Letsie)

The National Prosecuting Authority is proceeding with perjury charges against Public Protector Busisiwe Mkhwebane after she allegedly lied in connection with her investigation into the Reserve Bank’s loan to Bankorp.

Public Protector Busisiwe Mkhwebane will face two criminal charges of perjury, the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) has announced. 

This is in relation to her conduct during a judicial review of her 2017/18 investigation into the SA Reserve Bank’s (SARB) bailout of apartheid bank, Bankorp, between 1985 and 1991.

On Monday, NPA head advocate Shamila Bathoi informed advocate Paul Hoffman of the NGO Accountability Now that prosecutors would proceed with two remaining counts of perjury against Mkhwebane as “there are reasonable prospects of success”. 

Accountability Now laid perjury charges against Mkhwebane in 2019.

In November 2018, the Constitutional Court found that the Public Protector had “put forward a number of falsehoods in the course of litigation” on the Reserve Bank report.

Mkhwebane will become the first head of a Chapter 9 institution in South Africa to face criminal charges.

In July 2021, Mkhwebane made a brief appearance in the Pretoria Magistrates’ Court, flanked by her lawyer advocate Dali Mpofu, where one of the three charges was withdrawn.

The Public Protector is accused of having “unlawfully and intentionally” lied under oath in court documents in 2017 and 2018 about the number of times she met with former president Jacob Zuma and state security officials during the investigation into the SA Reserve Bank, and the purpose of those meetings.

At one meeting, Mkhwebane had written, with reference to the Reserve Bank, “How are they vulnerable?”

On 7 June 2017, 12 days before she released her report calling for an amendment of the Constitution to allow Parliament to alter the powers of the Reserve Bank, Mkhwebane met with Jacob Zuma’s legal advisers. By that date, she had vastly expanded the reach of her investigation.

Mkhwebane’s eventual report was overturned by the courts on the grounds that she had grossly overstepped her mandate by ordering Parliament to redirect the mandate of the Reserve Bank.  

Meanwhile, Mkwebane’s woes are multiplying as Parliament is going ahead with preparations for an impeachment vote. On 4 February 2022, the Constitutional Court unanimously found the Western Cape High Court had erred in declaring unconstitutional the participation of a judge in the initial impeachment assessment because it violated the separation of powers.

“… (T)he judge is appointed to the independent panel, not to make a binding decision, but to give advice on the subject of the removal of a Chapter Nine institution office-bearer… 

“Moreover, it bears emphasis that the judge is but one of a three-person panel. She may thus well find herself in the minority in decisions on the recommendations to be made by the independent panel,” said Judge Nonkosi Mhlantla

It also allowed for Mkhwebane to be legally represented during the impeachment process.

In a last-ditch bid to stave this off, Mkhwebane informed Parliament last week that she was following Jacob Zuma’s lead, applying to the Constitutional court for a rescission of its own judgment against her. 

Her lawyers have argued that the court “misapplied its own judgments”. DM

Gallery

Comments - share your knowledge and experience

Please note you must be a Maverick Insider to comment. Sign up here or sign in if you are already an Insider.

Everybody has an opinion but not everyone has the knowledge and the experience to contribute meaningfully to a discussion. That’s what we want from our members. Help us learn with your expertise and insights on articles that we publish. We encourage different, respectful viewpoints to further our understanding of the world. View our comments policy here.

All Comments 11

  • If the facts are against you, argue the law. If the law is against you, argue the facts. If the law and the facts are against you, hire Dali Mpofu.

  • “In July 2021, Mkhwebane made a brief appearance in the Pretoria Magistrates’ Court, flanked by her lawyer advocate Dali Mpofu, where one of the three charges was withdrawn.”

    aaah Dali Mpofu again. When Mpofu appears for someone, you know two things
    1. The client is one of the bad guys
    2. The client and Mpofu will lose

  • This person is demonstrably 100% intellectually completely out of her depth in the Office she occupies. Apart from perjury charges to boot. This is embarassing to say the least. Ms. Mkhwebane why don’t you just call it a day ….. ?

  • Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted