Dailymaverick logo

South Africa

This article is more than a year old

2024 ELECTIONS

IEC confirms Sunday poll results announcement amidst threats from Zuma's MK party

Jacob Zuma’s uMkhonto Wesizwe (MK) party is attempting to hold the country to ransom by threatening to challenge the announcement by the IEC of SA’s 2024 election results.
IEC confirms Sunday poll results announcement amidst threats from Zuma's MK party Leader of the uMkhonto Wesizwe Party Jacob Zuma arrives at the IEC National Operations Centre in Midrand on 1 June 2024. (Photo: Felix Dlangamandla)

The Electoral Commission of South Africa (IEC) has asserted its authority and confirmed that it will announce the 2024 national and provincial election results by Sunday, as initially planned. This announcement came shortly after the uMkhonto Wesizwe (MK) party, led by disgraced former president Jacob Zuma, threatened that announcing the results would be a provocation, as it refuses to accept the final outcomes.

By around 10pm on Saturday, the capturing of the final results stood at 100%.

Read more in Daily Maverick: Elections Dashboard

“The commission will be ready to announce the results of these elections tomorrow [Sunday],” said IEC chairperson Mosotho Moepya. “As you are well aware, South Africans are anxious that we complete this work and set them free to know the final outcomes of the elections. However, the completion of the capturing of the results does not mean the results are final.”

According to Moepya, the IEC is dealing with 579 objections. The IEC extended the deadline for objections to counting and capturing to 6pm on Saturday, 1 June.

This extension followed an urgent objection submitted by 17 political parties in the Western Cape under Section 55 of the Electoral Act. The parties jointly called for the objection period to be extended until 48 hours after the last ballot paper has been scanned and submitted for verification.

Read more on Daily Maverick: Appeal for calm as Electoral Commission extends objections deadline, tries to defuse counting debacle

There have been six general themes of objections, explained Moepya:

1.⁠ ⁠Someone filed an objection, but hasn’t had a chance to deal with the results.
2.⁠ ⁠Allegations filed by a third party regarding claims that votes were not recorded for a particular party.
3.⁠ ⁠Allegations under oath that votes were not recorded for a particular party, with an accompanying affidavit.
4.⁠ ⁠People asking about seat allocations and the kind of things you are going to consider.
5.⁠ ⁠People raising concerns about conduct of party agents or candidates during special voting or election day.
6.⁠ ⁠People raising issues affecting either the conduct or training of electoral officials.

Moepya said the commission is dealing with 24 recounts, but said these are not material enough to have an impact on the outcome of an election. 

The IEC announced that it has authorised edit windows to ensure any necessary changes are reflected on the results board, which may result in slight shifts on the leaderboard.

Jacob Zuma, continuing to cast doubt on the IEC and the integrity of the country’s election processes - processes that twice made him president - arrived at the National Operations Results Centre on Saturday night, greeted by a swarm of journalists. The MK party has alleged they possess evidence of election-rigging. They declined to provide this evidence when asked, hiding behind a planned court action. 

During a press conference led by party spokesperson Nhlamulo Ndhlela, the MK party claimed that an IT company interfered with the system during a two-hour glitch. “We have evidence of election-rigging,” said Ndhlela, fuelling further controversy and scepticism around the electoral process.

“We are contemplating a re-vote,” said Ndhlela. “We are going to request for a commission of inquiry into these elections.” 

Ndhela also made allegations that there were two men “picked” up by the police for their alleged involvement in the glitches of the IEC system. However, IEC CEO Sy Mamabolo said they were not aware of any such two people, either who are staff members or contracted to the commission. “We have checked with Natjoints if perhaps, to their end, they could be aware of such arrests. Even on their front, no knowledge has come to the fore about persons arrested.” 

EFF leader Julius Malema, in an earlier press conference, said they accepted the results despite not being complete. Malema said while there were objections, they held value in changing the results. The Inkatha Freedom Party and Mmusi Maimane’s Build One SA are some of the other parties that accepted the results. 

A number of other political parties with a poor showing in the polls - including the African Congress for Transformation, led by former ANC secretary-general Ace Magashule; the South African Rainbow Alliance (Sara), led by former City of Joburg speaker Colleen Makhubele; and the Alliance of Citizens for Change, among other parties - did not accept the results. Makhubele said 20 other parties joined Zuma’s MK party in its call to challenge the results. 

She mentioned that the Patriotic Alliance (PA) and the African Transformation Movement (ATM) were among the larger parties supporting this effort.

However, both PA leader Gayton McKenzie and the ATM’s Vuyo Zungula have denied any involvement.

“No, never,” said McKenzie when asked about it. 

“We have submitted our objections,” Zungula told Daily Maverick. “Our NPLC member will advise how far that is in terms of resolving issues, then we will take it from there.” 

Jacob Zuma stood firm in his claims that there were discrepancies with the results and demanded that the IEC not make a declaration until their grievances have been resolved.

The MK party has been set on garnering a two-thirds majority. However, the party’s support stands at 14.6%. Said Zuma:

“In my view, SA had been deteriorating in what we envisaged it to be. I am worried now that there are wrong things that happened during counting by the institution which should handle this for us, guided by principle and laws.”

He warned that if the complaints are not dealt with before a declaration is made on Sunday, it would “provoke” the collective.

“Nobody must force us to accept the results, when the results are not fine. The institution needs to satisfy us. Nobody must declare tomorrow and, if it does, they will be provoking us. Do not start trouble when there is no trouble, give the political parties the opportunity to present their cases, do not rush us,” he said.

Speaking to Daily Maverick, UDM secretary-general Yongama Zigebe confirmed that they shared the same sentiments about the elections.

“The UDM has lodged an objection on the issues of Nelson Mandela Bay, Western Cape, where a recount has been called. We demand a proper investigation and a recount of the affected areas. As we joined the call for a recount, we learnt of other areas and provinces, and a recount is indeed needed,” he said. 

Xiluva’s Bongani Baloyi also confirmed that his party is firmly behind the recount. 

The IEC’s Moepya said they were not feeling under siege as “some of these things come with the territory. The Constitution requires of us that, to be a member of this commission, you must act without fear, without favour and without prejudice. We are determined to discharge our obligation as required by the Constitution.” 

President Cyril Ramaphosa’s office confirmed that he will be present on Sunday when the official results are announced. DM

Comments (10)

neelsp200@gmail.com Jun 2, 2024, 11:46 AM

Blame of this to the loosing ANC. They let this convict out of jail with a terminal illness excuse and let him of his corruption cases for 16 years. This show us how really the people of South Africa wants a change from the ANC to vote for this idiot.

Richard Blake Jun 2, 2024, 06:40 PM

You can blame the DA for this mess as well. One can ask what has the ANC being doing for the last 30 years, and what has the DA been doing for the last 30 years. 30 years in to our democracy and many rural areas have never seen or spoken with a party representative from the DA.

mike@applegrapple.co.za Jun 2, 2024, 11:58 AM

MK is lead by a disgraced leader who is serving a criminal sentence (out on questionable medical parol) which the Constitutional Court prohibited from presenting his fledgling party in parliament. He can only be legally elected as a party representative in Parliament five years after his sentence is served. Yet we witness Zuma meddling in the election process and threatening the IEC demanding a recount of ballots. Zuma should have had no access granted to the IEC facilities and should be charged with inciting insurrection. Meaning that he should go straight back to prison and serve his sentence as his energetic rallying around the MK party proves that whatever health issues he had justifying medical parol are now a thing of the past.

The anti-spin doctor Jun 2, 2024, 03:49 PM

FYI His medical parole ended a year or so ago. He's finished serving that sentence.

Georgebaboolal15@gmail.com Jun 2, 2024, 07:54 PM

Maybe we all should try medical parole or is it for a select few or a selection process determining one's........ ....

trudi.schwartz Jun 2, 2024, 12:34 PM

It is so funny that JZ and his goons live in their parallel universe thinking they would garner a two thirds majority. I never thought I would say this but good on the EFF for accepting the outcome of the vote. Let sanity prevail. This is exactly why I think the DA should speak to the ANC about a coalition. I would not have said this a year ago.

jpvdb8@gmail.com Jun 2, 2024, 02:51 PM

Can someone tell Mr Zuma that 14.6 is not 2/3’s of 100. His threats must be dealt with ,with the contempt it deserves and may I add harshly. This country cannot again be held to ransom by this desperate pathetic individual!

Johan Buys Jun 2, 2024, 03:31 PM

The most important steps to follow the allocation of Parliament seats appears to be selection of the President that then in turn appoints cabinet. Q1: must Parliament have 201 votes for a President or would candidate with the most votes take the post? Q2: if alliances will take long time to solve, what are the practical implications? I imagine that on key not-controversial legislation, parties would vote for what is in country interest, not automatic knee-jerk against the ANC? In practical terms, only the fundamental votes would be a battle that involves getting 201 votes. Q3: is there anything in our rules that says members must vote their party line on an issue? For some of the no-confidence type votes, members did deviate, but does the same apply to legislative votes as for motions from the floor?

Skinyela Jun 2, 2024, 10:10 PM

Majority, meaning 50%+, not the most votes.

Maj.knox1@gmail.com Jun 2, 2024, 05:47 PM

Who is this motormouth clown and his seriously deranged daughter to threaten the entire country and the " integregity" of the election system, because he isn't a happy camper ... Shows the breeding of these indervdiuals.. below rational human logic.

langeraadt@yahoo.com Jun 4, 2024, 03:32 PM

He is in fact devilishly clever and only bent on getting his hand back into the cookie jar and to hell with the country. My guess would be that displaying psychopathic tendencies tend to show what he really it. He has no conscience.

robertfraser003@gmail.com Jun 2, 2024, 09:47 PM

Bob F June 2nd 2024 at 21:33? A majority vote for Zuma's party in KZN was to be expected as it is common knowledge once a Zulu always a Zulu. They followed him blindly into a riot situation once before and may well have done so if MK had not captured KZN. No matter the outcome of a coalition it is most imperative MK Zuma and his clan are not in position where they can enforce their way of thinking on the whole country. It is serious enough that they can control KZN and carry on with the thieving ways of the ANC. Is

monkeygas100@gmail.com Jun 3, 2024, 11:34 AM

And JZ the criminal just carries on holding the country hostage, what a joke Criminal – Thief and guilty of multiple crimes against this country, and yet here we are. When will this country grow a pair

baronrennie Jun 3, 2024, 09:20 PM

All the years of my life. Robert Mugabe. Originally seemed like a reasonable man. Zimbabwe worked well. Many houses were built. The economy was strong enough for the Zimbabwean dollar to buy pounds. I think in 1989, when I went to London a British pound cost 20 Zimbabwean dollars. It now costs over 20 South African Rands. So strange that currency can change its value. Now I work twice as hard for a tenth of what I used to get.

langeraadt@yahoo.com Jun 4, 2024, 03:20 PM

Disruption and anarchy is all these guys are ever interested in. Certainly not peace and stability.