AFRICA CHECK: ROAD TO 2024 ELECTIONS
Life under DA in Western Cape — fact-checking opposition party’s claims on governance
In a bid to retain power in the only province it governs and appeal to voters nationally, the Democratic Alliance has been keen to highlight its track record in the Western Cape.
The Democratic Alliance (DA), South Africa’s opposition party, has governed the Western Cape province since 2009.
Ahead of national elections scheduled for 29 May 2024, party leader John Steenhuisen has admonished what he calls “mercenary parties” challenging the DA’s leadership in the Western Cape.
Rather than being “in opposition to the opposition”, Steenhuisen has argued, political parties such as the Patriotic Alliance, Good, and Rise Mzansi should focus their attention on other provinces. This is because the DA has a proven track record in the Western Cape, he and other party officials have claimed.
Is the party delivering on key issues such as unemployment, access to basic services and crime? In this report, we look into five claims the DA has made about its performance in the province.
Read more in Daily Maverick: 2024 elections hub
Claim: “Where we govern in the Western Cape, eight out of 10 people are employed …”
Verdict: Incorrect
The DA launched its election manifesto on 17 February. You can read our fact-check of that plan here.
In his keynote address at the launch in Pretoria, in the northern Gauteng province, Steenhuisen made several claims about the DA’s track record in the Western Cape.
On the topic of jobs, he said eight out of 10 people in the province were employed.
Statistics South Africa (Stats SA) records unemployment in its quarterly labour force surveys (QLFS). The most recent survey available when the DA published its manifesto was for the third quarter of 2023, from July to September. During those months, the unemployment rate in the Western Cape was 20.2%. In other words, about two in 10 people were considered unemployed.
However, this doesn’t mean that 80% of people were “employed”. Stats SA considers a person to be unemployed if they did not have a job at the time of the survey but were actively seeking work and were available to work, or were set to start a new job at a definite date in the future.
An expanded definition of unemployment includes people who are unemployed and want to work, but have a reason for not seeking work — for example, a lack of available jobs in their area.
The labour force refers to all those employed and unemployed. By the expanded definition, 25.6% of the labour force in the Western Cape was unemployed in the third quarter of 2023. However, this still does not include all people in the Western Cape.
For the proportion of the working-age population (all people aged 15 to 64) that is employed, the absorption rate is a better indicator. This is what Dr Neva Makgetla, a senior economist at the Trade and Industrial Policy Strategies research institute, previously told Africa Check. This indicator includes people aged 15 to 64 who did paid work for at least an hour or had a job or business during the week of the survey.
In the third quarter of 2023, the absorption rate in the Western Cape was 54.7%, higher than any other province, but not as high as the DA claimed. Gauteng had the second highest absorption rate (45%) and Limpopo third (38.5%).
Data for the fourth quarter of 2023 was not available when the DA published its manifesto. However, the figures did not change much. The official unemployment rate was recorded at 20.3%, while the expanded rate was 25.6%. The absorption rate was 55.0%.
Claim: “This province is responsible for 78.9% of all jobs in our country in the last five years.”
Verdict: Misleading
At the launch of the DA’s manifesto in the Western Cape, Premier Alan Winde claimed that the province was responsible for creating 78.9% of all jobs in South Africa over the past five years.
A reader asked us to look into the claim.
Kylie Hatton, special adviser to the premier, told Africa Check that the source of the claim was Stats SA’s QLFS, “which shows that 78.9% of net jobs were created in Western Cape” since the fourth quarter of 2019.
However, the QLFS does not use the term “net jobs” and Stats SA previously told Africa Check that it does not “have an official definition for this”.
The latest edition of the QLFS covers the fourth quarter of 2023 (the months of October to December). Winde spoke about “the last five years”, which should have started with the fourth quarter of 2018, but Winde used figures from the fourth quarter of 2019 instead.
The increase in employment in the Western Cape between the fourth quarter of 2019 and 2023 was around 239,000 people. Over the same period, employment in South Africa as a whole increased by around 303,000 people. In percentage terms, the Western Cape accounts for about 78.9% of this total. But statisticians don’t use this method to compare changes in employment, and for very good reasons.
‘Not totally wrong but misleading’
Dr Ihsaan Bassier, a researcher at the South African Labour and Development Research Unit and the London School of Economics, told Africa Check that the claim was “not totally wrong, but I would classify it as misleading”.
The first issue becomes apparent when using data from 2018, five years before 2023, not from 2019 onwards. Employment increases in the Western Cape over this period were 236,000 and for South Africa, 194,000.
By the DA’s calculations, this would mean that the Western Cape produced 121.5% of the net jobs in that time. But KwaZulu-Natal province also provided more than 100% “of all jobs” during this period.
“Some provinces increased employment, some provinces decreased employment, and so a particular province can in fact ‘over explain’ national net job creation, as in this case, with over 100%,” Bassier said.
Employment also experienced major shock in 2020 as a result of the Covid pandemic. “In historical terms, the period since 2020 has been anomalous,” Bassier said. The net number of jobs created over the past five years finally turned positive in 2023 but was still very small.
Bassier calculated that for the period 2021 to 2023, which would be less affected by the pandemic, Gauteng had the highest percentage of “net national employment growth” at 23.4%, followed by the Western Cape at 22.7%.
Stats SA does not use the measure
Desiree Manamela, chief director for labour statistics at Stats SA told Africa Check that the data agency “does not use this measure used by the DA to assume that the Western Cape was responsible for 78.9% of all jobs in the country in the last five years and does not use the measure ‘% of net jobs’.”
So what can other measures tell us about the Western Cape’s employment statistics?
Between the fourth quarters of 2018 and 2023, the Western Cape did see the largest increase in employment of any province, with just over 236,000 more people employed in 2023 than in 2018. KwaZulu-Natal was a close second, with an increase of just over 208,000 people. Four provinces (Eastern Cape, Free State, North West and Gauteng) saw a decline in employment over that period.
Over the four years used by Winde, five provinces experienced a decrease in employment, with the Western Cape again recording the largest increase at 239,000 people. KwaZulu-Natal was again second with 192,000. There are, however, other ways of looking at the contribution to employment.
For example, Manamela highlighted how each province’s employment figures had changed as a percentage of people already employed in the province. This makes comparisons between provinces more intuitive, as, for example, a province that doubled its employment figures would show an employment increase of 100%, whether that meant an increase from 100 people to 200 or from 1 million to 2 million people. This means that large provinces do not dominate employment figures simply by having large populations.
From the fourth quarter of 2019 to 2023, employment in the Western Cape increased by 9.5% of its initial value. This was the highest increase of any province, followed by KwaZulu-Natal at 7.2% and Limpopo at 7%.
So the Western Cape is doing well in terms of employment, but Winde used a misleading measure to communicate this.
Claim: “Where we govern, in places like Cape Town … [we provide] the cleanest drinking water …”
Verdict: Incorrect
During the manifesto launch, Steenhuisen narrowed in on the City of Cape Town, claiming that the DA provided the cleanest drinking water there.
The 2022 general household survey (GHS), the latest available, shows that 99.3% of households in the Western Cape had access to piped or tap water. The quality of this water is another matter.
South Africa’s Department of Water and Sanitation (DWS) defines water quality in terms of its “microbiological, physical, and chemical properties”.
This information is made publicly available on the National Integrated Water Information System (Niwis), an interactive dashboard maintained by the department. The latest Niwis results at the time of publishing are for samples tested between 1 March 2023 and 1 February 2024.
Prof Craig Sheridan is the director of the Centre in Water Research and Development at the University of the Witwatersrand in Johannesburg. He told Africa Check that a water quality index helped determine how good the water was in a given place because it considered the chemical and microbiological aspects of the water. “The best score on a [water quality index] would be the best water,” Sheridan said.
The Niwis measures the quality of drinking water according to six chemical and microbiological categories and provides a rating of bad, poor, good or excellent.
Neil Griffin, a research officer at Rhodes University’s Institute for Water Research in Makhanda, told Africa Check that the index was based on the South African National Standard Drinking Water Specification (Sans 241). It sets out the minimum standards for water that is safe to consume. While there were other standards, Griffin said, Sans 241 was “probably the best”.
The results of the Niwis dashboard showed that Cape Town’s water was rated as excellent in four categories, poor in one and bad in another. Water in the City of Tshwane in Gauteng, which is also governed by the DA, was rated as good in two categories, poor in two others and bad in the remaining two.
On the other hand, water in the ANC-run City of Johannesburg was rated as excellent in five categories and bad in one. Water in the eThekwini municipality, also led by the ANC, was rated excellent in four categories, good in one and bad in another.
Based on the samples tested, the City of Cape Town therefore does not have the cleanest drinking water.
Asked about Cape Town’s poor result for the “chemical: disinfectant” category, Griffin said this indicated that the city’s water had higher residual chlorine levels than Johannesburg between 1 March 2023 and 1 February 2024.
Claim: “… and the best sanitation services in the entire country.”
Verdict: Unproven
South Africa’s national treasury defines basic sanitation services as providing households with easily accessible and sustainable facilities. These are often referred to as “improved sanitation” — flush toilets connected to a public sewerage system or a septic tank, or a pit toilet with ventilation pipes (also known as a VIP toilet).
Outdated facilities that do not fall into this category include pit toilets, chemical toilets (which collect human waste in a tank and use chemicals to minimise odour) and pit latrines.
According to the 2022 GHS, the Western Cape had the highest number of households using improved sanitation, at 95.7%. This was followed by Gauteng (87.3%) and the Free State (78.7%). The Western Cape also had the lowest number of households using pit toilets (0.2%), followed by Gauteng (6%).
However, the numbers look different at the local government level — particularly in metropolitan municipalities, known as metros.
(Data source: Stats SA, 2022)
Using the total number of sanitation facilities per metro from Stats SA’s 2022 census, the City of Johannesburg (94.9%) had the highest number of individuals that made use of improved sanitation, followed by Nelson Mandela Bay (93.7%) and the City of Cape Town (93.5%).
However, in terms of households, the 2022 general household survey showed that the ANC-governed Buffalo City (97.8%) had the highest number of improved sanitation facilities out of all the metros. The DA-governed Tshwane ranked second to last in terms of access to improved sanitation.
(Source: Stats SA, 2022 general household survey)
The difference in these figures is due to the distinction between a census and a survey. While the census aims to collect data from every person in South Africa, a survey collects data from a sample of the population.
Performance should reflect changes over time
Given the different data sets available, we asked Mike Muller, former director-general of South Africa’s water affairs department and adjunct professor at Wits University’s Graduate School of Governance, to weigh in.
“Without seeing the exact statements made, it’s difficult to respond,” he said. “Improved sanitation” was a very wide definition and the type and status of sanitation adopted by a household depended on the type of housing and settlement as well as household incomes.
In addition, Muller said, “‘performance’ cannot be measured by a single data point but must reflect changes made over a given period”. He said the 2022 GHS provided some useful insights into the performance of the different provinces over the past two decades.
It showed that at the national level, access to improved sanitation rose from 61.7% in 2002 to 83.2% in 2022.
“The best ‘performing’ province was the Eastern Cape where access rose from 33.4% to 90%. Limpopo also improved significantly, from 26.9% to 63.1%,” Muller said.
While most urban provinces showed limited progress, they started from a high coverage base and experienced high levels of in-migration, Muller added.
For example, access to improved sanitation in the Western Cape increased from 92.2% in 2002 to 95.9% in 2022. In Gauteng, the figures were 88.9% and 90.5%.
According to Muller, this meant that “poor rural provinces” had seen the most improvement.
“The two developed urban provinces started with high levels of coverage which improved slightly in percentage terms over the two decades. However, to compare their ‘performance’ it would be necessary to consider the number of households served since areas with high in-migration or more households to serve have to do more simply to stay in the same place.”
What looks like a slow rate of increase in percentage terms may be masking a significant rate of increase in terms of the number of households with appropriate access.
We have therefore rated this claim unproven. That is, publicly available evidence neither proves nor disproves the claim.
Claim: “The only province in South Africa where the murder rate is plateauing or coming down is in [the Western Cape].”
Verdict: Incorrect
Launching the DA’s manifesto in the Western Cape, Premier Alan Winde claimed that his province was the only one to see a drop or stagnation in the murder rate.
The Western Cape has long been associated with high murder rates. In April 2024, news media reported that 94 people had been murdered over just three days.
The province’s murders are largely concentrated in townships on the outskirts of the city of Cape Town and in areas characterised by economic exclusion, lack of access to basic services and gang activity.
Historically, the high murder rates in the Western Cape have been attributed to a number of factors, including the proliferation of gangs, the related issue of illegal firearms, and a weakened criminal justice system.
The Institute for Security Studies (ISS) in Pretoria uses police data to calculate annual murder rates for South Africa. These take the total population into account by looking at the number of murders in a given time and place per 100,000 people. At 56, the rate in the Western Cape was higher than the national average of 45 in 2022/23.
(Source: Policy brief: Murder trends in South Africa’s deadliest provinces)
Winde told Africa Check that his claim was based on a policy brief published by the ISS. It analysed trends in murder rates at a provincial level and found the Western Cape’s murder rate had fallen by 1.4 in the five years between 2017/18 and 2022/23.
Zoom out, and the picture is less hopeful. The policy brief also compares current murder rates with those of 2011/12. Here the Western Cape increased from 43 in 2011/12 to 56 in 2022/23. The national rate also increased from 31 to 45 over the same period.
Recent murder declines and the Leap initiative
As the policy brief points out, the increase in the Western Cape was between 2011/12 and 2017/18.
In recent years the province has introduced initiatives aimed at curbing the crime epidemic, such as the Law Enforcement Advancement Plan (Leap). Created in 2020, Leap focused law enforcement resources in murder hotspots. Murder rates started to decline around this time.
Africa Check spoke to David Bruce, security researcher and author of the policy brief, to learn more. He said that statistics since 2019 did suggest that initiatives like Leap might have had “a positive impact” on murder rates in the province.
Other researchers have written about the likely link between Leap and reductions in the murder rate. In a 2022 article, Dr Jean Redpath, senior researcher at the Dullah Omar Institute at the University of the Western Cape, wrote: “The Leap intervention, involving multilevel government co-operation, provides hope that it may be possible to make a dent in SA’s crime problem.”
Bruce added that the Western Cape did not show the same pattern of increasing murder rates over this period as seen in other provinces known to have high murder rates.
For example, while the murder rate decreased slightly in the Western Cape, Gauteng, the Eastern Cape and KwaZulu-Natal have all seen significant increases in the last five years.
(Source: Policy brief: Murder trends in South Africa’s deadliest provinces)
The ‘only’ province to see a decrease?
Winde claimed that the Western Cape was the only province in South Africa to see a decrease or plateau in murder rates. But when comparing rates between 2011/12 and 2022/23 data, the Free State observed a slight decline of 2% and the Northern Cape a decline of 4%. While the decline in the Northern Cape was concentrated between 2011/12 and 2017/18, the decline in the Free State took place between 2017/18 and 2022/23. Limpopo’s murder rate declined by 0.4% between 2017/18 and 2022/23.
This means the Western Cape is not the only province to see a plateau or a decrease.
Latest data a ‘curve ball’
More recent statistics further challenge Winde’s claim. Bruce told Africa Check that the last three quarterly crime reports from the South African Police Service (SAPS) show the province’s murder rate has increased slightly, “by about 5%”.
From April to December 2023, SAPS recorded 3,404 murders (adding quarters one, two and three). In the same period of the previous year, there were 3,242 murders.
As we have written before, experts prefer to use the more finalised annual data, when available, rather than quarterly reports. But for murder, according to Bruce, the difference in these numbers is “usually less than 1%”.
The data from the last three quarterly reports presents a “curve ball”, Bruce said. While the Western Cape’s murder rate had been in decline, this is no longer the case.
With fourth-quarter results due to be released in May 2024, it remains to be seen whether the province has started to buck the trend again. DM
This report is produced as part of the work of a South African election coalition. In the run-up to the 2024 national elections, the coalition aims to ensure that the claims made by those in charge of state resources and delivering essential services are factually accurate. As voters head to the polls, it is increasingly important that they are able to make informed decisions.
First published by Africa Check.
Congratulations to the author of this article. You are an excellent example of the problem in this country. You choose to be petty and nitpick instead of focusing on the real elephant in the room. While people like yourself continue to sabotage the obviously much better abled competition, so that your decaying masters can remain on the gravy train.
Anc is a disaster,the DA is mediocre. Should we now settle for mediocrity and wait another 30 years before we can get a competitive government
As opposed to another 30 years of disaster then?
If the DA is “mediocre” what does that make the and,eff,mk etc?
The “DA” is mediocre holds no merit. The DA is still many times better than any American political party, for example. Would you vote for the DA or the Republicans or the DP?
That is a ridiculous comparison. It’s like comparing chalk and the Amazon River. I’m surprised it even got published.
This is typical of the media. It cloaks itself in socalled even handedness and presents something called FactChecker like it does with everything else eg tours of forgotten towns on the platteland purporting to give us an unbiased view of these places.
But look up at the top where it says who is doing this? Why it is the Daily Maverick. Most people who know the Daily Maverick would say it has a left of centre bias. It tries to say it is balanced by choosing the odd right wing opinion or right of reply. However that unfortunately doesn’t prove anything. Take a sample of people in the place which would have to be a representative sample of all ages sexes and cultures and you will get a spread of opinions and you might begin to get a better idea i.e a sort of poll if you like.
For me I am probably to the right, hopefully somewhere towards the centre but lots of people will probably disagree with my own sentiments about my self. Then the socalled fact checkers could chose so called unbiased outside opinion but it is just about impossible to get rid of all bias in the amaterish fashion a newspaper might approach just about anything so quite frankly one should take this kind of reporting with a bag full of salt.
I think the point of balanced reporting is that it is overwhelmingly fact-based, and not tainted by myopia or partisan world views. According to that definition, this article qualifies as balanced: it simply uses a range of stats from authoritative sources to test whether the DA’s claims are true, and to what extent. Nowhere does the article pretend that things are better in ANC-run towns and municipalities; nowhere does it pretend that the EFF of MKP or ANC could do a better job, or are doing a better job.
The fact that you don’t LIKE what is said has zero to do with its objectivity.
100% in agreement with your comment
I agree with you Andre. It is sad that there are people who throw their toys out the cot if there is even a sniff of negativity towards the DA. This article is simply checking facts and the facts show that not all the claims made by the DA regarding their achievements in the WC are true.
Sorry I question your naivety. Authoritative source? you must be joking,
Just go into the recruitment document. Any one can join. This whole thing is run by journalists from who themselves are biased by virtue of the newspaper they right for. How do they gauge whether the thing is correct, ;mediocre or what ever. What is correct? Their stringent nitpicking definitions. The whole point is that they are making something which CAN’T be debated in a nutshell rather like X (twitter) . It is virtually sloganeering. Sorry if you are too blind to see.
Absolutely agree, well said.
Stephen, you made a statement on the source of this article and the ‘bias’ of DM. I fact checked your claims.
a)source is DM – incorrect, clearly stated the article is from “Africa Check” with a link to the original article
b)DM has a slight left wing bias – opinion
I’m looking forward to the DA’s response. They didn’t pluck their figures out of the air so it’ll be interesting to see them counter the nitpicking!
At least you supply your name unlike Grumpy Old man and is there hope for South Africa I won’t even bother with them. Andre Fourie – no where did I suggest visiting the towns was in the article. I just was trying to make the point that media love to say they are authoritative when it is extremely difficult to be authoritative . Every one has bias including me . Perhaps look at drug trials as an example . Just because you dress it all up with a few graphs, it doesn’t make it science. The point people are making is that nobody let alone the DA is perfect but broadly they get a lot more right than they get wrong. What people are sick of is the press and many other people throwing THEIR toys out of the cot for what seem minor misdemeanours and with all the nitpicking yes Steve Davidson nitpicking people will come to regret the madness of trying to bring down the party which has very painstakingly achieved the most down. Incidentally I should imagine the DA won’t even reply except to take in what can be improved. The other parties with no organisation make all kinds of claims because that’s all they have besides one or two leaders who have proved themselves as duds, none have any sort of record yet which is what counts.
I wonder Stephen (and only you know the truthful answer to this) whether you would have questioned the credentials of Africa Check had they fact checked the ANC and found their claims to be wanting?
Not that it matters, but I do value the Democratic Party and am appreciative of the good work that they do. This however, does not give them license to make factually incorrect statements or bend the truth a little.
South Africa has had its full of lies and in my opinion shows disrespect to people and their intelligence. What I don’t want then is the party (who I vote for by the way) commit the very same sins as the current incumbents.
The only way, you and I and everyone else get the politicians and political parties we desire is by holding them to account.
There are a lot of people on this platform who are dismayed at the blind loyalty many voters show for the ANC but cannot or won’t see that they practice the same blind faith mentality towards their own party
My thoughts exactly
Entirely agree with Etienne. This article is a waste of time. No one cares if the claims made are 1 0r 2 percentage points out – for goodness sake, everyone knows that whilst it is not perfect the Western Cape is run and administered better than any other province by a country mile. Make a difference and support competent people who do a good job.
Trying very hard to find holes in the DA, but we are not dumb and blind and deaf as you think you are. Do this for any place north of Plettenberg Bay please for the next 8 days
2 out of 3 ain’t bad Denise
… and yet, for someone who lives in Johannesburg, visiting my friends is increasingly about reaching for a mouse to book a flight to the Western Cape than reaching for my car keys.
Overall a more than pedantic article, but on balance the DA is doing an order of magnitude better job here than the ANC is doing anywhere else, bar none. Only one item stood out for me though:
“… and the best sanitation services in the entire country.”
Well maybe that’s not entirely true Mr Winde, I don’t think any other city pumps as much raw sewage straight into the sea as Cape Town does. Time to address this, with our staggeringly high rates, hmm?
You think…. prefer Durban or PE would you?
It’s essential to fact-check the claims made by any political party, including the DA, in the run-up to the elections. This article does an excellent job of providing detailed responses to the DA’s assertions about its governance in the Western Cape, offering valuable insights into the party’s performance.
To address the points raised by the dismissive earlier comments:
A: While some may consider the fact-checking “petty” or “nit-picking,” it’s crucial to ensure that all claims are accurate. Even small inaccuracies should not be overlooked because they can distort the overall picture. Fact-checking helps hold politicians accountable, no matter which party they represent.
B: It’s widely recognized that the Western Cape is comparatively well-managed, but that doesn’t mean the DA should receive a free pass on inaccuracies. Accountability and transparency are vital in any functioning democracy. This article reinforces that principle, ensuring that voters are informed with facts rather than just rhetoric.
C: It’s also fair to scrutinize the DA’s performance and claims, just as it would be for any other party. While the Western Cape is often touted as an example of good governance, this report isn’t dismissing that. Instead, it provides a nuanced view of how much progress has been made and where there’s still room for improvement.
Ultimately, this fact-check helps voters assess the DA’s track record with a clearer understanding. It’s not about finding holes in the DA but about promoting accuracy and transparency for all parties involved in the upcoming elections
Well put. Concise and to the point. This article seemed neither biased or petty.
Hear, hear!
Yet, despite marginally overclaiming achievements, the DA is far outperforming other governments on most metrics. I don’t need stats to prove this, I just need to drive through any other town in SA and witness the decline while dodging potholes and doing a 360 check at every traffic light for high jackers.
It’s a wonder Rebecca and Ferial were not involved (Maybe they are)…. now do for every province, same questions, and rate them!!
Take heed of the old adage of playing the ball.
This article proves that the DA performs better than any other option, but like all politicians, they can’t help themselves from stretching the truth.
The article wasn’t written by DM. It was written by Africa Check who specialize in checking factual claims made by politicians, as well as mis/disinformation spread on social media.
They don’t only check SA claims, but cover various countries in Africa.
They have won international awards for their objective and factual testing of claims made by politicians and others on social media.
They also run courses teaching people how to identify mis/disinformation, downright lies, and doctored photos/videos.
The onus really lies on the person (politician or other) who makes claims to ensure their statements are accurate and based on verifiable facts. If they don’t do this, they really can’t complain when the claims are shown to be false/misleading/unproven.
In an age where mis/disinformation is proving an ever increasing problem, we need organizations like Africa Check to hold people to account for erroneous and misleading information.
I was amazed by this report’s clever statistical gymnastics in trying its utmost to refute the DA’s governance claims, in particular regarding its job creation results and the decrease in crime in the Western Cape. A little comparison is quite illuminating : In Africa Check’s recent “fact-checking report” on the ANC’s election manifesto (23 April 2024) the checking was far more nuanced and generic – no statistical game-playing here – and where the verdict was not favourable, “context” was repeatedly provided, even by ANC spokespersons themselves, as part of the report.
Fact-checking, especially in election time, is great, but then the playing field should be kept even. If not, “fact-checking reports” can easily become handy instruments to give a veneer of respectability to intentional political messages. Don’t be duped!
Thank you DM, for publishing this article and the fact check article on Rise Mzansi.
Please ignore the DA sycophants. They perhaps do not understand that in a democracy, and under our constitution, we can be adults and acknowledge achievements, whilst simultaneously noting false claims.
These sycophants, hopefully, one day, will understand that by publishing constructive criticism of the DA, does not equal blind loyalty to the ANC. It is not a zero sum game as made popular by right wing nationalist populists. This whataboutism is a peurile argument. All politicians lie. Zille puppets are no different. Deal with it.
It’s election time. The country is just about falling apart People are comparing parties to decide who to vote for and trying to decide what is important ie whataboutism is important wouldn’t you say ? The darling Maverick thinks so doesn’t it ? Though because if their left wing bias they must have a different view of what the conditions ( mentioned below) are. Somehow I think one of the aims of the Daily Maverick would be to rate good journalism high on the list of conditions and good on them for doing so. However like many others I am tired of its journalists intimating I am immoral unless I I think exactly as they do. Sorry I looked at Africa Check. It is a joint effort by journalists from the Daily Maverick The Mail and Guardian Tukkies and others I can’t recall. I can assure you there are things I dislike about the DA but at the moment they are the party ( according me yes ) likely to take us to the conditions when the country just about runs it self no matter what party or coalition runs it. That’s what most people would like I presume and actually pertains to many countries in Europe eg Germany Netherlands Spain Italy and even Greece keeps going through changes of Government which are barely reported That is hardly sycophantic.
Why make a specific attack on the only party capable of good governance DM? Can we see a similar exercise on Durban, or Knysna, or Tshwane/Joburg/Ekhuruleni? Most of them are disgusting messes of out-of-control inept governance. I am desperately hoping the voters of SA do not absorb or share your misgivings of the Western Cape . We need a lot of hope in these elections and only the DAS and Multi Party Charter are able to give us any semblence of positive election outcomes.
so if i read correctly , after all the nits and tits —- the cape is still a better run and a more stable entity than the rest of SA!!…… so do the details really matter? as the overall perfomance is top