South Africa

PARLIAMENT

Lapsed parliamentary question on Ramaphosa’s Rugby World Cup outing trips up accountability

Lapsed parliamentary question on Ramaphosa’s Rugby World Cup outing trips up accountability
Illustrative image | Cyril Ramaphosa, President of South Africa, lifts the The Webb Ellis Cup following the Rugby World Cup Final match between New Zealand and South Africa at Stade de France on 28 October 2023 in Paris. (Photo: Mike Hewitt / Getty Images) | Thandi Modise (Photo: Gallo Images / Brenton Geach)

It’s not without irony that Thandi Modise, former National Assembly speaker and current Defence Minister, scuppered the unprecedented opportunity for Parliament to clear its question slate. But her missing reply on what it cost for President Cyril Ramaphosa to attend the Rugby World Cup final meant this first was missed.

So close and yet so far. With this parliamentary question from DA leader John Steenhuisen now lapsed under Rule 135, no reply is required on the costs of the presidential flights, accommodation, catering and more, or who accompanied President Cyril Ramaphosa on his jaunt to Paris. 

Accountability to Parliament on the presidential trip to the 2023 Rugby World Cup final has been sidestepped – unless the question is asked again.

Curiously, Defence Minister Thandi Modise answered another question on Ramaphosa’s travels – 13 people flew with the president to attend Queen Elizabeth’s funeral in September 2022. 

It also emerged that presidential flights have cost R138,882,918 since April 2018, R19-million of which has accumulated since April 2023.

Presidential travel questions fall to Modise because she’s responsible for the SA National Defence Force, which is responsible for presidential transport. 

Initially, ministers have 10 working days to respond – and if they fail to do so, the parliamentary question lapses, or falls away, 20 working days after the last sitting day in the parliamentary calendar, according to Rule 135. 

That deadline was 9 January 2024.

Police Minister Bheki Cele just made it, signing off on a DA question about his travel costs from June 2019 right on deadline day.

The R1,092,713 spent on Cele’s international travel since mid-2019 includes the R33,256 spent for him to attend the Rugby World Cup final in Paris. 

While his trip was sponsored by “a private company”, according to an earlier parliamentary reply, the travel insurance, ministerial subsistence and travel allowance were not – and his personal assistant’s attendance, aside from sponsored meals and stadium access, cost taxpayers R446,339.

In addition, R2,777,314 was spent on ministerial domestic travel since mid-2019, according to this parliamentary reply to the DA.

Cele’s reply was pretty much the last of the 273 written parliamentary questions that were still outstanding by 19 December 2023.

Read more in Daily Maverick: ANC barely asks parliamentary questions while ministers fail to answer on time

On the morning of 9 January, it was still possible for Parliament to potentially achieve its first cleared question slate. 

“This is the first time in the history of the democratic Parliament that we are on the cusp of ensuring that not one question lapses,” said correspondence on the status of questions seen by Daily Maverick.

But it was not to be – Modise’s parliamentary reply on Ramaphosa’s Rugby World Cup final outing failed to arrive by the 9 January deadline. 

Parliament describes questions – written, but also those asked in the House – as a key accountability and oversight tool. 

Putting questions to the government is one of the ways in which Parliament holds the government to account…”– that’s how the national legislature’s website puts it. But the devil is in the details.

Almost two-thirds of the 4,227 written parliamentary questions, or 2,871, were not answered on time. This signals ministers’ slapdash attitudes to accountability to Parliament – or perhaps party political recalcitrance, as the opposition submitted all but 134 written questions in 2023.

Minister in the Presidency Khumbudzo Ntshavheni was late in answering 38 of her 39 written questions in 2023, according to the National Assembly’s final 2023 questions status report seen by Daily Maverick

Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana answered 106 of his 113 written questions late, while Human Settlements Minister Mmamoloko Kubayi answered 81 of her 89 questions late.

Public Enterprises Minister Pravin Gordhan was late in answering 140 of his 155 written questions in 2023.

Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment Minister Barbara Creecy has one of the better track records – only 14 of 256 written questions put to her were answered late, according to the final parliamentary report.

Parliament has an established track-and-trace system for questions; all ministries have parliamentary liaison officials and National Assembly Speaker Nosiviwe Mapisa-Nqakula interacts with Deputy President Paul Mashatile in his capacity of leader of government business, or liaison between the executive and legislative spheres of state.

Mashatile is on record as saying how, at every Cabinet meeting, outstanding questions are raised on the back of reports compiled from the tracking system.

Aside from getting written questions answered, the quality of replies remains contested and often sharply criticised.

Written questions during 2023 seemed to increasingly invoke issues of security to not reply in detail on, for example, police staffing and training or almost everything related to State Security.

In the House, when opposition MPs raise concerns, the usual reply is that the minister has replied. Finish and klaar.

On that lapsed DA parliamentary question about the presidential Rugby World Cup trip to Paris, the new year brings a new cycle of questions and someone could raise it again. DM

Gallery

Comments - Please in order to comment.

  • Heinrich Holt says:

    In my previous corporate life I had to answer on the spot. In the rare case I had to answer at the next EXCO or Board Meeting I did not dare to be late. How nice would it be if if some of the questions I received could lapse.

  • Martin Kunhardt says:

    What message does that pose to the electorate? If a question is asked in Parliament, the member is under no obligation to respond. Rule 135 is a get-out-of=sticky questions card. What are the requirements regarding parliamentary questions in developed democracies? It seems the ANC has a reason to ride rough shod over our hard fought constitution

  • Geoff Coles says:

    Ignoring Parliamentary questions is a Ramaphosa art and followed by his Ministers

  • Jeff Robinson says:

    I expressed concern about the costs of our president’s attendance at the RWC final and was chastised for challenging what was so “obviously appropriate” (After all, this is rugby we are talking about!!!). I have also twice put the question of the costs to the presidency itself via its website (no reply). A country that is so massively in debt and unable to maintain critical infrastructure must adopt an austerity policy and cease such frivolous expenditure.

    • Scott Gordon says:

      how rude of you challenging the caviar lifestyle !
      how did they get a room at such sort notice , several rooms actually .
      What is an African president without his close entourage ?
      Did Mrs R and the kids go too ?
      For one so rich , could he have not found some more $ bills in the sofa ?
      Funny thing about democracies , all the leaders do so much better than the proletariat they are supposed to represent !
      Have you not heard about the ANC ‘s austerity measures , they do not exist !

  • Rae Earl says:

    This is simply a report which indicates a non-caring display of ANC arrogance. They refuse to answer to criminal wastage of SA citizen’s taxes and they cold- bloodedly ignore the plight of oppressed young people who are in desperate need of financial assistance. The chances of the EFF getting into power or entering into coalition with the ANC after elections would exacerbate this level of arrogance and result in a disaster of unimaginable magnitude for the country.

  • G. Strauss says:

    This all makes my blood boil. Taxpayers fund Ramapromise to go and bask in reflected glory in Paris and he refuses to hold press conferences and stand up to be counted? He’s worse than Zuma.

  • William Kelly says:

    “and his personal assistant’s attendance, aside from sponsored meals and stadium access, cost taxpayers R446,339”
    Says it all really. So glad I am paying my taxes.

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted

X

This article is free to read.

Sign up for free or sign in to continue reading.

Unlike our competitors, we don’t force you to pay to read the news but we do need your email address to make your experience better.


Nearly there! Create a password to finish signing up with us:

Please enter your password or get a sign in link if you’ve forgotten

Open Sesame! Thanks for signing up.

We would like our readers to start paying for Daily Maverick...

…but we are not going to force you to. Over 10 million users come to us each month for the news. We have not put it behind a paywall because the truth should not be a luxury.

Instead we ask our readers who can afford to contribute, even a small amount each month, to do so.

If you appreciate it and want to see us keep going then please consider contributing whatever you can.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options

Premier Debate: Gauten Edition Banner

Gauteng! Brace yourselves for The Premier Debate!

How will elected officials deal with Gauteng’s myriad problems of crime, unemployment, water supply, infrastructure collapse and potentially working in a coalition?

Come find out at the inaugural Daily Maverick Debate where Stephen Grootes will hold no punches in putting the hard questions to Gauteng’s premier candidates, on 9 May 2024 at The Forum at The Campus, Bryanston.

Become a Maverick Insider

This could have been a paywall

On another site this would have been a paywall. Maverick Insider keeps our content free for all.

Become an Insider