South Africa


A new blight befouls South Africa — truth shedding

A new blight befouls South Africa — truth shedding
President Cyril Ramaphosa at the Union Buildings on 20 April 2023 in Pretoria, South Africa. (Photo: Gallo Images / Frennie Shivambu)

While load shedding is a true economic disaster, it pales in comparison with the consequences of truth shedding, which includes South Africa’s embrace of Russia.

In December last year, a Russian cargo ship known to transport munitions, the Lady R, docked at Simon’s Town Naval Base. Unusually, in the dead of night, cargo was loaded on and off the boat.

That was five months ago. Despite the high-profile reporting on the incident and questions to the defence minister, Thandi Modise, in Parliament (dismissed without an answer), President Cyril Ramaphosa would have us believe that he has no idea what was loaded on and off the Lady R. So much so that he has asked a retired judge to investigate. 

Between Russia and a hard place, Ramaphosa’s instinct is to delay, obfuscate and hope it goes away. 

Apparently the option of calling the head of the Simon’s Town Naval Base or the defence minister or both into his office and demanding some straight answers by close of play on the day the story broke is a task beyond Ramaphosa. 

This suggests one of four possibilities:

  1. Ramaphosa was aware that arms had been supplied but chose to kick the can down the road to postpone a direct confrontation and not upset Russia;
  2. Ramaphosa was not aware that arms had been supplied to Russia as he had not been informed due to administrative failings or because the supply was made deliberately without his knowledge by government or external persons;
  3. Arms were not supplied to Russia and US intelligence on this is faulty; or
  4. Something other than armaments were loaded on to the Lady R and the President and his government are too scared/embarrassed to admit what it was.

Option 1 is a strong possibility as this would explain why Ramaphosa has not cleared up the matter despite it being of great public concern for five months. In this scenario, Ramaphosa, knowing that SA’s relationship with the US is fragile, has avoided dealing with the issue to avoid a confrontation. 

Option 2 is also strongly possible as it confirms the growing anarchy which characterises the government, where ministers openly contradict each other while Ramaphosa appears helplessly unable to lay down the law. It is conceivable that an arms transaction took place without his knowledge and with the cooperation of ministers wishing to curry favour with Russia, which has become a source of party funding. It is unlikely that private players outside the government would jeopardise their global sales by indulging Russia, which is heavily sanctioned.

Option 3 is possible as South Africa lacks the type of arms and ammunition that Russia requires for its Ukrainian campaign, in part due to the shrinking of its arms manufacturing capability and in part because of its legacy of using Western systems. 

Option 4 would probably have to be something from a third party dropped off and for collection in Simon’s Town to avoid sanctions. What could that be?

One has to wonder why the government has not said what was loaded on the ship if it were not weapons. Ordering an investigation into the matter  appears strange and evasive.

Russian cargo ship Lady R leaves Simon’s Town harbour. (Photo: Supplied)

Unspeakable incompetence?

Apparently the option of calling the head of the Simon’s Town Naval Base or the defence minister or both into his office and demanding some straight answers by close of play on the day the story broke is a task beyond or below the President.  

This suggests either unspeakable incompetence or a desire to cover up an unspeakable truth. Sadly, the former is a possibility given the government’s recent record of announcing and withdrawing decisions on states of disaster, national orders and other matters. 

But the suspicion must surely fall on the explanation that South Africa helped its “friend” Russia with some ammo for its press-ganged convicts to fire at soldiers and civilians in Ukraine and is now severely embarrassed.

Ramaphosa’s latest bout of dithering was brought about by a statement made by the US Ambassador to South Africa, Reuben Brigety. He said he was “confident” that the Lady R had taken South African weapons and ammunition on board “as it made its way back to Russia”.

Asked how confident, he replied that he would bet his life on it.

“The arming of the Russians is extremely serious, and we do not consider this issue to be resolved,” he said. The revelation had a dramatic effect on the rand, which immediately lost value, plummeting to R19.18 to the US dollar on the day of the announcement. The rand started the year at under R17 to the dollar.

The rand had already been softened up earlier in the day when it was revealed that Eskom had made provision for Stage 16 load shedding. At the moment the utility’s list of possible blackouts only goes up to Stage 8. The country is at present stumbling around in the dark of Stage 6 load shedding, which means that there is no power for 11½ hours a day. The toll on small and large businesses has been tremendous. Stage 16 would amount to an effective shutdown with the barest minimum flickering through the cables that have not been stolen, to avoid a grid collapse.

Read more in Daily Maverick: Lady R in South Africa

Pivoting away from the democratic world

But while load shedding is a true economic disaster, it pales when compared to the consequences of truth shedding, which includes South Africa’s embrace of Russia.

This is a decisive pivot away from the democratic world — including away from the majority of African countries that have consistently protested against Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and towards the authoritarian world inhabited by the likes of Russia, North Korea, Eritrea, Venezuela, Cuba and Iran.

The ANC has, in the past, fantasised about turning South Africa into such a state. It attempted to curb media freedoms using security legislation as a smokescreen and even proposed a government-appointed “media tribunal” where it could mete out punishment to journalists who asked the wrong questions. Those efforts failed when they met with public opprobrium. 

These days, the ANC leaves the dirty work of attacking the media to a plethora of bots and websites which agitate against the West and enjoy the patronage of the likes of the Armscor chairperson, Phillip Dexter.

Incidentally, Dexter recently commented on Twitter: “We look forward to hosting and protecting the President of the Russian Federation. Imperialists and their joke of an ICC be damned. They must first arrest all their war criminals before we take them seriously. Even then we will defend Putin.”

If this was indeed Dexter — the absence of a “blue tick” makes this less certain, although the account was established in 2009 — then there is no need for a retired judge to rouse himself from his beach chair to conduct an inquiry. The chairman of Armscor has, after all, spoken.

What Dexter was referring to was Putin’s looming visit to South Africa for a BRICS summit in August and the issuing of an arrest warrant for the Russian leader by the International Criminal Court (ICC). South Africa, as a signatory to the ICC’s statutes, is obliged by law to arrest Putin, more so because a court made this clear after the government failed to arrest Omar al-Bashir when he visited. (Yes, tyrants are frequent visitors to “democratic” South Africa.)

It is clear that the US is angry and that its ambassador was sending a strong message to South Africa that its days of consequence-free bad behaviour with malign actors are over.

It seems that SA had plenty of opportunity to respond in a manner that would not have resulted in the unusual press conference. The issue was reportedly raised with the national security adviser, Sydney Mufamadi, during his visit to Washington, DC. Pretoria was given time to respond through official channels but the South Africans preferred to bluff it out, supposedly believing that the US would not release satellite-gathered intelligence. If so, one has to ask: Where has the South African government been for the past 20 years? 

Adding to the government’s problems is the fact that most South Africans are against this anti-democratic shift. A survey by The Brenthurst Foundation found that 74.3% of South Africans — and 74% of ANC supporters — believed that Russia’s invasion of Ukraine was “an act of aggression that ought to be condemned”. 

A full 80% of South Africans said it ought to actively support a country invaded by a neighbour militarily, diplomatically or with moral support. This makes perfect sense. South Africans don’t want their country to become some ideological backwater in the orbit of one of the world’s worst human rights abusers. They fought hard to create an open democratic society with accountable government and they are not going to give that up easily.

Paying a stiff price

At the very least, whatever Pretoria’s response, angry or contrite, the damage is done, especially to SA’s already wobbly economy. 

Further costs will be significant, and not just in terms of the immediate impact on the currency. Already the discount on SA mining assets, as an example, is estimated at 35% due to perceived government risk, including from load shedding, and this can only increase. There will be an added fear of trading with SA, not just from a moral perspective, but given the possibility of tech transfer to Russia. 

Then there is the question of what might happen to the African Growth and Opportunity Act (Agoa), which offers duty and quota-free access to SA goods. And if the US had to respond with sanctions against SA individuals, the risk perception would rise and the economic consequences could only get worse. 

Ramaphosa attempted to assert the moral high ground by démarching Brigety, who, according to a government press statement, “admitted that he crossed the line and apologised unreservedly to the Government and the people of South Africa”. The ambassador, however, tweeted after the meeting with Foreign Minister Naledi Pandor: “I was grateful for the opportunity to speak with Foreign Minister Pandor this evening and correct any misimpressions left by my public remarks.”  

This hardly amounts to an apology for the content of his allegations. Whether this amounts to sleight of hand, diplomacy or an attempt to save face by truth shedding by the ANC remains to be seen. 

A clue might lie in Ramaphosa’s announcement this week during Singapore Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s visit about a new African-led peace initiative towards Russia’s war in Ukraine. 

Yet this seems to have little chance of success and is not a new initiative at all.  

It has been around since the end of 2022. It contains a great deal of upside for the Russians (offering a chance to legitimate their action, and freeze the conflict before the imminent Ukrainian offensive) with little downside; and the opposite for the Ukrainians, which is why it has enjoyed only lukewarm backing from the West and Kyiv while apparently having the support of the Russian foreign minister, Sergey Lavrov. 

Three components are necessary for mediation to be successful, at least when viewed through the prism of South Africa’s own experience: 

  • Both sides have to see that there is more to be gained from negotiating than continuing with fighting (not clear in this conflict, at all, and least of all from a Ukrainian perspective);
  • There needs to be uniform pressure placed on the conflicting parties by outside powers (definitely not the case); and
  • There needs to be leadership, timing and method (again, it is questionable why this initiative is happening now, while there are doubts about the mandate of the parties involved).

South Africa’s negotiating credibility is hardly likely to be helped by Pretoria’s close relationship with Russia, in the same way that Pretoria’s voice is hardly seen as neutral by Israelis in mediating an end to the conflict with the Palestinians. If anything, Pretoria’s leadership should warn the other African states as to the unlikelihood of success.  

West has woken up to the truth

Moreover, the ANC government appears pathologically unable or unwilling to face up to facts, including about its relationships with despots. 

At the very least, Washington’s action shows that the West has finally woken up to the realisation that the ANC today is no longer the party of Mandela and Mbeki, but something incompetent at best and more sinister at worst. Either way, it is not a reliable friend and ally, by no means a safe haven for pensioners’ investments and citizens’ tax dollars. 

Pretoria is now to be measured not by the apartheid explanation, but on its own merits. And apparently no longer does the US, in particular, view the ANC through the prism of its own civil rights experience.    

Of course, much depends on the way the ANC government responds. An early indication may be whether Lavrov visits South Africa (again) as planned at the end of May, a trip that will reportedly take in several other southern African states. 

All these countries will have to carefully contemplate the consequences of cosying up to Putin, especially when hoping for the continuing flow of Western inward investment. 

What is certain is that the true costs of the ANC’s ghastly love affair with Putin’s Russia are starting to accrue. Relationships are founded, after all, on shared values and common purpose. 

Around the corner are the cold winds of economic isolation and the Russification of politics through fake news, trolls and bots and, eventually, repression. Ramaphosa appears unable to see this or unwilling to stop it. 

Perhaps, given the winds of political change, he wants it? DM 

Ray Hartley and Greg Mills are with The Brenthurst Foundation.


Comments - Please in order to comment.

  • jcdville stormers says:

    We are starting to face the truth,a freedom fighter group who’s agenda was to steal themselves rich. With no morals

  • jcdville stormers says:

    Bottomline,we have a 100 percent corrupt goverment,zero chance of changing

  • Derek Jones says:

    I cannot imagine how stupid one must feel as a member of the ANC now. By now they have to have realized that they have failed themselves and their people completely. They must now know they have dashed the opportunities they had to forge ahead with education and productivity, only to arrive here, with nothing but misery to look forward to. The public knows it too.

    • Auke Van Der Meulen Van Der Meulen says:

      Not sure if they do realise it yet?

    • sl0m0 za says:

      They do not feel stupid and do not care, as long as their bank accounts keep growing from the plunder. They are not there to govern, but rather to steal

    • Bill Gild says:

      I doubt that the ANC feels stupid – their ideological trajectory (notwithstanding a hugely successful PR campaign since the 1950’s) has been hiding in plain sight for a very long time. No, they are not simply “freedom fighters”; their agenda always has been, and continues to be, Marxist/Leninist, with an inclination to thievery during the past decade or two.

  • Karsten Döpke says:

    Is it possible that electronics/chips were loaded on the LadyR to circumvent western sanctions ? Russia is apparently in need of them for their weapons systems, with a possible a connection to the increasing use of cruise missiles attacks on Ukraine in recent weeks. If this is true, it is arguably even worse then the loading of conventional weapons in Simons Town. It might also explain the relatively small amount loaded (4 containers?) . 4 containers of artillery would be used up very quickly, 4 containers of computer chips could have a much bigger effect.
    If either of the above is true, SA will pay a high price.

    • Rob Fisher says:

      My thought exactly. Armscor (Denel?) still has a lot of high tech ability to build guidance systems. That will leave us in very deep in moral and financial dwang.

    • Peter Slingsby says:

      What happened to the Gupta’s computer company? Perhaps it was the balance-of-stock that we sold to Russia?

  • Robert Pegg says:

    Opposition parties must be clapping their hands at the stupidity of the ANC government. The only people that can possibly support the ANC must be deluded. Mandella must be turning in his grave !

  • Wilhelm Boshoff says:

    Commentators still give CR too much credit. He is the ANC & the ANC is him. He wants what the ANC wants and that is a sure move (not openly – they still want access to the donor sponsored feeding trough) away from the democratic West and a total pivot towards an autocratic suppressive Russia. The dream of all true cadres. Why would they stay in a system where they will eventually loose power through the ballot box? The sooner we stop hoping for a miracle the sooner we can make the right decision for our own futures and that of our children.

    • Petrus Kleinhans says:

      The miracle South Africans should pray for is a credible leader emerging from somewhere who can inspire a nation to unity and to victory over theft and entitlement. Have we seen such a leader emerging yet?

  • Peter Doble says:

    Well we all know the ethics, morals and political alignment of those involved. That almost goes without saying. What is most surprising is that this country actually has the ability or capacity to produce anything that would be remotely useful. Even its own defence is ill-equipped or inoperable!

  • William Kelly says:

    Sadly spot on. Expect to see the freedoms we enjoy being stripped away, slowly one by one. 2024 elections are going to be tight.

  • Walter Spatula says:

    The headline picture sums up our president. #anyonebutramaphosa.

  • Jane Crankshaw says:

    Between the Russians, Chinese and Indians, South Africa has been stripped of its natural resources, morals, reputation and economic stability……the sooner we get rid of BRICS membership and racist BEE policies, the sooner we can stop treading water and get back onto a firmer footing….in my opinion.

  • Yvonne Riester says:

    Too many South Africans cannot think critically or analytically and do not read reputable newspapers and thus will continue voting ANC into power.

  • Rob Glenister says:

    Two most relevant statements:
    1. Ramaphosa was not aware
    2. This suggests either unspeakable incompetence or a desire to cover up an unspeakable truth.

    What more can one expect from RamaDoLittle.

  • Jana Krejci says:

    Didn’t the American ambassador apologized to Minister Pandor for his unverified comment?

  • Richard Bryant says:

    The events of the past 2 weeks has definitely seen a significant shift towards authoritarian. Now that the ANC can no longer bluff where their loyalties lie, and their determination to invite a war criminal to the country as a guest.

    Listen to the tone of Mantashe. He snarls at journalists and now NGOs. His behaviour at the people of the wild coast trying to protect the only valuable thing they have, was telling. He brought in an army and had not trouble in physically abusing people.

    Philip Dexters comments were not rebutted. He is in the position at Denel as an ANC cadre.

    It is clear that if the ANC lose power at the ballot box next year, they won’t go. Putin’s bots will be all over the electoral space stirring trouble through cretins like Zuma. By the time the elections come around, emotions will be high enough to declare a state of emergency manufactured by the ANC. They will effectively suspend the Constitution and then, woe betide us. We can then choose to protest but at the risk of being thrown into a SA jail.

    We need to corner this lot in Parliament with a motion of no confidence in the President and the Executive now. It is clear the President is not interested in fulfilling his Constitutional duties, and is just bluffing us to think he is a good guy.

    For my 10c worth, the goods loaded onto the ship came from Denel and were electronic components or propellant. Either way, they were in support of the Russian military. No question about that.

  • Petrus Kleinhans says:

    4. something other than armaments……
    a sofa or two full of cash??

  • James Miller says:

    The ANC no longer sees itself as accountable to the people (if it ever did). Against the wishes of the majority, they act with impunity, aligning with Russia and the like, shamelessly brushing aside inconvenient questions. As they lose popularity, their contempt for us, the citizens, is becoming more apparent. Their behavior is more autocratic than democratic, and given the stakes, and their control of the military, I fear we’re dreaming if we expect to get rid of them through an election. It’s a scenario which has played out many times in Africa and around the world.

    in control of the military, which puts it’s own interest above that of the country is unlikely to surrender power in the event of an election loss.

  • Brian Doyle says:

    Ramaphosa as usual dodges the question and truth by having an “investigation” into what actually transpired. Opposition parties should have sent their own investigators/delegates down to Simonstown to get to the truth, and should have done that just after the Lady R photographs were posted, especially as they did not get answers to their questions at the time. They are also at fault for sitting on their backsides and not DOING something

  • Aslam Dasoo says:

    “Moreover, the ANC government appears pathologically unable or unwilling to face up to facts, including about its relationships with despots.”
    “And apparently no longer does the US, in particular, view the ANC through the prism of its own civil rights experience.”
    In an otherwise fairly well-argued piece, marred somewhat by thinly-veiled polemic, these two sentences were notable. The SA government has indeed consorted with despots before and since the democratic era, but the first quote eschews the irony that the western paragons openly nurture, coddle, arm and protect despots who are useful to their cause, as well, underscored by the execrably coercive “You are either with us, or you are with the terrorist” refrain.
    It’s realpolitik. So, not much to wag a moral finger at SA on that score.
    On the second, the US Civil Rights struggle was never the prism through which the US viewed SA. If it was, it would not have cynically propped up the Apartheid government during the Cold War, only to pull the rug from under its feet at the end of it and, therefore, forcing it to negotiate an end to Apartheid.
    Government incompetence and ineptitude is rife in SA, no question about that. But the authors’ lack of diligence does not advance understanding as much as it plays into tropes.
    More’s the pity, because DM is celebrated for shining light on new and unknown things, rather than giving voice to what is common cause as though it is revelatory.

  • Gregory Scott says:

    Thank you for such a well-written article, chilling as the contents might be.
    It is scary to think how intellectually challenged the ANC leadership is to not know that “relationships are founded on shared values and common purpose”.
    The only way to explain the lunacy of the trajectory the ANC leadership has chosen to follow is that the long-term cost of isolation/sanction South Africans will pay is not important when compared to the ANC’s short-term need for funding as a political party.
    One can only wonder about the funding that is going to flow into the ANC’s coffers from the Turkish Carpower Ship 20 year deal, a Putin nuclear power deal or a Chinese power deal. Create the disaster and then find a solution through emergency-back-door-procurement-processes with the obligatory corruption, kickbacks etc. Hitachi, Chancellor House, Kusile and Medupi seem to ring a bell me thinks!
    Makes you think

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted


This article is free to read.

Sign up for free or sign in to continue reading.

Unlike our competitors, we don’t force you to pay to read the news but we do need your email address to make your experience better.

Nearly there! Create a password to finish signing up with us:

Please enter your password or get a sign in link if you’ve forgotten

Open Sesame! Thanks for signing up.

We would like our readers to start paying for Daily Maverick...

…but we are not going to force you to. Over 10 million users come to us each month for the news. We have not put it behind a paywall because the truth should not be a luxury.

Instead we ask our readers who can afford to contribute, even a small amount each month, to do so.

If you appreciate it and want to see us keep going then please consider contributing whatever you can.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options