NEWSFLASH
UCT investigation into vice-chancellor and Council chair finally gets under way
Almost four months after the Council of the University of Cape Town resolved to investigate governance concerns at UCT, a probe has finally begun. The four-member panel is chaired by retired judge Lex Mpati.
An independent investigation into the governance crisis at UCT, exposed via Daily Maverick reporting in October 2022, is finally under way.
The investigation was initially envisaged as completing its report by 31 December 2022, but its work was delayed by a series of acrimonious Council meetings and the unavailability of one of the nominated panellists.
On Thursday, UCT announced that a special Council meeting of 31 January 2023 had decided on a panel chaired by retired judge Lex Mpati, featuring fellow retired judge Azhar Cachalia, public sector governance expert Trish Hanekom and Wits transformation head Bernadette Johnson.
Justice Lex Mpati. (Photo: Gallo Images / Phill Magakoe)
Panel will investigate vice-chancellor and Council chair
The panel is to investigate the conduct of UCT Vice-Chancellor Mamokgethi Phakeng and UCT Council Chair Babalwa Ngonyama, who are alleged to have misled the university Senate over the departure of former deputy vice-chancellor Lis Lange.
It is also seized with “all matters related to executive relationships, including the number of, and reasons for, resignations of staff within and outside the executive”, UCT stated on Thursday.
Visit Daily Maverick’s home page for more news, analysis and investigations
As originally reported by Daily Maverick last year, UCT has seen a sustained exodus of senior administrative staff under the leadership of Phakeng — a polarising figure whose social media activity has been a reliable source of consternation to many observers.
The panel “is authorised to interview current and former members of staff and also current and previous members of UCT’s Council,” the university stated.
“The panel will approach potential witnesses and encourage witnesses who are able to assist the panel to avail themselves for this purpose.”
Issue of NDAs remains critical
Thursday’s statement made no mention of the issue of non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) — but Daily Maverick understands that during late 2022’s heated Council meetings over the terms of reference of the investigation, it was agreed that former UCT executives would be freed from NDAs when it came to speaking to the panel.
This is believed to be a critical aspect of assembling a full picture of events at the university over the past few years, as the increasing use of NDAs has meant enforced silence from the executives leaving UCT.
News24 previously reported that the panel would have access to all necessary university documents, including a list of departures of senior staff from 2018 onwards.
No explicit timeframes given for the panel’s work
UCT’s Thursday statement did not contain any deadlines by which the investigative panel was expected to conclude its work, though it noted that the panel had formally begun its task.
“The panel will report to the UCT Council at the conclusion of its work. Updates relating to the work of the panel will be provided from time to time,” it stated.
Though the crux of the governance issues exposed in 2022 revolved around UCT’s administrative staff, 2023 has kicked off with the heat now emanating from the institution’s academics.
A late January strike by UCT’s teaching staff was narrowly averted by negotiations after the university’s Academics Union objected to a proposed 3% salary increase. It would have been the first academic strike in UCT’s history. DM
Become an Insider
I brought the UCT Lecturers’ Association and the UCT Academics’ Association together as a single active political and salary negotiating body in about 1984. We also made sure that men and women academics enjoyed the same conditions of service with regard to pay and pensions. This was done with the support of the VC, Stuart Saunders, and the Registrar, Hugh Amoore. It is now very saddening indeed to see people leaving UCT after being compelled to sign Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs). My profound hope is that the enquiry into the actions of the VC and Chair of Council will produce results that can be acted upon to improve the lives of people who work for that outstanding and much-loved university – UCT.
Maybe “much loved”, but “outstanding”….?
The absence of a deadline for the panel to complete its work guarantees an excessively prolonged (and expensive) process, by the conclusion of which most observers and analysts will surely have lost sight – and memory – of the critical issues underlying the necessity for the enquiry.