Defend Truth

POWER CRISIS

DA heads to court to block 18.65% Eskom tariff hike amid rolling blackouts

DA heads to court to block 18.65% Eskom tariff hike amid rolling blackouts
Luyanda Makhathini uses a paraffin light while cooking during rolling blackouts at her home in Soweto. (Photo: Reuters / Siphiwe Sibeko)

Resistance to Eskom’s load shedding and tariff hikes is growing, with the DA announcing a legal bid on Tuesday seeking to interdict energy regulator Nersa’s decision to grant Eskom a 18.65% tariff hike for the 2023/24 financial year and 12.74% for the next, heralding pain for consumers subjected to intermittent power supply.

Leader of the opposition John Steeinhuisen announced on Tuesday afternoon that he had instructed party lawyers to immediately apply to the High Court of South Africa for an interdict, to stop the tariff increase.  

He said the time “for writing letters and for government talkshops” and for “begging this government” was over, and “it’s now time to take this government head-on”.  

The announcement came hours after several politicians and business people, in a legal letter, instructed a legal team to demand that the government and Eskom stop cutting the country’s power, as well as compensation for the catastrophic damage caused by rolling blackouts. If it failed to do so, they would meet in court.  

Read in Daily Maverick: “Gatvol citizens threaten Eskom and government with legal action, demand stop to rolling blackouts” 

Steenhuisen echoed similar sentiments and said his party not only rejected the tariff hike, but also Stage 6 blackouts and the government’s poor response to “the biggest crisis our country has faced in three decades of our democracy”.  

In its papers, the DA seeks to interdict the implementation of the tariff hike pending the following relief:  

  • To have Nersa’s decision of 12 January 2023 declared inconsistent with the Constitution, and to have it declared invalid and set aside;
  • To have the ongoing and repeated decisions to implement load shedding declared inconsistent with the Constitution and therefore invalid, and for these decisions to be set aside. These include the disastrous load reduction;
  • To have the government’s response to the energy crisis declared inconsistent with the Constitution and invalid; and
  • Regarding the government’s response to the crisis, to have it declared as having having failed to respect, protect and fulfil the rights contained in the Bill of Rights, thereby limiting the rights of citizens to human dignity, the right to life, the right to an environment that is not harmful to health and well-being, the rights of access to healthcare services, the right to have access to sufficient water, the right to basic education and the right to access courts.

Steenhuisen said they would also ask that the court direct the government to file, within 30 days, a comprehensive and measurable plan, including short-term, mid-term and long-term steps, to avert this energy crisis.  

Residents talk on the main street of  Masiphumelele in Cape Town, with vehicle lights the only illumination during rolling blackouts on 18 March 2019. (Photo: EPA-EFE / Nic Bothma)

“It has become abundantly clear that this government will not act in the interests of the citizens of this country, including protecting them from blackouts… unless they are compelled by a court of law to do so.”    


Visit Daily Maverick’s home page for more news, analysis and investigations


In a hybrid media briefing on the President’s public programme, presidential spokesperson Vincent Magwenya said Cyril Ramaphosa was engaged in critical meetings aimed at “urgent measures that can be undertaken in order to mitigate against the impact of load shedding”.  

Quizzed on the President’s view on the tariff hike, Magwenya said Ramaphosa was aware, from a consumer perspective, of the pain of having to pay more for power that is intermittent in its availability.   

Read in Daily Maverick: “Eskom gets tariff hike while Ramaphosa ‘deeply regrets’ Stage 6 rolling blackouts” 

Ramaphosa, who was scheduled to attend the World Economic Forum’s meeting in Davos, cancelled the trip so he could remain in the country to deal with the electricity crisis.  

The country was plunged into darkness on 11 January after Eskom announced the implementation of Stage 6 blackouts “continually until further notice” due to severe capacity constraints.  

Eskom spokesperson Sikonathi Mantshantsha said the utility would reduce this to stages 4 and 5 from Tuesday.

In addition to the legal bid, Steenhuisen said the DA would forge ahead with its anti-load shedding march to the ruling party’s headquarters in Johannesburg, Luthuli House. 

People walk home in complete darkness during a blackout in Meadowlands, Soweto, on 9 March 2022. (Photo: Felix Dlangamandla / Daily Maverick)

“It is clear that our president is unwilling and unprepared to catch up to the corrupt and inept in his own party who are holding us back from putting power into our energy grid. It is not good enough to simply sit back now and expect this government that has made hollow promises since 2007, to address this crisis, to do anything concrete about it,” he added,  

“We have a president who does a lot, but he does very little. And that is why we are now calling on all South Africans to unite on this key issue, to stand up and show this government that we are not prepared to pay the premium for their corruption, their maladministration and their poor policy choices.” DM

Gallery

Comments - Please in order to comment.

  • betsy Kee says:

    Is this not just more talk? And will cluttering the courts really achieve anything? The ANC- led government does not strike one as an institution that respects the rule of law, let alone have concerns for the common man.

  • Rod Bulman says:

    It’s one thing to moan and complain and even march and launch court proceedings to score political points; it’s a totally different matter to offer feasible, responsible, costed alternatives.
    It’s time for the DA to ditch the former and take up the latter.

    • Alan Watkins says:

      If you believe that the DA and many others, including energy experts have not offered ” feasible, responsible, costed alternatives, then you really have not been concentrating.

  • Derek Jones says:

    The people running the government must be forced to do their job properly when they have been proven to be corrupt and useless. It is not rocket science. The constitution is there to protect us, if the courts cannot hold the guilty and corrupt to account then we have nothing here to look forward to at all.

  • Penny Philip says:

    This is the way to go. There are too many people making an obscene amount of money from Eskom being in a state of emergency.

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted

X

This article is free to read.

Sign up for free or sign in to continue reading.

Unlike our competitors, we don’t force you to pay to read the news but we do need your email address to make your experience better.


Nearly there! Create a password to finish signing up with us:

Please enter your password or get a sign in link if you’ve forgotten

Open Sesame! Thanks for signing up.

We would like our readers to start paying for Daily Maverick...

…but we are not going to force you to. Over 10 million users come to us each month for the news. We have not put it behind a paywall because the truth should not be a luxury.

Instead we ask our readers who can afford to contribute, even a small amount each month, to do so.

If you appreciate it and want to see us keep going then please consider contributing whatever you can.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options

Daily Maverick Elections Toolbox

Download the Daily Maverick Elections Toolbox.

+ Your election day questions answered
+ What's different this election
+ Test yourself! Take the quiz