Maverick Citizen

Maverick Citizen OP-ED

Time to address the struggles of black learners in private and former white public schools

Pretoria Girls High School pupils during protest against alleged racism and intimidation at the school on August 29, 2016 in Pretoria, South Africa. There has been a huge social media outcry after pupils of the school reported that they were told their afro hair makes uniform look untidy and were barred from doing hairstyles that were inherently African. (Photo by Gallo Images / Sowetan / Alon Skuy)

As a black/brown womxn and lawyer, I have worked within the hallowed halls of liberal, legal academia and languished miserably as a member of that elite society of advocates of the Bar.  Through this, I have observed and experienced the impact of the absence of institutional transformation in spaces that are formally the preserve of whiteness.  That is a story for another day. For now, as we commemorate Youth Day on 16 June, this is a call to elite and middle-class private schools and former white public schools to provide spaces where all our youth can belong.

Faranaaz Veriava is Head of Education at SECTION27. She previously worked at Idasa and headed the Western Cape office of the South African Human Rights Commission. Veriava was a founder of the Education Law Project at the Centre for Applied Legal Studies at Wits University and also worked as an advocate of the Johannesburg Bar.

On 16 June 1976, 20,000 pupils walked out of their schools in Soweto protesting against the imposition of Afrikaans as the language of instruction in African schools and demanding an equal education. Police responded with teargas and live bullets, leading to the massacre of hundreds of pupils. The protests that began on that day would be the renewed catalyst in the struggle against racial inequality until democracy was won.

Today, so many years later, despite the desegregation of schools, educational inequality, with racial and class bias, persists. Poor, primarily black learners continue to attend under-resourced schools to attain a substandard education. The primary focus for education rights advocacy in public interest organisations such as SECTION27 has therefore been about ensuring equal educational quality for learners attending these schools. This struggle is far from won.

There is however another education struggle that our youth are demanding we pay better attention to. This is the ongoing struggle of black learners attending elite and middle-class private schools and former white public schools. Because public interest organisations cannot always direct scarce resources to addressing the transformation issues at these schools, it is incumbent on parents and educators to do this more proactively.

Black learners attending elite and middle-class private schools and former white public schools experience racism, other forms of discrimination and alienation in myriad and often subtle guises. To survive at these schools, learners must assimilate to archaic cultural norms or risk having their identities and conduct questioned, if not pathologised, in ways that other learners do not experience.  

As parents, we recognise this injustice and complain about it amongst each other, but we nevertheless coax our children to conform and assimilate while simultaneously preaching independent thought and pushing for academic excellence.  As a parent, I too am guilty of this.  This is because we fear the alternative — exile to a substandard public education system in an increasingly competitive and saturated job market. At another, perhaps unconscious level, we feel we must be grateful that our children attend these schools with their sprawling fields and impressive structures that we once could only admire from afar.

In 2015, the Gauteng Department of Education investigated a Curro Holdings School that was reported for racially suspect practices including segregating classrooms by race, hiring all-white teaching staff, and not including African languages as part of the school’s curriculum.  

In August 2016, black learners at Pretoria High School for Girls received nationwide attention for protesting against institutional racism at the school.  Their main complaint was in respect of the implementation by the school of its Code of Conduct, in particular its policy on hairstyles.  Shortly after this, SECTION27 was approached by a group of dynamic young womxn to address a similar complaint at another school.  SECTION27 successfully mediated the conflict through a change in the Code of Conduct without much fanfare.   

In 2017, St John’s College came under fire for its failure to properly discipline an educator for racist remarks he made towards black, Indian and Greek learners. SECTION27 was approached for advice from a group of parents but chose to remain out of the fray because the parents were well resourced to advocate for themselves. 

Last month, Cornwall Hill College in Pretoria publicly apologised to learners and parents for the delay in transforming the school. This apology followed eloquent protests from the learners and an equally impressive display of solidarity from parents including the Governor of the South African Reserve Bank, Lesetja Kganyago. The pupils’ memorandum of concerns was lengthy, documenting the daily experiences of learners subjected to microaggressions with comments about their appearance and hair. It raised concerns about the lack of diversity at all levels of the school including the lack of representation on the board of directors. It also noted the preferential treatment of some sports like rugby over others such as soccer.    

These are the most public cases but there are many more instances.  There are also the statements and acts of unconscious bias that shame our children and which make them feel “less than”, which they struggle to name or understand. The kinds of statements that tell a child he carries himself, “as if he belongs in a public school” (as if that is something to be ashamed of) or the disparities in punitive sanctions that, on close scrutiny, expose a racial bias. An ongoing complaint from learners challenging transformation in schools is that black learners tend to be punished more severely than their white counterparts. It is interesting that research into corporal punishment practices prior to it being banned reveals that while corporal punishment was used in boys’ schools — both black and white — white girls’ schools were not exposed to corporal punishment, but black girls’ schools were.

Certain private schools, in their own constitutions, declare their commitment to the South African Constitution, but such declarations do not always translate into practice. The Constitution with its vision of equality, non-racialism and non-discrimination, together with an ever-evolving progressive and transformative education jurisprudence, should be the lodestar for transformation charters that many schools are now developing.  

In addition to race, private schools and indeed all schools, are prohibited from unfairly discriminating against learners, on a number of other grounds, including gender, sex, marital status, ethnic or social origin, colour, sexual orientation, disability, religion, conscience, belief, culture, language and birth.    

Our developing jurisprudence is addressing discrimination in its many forms as its manifests in an education context. This includes learners demanding accommodation for their religious and cultural practices in schools codes of conduct; learners with disabilities demanding accommodation and equal provisioning; and LGBTQ learners demanding accommodation in respect of uniform requirements. 

A transformative education jurisprudence has also addressed authoritarian forms of discipline, requiring schools to move away from corporal punishment towards having respect for the dignity and freedom of pupils. 

Most recently, our education jurisprudence tackled head-on the tendency of private schools to contract out of their constitutional obligations.   

The high court case Mhlongo v John Wesley School and the Constitutional Case of AB v Pridwin Preparatory School shared the commonality that the private schools in each of these cases attempted to rely on a termination clause in the contracts that allowed private schools to expel learners from the school without due process. The latter judgment notes that: “[I]ndependent schools cannot be enclaves of power immune from constitutional obligations”.

Clear principles have been established in these cases that must be seeped into the institutional fabric of private school practices. These are the best interests of the child principle in terms of section 28(2) and the right to basic education in section 29 of the Constitution and, finally but importantly, the principle that private schools cannot maintain standards inferior to that of comparable public schools. The consequence of these cases and principles that derive from these cases is that learners cannot be suspended or expelled without being afforded the opportunity to be heard prior to a suspension or expulsion.  Nor can private schools impose practices that would be clearly unlawful at public schools. This includes the meting out of corporal punishment or suspensions that are longer than that legally permissible at public schools.  

In short, schools must go beyond simply stating their commitment to the Constitution. Schools would do well to review their codes of conduct and align their transformation codes in accordance with our education jurisprudence.  

We are finally beginning to see educators who resemble wider society trickle into leadership positions at these schools. Black professional parents are also being wooed onto the governing boards of these schools so as to make the governance at these schools more diverse in their governing practices and to ensure transformation.  Educators and parents must meet the challenge of transformation at their schools rather than be absorbed into the old norms and practices.

James Baldwin has said, “A child cannot be taught by anyone who despises him [or her].” So, when we witness our children struggle with alienation or when they are brave and push for change, let us stand with them. After all, they are becoming who we want them to be, even when we are afraid for them. DM/MC

Faranaaz Veriava is the head of the Education Rights programme at SECTION27.

Gallery

Comments - share your knowledge and experience

Please note you must be a Maverick Insider to comment. Sign up here or sign in if you are already an Insider.

Everybody has an opinion but not everyone has the knowledge and the experience to contribute meaningfully to a discussion. That’s what we want from our members. Help us learn with your expertise and insights on articles that we publish. We encourage different, respectful viewpoints to further our understanding of the world. View our comments policy here.

All Comments 13

    • Brian : you need to understand the difference between DM articles and visitor articles. Sometimes the best remedy is lots of free rope and a spotlight. Either way, blocking your ears is never a remedy.

  • You do these children no good by focussing on victim hood. Dealing with adversity, however unjust, is a life lesson in becoming victors.
    That is not to say that overt racism should not be called out but it does say that attitude is everything.

  • I was frequently bullied at school; no micro-aggression, but the real thing including head-locks and being pushed to the ground. I told nobody, I never complained because that would only have made it worse. I lived with it, and here I am, all grown up now, a few scars here and there, but all is well 🙂

    • That being said, I have every sympathy for those who are being bullied or discriminated against. I am sorry that you have to go through this.

  • As a 57 old whyte mxn I do not understand your challenges as a born-free black womxn advocate. I do know 57y and 75y old black womxn that could summarize you in short sharp sentences you will not like.

  • Interesting article Faranaaz.
    As a lawyer you obviously have to think legally, but your article is about culture, and the culture already instilled in schools. The mixture of legal and cultural ideas feels unthought-through and has clearly triggered some DM readers who feel your article as a rejection despite you clearly trying to show that you do not. I’m not convinced that you will get the inclusive, celebratory culture that it feels like you are after by using legally delineating thought. Heartfelt investment with clarity of mind would probably move this goal forward better. As you say, kids don’t learn well when they don’t feel loved, so as much as I can feel this behind what you are trying to say, it unfortunately seems hidden by the lawyer in you. It does make me grateful that education is still in the hands of teachers who mostly understand how to love our children appropriately.

  • Thanks for the call to action on transformation. Judging by the derogatory responses, there’s much work to do! That’s what jaded elite education does – it produces cynical bigots.

  • Faranaaz, your first paragraph is powerful. Who is responsible for this situation? The ANC. They did not learn from their previous masters. Look what they did. They created there own schools with their own culture. My Granddaughter who was staying with us to complete her schooling here at a good private school, was bullied so much that she left and is now in London. She was bullied by jealous black girls because she was very friendly with a couple of black boys.
    We need to concentrate on suitable education, that would lead to value added employment, but that is not the policy of our governing party!

  • I cannot see how preferring rugby over soccer can be considered racist? Some schools still play hockey-others don’t. Surely it is a matter to be decided by each school?