X

This is not a paywall.

Register for free to continue reading.

We made a promise to you that we’ll never erect a paywall and we intend to keep that promise. We also want to continually improve your reading experience and you can help us do that by registering with us. It’s quick, easy and will cost you nothing.



Nearly there! Create a password to finish up registering with us:


Please enter your password or get a login link if you’ve forgotten


Open Sesame! Thanks for registering.

First Thing, Daily Maverick's flagship newsletter

Join the 230 000 South Africans who read First Thing newsletter.

We'd like our readers to start paying for Daily Maverick

More specifically, we'd like those who can afford to pay to start paying. What it comes down to is whether or not you value Daily Maverick. Think of us in terms of your daily cappuccino from your favourite coffee shop. It costs around R35. That’s R1,050 per month on frothy milk. Don’t get us wrong, we’re almost exclusively fuelled by coffee. BUT maybe R200 of that R1,050 could go to the journalism that’s fighting for the country?

We don’t dictate how much we’d like our readers to contribute. After all, how much you value our work is subjective (and frankly, every amount helps). At R200, you get it back in Uber Eats and ride vouchers every month, but that’s just a suggestion. A little less than a week’s worth of cappuccinos.

We can't survive on hope and our own determination. Our country is going to be considerably worse off if we don’t have a strong, sustainable news media. If you’re rejigging your budgets, and it comes to choosing between frothy milk and Daily Maverick, we hope you might reconsider that cappuccino.

We need your help. And we’re not ashamed to ask for it.

Our mission is to Defend Truth. Join Maverick Insider.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options

SA government makes almost 900 farms available for emer...

Business Maverick

BUSINESS MAVERICK

SA government makes almost 900 farms available for emerging farmers

The authors argue that data from countries where Agra is actively focused have seen continued poverty and as much as a 30% rise in food insecurity. (Photo: Waldo Swiegers/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

The South African government has made almost 900 farms available for emerging farmers to lease on underutilised or vacant state land. The government is offering 30-year leaseholds, with an option to buy, which raises the old issue about how these farmers can raise finance without collateral.

Agriculture Minister Thoko Didiza made the announcement on Thursday, 1 October that over the next two weeks, the government will issue advertising notices for 896 farms on 700,000ha of underutilised or vacant state land. The plots in question are found in all provinces with the exceptions of Gauteng and the Western Cape. 

The process unsurprisingly involves reams of red tape. 

The District Beneficiary Screening Committee will screen the applications, which, in turn, will make recommendations to the Provincial Technical committees (PTC). The PTCs will review these and then submit them to the National Selection and Approval Committee for approval. Applications who don’t make the grade can turn to the Land Allocation Appeals Committee.

South Africa’s efforts at land reform, which aim to rectify enduring racial disparities in ownership, have generally been regarded as a flop. This is, in part, because of the bureaucracy involved, which is overseen by a state clearly lacking capacity. 

This is one of the points driven home by Wandile Sihlobo in his insightful book on land reform, Finding Common Ground, where he details cases of prospective emerging farmers who gave up after waiting years only to discover their applications had not been processed.

Book Review: Finding common ground on land reform after Covid-19

The convoluted process for the almost 900 farms being made available this time around has relatively short timelines. In total, it should take about eight weeks to process and approve applications. A cynic might suggest not holding your breath, but let’s see eight weeks after the closure date for applications if this is indeed the case. 

Potential corruption in this process is another concern, but Didiza, in response to questions from the media on the issue, made the usual ANC commitments to rooting it out. 

A lack of training and experience has also been widely cited as a reason behind the failure of many emerging farmers to make a go of what is a very tough and demanding business. 

“All beneficiaries who have been allocated state land and signed lease agreements will be subjected to a compulsory training programme. The training programme will include entry-level training on the commodity of their choice, basic record keeping, and basic financial management as well as enterprise development,” the Department of Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development said in a statement. Such a move is clearly welcome, but delivery remains to be seen. 

The government will undertake quarterly inspections by the Land Administration unit, and annual reports will be written up for the minister. In the past, there has also often been a lack of oversight, which raises the question about the department’s ability to do so now. 

Then there is the matter of the 30-year leasehold with the option to buy. This is a big red flag over an issue which has bedevilled the land reform process from the get-go. How can farmers raise finance without a title deed that allows them to use their land and infrastructure as collateral? The Department of Agriculture said in its statement that a “credit management system will be put in place to manage debt recovery and management”. But it all remains fairly vague at this point. And given the blowout in government finances caused by the Covid-19 pandemic and subsequent economic meltdown, the state certainly does not have much in the way of resources to support emerging farmers. 

It will be interesting to see in a year’s time how much of this land is on its way to becoming productive and commercially viable, and how much of it will remain underused. BM/DM

Gallery

Comments - share your knowledge and experience

Please note you must be a Maverick Insider to comment. Sign up here or sign in if you are already an Insider.

Everybody has an opinion but not everyone has the knowledge and the experience to contribute meaningfully to a discussion. That’s what we want from our members. Help us learn with your expertise and insights on articles that we publish. We encourage different, respectful viewpoints to further our understanding of the world. View our comments policy here.

All Comments 5

  • I would like other political parties to give the land to the farm with a productivity clause built into the title deed of the land. If the land is unproductive for a season it reverts back to the state who can give it to someone else.

  • They’d be better off giving them to big commercial farmers to develop, with the leaseholder as a tenant farmer. The annual quota would serve as payment so that it would operate as a 30 year bond. The government’s not capable of managing anything, and this least of all. It never has been.

  • The accompanying photo of soil blowing in the wind as a huge tractor and disc plough trundle across burnt crop residues strikes terror in my heart. Conservation of the soil and other natural resources is even more important than productivity. Without education of sustainable farming methods there can be no long-term success.

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted