Dailymaverick logo

Opinionistas

This article is an Opinion, which presents the writer’s personal point of view. The views expressed are those of the author/authors and do not necessarily represent the views of Daily Maverick.

Why punish the children of 2025 for the apartheid sins of their parents?

I cannot remain silent when Bidvest runs a bursary programme ‘only for black, coloured and Indian’ children. It brings back all the pain and sorrow of the past.

Bidvest’s recent handling of its bursary scheme deeply unsettles me. The company has a bursary programme for students from grades 4 to 12. The bursary covers school fees, stationery, school uniforms and assistance with extra classes. Full-time employees earning less than R15,300 per month before deductions may apply.

However, the programme is only for black, coloured or Indian employees. White employees’ children are explicitly excluded.

It reminds me of the day I was chased out of the post office because the child in me was too naïve to see the “whites only” notice. The door for coloured people was at the back.

It also reminded me of the time when I had to wait for the train as a student at the University of the Western Cape, but couldn’t sit on the bench that had the words “for whites only” written on it.

I vowed to myself that I would do everything in my power to prevent any child from being hurt like that again. If it hadn’t been for a good Samaritan who took care of me when I was a poor student so that I could receive a bursary, I would not be in the position to write this article today.

In its defence, Bidvest states that the trust was established in 2003 as part of a corporate social investment structure that formed part of a consortium for black economic empowerment. They further argue that in accordance with the principles and philosophy of the Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Act 53 of 2003, the trust was established with the sole purpose of uplifting historically disadvantaged individuals who are employees of the Bidvest Group.

It has been in operation for 22 years and has been very successful in changing the lives of their employees and their families, states a release from the company’s communications firm.

With regards to the success of the programme, I will not argue, and I want to give Bidvest credit for the fact that 22 years ago it was indeed important to uplift historically disadvantaged black people.

However, this is not what is being discussed here. On its website, the company states that they want to make a meaningful “impact on society” in a way that is “innovative” and that the company is “influenced by the context within which it operates”. They want to do this in a “unique and resilient” way within an adaptable structure.

The board members of Bidvest will agree with me that the circumstances today look significantly different than 22 years ago. After 30 years of a democratic order, the playing field is completely different.

Today you find poor children across a wide spectrum of South African society. It is no longer restricted to just black children. As vice-dean at the University of Stellenbosch’s Faculty of Education, it was my task to administer bursaries. I am also involved in the Foundation for Empowerment through Afrikaans (Stigting vir Bemagtiging deur Afrikaans, SBA) Honours programme and Rapport’s education bursary fund.

Over the past 20 years I have seen how our financial landscape has changed. Poverty knows – unlike 22 years ago – no colour. Students who are dependent on bursaries have increased among all families.

Therefore, no student should be disadvantaged. The only criterion should be whether the child qualifies for the bursary and whether or not their parents can afford their studies.

Also, the context in which the company currently operates differs from when the bursary scheme was established. Today, all employees can progress to the boardroom.

I would really like to know how Bidvest looks its staff in the eye knowing that the company has failed to help all the needy children. What impact does this have on healthy relationships in the boardroom when employees who earn the same do not receive equal treatment?

I acknowledge the terms of the trust that was established 22 years ago, but surely a company that prides itself on being adaptable and innovative could have made a plan to start a new bursary scheme from which all its employees can benefit?

Nelson Mandela once said: “Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world.” These words of Madiba emphasise the transformative potential of education and highlight the critical role that education plays in promoting social, economic and political change. It is time for all of us – including Bidvest – to act on Madiba’s words.

Therefore, I could not remain silent when Bidvest ran a bursary programme “only for black, coloured and Indian” children. It brings back all the pain and sorrow of the past.

Children of 2025 had no part in South Africa’s apartheid past. Why punish them for the sins of their forefathers?

All children have dreams. All children are born in innocence. It is adults who raise children to be racists. After 30 years of democracy, it’s time for us to banish words like whites, blacks, coloureds and Indians from our vocabulary. They do not belong in a democratic dispensation.

According to their website, Bidvest deems all forms of discrimination based on race as illegal and they will not tolerate it. Furthermore, the company says: “We do the right thing, even when no one else is looking.”

To this, I can only say: Put your money where your mouth is. DM

Comments (10)

Donald bemax Jul 23, 2025, 07:43 AM

I cannot agree more..This gentleman should run for President

mpadams10@gmail.com Jul 23, 2025, 08:34 AM

Thank you. SA needs more mature thinkers like Mr Le Cordeur. Times have changed. SA is proud of besting apartheid peacefully. So why the continued reverse colour exclusion 3 decades later? It is immoral to close down the opportunities of any child (or person) based on the colour of their skin.

Kbcmotshegwa Jul 23, 2025, 10:13 AM

Race-based bursaries aren’t about “punishing” white children, they’re redress for structural inequality that still benefits white South Africans today. It’s not about guilt, it’s about math, correcting access gaps that remain decades after apartheid “ended.”

jcf.7140 Jul 23, 2025, 03:04 PM

The redress has been ongoing for more than 3 decades. Sadly though, its implementation under the 'great' liberation movement has been poor, at best. I agree with you that inequality is still rife in our country, but until when should race-based programs be practiced? Another 30 years or so? These BEE programs and discrimination based on skin color are creating a new, vicious cycle of racism in younger people, which we can ill afford.

Kbcmotshegwa Jul 23, 2025, 10:16 AM

White students make up under 8% of the population but hold over 60% of skilled jobs. Black and Coloured youth face the highest dropout and unemployment rates. Equity isn’t reverse racism, it’s a long-overdue course correction. Avg white household wealth: R3m. Black households: R90k. Coloured households: under R400k. This isn’t “the past”, it’s now. Ending targeted bursaries just preserves this divide under the illusion of fairness.

megapode Aug 28, 2025, 11:27 AM

This is true. What is frustrating for everybody, I think, is that these divisions have persisted for so long. Admittedly, changing that dynamic was never going to happen quickly. And it still won't.

Kbcmotshegwa Jul 23, 2025, 10:17 AM

Only 9% of Black South Africans and 13% of Coloureds over 20 have post-school qualifications. For whites? 38%. That’s why race-based bursaries exist. It’s not punishment. It’s basic justice. Poverty affects all races, yes, but not equally. 64% of Black people live in poverty vs just 1% of whites. Saying “poverty has no colour” erases the very system that created this imbalance.

Beverley Roos-Muller Jul 23, 2025, 03:42 PM

White-blindness never ends....I constantly hear my white cohorts complaining about almost everything except the structural and legal framework of apartheid that still keeps us whites in the top percentile of everything. It's as if it either never existed (including white's massive corruption) or they are unaware that generational disadvantage takes decades, perhaps centuries, to overcome. We still don't have equality in land distribution. I support your comments, Candice.

Kbcmotshegwa Jul 23, 2025, 10:18 AM

When a professor ignores structural inequality to frame bursaries as “punishment,” it’s not ignorance, it’s denial. With all that education, he still confuses redress with revenge. Disappointing, but not surprising.

Miles Japhet Jul 23, 2025, 04:09 PM

Candice, you seem to think that works. There is no successful record of social engineering working. Bantu tribes who moved down from the North were as much colonialists as the Europeans - so no moral high ground there. I am no defender of the evil of apartheid, but Europeans were advantaged by the centuries of innovation and development and were always in a position to out compete the people they found here. Appoint on merit, grow the economy and provide opportunity not entitlement.

David Kramer Jul 23, 2025, 12:53 PM

SA's Sydney Brenner: Nobel Prize, Medicine. He co-discovered mRNA, building block of covid vaccines(not his Nobel). He was Singapore's 1st honorary citizen, for setting up it's research capacity, especially biotechnology worth 30US$ billion/year today. He received Japan's Order of the Rising Sun, 1st Class. He set up OIST Japan's (and world's) leading scietific research institute. His father was illiterate shoemaker. He almost never went to university. Bidvest wouldn't have helped!

Johan Greyling Jul 23, 2025, 04:17 PM

Racism is racism and when I fought against it I never thought I will be saddled with it again in a new dispensation. The thing that worries me is the perception that is created that certain races are inferior and should be treated like they are in special schools or institutions. You treat people like victims and they will for ever be victims. No wonder there is no pride and insentive to use your God given gifts.

Eckart Schumann Jul 23, 2025, 05:49 PM

Of course, the question to ask Bidvest is how do they determine race? As an example, the last apartheid president, FW de Klerk, was descended from an Indian slave. So was Paul Kruger. So does Bidvest consider their descendants to be 'white' or 'coloured'? Especially when they classify themselves as 'Other', according to the official racial classifications options?

megapode Aug 28, 2025, 10:56 AM

Colour is still a strong proxy for disadvantage and for advantage. Stats repeatedly show that white SAns are better off in every measurable way, especially better earnings and a significantly lower rate of unemployment. In the case of the Bidvest scheme it would seem that the removal of the race qualifier will have little effect overall and in the real world, but might provide a bost to small number of individuals.