Dailymaverick logo

Opinionistas

This article is an Opinion, which presents the writer’s personal point of view. The views expressed are those of the author/authors and do not necessarily represent the views of Daily Maverick.

Apartheid denialists will never know the value of reconciliation

Had more white people acknowledged that they benefited from apartheid, South Africa might actually be much further in its reconciliation project.

I came across an interesting part of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission archives a few weeks ago, and have since been reflecting on how it could be used as a tool for social cohesion and a step towards true reconciliation.

It is a page on the Department of Justice’s website titled “Reconciliation page”. It was recorded on 16 December 1997, which has come to be commemorated as the Day of Reconciliation, and is a register of white people acknowledging the atrocity of apartheid and apologising for not having made concerted efforts to renounce it, and also acknowledging how they benefited from the oppressive system.

I was particularly struck by a brief, concise entry which reads: “I am in awe of the capacity for forgiveness. I am committed to reconciliation and to actively participating in and contributing to building a peaceful, dynamic and healthy South Africa. For being complicit through my lack of meaningful opposition, I am sorry.”

The statement made me think that, had more white people made similar acknowledgements, we might actually be much further in our reconciliation project.

It also made me recall the Institute of Justice and Reconciliation’s SA Reconciliation Barometer Survey, which was released in 2014. A sample pool of white people were asked whether they thought apartheid was a crime against humanity, to which only 53% replied that it was. I remember being stunned as it left me wondering what the remaining 47% thought it was, never mind the highest international relations body, the UN, declaring it so in 1966.

Article 1 of the UN International Convention on the Suppression and Punishment of the Crime of Apartheid states that “inhuman acts resulting from the policies and practices of apartheid and similar policies and practices of racial segregation and discrimination ... are crimes violating the principles of international law, in particular the purposes and principles of the UN Charter, and constituting a serious threat to international peace and security ... The States Parties to the present convention declare criminal those organisations, institutions and individuals committing the crime of apartheid.”

The survey also drew a link between those who didn’t think it was a crime against humanity and those not accepting that its perpetration had resulted in the manifest economic disparity between the races and, perhaps more to the point, the privilege afforded to white people.

In anticipation of the shouts of “I pulled myself up by my bootstraps”, it is incumbent on me to remind people that white privilege is not the absence of hard work, hardship or suffering, but the absence of certain historical obstacles and barriers faced by people, in this instance black people, because of their race.

Judging by recent events, I’m inclined to believe the missed opportunity for honest reconciliation is on full display, because it is probably not those few white people who signed that reconciliation register in 1997 kicking up dust and being offered “refuge” in the US. Most probably, it is those who never had an interest in doing so and don’t believe apartheid was a crime against humanity. And they do so at the expense of South Africa’s much-needed social cohesion. DM

This story first appeared in our weekly Daily Maverick 168 newspaper, which is available countrywide for R35.

Comments (7)

kanu sukha Mar 30, 2025, 05:03 PM

Your article reminds me of my early upbringing. My family lived in an area declared 'white' where my father ran a 'corner shop'. Our clients were the predominantly sea of 'white' people around us, the majority being Afrikaans speakers. Relations were cordial with all the people. That language became our 'mother' tongue, so to speak. So when we were told to 'get out' in terms of the group areas act, several 'Afrikaners' we interacted with, in genuine disbelief enquired why ? Many also kept quiet, probably not understanding (confused?) the full ramifications of 'apartheid'. So, when you point out that only 53% of 'whites' agreed that it was a 'crime against humanity', I am not totally surprised. It seems a similar situation is playing out in a part of the mid-east.

Nkunku S Mar 31, 2025, 02:48 PM

It is insulting to compare apartheid SA to any part of the middle east. It undermines the true struggle of South Africans under apartheid. To equate it with (presumably) Israel is opportunistic and inaccurate. They are incomparable, regardless of the prevailing disinformation. The use of "apartheid" as a description of Israel is simply a way of generating an emotive response

kanu sukha Apr 1, 2025, 04:42 PM

You are entitled to your opinion/s.

jcscholtz123 Mar 30, 2025, 05:52 PM

"Those people" are often poor, rural Afrikaners that feel their language is under threat. They are passed over for promotion because of BEE. They are afraid they might lose their property. They and their families have been victims of violence. Things are more complicated than: black = oppressed/good; white = racist/bad; Afrikaner = very bad

kanu sukha Mar 31, 2025, 12:30 AM

Yes .. feeling 'threatened' may be a 'normal' response in an unfamiliar 'situation'. Regarding being "passed over for promotion because ..." .. have you thought about people like me and many others, who for decades were "passed over" from even being 'considered', because of the colour of my skin ? Could not even get their 'foot into the door' .. let alone for 'promotion' !

Mikesmithathome57 Mar 31, 2025, 09:42 AM

Many who 'signed" have either passed on or are in the "departure" lounge. the lack of Social cohesion is now being driven by rhetoric such as slitting the throat of witness/kill the boer and the lack of economic upliftment/opportunity (as apposed to empowerment). Ditch the socialist mind set, open up the economy enabling job creation and social cohesion/healing will begin fast!!!! If one continually looks backwards you will inevitably walk into a tree, trip or fall....

Georg Scharf Mar 31, 2025, 04:03 PM

Oh common, it is time that we should get over it. We all suffered, and yes we also had severe poverty.

Johan Bosman Mar 31, 2025, 05:05 PM

Surely whites had privileges under apartheid which blacks have not had. When I was in my mid-twenties in the 1970's, I realised that apartheid will not work and is unfair. I then decided to work in a black state for 15 years before 1994 amongst black people. I also voted "yes" in 1992-referendum for change in SA. I (and I will say most whites) was willing to make a contribution to the "new" SA . What did we get instead: racism, incompetence, corruption, theft.

Beverley Roos-Muller Apr 1, 2025, 10:14 AM

Apartheid was a human rights crime for which, as a white person, I unequivocally apologise; as did my late husband Prof Ampie Muller, always a leader in the field of peace and reconciliation. Any other interpretation ducks the fact that such oppression is always wrong, and yes, that applies to those Boer children who died in the war, too (see my book on it). All the 'whataboutism' will not deflect from the facts; and to say 'just get on with it' shows a baffling lack of context/compassion.

kanu sukha Apr 1, 2025, 04:50 PM

Not just "get on" but also "get over" . I remember with fondness the courage of the few who refused to do 'military' service, and the 'price' they paid for it . Think also of the stand Beyers Naude took .

Ian McGill Apr 2, 2025, 08:48 AM

There is still apartheid...in Britain, known as "the class system". The pernicious thing is there are no formal laws on the books. SA seems to think they are exceptions, no they're not. All societies have their struggle history.