Defend Truth


International Anti-Corruption Court needed now to clamp down on global white-collar crime


Lord Peter Hain is a former British Cabinet Minister and anti-apartheid campaigner whose memoir, ‘A Pretoria Boy: South Africa’s ‘Public Enemy Number One’, is published by Jonathan Ball.

Kleptocracies have ravaged their populations for far too long, with corrupt leaders looting public funds for personal gain and thrusting their people deeper into poverty.

South Africa’s debilitating experience of State Capture, coupled with ongoing and ubiquitous corruption, should put the country at the head of the queue to establish a new International Anti-Corruption Court (IACC).

Let’s hope therefore that President Cyril Ramaphosa’s government monitors a key meeting beginning on 27 August in Hamburg, Germany, when a group of eminent jurists and lawyers will start drafting a treaty.

The proposal is backed by influential South Africans including Judge Richard Goldstone; Zondo Commission counsel Paul Pretorius; Paul Hoffman, director of the Institute for Accountability in Southern Africa, and former Presidency staffer, Koogan Pillay.

The problem is global and the need is urgent.

Money laundering is causing a staggering $1.6-trillion in global losses annually, with more than $7-trillion in private wealth held in secretive offshore accounts – the equivalent of 10% of global gross domestic product: enough to transform the lives of billions of poverty-stricken, hungry people.

Developing countries have been the main victims, in some cases sparking state failure.

As Navi Pillay, the former UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, ominously warned in 2013: “Corruption kills.”

Kleptocracies have ravaged their populations for far too long, with corrupt leaders looting public funds for personal gain and thrusting their people deeper into poverty.

And they have done so with the help of global corporates and banks and many household names, most based in New York and London.

I have detailed in the British House of Lords how Bain & Co, McKinsey, KPMG, HSBC, Standard Chartered and Baroda Bank actively aided and abetted the looters in South Africa.

Dubai and Hong Kong especially are notorious money laundering centres.

South Africa’s infamous “State Capture” decade under former president Jacob Zuma triggered a collapse in the country’s GDP, estimated at fully one-fifth, devastated public services and led to paralysing daily electricity cuts and water supply contamination.

The ANC’s RET faction, joined by the EFF, wants to resurrect all that if they can grab power.

Yet Zuma’s business buddies, the Gupta brothers, have escaped any retribution – the billions of rand they looted from SA taxpayers safely ensconced in shell companies and secret offshore accounts, aided and abetted by global banks who moved it from Johannesburg through mainly Dubai and Hong Kong. 

In Angola, billions of US dollars were stolen by former president José Eduardo dos Santos, his daughter Isobel dos Santos, and their cronies, with dire results – 53% of Angolans now live on less than $2.15 per day while their former leaders continue lavishly spending Angola’s public funds they have laundered abroad.

Why a corruption court?

But why the need for a new court when we already have the International Criminal Court? Because the ICC’s remit is atrocity crimes like genocide and war. It cannot prosecute individuals for corruption.

Amending its foundational Rome Statute to include crimes of corruption would be extremely difficult, requiring ratification by the vast majority of its 123 member states – some led by the very kleptocrats who should be prosecuted.

But the core crimes in the new IACC’s jurisdiction would not require time-consuming fresh examination, because the UN Convention Against Corruption already obliges its 189 parties to criminalise bribery, embezzlement, money laundering and obstruction of justice.

However, it has been powerless in the face of global financial crime, and in many nations, kleptocrats abuse their power to prevent enforcement.

The IACC would target high-level officials, bribers and money launderers who commit a part of their crimes within member states. 

Entrenched kleptocracies (Russia, for example) may resist joining the new court, but kleptocrats frequently conceal their illicit assets in countries like the UK or other jurisdictions that should sign up to the IACC.  

That would enable the IACC to freeze and recover stolen assets, even where kleptocrats evade arrest by staying in their home countries or depositing their illicit gains in safe havens. 

Moreover, if they travel to an IACC member state or a country with an extradition treaty, they face the risk of arrest, trial and imprisonment. Although never ideal, trials in absentia could also be considered.

So far, more than 300 prominent figures, including more than 50 former presidents and prime ministers, and more than 30 Nobel laureates, have endorsed the idea. Boston-based former US federal prosecutor Judge Mark Wolf has been a vocal supporter.

Integrity Initiatives International has coordinated a global network of civil society organisations championing an IACC, resulting in commitments from countries like Canada, Ecuador, Moldova, the Netherlands and Nigeria.

London and UK overseas territories – from the Caribbean to Gibraltar – are infamous money laundering hotspots, and the British government should lead the way in gathering global support for the IACC.  

Encouragingly, Labour’s shadow foreign secretary, David Lammy, recently made a speech endorsing it.

Much more also needs to be done to regulate lawyers, bankers, real estate agents, accountants and financial advisers who aided South Africa’s State Capture criminals and do so daily across the world, earning fat fees. 

From Pretoria to London, from Washington DC to Beijing, from Delhi to Paris, governments all say they abhor corruption. Yet they do next to nothing about it.

They must be pressed hard to back an International Anti-Corruption Court right now. DM


Comments - Please in order to comment.

  • Andre Swart says:

    YES! YES! YES!

    ‘ … they can run … but must have nowhere to hide … the ANC!’

  • Gordon Pascoe says:

    “Let’s hope therefore that President Cyril Ramaphosa’s government monitors a key meeting beginning on 27 August in Hamburg, Germany, when a group of eminent jurists and lawyers will start drafting a treaty”.

    Corruption has grown under Ramaphosa, who has done absolutely nothing to prosecute high-level government officials implicated in corruption. Of course they will be monitoring the meeting, but unlikely for the reasons you believe.

  • Michele Rivarola says:

    It is pointless if governments are unable to control multi-nationals and only pay lip service to this as to will be another case of justice being applied selectively. There is an oil and gas boom in Africa because US and EU based oil multinationals are doing in Africa what they are not permitted to do in their own countries yet there are no consequences for them. So until the scales are balanced this will never be legittimised outside of a a very few countires.

  • Kanu Sukha says:

    In ‘principle’ … a good development worthy of support … YET it is in the ‘practise’ that it will fall short ! Remember how CR’s ANC happily joined in the formation of the ICC … yet wanted to ‘pick and choose’ how and which of its statutes would apply … and are now wanting to ‘leave’ it ! Against that backdrop the ANC will be even more wary of subscribing. Off course … it needs to be noted how the ‘powerful’ like the US (et al) from the outset chose to avoid it … for fear of its application to itself ! Good intentions but unlikely to bear real fruit for change. Perhaps a case of appealing to the ‘converted’ ? The writer has acknowledged that far too many unscrupulous lawyers, financial institutions, and various other middle-men have too much to lose from such a process ! As an example … can you imagine being able to claw back all the ‘peanuts’ an advocate here (who should have been barred from practising the law a long time ago already as … they belatedly did with Guilianni) has made from ‘defending’ the corrupt .. but actually funded by our taxes ? ! A really uphill and backbreaking undertaking .

  • Kanu Sukha says:

    Oh … about the British gov. leading the campaign for support of this initiative ? … I guess its recent invitation to known journalist murderer MBS … is a good start ? Money still talks … very loudly so !

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted

[%% img-description %%]

The Spy Bill: An autocratic roadmap to State Capture 2.0

Join Heidi Swart in conversation with Anton Harber and Marianne Merten as they discuss a concerning push to pass a controversial “Spy Bill” into law by May 2024. Tues 5 Dec at 12pm, live, online and free of charge.