Dailymaverick logo

Maverick News

NATIONAL DIALOGUE

Mbeki says the way presidents in South Africa are elected is wrong

During an address on Saturday, former president Thabo Mbeki said a National Dialogue was urgently needed to solve South Africa’s many crises and called for a reform of the country's presidential election method.
Mbeki says the way presidents in South Africa are elected is wrong Former president Thabo Mbeki speaking on Saturday at the National Dialogue for the Eastern Cape higher education sector. (Photo: Michael Sheehan)

Former president Thabo Mbeki on Saturday called for a change in the way South Africa’s President is elected.

At the launch of the National Dialogue for the Eastern Cape higher education sector at Nelson Mandela University in Gqeberha, Mbeki said, “The manner in which we elect the President is wrong. The question is never asked if a President is capable and a fit and proper person.

“When Parliament said I must become president, they did not have a clue what I was capable of doing, and they never asked.”

He said this was one of the issues the National Dialogue had to address.

Read more: Taking back our dreams and our country — why the National Dialogue is the only way forward

Explaining the importance of the higher education sector taking part in the National Dialogue, Mbeki said, “When I was asked to comment about South Africa at 30 years, I said we need an intervention. The economy is in crisis. Politics is in crisis. We have a crime and corruption crisis. Even our relations with the rest of the continent are in crisis. There is nothing that does not say crisis.”

He said that before the national elections last year, he examined the manifestos of political parties and concluded that politicians did not have the answers.

It was time for South Africans to provide the answers, said Mbeki. “And by answers, I don’t mean [political] promises. Answers can only come from the people, not political parties.” This, he said, was the basis of his proposal for a National Dialogue.

He said it would be crucial for thought leaders from the higher education sector to take part in the dialogue, as “the country depends on their brains”.

He said the National Development Plan was a brilliant vision for the country, but it was not a plan. “And that is the intelligentsia’s fault,” he said.

“They should have intervened and said, ‘This is what must become of the National Development Plan.’ They should have said: “We have a very good vision, but what is the plan?”

The National Development Plan was adopted by the Cabinet in 2012 and provided a roadmap of how South Africa would develop by 2030.

“The vision was never translated into practical steps,” said Mbeki.

“With the National Dialogue, this is what you now need to contribute,” he told the audience.

He said the higher education sector had an important role to play in changing the narrative that “black people always fail” and ensuring that young people were not demoralised and demotivated.

He called on the sector to provide tangible, practical solutions to tackle the multiple crises facing South Africa and said representatives from the country’s universities should also advise the 32 different constituencies in the National Dialogue, be they women, civil society organisations, businesspeople, labour representatives, traditional leaders or religious bodies.

Touching on the controversial issue of National Health Insurance (NHI), Mbeki asked why there had not been a comprehensive discussion with health professionals about the new scheme.

“No effort has been made to talk to the health professionals to resolve questions on the NHI; their intellectual input has not been made,” he said.

“In the end, the National Dialogue will happen,” he said. “Practically to answer to the whole bundle of crises facing the country. For this, the country’s intelligentsia will be a very important player. Our intelligentsia has a much broader task.

“I think it is the beginning of a different process. Not just to discuss higher education, but also the question: What does our intelligentsia do to provide an answer to the multiple crises in our country? You have a responsibility. You are the only body that can legitimately say: ‘We are the thought leaders.’ The politicians are not thought leaders. I don’t know what they lead, but they are not thought leaders.” DM

Comments (10)

Cape Doctor Nov 3, 2025, 09:12 AM

It is a bit "rich" for an HIV/AIDS denialist to now suggest that health professionals should have been consulted - about the NHI or anything else.

libby Nov 3, 2025, 09:54 AM

This is rich coming from Mr Mbeki. Did he allow medical experts to tackle aids or did he go for garlic? And the arms deal? The fact is the ANC keeps intelligent, educated and honest people at arms length and the majority votes for uneducated thugs who have no intention of doing anything to administer the country, uplift the poor or uphold and honour the constitution. The intelligentsia has always been gagged and banned from politics - as with National party so with the ANC.

Peter Dexter Nov 3, 2025, 10:08 AM

Some very valid points. I agree that the president should be voted for by the citizens, but the prerequisites to stand for elections should be appropriate academic qualifications and experience combined with a history of impeccable integrity. The President should answer to the people and the Constitution, not a party. Most of our candidates would not meet these standards- and there lies the problem.

megapode Nov 3, 2025, 02:06 PM

Parties have to publish a list, and number one on the list is the guy who they would make President if they win. So the plans have to be thrashed out at party conference level. Or a large number of MPs have to defy the whip and vote for somebody who is not their party's number one choice.

Charl Marais Nov 3, 2025, 02:19 PM

Change the constitution to not have a president. Placing too much power in the hands of one person should be replaced by a counsel of decision makers. Members can be drawn from cabinet ministers. Cabinet appointments could be made by parlement. And ordinary citizens can have the recall vote to remove individual cabinet ministers and parlement members.

megapode Nov 3, 2025, 03:26 PM

The President doesn't get to make laws or policy really. Parliament get to do that, as in the UK, as Congress do in the USA. The SA President has to give assent to a bill passed by Parliament unless there are conflicts with the Constitution (and that's questionable some times). Parliament gets to make laws. I think Mbeki is really talking about party leadership - or should be.

Johann Olivier Nov 3, 2025, 04:57 PM

At the present time, I'm not sure that Congress is working as it has & should. Trump seems to be acting as an imperious executive. In conditions of extreme State Capture, it's a scary proposition.

megapode Nov 3, 2025, 03:33 PM

Democracies allow us to pick leaders, and allow any of us to aspire to leadership. So having a certain level of academic achievement or a track record in business leadership will rule people out. There should be (and is, I think) a requirement that if you have a recent criminal record then you are excluded. But there needs to be a way for candidate MPs to appeal to us, not just to their party. That would require constituency based voting.

smith Nov 3, 2025, 07:22 PM

Damage is done. He is directly responsible along with the rest of his ilk.

smith Nov 3, 2025, 07:22 PM

Damage is done. He is directly responsible along with the rest of his ilk.

brucedanckwerts Nov 4, 2025, 06:20 AM

My suggestion is that all the Ministers should be elected by their Industries - Agriculture by Farmers, Education by Teachers, Health by Doctors and Nurses (which would have prevented the NHI problem). These elections 2 b staggered in time, so there is the minimum of disruption when 1 or 2 cabinet members need 2 b elected. The president is then elected from within the ranks of Cabinet, by Cabinet, choosing a person who has already served 2 yrs within cabinet & so has demonstrated their integrity

Hilary Morris Nov 4, 2025, 09:48 AM

How do we even begin to get past the major hurdle? Integrity is the missing ingredient in almost every government department. Basically we need to scrap the whole lot and start again! Likelihood remote to non-existent.

Nanette JOLLY Nov 4, 2025, 09:14 PM

Yes. Politicians are interested in power in order to become rich and influential. Not in leading a safe, prosperous country. We need people of intelligence, honesty and wisdom, and I don't know where we could find them, but the political parties have not produced any since Mandela. I doubt academia will do any better.