Dailymaverick logo

Politics

STRATEGIC RETREAT

SANDF backs off from contentious joint military exercise with Russia and China

The SANDF has postponed its naval exercise with Russia and China, Mosi III, to avoid overshadowing the G20 Summit.
SANDF backs off from contentious joint military exercise with Russia and China Russian navy ships, among them the frigate Admiral Gorshkov, which participated in Exercise Mosi II. (Photo: Olga Maltseva / AFP)

Bowing to pressure, the SA National Defence Force (SANDF) has postponed a joint naval exercise with Russia and China that was due to coincide with the G20 Summit in SA in November.

The SANDF announced on Thursday, 4 September that it was postponing the exercise — Mosi III — which was scheduled to be held in the Western Cape, “to ensure that the exercises do not impact on the logistical, security and other arrangements associated with South Africa’s G20 Presidency”.

However, this was clearly a face-saving measure, as the SANDF had defended the exercise and the timing until the last moment, before it suddenly backed down on Thursday.

In the US and other Western countries, the earlier announcement that SA would again hold joint military exercises with Russia and China — and particularly in the full glare of the international publicity around the G20 Summit — had prompted disbelief.

US sources, in particular, said Mosi III would further aggravate the already fraught efforts of SA to restore relations with Washington to normality and to try to reverse the punishing 30% trade tariffs President Donald Trump slapped on SA.

In its statement, the SANDF hinted that it had bowed to pressure from President Cyril Ramaphosa and International Relations and Cooperation Minister Ronald Lamola to postpone the military drill.

The statement said, “In consultation with the Presidency and the Department of International Relations and Cooperation, the Department of Defence is engaging its counterparts in the People’s Republic of China on a postponement of the exercise to a mutually suitable date.” China was scheduled to lead the exercise, although it was going to take place in South African waters.

The SANDF statement also incorrectly labelled Mosi III as a “joint BRICS military exercise”. Although Russia and China are both members of BRICS, Mosi III is not an official BRICS exercise as the BRICS cooperative engagements do not have a defence component.

The other original BRICS members, India and Brazil, did not participate in the first two iterations of the exercise. The previous one — Mosi II — also sparked huge controversy as it occurred in February 2023, precisely on the first anniversary of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

Just a few days ago, SANDF spokesperson Rear Admiral Prince Tshabalala had told News24, “The planning for exercise Mosi III is currently in progress for execution towards the end of November 2025. The exercise will continue as planned. The authority is exercised by the Department of Defence [DoD].”

DA welcomes postponement

DA defence spokesperson Chris Hattingh said: “The Democratic Alliance welcomes the postponement of Operation Mosi III.

“Hosting the G20 Summit in November should be at the core of the state’s focus; thus, undertaking military drills with nations at such a pivotal moment for the country points to a profound failure of strategic foresight on behalf of the DoD.

“Our national interest must rest upon protecting and advancing South African National imperatives. Ultimately, to jeopardise crucial trade and diplomatic relations with trade partners by undertaking such military activity is far beyond non-alignment, but also showcases a deep-seated state of misalignment on the side of the DoD leadership.

“The DoD makes reference to Mosi III as being a ‘joint BRICS exercise’, further showcasing the department’s ineptitude, as BRICS is a purely economic and political bloc.

Baffling

Darren Olivier, a director at African Defence Review, said: “While I welcome the postponement of the exercise, it’s baffling that South Africa’s Department of Defence thought the timing was appropriate in the first place.

“Not only is it a politically inept move, given the country’s diplomatic manoeuvring around the G20 Summit, but it introduces significant operational security risks to have ships and personnel committed to an exercise rather than security during such a critical and high-profile event.

“I also cannot understand why, even in its statement announcing the intended postponement, the DoD refers to Exercise Mosi III as a ‘joint BRICS military exercise’. It’s nothing of the sort, as BRICS is not a military alliance and has no institutions, committees, agreements or organising bodies for military cooperation or the organising of military exercises. This is unlike, for instance, SADC, which has explicit military cooperation agreements and organising committees for military exercises and operations.

“No other country in BRICS refers to these types of exercises as ‘joint BRICS military exercises’, and, to my knowledge, when South Africa has hosted its semi-regular naval exercises with India and Brazil in Exercise Ibsamar, it has not referred to that as a BRICS exercise, despite both being founding members.

“It seems that even after the DoD has received the internal governmental equivalent of a slap on the wrist for wrongly engaging in its own rogue diplomacy, its leadership and spokespeople can’t help themselves from stepping outside their lane and into contentious foreign policy issues once again.”

He was referring to last month’s visit to Iran by the SANDF chief, General Rudzani Maphwanya, during which he made strongly political statements in meetings with his Iranian military counterparts. Both the Presidency and Dirco publicly reprimanded him for trespassing into their foreign policy domain. DM

Comments (10)

Robinson Crusoe Sep 5, 2025, 09:45 AM

Well, that's a relief. Why on earth do we want military alliances with China and Russia? All of the free world well understands that both of these nations are endangering world peace. And Putin's Russia is run by a tyrant, and has broken all international law by its brutal invasion of Ukraine. Anyway I wouldn't even lend the incompetent SANDF my Daisy BB pellet gun.

Peter Dexter Sep 6, 2025, 01:16 PM

I agree with you. On the subject of your pellet gun: No risk there, I doubt any sector of the SANDF would be able to load it.

roelf.pretorius Sep 5, 2025, 03:18 PM

The mixed signals and actions/statements contradicting each other from different SA state departments is in my view a direct result of SA's national executive being FAR too big. With a cabinet comprising 76 members (and with deputy ministers not attending meetings, things are only worse) it is impossible to properly co-ordinate department actions. For proper co-ordination ideally cabinet should not have more than 15 - 20 ministers incl. deputies, all of which should attend all cabinet meetings.

Michael Kearney Sep 5, 2025, 03:22 PM

Probably the real reason for the cancellation is the embarrassment the ANC would have suffered when our "friends" saw how little we have that actually floats (or sinks in the case of the recent submarine incident).

Anton William Sep 5, 2025, 04:15 PM

SADF do not have enough ships or aircraft in working order to even display a ragtag defence force so its just as well that they do not embarrass them selves and the rest of the country.

Hilary Morris Sep 6, 2025, 08:39 AM

"The SANDF hinted that it had bowed to pressure!" Seriously? WTF! The clearest indication that each department is run at the whim of the Minister (or General) in "charge"? What a shambles....

Rae Earl Sep 6, 2025, 09:28 AM

Any alliance the DoD has (or desires) with Russia and China is simply beyond the bounds of comprehension. Both countries are marauders of the first order and seek only to extract wealth from victims like SA. Many thousands of jobs have already been lost thanks to the septic Donald Trump's view of SA as an enemy state? How long before the EU and other Western nations begin to sever ties with us?

Michael Clark Sep 6, 2025, 03:43 PM

The last time I looked the only sub still "going" but cant submerge any more for "maintenance" reasons could not even get from Simonstown to Cape Town without tragically loosing 3 sailors of Kommerjie and others rescued by the NSRI! I would urge the ANC to ensure that our navy just plays an observation roll, perhaps from the bar at the NSRI where at least the NSRI can keep a close watch on these "commanders" and ensure they safely get an Uber back to barracks.

albertg.glass Sep 7, 2025, 11:24 AM

Face saving at its best.... something we are getting good at... How embarrassing it would been. All the motorised , efficient navies of Russia and China ... playing war games with us in our rowing boat !!. Thank you for sparing 60-million of us with disbelief and sheer and utter embarrassment ..... Life on the ocean waves is not for us ( presently) in the South Atlantic. Wew !!!

Richard G Sep 7, 2025, 07:57 PM

How far we have fallen! A once proud and respected SA Navy (SANDF) is now being scorned and ridiculed by their previous colleagues. What happened to leadership? What happened to professionalism? I dare not say

Sep 8, 2025, 10:05 AM

Well, apart from the moral issues of consorting with these two countries, how exactly do we take part in a naval exercise? Surely that requires actual operational vessels, funds for ammunition. Our generals and admirals should limit themselves to navel exercises, as that is about the limit of their capabilities