Dailymaverick logo

World

UK POLITICS

‘I am deeply ashamed’ — Peter Hain breaks with Starmer government’s ban on Palestine Action

Former anti-apartheid activist Peter Hain voted against the banning order issued against Palestine Action in the House of Lords last week. The order came into force on Saturday.
‘I am deeply ashamed’ — Peter Hain breaks with Starmer government’s ban on Palestine Action Former anti-apartheid activist and British Labour lord Peter Hain. (Photo: Jaco Marais / Gallo Images / Die Burger)

Peter Hain, the former anti-apartheid activist and now a British Labour lord, has broken with Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s government over its banning of the activist group Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation.

Hain, who grew up in South Africa, voted against the Terrorism Act 2000 (Proscribed Organisations) (Amendment) Order 2025 — which proscribes Palestine Action and two right-wing extremist groups — when it came before the House of Lords on Thursday, after passing the House of Commons on Wednesday.

The House of Lords also passed the Bill, and after the Court of Appeal rejected an appeal to block the ban on Friday, it came into effect on Saturday. That day, the police detained 29 individuals in London on Saturday on suspicion of terrorism-related offences for holding a demonstration in support of Palestine Action.

The decision to ban Palestine Action followed vandalism by its members of two Voyager refuelling planes at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire on 20 June by spraying paint into their engines, resulting in about $9.5-million of damage. Palestine Action said the aircraft had been involved in Israel’s bombing of Gaza.

Hain told his fellow lords that in 1969-70, “I was proud to lead a militant campaign of direct action to disrupt all-white racist South African rugby and cricket tours, and we succeeded in getting them stopped for two decades.

“No doubt I would have been stigmatised as a terrorist today rather than vilified, as indeed I then was.

“That militant action could have been blocked by this motion, as could other anti-apartheid activity, including militant protests to stop Barclays Bank recruiting new students on university campuses, eventually forcing Barclays to withdraw from apartheid South Africa.

Nelson Mandela

“Remember also that Nelson Mandela was labelled a ‘terrorist’ by the apartheid government, by British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, by the United States and other Western governments during much of the Cold War.

“Mandela even remained on the US terrorism watchlist until 2008, many years after becoming South Africa’s first democratically elected president and receiving the Nobel Peace Prize.”

Hain noted that the suffragettes had gained iconic status and were treated as heroines today.

“Yet they could have been suppressed under this proscription. They used violence against property in a strategic manner to demand voting rights for women as part of civil disobedience protests when their peaceful protests seemed futile.

“They intended to highlight the injustice of denying women the vote and to provoke a reaction that kept the issue in the public eye. Like Nelson Mandela, they were vilified at the time, including in strident denunciations by members of this House.

“Suffragettes attacked shop windows, government buildings and political party offices, sometimes using hammers, stones or iron bars.

“They also set fire to unoccupied buildings such as churches, railway stations, sports pavilions and empty country houses, intending to cause material loss without causing injury.

“Suffragettes cut telegraph and telephone wires to disrupt government and commercial operations.

“They even hid small homemade bombs inside mailboxes and attempted to bomb Westminster Abbey and Prime Minister David Lloyd George’s uncompleted house.

Criminal damage

“Frankly, Palestine Action members spraying paint on military aircraft at Brize Norton seems positively moderate by comparison. And those alleged to have done this are being prosecuted for criminal damage, as indeed they should be.

“There are plenty of criminal offences which such activity could attract rather than treating young people as terrorists because they feel frustrated about the failure to stop mass killings and bombings of Palestinians in Gaza.”

Hain stressed that he supported the right of Israel to exist and of Israelis to enjoy full security.

“I am also a long-standing supporter of Palestinian rights to self-determination in their own state.

“I was vehemently opposed to widespread anti-Semitism tolerated under Jeremy Corbyn’s ill-fated Labour leadership.”

Hain deplored that the Labour Party government was now putting Palestine Action in the same category as “real terrorists: Al-Qaeda and Islamic State”, which had killed thousands of people in terror attacks.

“Nazi-like US racists and, here in the UK, the IRA, also committed terrible atrocities, targeting or killing innocent civilians, properly and rightly labelled ‘terrorists’.

“This government is treating Palestine Action as equivalent to Islamic State or Al-Qaeda, which is intellectually bankrupt, politically unprincipled and morally wrong.

“Frankly, I am deeply ashamed,” he said. DM

Comments (1)

Fanie Rajesh Ngabiso Jul 6, 2025, 10:07 PM

Peter Hain, do you think that Hamas supporters sit at home agonizing as you do about the the targetted murder of Israeli civilians on October 7? Do you think Hamas entertain the idea of a peceful relationship with Israel? Do you think that the information Hamas presents to the world is honest? Does Hamas represent the type of world you want to live in? Do you think it a fine thing that people accepted into and sustained by Britain are trying to impose their own cultural desires by force?

John P Jul 7, 2025, 08:48 AM

Do you think Israel's actions in Gaza are justifiable? Do you condone the killing of tens of thousands of civilians? The destruction of their infrastructure, livelihoods and hope for the future?

Fanie Rajesh Ngabiso Jul 7, 2025, 11:32 AM

Across many attack sites, Palestinian fighters fired directly at civilians, often at close range, as they tried to flee, and at people driving through the area. The attackers hurled grenades, shot into shelters, and fired rocket-propelled grenades at homes. They set houses on fire, burning and choking people, and forcing out others whom they shot or captured. They took dozens hostage and summarily killed others.

John P Jul 7, 2025, 01:14 PM

Yes and that was terrible. Even more terrible is Israel's response since then. Your comment did not actually respond to any of my questions.

Fanie Rajesh Ngabiso Jul 7, 2025, 11:38 AM

...firstly I'd be interested to know how you would respond if these were your family members. Secondly Israel has 2 stated aims, which they are pursuing: 1. Completely destroy the terrorist organisation Hamas 2. Return their citizens taken as hostages. If Hamas choose the tactic of literally using civilian human shields (disgustingly), one surely cannot reasonably blame Israel.

Fanie Rajesh Ngabiso Jul 7, 2025, 12:09 PM

Most religiously motivated killings in 2024 were perpetrated by extremist groups claiming to act in the name of Islam (i.e., militant Islamist violence). According to conflict monitoring data, there was a record high in deaths linked to militant Islamist groups, with 23,322 fatalities in the 12-month span leading up to early 2024

John P Jul 7, 2025, 01:38 PM

Your quoting of unsubstantiated figures re "Islamist violence" is just an attempt to deflect away from answering the questions posed.

Fanie Rajesh Ngabiso Jul 7, 2025, 06:19 PM

Sources are Human Rights Watch and Chat GPT - likely as good figures as anything out there. The thing is though - even one killing in the name of religion is too much - and if you can't agree there you are part of the problem and not worth engaging with.

John P Jul 8, 2025, 11:53 AM

One hundred percent in agreement with you there Fanie, one killing in the name of religion is too much, any religion.

Pieter van de Venter Jul 7, 2025, 12:52 PM

Dear John, I grew up during the hey days of Yassar Arafat. Often we would wake up and hear of an aircraft or ship hi jacked by the PLO. And the next day the news will break about the number of passengers/travelers (or just innocent bystanders) were killed. Not even the Arab states want the Palestinians because they are so voletile. Get rid of Hamas and your troubles will disappear. So please tell me what is your question???

John P Jul 7, 2025, 01:34 PM

Yassar Arafat was a nasty piece of work. Your statement re Arab states not wanting Palestinians is twisting the truth. Firstly why should they take them? Secondly forcing Palestinians into other Arab states is exactly what Israel, not the Arab world, wants. The statement "get rid of Hamas..." could just as easily be "get rid of Israel and the troubles disappear." Neither one is the answer. Read my post again, the questions are right there and plain to see.

Fanie Rajesh Ngabiso Jul 7, 2025, 06:33 PM

I do. Israel has 2 stated aims: 1. Destroy the terrorist organization Hamas 2. Return the hostages Both are in my opinion entirely reasonable. If Hamas chooses to engage by (disgustingly) using their own civilians as shields, one surely cannot blame Israel.

John P Jul 8, 2025, 08:11 AM

So to be clear you are OK with the killing of thousands of innocent civilians? The Hamas human shield argument is mostly Israeli propaganda, how can "human shields" be of any use against multiple 500 Lb bombs dropped into residential areas?

rouxfoto Jul 7, 2025, 01:55 PM

What is your point? Palestine Action is not Hamas. Can one not condemn the killing of Palestinian civilians, children and babies and at the same time condemn the atrocoties of Hamas? Can one not wish peace for both Palestinians and Israelies?

Fanie Rajesh Ngabiso Jul 7, 2025, 06:46 PM

Civilian deaths are of course a tragedy but if you think the IDF are targeting civilians you are wrong. They are targeting Hamas, who have an entire tunnel network created under their own civilian. Do you honestly think this design isn't entirely intentional by Hamas? They are disgusting in their approach to human life generally.