Dailymaverick logo

Business Maverick

BUSINESS REFLECTION

After the Bell: Why we abandon BEE at our peril

Maybe some people in the ANC are finding it difficult to defend. Perhaps because when we talk about BEE, we might mean other things, such as cadre deployment or corruption.
After the Bell: Why we abandon BEE at our peril Despite how BEE has been under attack, very few people have raised their voices to defend it. (Images: Freepik)

I’m sure you’ve noticed that black economic empowerment (BEE) suddenly seems up for discussion again. I think some of this is because of Elon Musk and some of it is because the DA is now in government.

I’ve made the point before that considering how almost fundamental it is to the South African project, it’s strange we don’t discuss it more often. Especially when you consider that it (BEE) is an exercise in constructive social engineering.

But I’ve been surprised that, despite how it’s been under attack, very few people have raised their voices to defend it.

I wondered if maybe some people in the ANC are finding it difficult to defend. Perhaps because when we talk about BEE, we might mean other things, such as cadre deployment or corruption.

One of the things that State Capture damaged was the argument for BEE, even though it really had nothing to do with it.

Cadre deployment

I think you can conflate BEE with cadre deployment and all that follows.

But in reality, they are completely different things.

I think for some people there is a real hope that BEE will disappear.

I was on a panel recently and, when the issue came up, you could almost feel the anticipation in the audience. 

I can understand why. I think some people simply feel they are being excluded because of BEE. They worry about themselves, but they worry about their families and their children too. And that makes it really fundamental.

There are things you might accept for you. But you will not accept them for your children. It is almost our duty to fight harder for our children than we do for ourselves. 

Several years ago, I was at a weekend event attended by many of the great and good. In the bar, over a solitary dose of the medicinal, I got into a conversation with someone who has made an important contribution to our country.

But he told me his company couldn’t get any bigger without him handing over control of it to someone else. So, he could do that and get out. Or, he could start another company from scratch.

Or, he could sail his yacht around the world. 

I’ve often wondered what he did. This is someone who could create jobs and services, but was being actively disincentivised from doing it. So, I don’t blame him if he set sail for seas afar.

Economy

But I also get irritated with this idea that if we end BEE, then our economy will magically start growing. I don’t think it works like that at all.

Yes, BEE may be a factor. But I don’t think it’s a major factor.

And consider the alternative of what happens if we end BEE. And this is where those who argue that we must keep it are on pretty strong ground.

Saki Macozoma, now the chairman at Vodacom, at Safika Holdings, and someone who has done many many things with his life, has given an important defence of BEE.

Yes, he has benefitted from it himself, so have others. But his words are still important.

Speaking on The Money Show on Wednesday night, he said that BEE was adopted in the 1990s because: “We understood that we could not have a group of people of a certain hue holding political power, and another group of people of a different hue holding economic power. That’s a recipe for disaster. And a lot of poor people in the process.”

Of course he is entirely correct.

He went on: “So, until we reach a certain equilibrium between those two forces in society, we will always have tumultuous times.”

If you look at the debates in our society, how we still fight and argue with each other (unless Donald Trump or the All Blacks are in the room, in which case we will all band together and fight them), you can see that what Macozoma says is true.

Inequality

Our inequality is one of the most important factors that leads to the divisions between us. 

And we should be clear about this; they will not resolve themselves through “trickle-down economics”. It will take a concerted and deliberate effort.

That said, nothing is going to change without growth. If we don’t create jobs, and don’t create an enabling environment for jobs, then all that will happen is that we will fight harder over shrinking pieces of the pie.

So many people have spent so much time discussing growth in recent days, but very few have brought up BEE as a major factor.

For me, I think we abandon race-based redress at our peril. Without it, and the real difference it makes in people’s lives, and the hope it brings countless others, we could be doomed. DM

Comments (10)

Paul T Jun 13, 2025, 06:33 AM

100% agree with this piece. Calls to end BEE in its current form need to carry with them solid plans for a compelling alternative. Education is key but it's not enough. Focusing on growth is not enough if the key beneficiaries of that growth are not the poor in this country. As he says, it will take concerted effort to redress inequality and, as flawed as BEE has been in practice, we just don't hear enough about convincing alternatives from the likes of the DA.

Karl Sittlinger Jun 13, 2025, 07:21 AM

I disagree. First of all, if a policy is clearly doing significant damage to the country (and I am afraid I will take economists and world bank facts above Grootes opinions), it is critical to stop the poison even if there would be no alternatives. Which there are, based on means and actual privilege not skin color. 1 trillion rand for 100 BEE beneficiaries, there can be no excuses that this should happen. Shut down BEE immediately, we have other options, they just won't enrich cadres.

Rod MacLeod Jun 13, 2025, 08:05 AM

Exactly. After 32 years of doing the same thing expecting a different outcome each year, we fit neatly into Einstein's take on insanity. Either say "it can't be done, it's too difficult to change" or "it may be difficult to change, but it can be done". Let's find a better way.

Paul T Jun 13, 2025, 11:40 AM

Again, shut down BEE, but no alternative. What's your solution?

Karl Sittlinger Jun 13, 2025, 12:15 PM

Again, there are, based on means and actual privilege not skin color.

Michael Thomlinson Jun 13, 2025, 01:14 PM

Ask the average Joe Soap on the street: Has BEEE benefitted you? And 90% of the time I am confident that the answer will be a resounding NO. Only a few have benefitted while actually (in most cases) adding no value. When will it end? Surely it cannot go on forever? It is a racist policy and a huge disadvantage to white kids who had nothing to do with apartheid. Why should they be made to pay now? Is this a case of the sins of the father being passed on to the children?

A Concerned Citizen Jun 13, 2025, 12:37 PM

Paul (and others), kindly do yourself a favour and visit the DA's website. The Economic Justice Policy is right there - an alternative to BBBEE that targets means-based proxies for disadvantage rather than just race.

A Concerned Citizen Jun 13, 2025, 12:40 PM

Nobody contends that redress is necessary. Nobody contends that transformation is necessary. Nobody contends that we should strive for a society where race is unimportant. So, design your economic redress policy to target actual disadvantage - measurable indicators like income and employment status. Stop saying that only certain races qualify. In SA, if you measure actual disadvantage, 99% of your beneficiaries will be non-white anyway. Grow the economy and create enough opportunities for all.

D'Esprit Dan Jun 13, 2025, 12:44 PM

The Nats used the IDC as the primary means of giving heft to Afrikaner businesses back in the day. The ANC has controlled the IDC for over 30 years, but has not come close to the same levels of success. Why was there no plan to create massive black-owned renewables companies or ICT companies or critical minerals companies when it was obvious that we're entering a new economic era? BEE is a significant contributor to blocking domestic and foreign investment - it needs changing. Lots of it.

Keith Wilson Jun 13, 2025, 08:29 AM

Of course BEE (in it's current guise) is a major factor. We need foreign investment desperately, but we punish foreign businesses immediately. Giving 30% of your business to already wealthy Black Businessmen won't feed the millions of unemployed. But job creation will. Personally, I think Employment Equity is much more important, but from personal experience, finding competent Black Managers with realistic salary expectations is tough.

Fred Lightly Said Jun 13, 2025, 09:03 AM

"People conflate BEE with cadre deployment but they are completely different things" - what a load of rubbish. BEE has enabled and promoted cadre deployment and is its core driver - competency and ethics are removed from appointments and replaced with a requirement for party loyalty and black ethnicity. How can this address the inequality for the millions of citizens who don't have a seat at the trough? Get real and stop trying to accumulate political favour.

oliver59 Jun 13, 2025, 09:13 AM

The principle of transformation is not the problem. Policies that provide additional assistance to previously disadvantaged are not the problem, but policies that provide a hindrance to growth to other South Africans are the problem. These negatively impact the whole country. The solution lies not in doing away with BEE, but in adapting it into a form that provides additional assistance to those who need it, while not being a hindrance to those who don't.

ashton Jun 13, 2025, 12:09 PM

Less than 10% of the population is white. If our economy is in such a state that we need laws to prevent white people from taking all the good jobs, we have bigger problems than race issues. BEE reduces the value of black people's equity. A white person can sell their shares to anyone in the world. A black person's shares typically are linked to the company's BEE status. It can only be sold it to a limited market of other South African black people who can afford it.

Karl Sittlinger Jun 13, 2025, 12:47 PM

Quite apart from the fact that the majority of those shares rest in the hands of a few connected cadres.

D'Esprit Dan Jun 13, 2025, 12:57 PM

Grootes has fallen into the trap, and ANC narrative, that BEE and transformation are synonymous. Not so. BEE enriches a small elite, almost invariably linked to the ANC for the big ticket deals. Transformation would be better served if, instead of 30% to a fatcat, 10% goe3s to employees in an inverse pyramid - those at the bottom getting the lion's share, and those above a certain level of management, get nothing. You'd uplift more people and attract more investment, local and foreign.

Johan Buys Jun 13, 2025, 01:57 PM

If we wanted broad impact then a better route would have been that a form of sovereign wealth fund was a qualifying investor. Nobody wants to have a shareholder forced on them, much less so one generally wants free shares and a board seat. That wealth fund could be ring-fenced, investing ONLY in infrastructure for education, health, sectoral development and run independently of government policy. It must be a hard-nosed investor : no touchy-feely nonsense.

Marc Caldwell Jun 14, 2025, 10:07 AM

The last time I met Saki Macozoma was in Zwide (PE) 1984, just before the UDF launched in E Cape. I expected he would be part of it, having participated in its planning. I was gazing onto Njoli Rd when he walked by. We chatted briefly; then he said he was going overseas for postgraduate study. He explained why (exactly as in this article). I recalled his words when, in higher education from about 1995 onward, my black students grew in numbers.

Marc Caldwell Jun 14, 2025, 11:41 AM

I suspect BEE is now far more a political issue than an economic one. The ANC needs it to stay in power; just as it needs to provide social grants, black jobs, and NSFAS for the same reason. The middle class is the real economic indicator. After school, who is outside waiting to be fetched? What is mother driving; going home where? Count who shops at Woollies? In rush-hour traffic: Who's driving the fancy cars?

Adrian Thornycroft Jun 14, 2025, 02:57 PM

BEE COULD have worked broadly but instead benefited key connected people AND enabled rampant corruption. BEE caused talent from ACROSS the Rainbow Nation spectrum to leave. They now pay tax to foreign governments. My experience (age 34, 20 years ago): "you did great work but I am sorry I can't offer you a permanent job because you are white". When visiting SA all chat is about race. BEE holds us back from moving on. Either get rid of BEE entirely or come up with a different system.