Dailymaverick logo

Maverick News

‘I AM SORRY’

Ex-DA MP Renaldo Gouws settles hate speech case, apologises for racist video

Former Democratic Alliance member of Parliament Renaldo Gouws has apologised for a 15-year-old racist video that emerged after he was elected to public office. The apology is part of a settlement with the South African Human Rights Commission, which had brought a hate speech case against him.
Ex-DA MP Renaldo Gouws settles hate speech case, apologises for racist video Former DA MP Renaldo Gouws, now a member of the Freedom Front Plus. (Photo: Lulama Zenzile / Gallo Images / Die Burger)

Former Democratic Alliance MP Renaldo Gouws has made a full and unconditional apology for a 15-year-old racist video he uploaded on YouTube, but later removed.

The video resurfaced when he was sworn in as a member of Parliament in 2024.

“To all South Africans and especially black South Africans, I am sorry. I am sorry for the pain, anger and trauma my words have caused. I am sorry for trying to justify, minimise and sanitise them. I know this apology does not erase what I said or did, but it is a step I must take to acknowledge the effect of my actions and begin to account for them,” said Gouws in the

broadcast on his YouTube channel on Thursday.

He expressed a commitment to “learning, listening and doing the difficult work of repair.”

“I apologise unreservedly to the people of South Africa both for the racial invective I expressed in the video itself and for taking so many years to take full responsibility for it,” he said.

“I despise racism in all its forms and have always been committed to building a true nonracial South Africa. My actions over the past 15 years have clearly demonstrated this. During the period when the video in question was made, I was actively involved in charitable work for people of all races.”

After the video resurfaced, the South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC) approached the Equality Court seeking an order for Gouws to apologise, be fined R100,000, undergo diversity training and be given 20 hours’ community service.

Read more: Renaldo Gouws ‘hate speech’ row — SAHRC seeks apology, community service, R100,000 fine for ex-MP

In the video, Gouws is heard saying: “Alright, so there’s a couple of things I want to say. Kill the f***ing k****rs, kill all the f***ing n***ers. That’s all I gotta f***ing say. Kill all the k****rs! Kill all the f***ing n***ers!”

In papers filed before the Gqeberha Equality Court, Gouws said that it was “patently false” that he called for the killing of black people in the video.

He argued that this was only a snippet of the video and by itself conveyed the “completely wrong impression” of what he intended to say. The online news website IOL was sanctioned by the Press Council for not showing the full video.

“I had no intention to be hurtful or harmful to incite harm or propagate hatred,” Gouws said in his affidavit before the court.

“In fact, I specifically state in the video that I did not mean anything that I had said, but I wanted to evoke a response.”

In his apology, he confirmed that he had met with the SAHRC on 14 May to discuss a settlement.

He said they had agreed that he would issue an unconditional apology, and the case against him would be dropped.

“Fifteen years ago, on 11 March 2010, while I was a 27-year-old student and not yet a political figure, I recorded and published a video on YouTube where I intended to comment on the then ANC Youth League President Julius Malema singing the words: ‘Kill the Boer, Kill the Farmer.’

“I maintain that singing of those words is insensitive, divisive and deeply hurtful towards Afrikaners, especially those affected by violent crime in rural areas. However, I acknowledge that my critique itself was insensitive, divisive and deeply hurtful towards black people,” the apology began.

He said that although he followed up his racist rant with a caveat that he did not mean what he said, “It was unacceptable to use such violent language to make my point.”

Constitutional Court

Gouws continued by saying that he accepted that the Constitutional Court had ruled that the phrases were unutterable and racist.

“Further in the video,” he continued, “I described Julius Malema as an ‘ignorant, little f***ing black idiot’  and referred to those who sang along with him as ‘f***ing barbaric people’.

“In the same video, I claimed that some of the policies introduced in democratic South Africa constituted a ‘new apartheid’.”

He said he maintained his political view that affirmative action and Black Economic Empowerment were not being implemented fairly and constructively. But, he added that he acknowledged that this could not be equated to apartheid — a crime against humanity that stripped black people of meaningful opportunities and was enforced through murder, disappearances and arbitrary detention of political dissidents.

“The video in question had been viewed over 100,000 times by people from all over the world before I removed it from YouTube in 2013 and published a Facebook post,” he said.

The Facebook post Gouws refers to reads: “I will never apologise for feeling the way I did back then as there were various factors that brought out that rage in me. I will apologise though for not educating myself enough on certain topics before giving my opinion on them.

“It’s only now at the age of 30, that I get it. It took me some time to look at the other side of the coin and put myself in someone else’s shoes and completely understand the effects the history of our country has had on all of us.”

Gouws said he now understands that this was not an adequate apology for what he said in 2010.

“More significantly, I failed to acknowledge and apologise for the deep pain and humiliation that my words undoubtedly caused to black people both at home and abroad.”

He claimed that when an “edited version” of the video resurfaced after he became an MP, IOL treated him unfairly by withholding the full context of his words — a fact confirmed by the Press Council, which ordered IOL to apologise to him.

Gouws also maintains that he was treated unfairly by the DA. After the video resurfaced in 2024, the party terminated his membership.

Read more: Axed DA MP Renaldo Gouws to explore legal, ethical challenge to membership termination 

He said he had apologised again for the video in 2024, but that he now accepted that his previous apologies were limited and qualified.

“I use this opportunity to tender a full and unconditional apology,” he added.

Remarks retracted

He also withdrew previous public statements accusing the SAHRC of double standards and calling for its defunding.

“I retract these remarks. The SAHRC performs vital functions in our society, including combating racial hostility and hatred, and its officials do so with dedication and care.”

He condemned the actions of other social media users who vilified SAHRC officials.

Gouws said he hoped that this would be the end of the matter.

“I am happy with the settlement. I can now close this chapter in my life and focus on continuing doing the work I have been doing to make South Africa a better place for all.”

He said he would focus on growing his businesses and his podcast, adding that he was starting a new venture with the billionaire and private investor Rob Hersov.

Read more: World champs of white supremacy — why SA needs online disinformation laws, quick

He said he welcomed a chance to just “enjoy life”.

However, he said, he wasn’t done with IOL yet. “⁠I will offer them the opportunity to publicly apologise and admit that they manipulated the video and lied to their readers. If they don’t, then I will be taking them on legally.”

Gouws said in the hours after publishing his apology he had received “overwhelmingly positive” feedback.

“I think everyone is just happy that I can move on from this and start the next chapter of my life.”

Gouws’ attorney Willie Spies said Gouws “has committed himself to ongoing work to improve the relationship between people in South Africa. Our client has on various occasions in the past apologised for the way in which he, 15 years ago, expressed his opinion.”

He said the latest apology was agreed on by Gouws and the SAHRC and Gouws was committed to working for greater “mutual respect amongst all South Africans”.

The SAHRC confirmed the settlement. DM

Comments (9)

Rohan Holmes May 16, 2025, 08:45 AM

This is proof that as a white South African a person is victimized and we cannot express our frustrations with what is going on in this country. There are two politicians in parlement that have called for the death of white people on a number of occasions and nothing is done about it. As far as I am concerned President Trump is correct in what he is doing to this government. What this has done is just shown the world the racist state and double standards of South Africa and I will subscribe to this gentleman's YouTube channel. Well done Mr Gouws.

graemebirddurban May 17, 2025, 08:55 AM

What he did was not simply expressing frustrations. He demonstrated the same sick racist hatred that created one of the most vile societies in the history of humankind.

graemebirddurban May 16, 2025, 08:50 AM

Looks like Rob Hersov and John Steenhuisen look for similar characteristics in their choices of who to support and hire.

tokeloshe.smith1 May 16, 2025, 09:03 AM

When he is willing to make an apology for his followers doing a "pile on" on Twitter, as it was then, if anyone vaguely disagreed with him I may be willing to accept that he has changed his ways.

megapode May 16, 2025, 10:05 AM

Things should never have got to this. Firstly Gouws had made previous apologies for that video - without any prompting from a court or from the party that he represented for a while. Secondly the DA knew that Gouws had a controversial, provocative on-line brand. Helen Zille herself had guested on that channel. They knew who they were putting into parliament and, as with Cabanac, just created problems for themselves that would be a distraction and a stick to beat them with.

graemebirddurban May 17, 2025, 11:23 AM

Or actually just a reflection of their inherently backwards thinking ideology

Jubilee 1516 May 16, 2025, 10:28 AM

But? I.e. a metaphor,struggle song, not meant literally. Our president and Concourt approved wrt Mr Malema. We are struggling against the most racist and destructive legal system in the world the past 100 years, against increased rape and murder rates, implosion of Healthcare, Education the past 31 years under the ANC. We won't blow up babies and murder office workers like struglle "heroes" Andrew Zondo, Solomon Mhlaba, who all have streets, uni residences, schools named in their honour.

megapode May 16, 2025, 10:57 AM

I am tired of the one sided views of that brutal era. The bomb that Zondo planted was retaliation for an incursion by the SADF, three days earlier, into Lesotho to assassinate anti-apartheid activists. Craig Williamson, who ordered the letter bombs that killed Ruth First and Jeanette Schoon and her daughter walks around free today. As does Barend Strydom. It was a war, and as with all wars, all sides ended up with blood on their hands.

Jubilee 1516 May 16, 2025, 02:11 PM

You posted : “ It was a war, and as with all wars, all sides ended up with blood on their hands.” So why then name streets and buildings after one side only, villainize the other? Despite what was said at the TRC about e.g. Mrs Mandela, Mahlangu, and our current Chief of Army? Zondo’s plan was completed long before the Lesotho event. I am tired of the one sided views of that brutal era. Hope my reply will be posted this time.

megapode May 16, 2025, 02:32 PM

I can only give my opinion, I don't know about policy. But there were already lots of roads named after people like Verwoerd and Malan. At the least a balance would be sought. There's also that Zondo was hung. Williamson, for one, was not. For Zondo the stakes were higher and the price paid heavier. There are still roads named after Afrikaners - off the top of my head President Fouche, CR Swart, Beyers Naude. So we maybe need to balance our views a bit.

Jubilee 1516 May 16, 2025, 03:33 PM

The Nats sentenced Strydom and Waluz to hang. No balance and reconciliation possible if people denied amnesty, found guilty of gross human rights violations at the TRC are honoured by having just about anything named after them or be appointed Chief of Army. It is not about race, ethnicity, but human rights violations and inconsistency. There are no Eugene de Kock, Williamson roads. Study the Frontier wars; Maqoma, Ngika, Hintsa and ask yourself why there is still a Durban+Port Shepstone.

megapode May 16, 2025, 10:59 AM

My 5c worth. That song is a struggle song, and it does use metaphor. But there are plenty of these rebel songs in many countries (Northern Ireland and the Republic being good examples). Those songs get remembered, passed down through generations, but once the dust has settled they should be kept for private gatherings and not sung in public.

Wilhelm van Rooyen May 16, 2025, 11:41 AM

By when will you consider the dust to have settled? And should I infer that we, in the interim, should accept the singing of "Kill the Boer"?? Because it's a metaphor?? I say BS

megapode May 16, 2025, 01:30 PM

I don't think you can infer that at all from what I've said.

Jubilee 1516 May 16, 2025, 12:03 PM

You said : "My 5c worth. That song is a struggle song, and it does use metaphor. " Well so is Gouws's song by that logic , and his is better motivated, but should not be sung in public.

megapode May 16, 2025, 01:32 PM

I think you don't know what a metaphor is. Gouws has apologised for what was in that video, and did so in a mature and, I hope, helpful way. But there was no metaphor there.

Jubilee 1516 May 16, 2025, 03:36 PM

If he did not apologize he would be in jail now. Moreover, he only made a comparison and ab initio explained that. He does not have Mr Malema's ??? privilege. If it is a metaphor to Mr Malema, Mr Ramaphosa and the Concourt, why is it not to him? Read my opening statement. It can easily qualify as a struggle song too for better reasons than Mr Malema's version.

Pieter van de Venter May 17, 2025, 06:20 AM

What a total load if crock. The ANC and some of their appojnted judges obviously only see one side. I did a military camp in Messina in 1983. My platoon collected pieces of flesh from the Vhembe road and trees of black people due to landmines planted just before Christmas. As far as I know, the ANC did not send those to the TRC nor the murdeters of Zulus that were shot from Shell House (now Loothullie) or the necklace murderers.

Arthur Mutlow May 16, 2025, 12:08 PM

It appears that "Hate Speeches" only apply to white South Africans - at least the Constitutional Court and the SAHRC seems to rule that way. Personally, I find it despicable that Renaldo Gouws has been forced into agreeing with them! Freedom of speech is only permissible if you're a member of the so-called revolutionary movements! What can be done to resolve this unnecessary state of affairs in South Africa?

megapode May 16, 2025, 01:36 PM

Not so. The SAHRC sanctioned Velaphi Khumalo for posting anti-semitic hate speech. Khumalo seems to be a fan of Hitler and wanted to see the "job" that Hitler had begun finished.

Arthur Mutlow May 16, 2025, 04:04 PM

To be pertinent, let's stick to black and white in a SA context!

Nicolaas Van Rensburg May 16, 2025, 12:56 PM

Malema apologize for inciting violence by repeatedly singing that so called "struggle song"....never, but when a white person says anything along those lines he is held to account, and a big deal is made of it.....not saying what Renaldo said was right, at all, but let's draw the line somewhere... same playing field, should be the same rules...not?

Michiel Otto May 16, 2025, 02:28 PM

This was/is obviously hate speech. Kill the Boer is not ????????? Lick my(******)

Anne Swart May 16, 2025, 04:08 PM

It is a good public apology. My question, though, is what does he say in private? I have witnessed too many of my fellow white folk sprouting superiority. They feel safe to do so in my presence because of my surname. Then, in public they are back-slapping and glad-handing their diverse associates. I call them out on it because never will I let them think I condone hatred. Ideology does not change with jail, or fines. Perhaps forced community service is best, learn empathy by caring for others.