Dailymaverick logo

Business Maverick

This article is more than a year old

TRADE AGREEMENT

Trade Minister Tau confident US will renew SA’s Agoa membership

Trade, Industry and Competition Minister Parks Tau is confident that South Africa will remain in Agoa, despite concerns over its international relationships, following a successful lobbying effort in Washington, with bipartisan support for the reauthorisation of the preferential trade programme, although uncertainty remains due to the upcoming US elections and the legislative timeline.
Trade Minister Tau confident US will renew SA’s Agoa membership Trade and Industry Minister Parks Tau fought for SA’s continued participation in Agoa at the Agoa Forum in Washington. (Illustrative image: Photos: Rawpixel | Dwayne Senior / Bloomberg)

Trade, Industry and Competition Minister Parks Tau is confident that the US will allow South Africa to continue participating in the African Growth and Opportunity Act (Agoa) and that the US will reauthorise this preferential trade measure as a whole before it expires next year.

Trade, Industry and Competition Minister Parks Tau. (Photo: Gallo Images / Luba Lesolle)
Trade, Industry and Competition Minister Parks Tau. (Photo: Gallo Images / Luba Lesolle)

Tau was addressing a press conference in Cape Town after his return from the 2024 Agoa Forum in Washington. When he was in the US capital he urged members of the Biden administration and of Congress not to remove South Africa from the programme, which gives eligible sub-Saharan African countries duty-free access to the US market for most exports.

Some members of Congress had threatened to kick SA out of Agoa because of its perceived friendships with the US’s enemies, Russia, China and Iran.

“We received bipartisan support for the reauthorisation of Agoa… We’re confident that Agoa would continue and that South Africa would stay in Agoa,” said Tau. 

He said his delegation, which included Deputy Minister Andrew Whitfield, had met a wide range of officials as well as members of Congress from both parties and business leaders.

Legislation which had originally suggested South Africa’s possible exclusion had been withdrawn “and there’s no Agoa resolution at this stage or proposal that suggests the exclusion of South Africa”.

Tau is from the ANC. Whitfield, of the Democratic Alliance, also expressed confidence that SA would remain in Agoa.

“In every single engagement, the sentiment was positive, to a large extent because of the extraordinary turnaround in our ability to form a Government of National Unity in South Africa … so quickly.

“We had a net positive visit. We had a feeling very much that our relationship with Agoa is not going anywhere.”

‘Unaligned position’

Tau said the delegation met staffers of Republican Congress Representative John James who had proposed controversial legislation which would, if adopted, require the US administration to undertake a comprehensive review of US-SA relations, including establishing whether Pretoria has harmed US national security and foreign policy interests through its close relations with Russia, China and Iran, and its hostility to Israel. A finding against SA could also jeopardise SA’s participation in Agoa.

Tau noted that the legislation had passed the House of Representatives but had not yet passed the Senate or been signed by President Joe Biden. SA would continue to lobby the US to try to prevent that from happening. However, if the legislation were passed, “as South Africans, we should be comfortable that we can respond to any questions that are being raised.

“We indicated that South Africa has consistently maintained an unaligned position. And many of the parties that we engaged with said they respect an unaligned position.

“They, however, perceived that South Africa might not in certain instances have articulated its non-alignment in a manner that is demonstrable.

“And it’s a matter that we’ve said we’re prepared to engage with and we’re prepared to discuss to the extent that there might be concerns.”

Tau noted that the US presidential election in November introduced some uncertainty about whether Agoa as a whole would be renewed as the Republican candidate, Donald Trump, had not stated his position.

Read more: Minister Tau makes headway in persuading Washington not to drop SA from Agoa

He said SA was proceeding on the basis of the support for renewal which it had heard from the Republican Party but would try to engage with the presidential candidates from both parties.  

He said that although there was general agreement among the officials and legislators they met that Agoa should be speedily reauthorised, none could give them a certain timeline because of the upcoming elections.

“There are three possible timelines,” he said.

The ideal, for which the delegation pressed hard, would be to reauthorise Agoa before the elections. Second prize would be to reauthorise it in the “lame-duck period” between the elections and the inauguration of the new government in January. The least ideal would be to reauthorise Agoa after the inauguration. 

Tau noted that Congress would be going into recess this week and returning only  — briefly — in September before the elections. In addition, Agoa reauthorisation would be competing with other legislation. US sources told Daily Maverick it was highly unlikely that Agoa would be renewed this year. 

Tau said the SA delegation had lobbied not only for an early and longer extension of Agoa to provide greater certainty to investors, but also for improved rules of origin and less frequent eligibility reviews to preserve regional value chains and enhance Africa’s manufacturing capability.

He said SA would continue engaging with the US about complementing Agoa with the African Continental Free Trade Agreement, which is creating a single market for Africa.

He noted that some African countries had been disqualified from Agoa, which raised the question of whether goods which might be produced in say, SA, using components from one of those countries, would qualify for duty-free Agoa entry into the US.  This was important for value-chain integration.

He said that the SA and US governments had agreed to revive the existing trade and investment framework agreement between the two countries to discuss trade issues including Agoa.

Read more: GNU gives SA a honeymoon period for keeping its Agoa status, say analysts

Meanwhile, in Moscow

Tau noted that the other deputy minister of trade, investment and competition, Zuko Godlimpi, last week represented SA at the “pivotal” BRICS-Plus trade ministers’ meeting in Moscow, which had called for “a predictable, fair and equitable” trade environment consistent with the rules of the World Trade Organization (WTO).

It had also expressed concern about “unilateral measures such as the carbon border adjustment mechanism” (CBAM). The European Union regards this purely as a climate control measure, but SA and others insist it is a trade restriction. It would impose levies on some exports to the EU calculated on the amounts of carbon emitted in producing the exports. 

Tau said the BRICS-Plus meeting had called for international rules and standards to address e-commerce and had agreed to share best practices in creating special economic zones to drive economic growth and investment. 

Godlimpi told the press conference that SA had already begun pushing back against the EU over the CBAM but wanted to present a united position of all the BRICS-Plus countries: Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.

He said bringing the issue to the WTO would re-engage the WTO as a strategic platform to resolve such issues, and “constrain what appears to be an unmitigated move towards unilateralism”. DM

Comments (10)

Just Another Day Jul 31, 2024, 09:13 AM

Minister Parks Tau is part of the problem with is the ANC's practices and policies, which put the US/SA’s Agoa membership relationship at risk in the first place.

Just Another Day Jul 31, 2024, 09:13 AM

Minister Parks Tau is part of the problem with is the ANC's practices and policies, which put the US/SA’s Agoa membership relationship at risk in the first place.

thabaafrica Jul 31, 2024, 09:42 AM

I don't know how to feel about this fence-sitting stance. How much longer will we by-stand? if indeed we deem what is Happening in Palestine as an apartheid then why are we trying to get in bed with its financors while equally building ties with its historic enemies? I don't understand the stance

Middle aged Mike Jul 31, 2024, 12:12 PM

Because we are a basket case that has had a government of incompetent thieves for at least 20 years and the larder is bare. Without handouts like AGOA we are not competitive and the industries that depend on it will disappear along with the livelihoods of many, many hundreds of thousand if safricans

Middle aged Mike Jul 31, 2024, 12:12 PM

Because we are a basket case that has had a government of incompetent thieves for at least 20 years and the larder is bare. Without handouts like AGOA we are not competitive and the industries that depend on it will disappear along with the livelihoods of many, many hundreds of thousand if safricans

johnbpatson Jul 31, 2024, 09:47 AM

What benefit will Biden get from fast-tracking South Africa? Only one I can see will be to betray Harris, who is vulnerable to the Democrats being portrayed as being soft on Hamas terrorists. And he will not want to boost Putin allies, after all Putin has said about him.

Rae Earl Jul 31, 2024, 10:02 AM

Hey ANC! So what have you received as a result of your support for lost countries like Russia, Cuba, Venezuela etc? New car building factories (ie Ford, VW, BMW), new breweries from corporates like Heineken, or expansion programs in steel (Arcellor)? Know what you got from Russia etc? Carrots!

Malcolm McManus Jul 31, 2024, 10:22 AM

I think it has more to do with the one sided ICJ stance, Russian war games and Lady R, rather than economic ties with the countries you have mentioned. When it comes to siding with countries in war is most likely what annoys the USA most. I don't think they have an issue with normal trade relations.

Michele Rivarola Jul 31, 2024, 10:10 AM

The only interest the US has is access to Africa's minerals nothing more. Once that interest vanishes so does AGOA. We are but a gnat in the USA's trade balance and as much as we like to think we are the big cheese we are more like a cheese crumb.

Malcolm McManus Jul 31, 2024, 10:41 AM

All trade relationships are important. We need to explore as many alternate markets as possible to the US, so we are less reliant on their trade, but still try to maintain whatever trade we have with them. At this stage they are very relevant to us for platinum and cars being high on export list.

Jimbo Smith Jul 31, 2024, 10:15 AM

Our geniouses do not, and never have, understood the Law of Unintended Consequences. Somehow own goals are scored, we realize we have stuffed up and then grovel for some kind of "deal". Nauseating!!

Middle aged Mike Jul 31, 2024, 03:46 PM

If I was an american voter with even a passing interest in the auto manufacturing sector or agriculture I would rail against the notion of giving import tariff breaks to a country so clearly aligned with my country's enemies. SA gives nothing in return other than a bunch of smart mouthed tired 70's anti-western rhetoric.

marc36 Jul 31, 2024, 04:23 PM

Where are all the Ministers who said that AGOA was an unnecessary Western construct and that we don't need these handouts? Maybe they were voted out? Or maybe the Iranian paycheques have stopped coming?

christer.hederstrom@icloud.com Jul 31, 2024, 05:50 PM

SA is gradually losing respect in Europe by being friends with the most brutal dictator since Hitler and Stalin. Next yesr there will probably EU sanctions for SA. Time for SA to show its intentions to stay in the democratic family. Time to leave the Brics gang.