Dailymaverick logo

Maverick News

This article is more than a year old

COUNTER-TERRORISM

US Treasury announces sanctions against two alleged Isis agents in South Africa

The US Treasury has sanctions against two people in South Africa allegedly tied to Isis activities in Africa. Abubakar Swalleh and Zayd Gangat are accused of roles in funding transfers and facilitating Isis movements, while a third suspect based in the DRC, Hamidah Nabagala, is accused of financing a deadly bombing in Kampala.
US Treasury announces sanctions against two alleged Isis agents in South Africa Abubakar Swalleh was described as a South Africa and Zambia-based ISIS operative. (Photo: Radio Simba Ffemwe Mweffe / Facebook)

The US Treasury has announced that it is taking action against two individuals in South Africa who are allegedly associated with the expanded activities of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (Isis) on the African continent. The two, along with another alleged Isis agent based in Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), will be subjected to sanctions.

The two in South Africa are Abubakar Swalleh, described as a “South Africa- and Zambia-based Isis operative”, and Zayd Gangat, “a South Africa-based Isis facilitator and trainer”.

Swalleh is allegedly involved in the physical transfer of funds from South Africa to the DRC, while also facilitating the movement of Isis-affiliated individuals from Uganda to South Africa, and vice versa.

The US Treasury said Mohamed Ali Nkalubo, a DRC-based Isis commander, relied on Swalleh to move funds and recruit members for the DRC affiliate of Isis. 

“Swalleh moved to South Africa under Nkalubo’s direction, where he has been involved in robberies and kidnap for ransom,” it said.

The third individual, based in the DRC, is Hamidah Nabagala. According to the US Treasury, she serves as an intermediary for Isis financial flows in central Africa and has been accused of funding the October 2021 Kampala bombing, which killed one and injured at least three others.

The sanctions against the three mean that their properties and any entities in which they have a direct or indirect stake of 50% or more will be frozen.

The US Treasury said, “These individuals serve as key financiers and trusted operatives, enabling the activities of Isis and its leaders across central, eastern and southern Africa. They also serve as critical links between far-flung Isis operations, including Isis affiliates in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), Mozambique, Somalia and Isis cells in South Africa, allowing Isis leadership to leverage each affiliate’s capabilities to conduct terrorist attacks that undermine peace and security in the region.”

The decision of the US Treasury to sanction the three coincided with the 20th meeting of the Counter Isis Finance Group on 23 July. This is a working group of the Global Coalition to Defeat Isis, which includes more than 80 countries and international organisations. South Africa is not a member of this coalition.

“Today’s action underscores the crucial work of the Counter Isis Finance Group and the importance of effective information-sharing among coalition countries to target Isis’ facilitation networks,” said Brian Nelson, the US undersecretary of the treasury for terrorism and financial intelligence. 

“While we have made considerable progress over the nearly 10 years since the establishment of this working group, we must all remain vigilant because Isis continues to develop new financial methods. 

“The United States, in close coordination with our key partners, remains committed to disrupting the key nodes that enable disparate Isis groups to work together and their ability to finance the group’s terrorist activities.”

South Africa’s Department of International Relations and Cooperation was unable to respond to Daily Maverick’s questions by the time of publication. Its response will be included in this report once received.

Terrorism financing risk

This is not the first time the US Treasury has announced the presence of Isis agents in South Africa. In November 2022, it stated that it had identified four members of an Isis cell operating in the country, as well as eight companies that were owned, controlled or directed by members of the group. 

In June 2024, the Financial Intelligence Centre issued its second Terror Financing National Risk Assessment of South Africa. In contrast to the 2022 risk assessment, which found South Africa had a moderate terror financing risk, the updated report found that terror financing now presented a high level of risk to the country.

“From a global and regional perspective, during the period under assessment, the activities of the Islamic State (IS) and its affiliates have seen them become one of the deadliest global terror groups. South Africa’s current TF [terror financing] threat emanates predominantly from the IS, its affiliates, its supporters and its ideology,” said the assessment.

“Following the demise of the IS Caliphate in Syria and Iraq, there has been a decentralisation of activities and solicitation of support, including fund-raising, to regions that were not previously affected, including central and southern Africa. IS-linked terrorism theatres in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and northern Mozambique are key areas of concern for South Africa’s national security, particularly as there are links to IS supporters in South Africa.”

The US Treasury’s sanctions against Swalleh, Nabagala and Gangat come at a time while South Africa is still on the Financial Action Task Force’s (FATF) greylist. It was added to the list in February 2023 as a country with strategic deficiencies in anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism. 

To be removed from the greylist, South Africa is expected to tackle 22 action items linked to eight areas of strategic deficiencies identified by the FATF, by no later than the end of January 2025.

At the latest round of FATF plenary meetings in June, the plenary adopted a report confirming that eight of the 22 action items had been addressed or largely addressed in accordance with the specified deadlines. DM

Comments (8)

Tony Reilly Jul 25, 2024, 06:30 AM

So where is our police intelligence (sic) and Home Affairs …….asleep at the wheel as usual ?

Dennis Bailey Jul 25, 2024, 07:04 AM

U r too generous. I wouldn’t put them at the wheel but under it

Andrew Blaine Jul 25, 2024, 07:32 AM

Or protecting their investment?

manie1974 Jul 25, 2024, 12:33 PM

More appropriate question. Where is the SA FIC? What about international relations? The US seems to be able to place sanctions on all and sundry - be it individuals, companies or sovereign states globally. Where do they get this seemingly limitless power from?

alastairmgf Jul 25, 2024, 07:52 AM

Not surprising considering the ANC pro-Hamas stance.

Garth Luxton Jul 25, 2024, 08:33 AM

I don't see Mrs. Pandor listed here ... yet ...

Rod MacLeod Jul 25, 2024, 08:40 AM

Nothing sinister from our wonderful state security here. They're just somnambulating from pay cheque to pay cheque.

Rod MacLeod Jul 25, 2024, 08:40 AM

Nothing sinister from our wonderful state security here. They're just somnambulating from pay cheque to pay cheque.

Ian Gwilt Jul 25, 2024, 08:59 AM

I see my tongue in cheek response to this article was rejected. I always tick acceptable to every comment as I believe in seeing others views. If my view on this is unacceptable I shall start being a bit more discerning before ticking the boxes.

russellgiles10@gmail.com Jul 25, 2024, 09:27 AM

The same happened to me regarding my comment on Netanyahu's speech to the US Congress. The DM clearly doesn't get irony.

alastairmgf Jul 25, 2024, 03:10 PM

And me. I have started receiving emails telling me my comments are “unkind”. And sometimes the comments just disappear or remain “unvetted”

07_nervier.kernels@icloud.com Jul 25, 2024, 10:28 AM

This isn't news to black/coloured SAns who are forced to live with growing numbers of them. They are armed, harass the community, force locals out violently, but the SA media & NGOs will call it xenophobia when it's called out. Who is really behind this seeing that the media/NGO support this?

Matt 218 Jul 25, 2024, 11:09 AM

100% Nevina. Until the ngo's and media fully grasp who's rights are actually being violated, they will continue to protect them.

Middle aged Mike Jul 25, 2024, 12:54 PM

What are the odds we aren't a hub for illicit flows of funds? The glorious liberation movement didn't struggle to be poor nor to keep all their loot in msanzi. The mechanisms they use to move tens of billions of the proceeds of their looting offshore must be available for others to use too.

Indeed Jhb Jul 25, 2024, 01:38 PM

Think you nailed it Mike. Also our ex-Minister of all affairs has quite a few terrorists on speed dial some must be related to Isis too

lesley.young1945 Jul 25, 2024, 01:43 PM

The answer to this question is probably: It is too early in a long term approach to a major unknown to justify a statement of high confidence. In other words: I don’t know.

Middle aged Mike Jul 25, 2024, 02:45 PM

I lean more towards 'exceedingly low to bugger all'.