Dailymaverick logo

Business Maverick

This article is more than a year old

TRADE AGREEMENT

GNU gives SA a honeymoon period for keeping its Agoa status, say analysts

South Africa's Government of National Unity has bought the country some time with the US on Agoa, but with concerns lingering over the ANC's international friendships, the honeymoon period might be short-lived, leaving SA's future eligibility in the balance.
GNU gives SA a honeymoon period for keeping its Agoa status, say analysts Trade and Industry Minister Parks Tau fought for SA’s continued participation in Agoa at the Agoa Forum in Washington. (Illustrative image: Photos: Rawpixel | Dwayne Senior / Bloomberg)

The formation of the Government of National Unity (GNU) has secured South Africa a “honeymoon period” for retaining its privileged access to US markets under the African Growth and Opportunity Act (Agoa). This is the view of US politicians and South African trade analysts on the eve of the annual Agoa Forum which runs from Wednesday, 24 July to Friday, 26 July in Washington. 

South Africa’s continued participation in Agoa and its good diplomatic relations with the US generally have been under attack in the US, mainly from conservative Republican members of Congress — though with some Democratic support — who have tabled legislation that would oblige the Biden administration to conduct a comprehensive review of US-SA bilateral relations that includes an assessment of whether SA is undermining US national security and foreign policy interests.

These legislators have been antagonised over the past two years by the ANC government’s friendships with Russia, China and Iran — and its perceived hostility to Israel, particularly in taking it to the International Court of Justice on charges of genocide in Gaza.

If the legislation proposed by Republican Representative John James passes and the Biden administration is forced to review US-SA relations and particularly to investigate whether SA has undermined US national security and foreign policy interests, this could jeopardise SA’s continued participation in Agoa.

Read more: Pretoria walks tense tightrope on US relations under shadow of Russia, Iran, China alignment

This legislation, open to eligible sub-Saharan African countries, gave duty-free access to the lucrative US market for more than $3-billion worth of SA exports in 2022, mainly motor vehicles, fruit and wine. SA exports in 2023 under Agoa reached $2.9-billion by November.

Trade, Industry and Competition Minister Parks Tau. (Photo: Gallo Images / Luba Lesolle)
Trade and Industry Minister Parks Tau. (Photo: Gallo Images / Luba Lesolle)

But even without the specific legislation which has been proposed by  James, Agoa itself makes provision for US legislators or officials to review a country’s participation at any time.

The Agoa programme as a whole is up for renewal next year and as things stand, it seems likely to be renewed — and almost certainly if current US Vice-President Kamala Harris or another Democratic Party candidate wins election in November. It is less clear what a victory for the unpredictable Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump would mean for the future of Agoa.

GNU influence

New Trade, Industry and Competition Minister Parks Tau is in Washington to attend the Agoa Forum and more generally to lobby the Biden administration and Congress to save Agoa and keep relations between SA and the US on track.

He told Bloomberg, “We intend to engage senators and also members of Congress about what our position is on a whole range of issues as the South African government on the back of the Agoa Act, but also taking into account bilateral relations.”

The formation of the GNU constitutes a more eloquent argument in favour of SA’s continued Agoa rights than anything Tau could say, unless, of course, the GNU is part of his argument. 

“I do not think the GNU has secured SA’s long-term eligibility, but there will certainly be something of a honeymoon period as we watch to see the direction the GNU charts in the coming months,” a Washington insider told Daily Maverick.

“As a result of this honeymoon period, I would expect SA to keep its eligibility for next year.

“However, the concerns that exist here about the ANC’s ties with Moscow, Beijing and Tehran and its consistent anti-Israel sentiment are strong and pending a significant shift in foreign policy from Minister [Ronald] Lamola (which we do not expect), will remain.

“This will keep the ‘undermining US national security’ argument relevant as it pertains to Agoa eligibility going forward. If the GNU were to collapse these concerns would only be strengthened.”

The Democratic Alliance has played a significant role, both directly and indirectly, in buying SA time on Agoa. Its participation as the ANC’s main GNU partner is in itself a major factor. The party’s deputy minister of trade, industry and competition, Andrew Whitfield, will also attend the Agoa Forum in Washington.

The DA has conducted four missions to the US over the past year to lobby for SA to retain its Agoa privileges. In part, the DA is motivated by the fact that many farmers in the DA-controlled Western Cape export to the US, enjoying Agoa privileges. 

Review in question

One of the main threats to SA emanates from the US-South Africa Bilateral Relations Review Act which James introduced into the House of Representatives in March.

It called for the full review of US-SA relations by the Biden administration and an investigation into whether SA’s warm relations with the US’s enemies were undermining US national security and foreign policy interests. The Bill passed the House Foreign Affairs Committee, but has not reached the floor.

To accelerate the reviews, James reintroduced the operative clauses of his Bill last month as amendments to the National Defense Authorization Act. The legislation authorises the massive US defence budget and has to be passed fairly promptly.

James’ amendments on South Africa were passed by the Republican Party-controlled House. They now have to also be adopted by the Democratic Party Senate. Negotiations to reconcile the House and Senate defence authorisation Bills are under way.

The formation of the GNU has created some ambivalence among Republican legislators about this legislation. Coincidentally, but perhaps significantly, the amendments by James to the Defence Authorization Bill passed the House on the very day the GNU was formed. That has prompted some concern that a full review by the administration into US-SA relations could undermine SA’s Agoa status just as the GNU is beginning to restore US confidence in SA.

However, some supporters of James’ legislation believe that a thorough US examination of SA’s relations with Russia, China and Iran — including a probe into untested allegations that some of them might have been meddling in local politics — could still be useful.

Eckart Naumann, an independent economist and associate at the Trade Law Centre, told Daily Maverick that an investigation by the US administration into US-SA relations, even if it concluded that SA had undermined US foreign policy and security interests, would not necessarily lead to SA being kicked out of Agoa.

“Perhaps put on notice, perhaps warned, perhaps monitored even more closely. I don’t think that it’s in the best interest of the US to kick SA out — as tempting as it may be. It would come at too high a cost, politically and to business, both domestic and foreign investors.”

Naumann is also not convinced that James’s legislation will pass in the Democratic Party-controlled Senate.

Best hope, Democrats

Hanging over the whole debate is the uncertainty about the outcome of the presidential elections. Biden’s withdrawal from the contest has raised the hopes of many South Africans that a Democratic Party candidate — either Harris or someone else — will defeat Trump, who remains ahead in the polls.

Trump’s position on Agoa and relations with SA more generally is unknown, but most commentators suspect his positions would be less favourable to SA than those of any Democratic president.

Donald MacKay, the CEO of XA Global Trade Advisors, believes that SA-US relations, including SA’s continued participation in Agoa, depend very much on who becomes the next US president.

“I think if it’s Trump, our prospects are fairly slim. If it’s anyone but Trump, then probably quite a bit better. I think that affects the outcome of all of this more than anything that Tau can do.”

MacKay adds that, “All bets are off if Trump wins. Firstly, he’s just wild. No one knows what the hell he’s going to do.

“He doesn’t appear to have any sort of principled stance on anything. So, I have no idea what he would do.

“I would just say that the chances of renewal [of Agoa] under Trump are far less than they are under a Democrat president.”

MacKay also believes that the formation of the GNU is a positive. “I think the perception is that the GNU makes the government more business-friendly and more investment-friendly. Whether that is reality, it’s just too early to call.”

He believes the fact that the DA has an agriculture minister, a deputy trade and industry minister and a deputy finance minister is helping to keep the US on side. DM

Comments (10)

D'Esprit Dan Jul 24, 2024, 07:46 AM

Google 'Alvin Botes' and have a look at what our Deputy Foreign Affairs Minister - and someone I believe is the real policy formulator in government - says. He is completely over the top in wanting to re-run the Cold War. Matters not a jot what Parks Tau and the GNU do.

Trevor Thompson Jul 24, 2024, 08:34 AM

A good way to mitigate this effect would be to accord Ukraine the same attention we provide to Palestine. Both are after all worthy causes. Russian atrocities and the flagrant denial of the rights of Ukraine don't cut it.....

Malcolm McManus Jul 24, 2024, 08:49 AM

I don't think this will be as significant a factor if Trump comes in to power. He doesn't want to support Ukraine either.

D'Esprit Dan Jul 24, 2024, 09:10 AM

Agreed - Ukraine's terrified of a Trump presidency. There is almost nothing in our foreign policy that aligns with Trump, so we'd need to feed his ego in other ways.

Colin Braude Jul 24, 2024, 09:39 AM

But, unlike Putin and Hamas/Iran, Ukraine does not finance the ANC

lyster.w Jul 24, 2024, 08:48 AM

Forever banging on about the colonial West and claiming they don't need "white monopoly capital" or anything Western yet they're quick to stretch out the begging bowl.

Confucious Says Jul 24, 2024, 08:54 AM

There is no down-side for SA with AGOA, only up-side. The only conceivable reason for not wanting AGOA is political ideology only. Why jeopardize trade relations with one of your biggest trading parters? Ideology will lead to lower and lower quality of imports and cheaper exports.

Malcolm McManus Jul 24, 2024, 09:04 AM

Agreed, however I believe all trade is important particularly if it involves export. North, East, South and West. Manufactured and agricultural trade, as long as it doesn't involve arms and ammunition.

David Jeannot Jul 24, 2024, 08:55 AM

AGOA has helped us created thousands of jobs in key industries, notably boat building as we have some of the best boat and yacht building companies worldwide. These jobs put money into the pockets of thousands of households and the DA recognised the necessity to maintain this key trade agreement.

D'Esprit Dan Jul 24, 2024, 09:13 AM

100%, but the champagne socialists who declare that 'we' will carry the burden of the loss of exports, are actually not sacrificing anything from their cozy ivory towers, other than the livelihoods of those who can least afford it. 'Twas ever thus, with the ideological left.

Gregory Scott Jul 24, 2024, 09:10 AM

Take a careful look at which side our bread is buttered, economically speaking, the trading numbers speak for themselves. Not cuddling up to our trading partners is illogical and will be detrimental to South Africans, very much like Cuba, North Korea.

Glyn Morgan Jul 24, 2024, 09:41 AM

Our President has just signed a racist law into effect. The "Public Procurement Act". How will that go down in the US of A"?

Colin Braude Jul 24, 2024, 09:44 AM

Worth mentioning that, during Apartheid, the ANC, in order to get into power, called for trade sanctions, no matter how badly they affected the poor while the DA or its predecessors campaigned on behalf of the poor who would have been worst affected.

Roddwyn Samskonski Jul 24, 2024, 10:54 AM

And anyone who dared to differ with the great god ANC was ostracised. Not much has changed today.

cwf5108@gmail.com Jul 24, 2024, 11:25 AM

Incredible how many commentors on Daily Mail's articles favor Cackling Harris (RSA have better comedians) over Trump, China/Russia over West, rich RSA citizens over the poor, etc. It shows how woke RSA citizens have become. Dems started and fueled wars in 3 locations, Trump none.

D'Esprit Dan Jul 24, 2024, 04:26 PM

Which locations did the Dems start wars in? And how is favouring the rich, woke (yoh!)? I favour Harris (or even my pug) over Trump for president; the West over Russia/China/ANC, and equitable access to jobs and opportunity. Which pigeonhole are you gonna slap me into?

B M Jul 24, 2024, 04:40 PM

Chris, please list the 3 wars started and fueled by Dems. Please list any wars during Trump's tenure as president with the US alliance partners?

markgcfriedman Jul 24, 2024, 12:59 PM

As long as SA remains Hamas's legal arm, calls for the destruction of Israel, allowing Iran and its proxies into BRICS+, the USA will see the inclusion of the DA in a GNU as tinsel. As long as the DA allows the Lamola/Pandor's stance, AGOA remains high risk, and no window dressing will mitigate it