Dailymaverick logo

Politics

This article is more than a year old

EXPLAINER

Jacob Zuma’s MK party wants a revote — but what does the law say?

Jacob Zuma's MK party has emerged as the third-largest party in the recent elections, with more than 2.3 million votes, but their call for a rerun seems more like a strategic chess move than a genuine request, as chaos appears to be their chosen path in challenging the ruling party and key democratic institutions.
Jacob Zuma’s MK party wants a revote — but what does the law say? Illustrative image : An MK party member. (Photo: Gallo Images / Fani Mahuntsi) | Former president Jacob Zuma. (Photo: Gallo Images / Darren Stewart) | A screen projects the vote count at the IEC's Results Operations Centre on 30 May 2024. (Photo: Felix Dlangamandla)

Didn’t Jacob Zuma’s MK party do really well in these elections?

Astonishingly so, exceeding the predictions of almost all pundits and all polls. MK has landed up as the third-largest party in our electoral system, taking home more than 2.3 million votes (14.6% of the total vote share).

This is an unprecedented showing for a party on its election debut in democratic South Africa. The previous record was held by the EFF, which contested elections for the first time in 2014 and bagged a then-unthinkable 1.1 million votes, or 6,35% of the total.

That was considered gobsmacking at the time. But the MK party has smashed past that, and looks to take 58 MPs into the seventh Parliament – more than twice as many as Malema’s party managed in 2014.

So why on Earth would they want to rerun the elections?

If the call was sincere, it would be ludicrously high risk for the MK party – since a revote might well galvanise people who didn’t bother voting on 29 May to swarm the polls on this occasion out of sheer horror at the rise of the MK party.

But the chances are, overwhelmingly, that the call is not sincere. Instead, it likely stems from two factors.

The first is former president Jacob Zuma’s beef with the IEC, since the body initially did not allow the registration of the MK party due to suspicions around the party’s submitted signatures, and subsequently announced that Zuma was ineligible to top the party list as a result of his criminal conviction (a stance subsequently affirmed by the Constitutional Court).

As we know, most forcefully from the entire MK party project, uBaba is not a guy to abandon a grudge easily.

The second explanation for the MK party’s brinkmanship is the one laid out by Daily Maverick’s Ferial Haffajee here: chaos is the point. It’s a demonstration of defiance to the ruling party.

It’s also the first of what is certain to be the calling card of the MK party: attacks on institutions which are fundamental to the functioning of our democracy. Zuma and co need to sow suspicion about the IEC because it lays the ground for what is to come: an onslaught on other institutions like Parliament and the Constitutional Court.   

Leader of the uMkhonto Wesizwe party Jacob Zuma arrives at the IEC National Results Operation Centre in Midrand on 01 June 2024.(Photo: Felix Dlangamandla)
Leader of the uMkhonto Wesizwe party Jacob Zuma arrives at the IEC results centre in Midrand on 1 June 2024.(Photo: Felix Dlangamandla)

Ok. Regardless, what have they actually asked for?

Spokesperson Nhlamulo Ndhlela said at the party’s press conference on Friday night: “We are engaging with our legal team; they have stated that we should contemplate a revote. We want a total revote.”

This may have been an empty call, however, because the party has also submitted a legal demand to the IEC which contains no mention of an electoral rerun.

Read more in Daily Maverick: Elections dashboard

The letter, which Daily Maverick verified with Ndhlela is authentic, demanded that the IEC extend the timeframe for receiving objections until 10.30pm on Saturday. (The IEC already extended the deadline, but only until 6pm on Saturday.)

MK and a few other aggrieved parties it has partnered with have asked the IEC to delay the announcement of the results, scheduled for 6pm on Sunday, until a satisfactory conclusion has been reached to all the objections.

https://public.flourish.studio/visualisation/18162132/

If not? MK “will have no choice but to consider all their legal options,” says the letter from Boruchowitz Attorneys, which is the firm acting for MK.

Zuma hinted on Saturday night, however, that retaliatory violence – or as he glossed it, “trouble” – might also be on the cards if the IEC does not delay the announcement.

Is the revote thing legally possible?

It hasn’t happened before, and apart from anything else it would be financially ruinous for South Africans to rerun elections: we literally can’t afford it.

Could a court order the IEC to rerun elections? Maybe…

But the Electoral Act appears to make no specific provision for an election do-over.

uMkhonto Wesizwe party leader Jacob Zuma arrives at the IEC's National Results Operations Centre in Midrand on 1 June 2024.(Photo: Felix Dlangamandla)
uMkhonto Wesizwe party leader Jacob Zuma arrives at the IEC's National Results Operations Centre in Midrand on 1 June 2024.(Photo: Felix Dlangamandla)

Section 56 of the legislation says that if a “serious irregularity” is found to have happened at a particular voting station, those votes may be discarded. There’s nothing there about revoting.

The Electoral Act gives the IEC seven days after voting day to declare the results, but does also give the Electoral Court the power to extend this period if there is “good cause shown”.

The law also says that an election may not be set aside “because of a mistake in the conduct of that election or a failure to comply with this Act” unless that mistake or failure “materially affected the result of the election”.

Is the IEC going to delay the results announcement as MK wants?

No. At the IEC press conference on Saturday night, at least, officials were adamant that matters would proceed as scheduled, with the announcement to happen at 6pm on Sunday.

As to how the MK party will respond: let’s wait and see, and pray for cool heads to prevail. DM

Comments (10)

Robert de Vos Jun 2, 2024, 03:28 PM

What's fascinating is how this election has so clearly demonstrated the racial divisions in SA society.

Vincent L Jun 2, 2024, 04:25 PM

Racial and/or tribal divisions?

Kenneth FAKUDE Jun 2, 2024, 04:26 PM

After 1994 the push was growing the economy and the black pride was never restored, connected elites and the educated rose to higher and middle class, the low class were left to the mercy of the corrupt ANC the party they had based their hopes on, this makes a big chunk of the votes and a fertile ground for manipulation.

Noelsoyizwaphi@gmail.com Jun 2, 2024, 06:27 PM

I think it highlighted racial divisions more than tribal differences. We all know that, if DA was to look to white voters it wiuld not reach only about 18% of the electorate. Which then means that only 4-6% of blacks gives DA the nod. This is something the part Must work on, very hard. Zuma, while in the ANC, especially towards the end of his tenure as its president, was leading a faction that is known as Radical Economic Transformation, the RET, hence MKP's national appeal. Yes, the Zulu nationalism does feature, but not the main driver. Even if it were the case, the ANC will soon sort that problem out as Mdumiseni Ntuli is rising in the party and that will then address the Zulu exodus. The ANC was formed as Zulu initiative and Zulu people know this fact.

Dave Gould Jun 3, 2024, 12:39 PM

Sorry Noel, your maths does not tie up. Only 7.3% of the SA population is White as per 2022 census, so I am not sure how you get to 18 % Whites voting for the DA. I think you got it the wrong way around, likely to be around 15 % of the 22 % they garnered, or 68 % non-white vote. Pretty good. I do agree that the DA needs to do more to attract the black vote, but they are easily the most racially diverse of the biggest 5 parties, obviously just the wrong race group started it which is why this never gets recognised.

Joe Soap Jun 2, 2024, 04:59 PM

Jacob Zuma has been attacking the institutions forever. First, the Apartheid government, and then the ANC government. First from within, and now from without. The ANC protected him when he was doing it from within. Let’s see if they support him doing it a second time, from outside the real ANC.

dieterf45@gmail.com Jun 2, 2024, 06:06 PM

With tinfoil hat on:" Putin's boys rigged the success of the MK party, but he promised Zuma a Majority, for a share of the spoils especially a nuclear power station! The technical hitch experienced at the IEC is "proof" of that. Now Zuma is giving them a second chance, but if the IEC secures its platform from cyberattack, i doubt the MK would get more than 5%

Shaun Pastor Jun 2, 2024, 08:30 PM

I am so glad that it is not only me that see's that connection between Putin's hacker team and the corrupt here in SA. I said in a previous message that they are involved and look at the results. How can most of the papers that I have been reading throughout the year have gotten it so wrong with there stories that no-one saw this coming. Well except for us 2. ;-) Is anyone counting the scrapped votes? Look at this. Spoilt votes, @ the time I was writing this. Nationally 1.31% Eastern Cape 1.13% Free State 1.22% Gauteng 0.81% Natal 1.05% Mpumalanga 1.12% Northern Cape 1.11% Limpopo 0.98% North West 1.32% Western Cape 0.71% 1.3, 1.2, 1.1, 0.98, They all vary around the 1% mark. Doesn't make sense to me how nearly even the amount of spoilt votes are across all the provinces.

Watchwigan Jun 2, 2024, 06:29 PM

“says the letter from Boruchowitz Attorney” as always… blah blah pro-black…. Blah blah white handlers… then straight to the white lawyers !!

Sandile Ntombela Jun 2, 2024, 06:57 PM

This Article and it subject line don't correspond! The fact that the actually thing that this article was to address only appears on the last paragraphs and also not entirely addressee rather speculation thrown out says a lots about the intentions of the author and the editor who approved such utter speculations that have factually basis at all.

caseyare Jun 2, 2024, 07:46 PM

This despicable crook has done enough damage to the country. It is time for the rest of the country’s leaders to discover that they have a backbone and deal with him and his threats firmly and decisively. It is quite possible to do so lawfully. The kid gloves and accommodation have gone on too long and serve only to embolden him.

Tshepang Moloi Jun 2, 2024, 07:48 PM

The danger of being power hungry is that it blur one from discerning realities. MK has fared significantly well, I do not reckon their assertion of revoting is justifiable no matter how aggrieved they are.... Let them join the republic on accepting the results as free and fair. It will be best for their political expediency.

James Fulton Fulton Jun 3, 2024, 08:46 AM

Agree!

leon.stats.prinsloo@gmail.com Jun 3, 2024, 09:26 AM

Another African dictatorship in the making.

Colin Braude Jun 3, 2024, 03:52 PM

Have the allegations of forged MK signatures been investigated, and if so, what were the findings?

ace00864 Jun 3, 2024, 07:46 PM

I have been a party agent before l, there is no way that elections can be rigged as they are counted in front of everyone (party agents from other political parties). So all these noices are all nonsense and a waste of our precious time. If there is any irregularity the official at the voting station is empowered to deal with that at that level. Why escalate that to national. The only concern is exclusion, yes any fscter that may prevent members of the community not to excecise his own right can be elevated and entertained by higher structures.