Dailymaverick logo

World

This article is more than a year old

World

Harvard chief’s shock exit exposes decade-spanning fractures

Harvard's first Black president has resigned after six months due to plagiarism and mishandling of antisemitism allegations, leading to a donor revolt, plummeting early applications and deepening divisions on campus.
Harvard chief’s shock exit exposes decade-spanning fractures Dr Claudine Gay, then president of Harvard University, testifies before the House Education and Workforce Committee at the Rayburn House Office Building on 5 December 2023 in Washington, DC. The committee held a hearing to investigate anti-Semitism on college campuses. (Photo: Kevin Dietsch / Getty Images)

The school’s first Black leader resigned Tuesday after just six months — a historic elevation cut short by allegations of plagiarism and anger over her handling of antisemitism on campus in the aftermath of Hamas’ Oct. 7 attack on Israel.The tumult has tarnished the oldest and richest US university’s brand, led to a revolt among its wealthy donors and deepened rifts between faculty, students and administrators. Harvard Corp., the institution’s top governing authority, is poised to undertake a search for her successor against that backdrop, with the university at the center of broader national debates over academic freedom, free speech, diversity and governance, issues that have divided the campus for years.

“It should be a moment for Harvard to take stock, figure out how we got into this trouble, and make changes to restore its reputation,” said Steven Pinker, a Harvard professor of psychology and well-known author. “Now is the time for Harvard to draw a line between the future and implement reforms for the benefit of itself and higher education in general.”

Read More

Harvard Corp. said it accepted Gay’s resignation with sorrow and pointedly called out the “repugnant and in some cases racist vitriol” directed at her. The now 11-member board, led by former Commerce Secretary Penny Pritzker, named Provost Alan Garber to serve as interim president and said it’s embarking on a search for a new leader just over a year after settling on Gay, who beat out 600 other candidates.

The university’s reputation took a beating when it was slow to condemn more than 30 student groups who blamed the Hamas attack solely on Israel. Within days, Larry Summers, a former Harvard president, said he was “sickened” by the university’s lack of response and contrasted its silence with Gay’s powerful writing about the killing of George Floyd in 2020, when she was dean of the Faculty of Arts and Sciences.

Gay sought to quell the controversy, but it escalated as protests proliferated and reports of antisemitic incidents were highlighted on social media. Donors such as billionaires Idan Ofer and Leslie Wexner halted support, while US Senator Mitt Romney accused the university of ignoring the safety of Jewish students.

Congressional Uproar

The furor intensified when Gay appeared before Congress on Dec. 5 to testify about antisemitism on US campuses. Replying to questioning by Representative Elise Stefanik, a New York Republican, Gay and her counterparts at the University of Pennsylvania and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology gave widely derided testimony in which they failed to condemn calls for genocide against Jews as a violation of university policy.

Penn President Liz Magill stepped down days later. Gay faced a wave of calls to resign as well, including from Stefanik, investor Bill Ackman and other Harvard alumni.

Professor Avi Loeb, a world-renowned astronomer who’s been at Harvard since 1993, said he was horrified by Gay’s testimony. Loeb, who grew up in Israel and lost 65 members of his father’s family to the Holocaust, said he was worried by the long-term impact on the school, including its ability to raise money from donors and work with Washington legislators.

“The consequences are obvious,” he said before she resigned.

Faculty Support

But 700 other faculty members, many of them from the Faculty of Arts and Sciences, vocalized their support for Gay in the wake of the hearing.

They signed a petition defending “the independence of the university” and urged its leadership “to resist political pressures that are at odds with Harvard’s commitment to academic freedom.”

One of the signatories was Professor Suzanne Blier, who had endorsed Gay to become president.

“President Gay stepping down won’t stop the demoralizing national downturn in civility,” said Blier, a professor of fine arts and of African and African American Studies. “We need calm and reasoned discussion to advance respect and mutual trust — not more division.”

Like some of Gay’s other supporters, Blier had been part of a group that years earlier had sought to remove Summers from Harvard’s top job. He stepped down almost 18 years ago after clashing with faculty, including over remarks he made about women’s aptitude for science and engineering.

DEI Focus

A daughter of Haitian immigrants, Gay was selected in 2022 as the much heralded successor of Lawrence Bacow. Her research as a political scientist often focused on race and one of the hallmarks of her leadership was promotion of diversity, equity and inclusion policies. She took the reins at Harvard in mid-2023, days after the US Supreme Court struck down race as a factor in undergraduate admissions.

“When I became president, I considered myself particularly blessed by the opportunity to serve people from around the world who saw in my presidency a vision of Harvard that affirmed their sense of belonging—their sense that Harvard welcomes people of talent and promise, from every background imaginable, to learn from and grow with one another,” Gay said in her resignation letter. She will remain on the Harvard faculty.

DEI though has long been a target of conservative lawmakers and pundits. After the Congressional hearing, those attacks intensified, including from Republican presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy. Ackman, who has supported Democrats, increasingly focused his criticisms of Harvard on the diversity initiatives, suggesting that Gay’s appointment resulted from the effort.

One of his former professors called Ackman’s comments about Gay’s selection a “dog whistle” against Black women. Ackman rejected that assertion.

In a lengthy post on X after Gay announced her resignation, Ackman said he’s always supported “diversity in its broadest form,” including race, ethnicity, religion, socioeconomic background, sexual identity, viewpoints and politics. But he said DEI has become “a political advocacy movement on behalf of certain groups that are deemed oppressed.”

Ackman went on to say that Pritzker and other Harvard Corp. board members should resign.

Bill Ackman

@BillAckman

In light of today’s news, I thought I would try to take a step back and provide perspective on what this is really all about.

I first became concerned about @Harvard when 34 Harvard student organizations, early on the morning of October 8th before Israel had taken any military…

Sent via Twitter Web App.

View original tweet.

Harvard Corp. said Gay had been the recipient of “repugnant and in some cases racist vitriol” through emails and phone calls.

“These last weeks have helped make clear the work we need to do” to “combat bias and hate in all its forms, to create a learning environment in which we respect each other’s dignity and treat one another with compassion, and to affirm our enduring commitment to open inquiry and free expression in the pursuit of truth,” Gay wrote in her letter.

Ultimately Gay was toppled by growing allegations of plagiarism in her scholarship, including fresh allegations published this week in the Washington Free Beacon. A House Committee has asked Harvard to respond to questions about its academic integrity standards and how it handled claims against Gay.

“We should hold everyone to the highest standards and Harvard should have scholars of the highest level as members of the faculty and as leaders of the university,” David Weitz, a physics professor who has been at Harvard since 1999, said before Gay announced her departure. “How can I tell my students not to plagiarize? How can you hold different standards? I just don’t see it.”

The university’s board, which had backed Gay less than a month ago, said it would stand by its “core values of excellence, inclusiveness, and free inquiry and expression.”

But moving forward won’t be easy. Donors have severed ties and in one worrying sign early-admission applications dropped 17%.

Congress also continues to apply pressure. In addition to the plagiarism inquiry, the committee that invited Gay to testify is still investigating antisemitism on campuses. Stefanik, who took a victory lap after Gay’s resignation, said it’s “just the beginning of a reckoning.”

Pinker has proposed adopting a clear policy on academic freedom, promoting a wide range of viewpoints and embracing institutional neutrality by avoiding pronouncements on events of the day.

“It’s not just about Harvard, but about higher education and institutions in general,” Pinker said.

Comments (10)

Martin Neethling Jan 4, 2024, 07:02 AM

Freedom of speech has limits, as we know in South Africa. The question posed to Gay and the other university heads was a pretty easy one - would calling for the genocide of Jews infringe Harvard’s own policies. All she could do, in the most tone deaf fashion, was mumble about ‘context’. In response to what should be an easy ‘yes’. The subsequent interrogation into her academic track record was inevitable, not a ‘red herring’ as has been suggested, and the outcome is of a weak academic and a serial plagiarist. If we really support academic excellence then the person who leads an institution like Harvard needs to be the best. She clearly is not.

megapode Jan 4, 2024, 11:13 AM

I do think the look into her track record was triggered by her response. If she'd said things that pleased pro-Zionists then there would have been no investigation. But she didn't, and it became a game of seeing exactly what skeletons could be found in her closet. It's possible that the deck was being stacked against her. Congresswoman Stefanik said “This call for intifada is to commit genocide against the Jewish people in Israel and globally.” Except it isn't. That's a misrepresentation of the word "intifada" - and a look at the historic use of that term would have made that clear. So it is possible that, in fact, there had been no calls for genocide. If Gay had been prepared to deal with straightforward questions about her own and the universities position on anti-semitism and calls for genocide IF THEY WERE MADE, then she should have been able to give a straightforward answer. But she was questioned as if those calls had already been made on campus. But had they? If they hadn't, then what we she supposed to have dealt with? Be sure of one thing: This constant calling out of the "woke", the misrepresentation of diversity policies is going to chill free speech, if that's what these debates are really about. The hypocritical right like to act horrified by "cancel culture". Gay has just been cancelled, and there was going to be no rest until she had been.

Karl Sittlinger Jan 4, 2024, 12:25 PM

"Be sure of one thing: This constant calling out of the “woke”, the misrepresentation of diversity policies is going to chill free speech, if that’s what these debates are really about." Funny that this accusation is the same for both right wing and left wing supporters. I think that some of responses by heavy supporters of the current version of DEI seek to police thought and speech in very much the same way as your accusation. It should be completely ok to discuss whether current trans athletes (male to female) should be competing in women's professional sport, or not to accept some the new postulates of CRT for instance that only white people can be racist and are so by default and in perpetuity simply due to their skin color without being branded a racist or transphobe. I think both sides (left and right) are being very disingenuous in this discussion, never even trying to understand the others viewpoint and problems, often conveniently downplaying the other perspective while selling emotions and opinions as facts. Maybe many people are not clearly left or right on all thoughts, but have mixed views depending on the actual topic being discussed. A person can be against heavy gun control, but support women's rights to abort as an example. While I support giving previous disadvantaged a chance, it should not mean that such candidates are beyond reproach or should be excused for their mistakes. Nor is any resistance to this always automatically racism (or a other 'ism')

joules-airbase-0b Jan 4, 2024, 01:28 PM

Woke and its ludicrous embrace of DEI is the problem, not the people who criticise it. CRT with its dogma of "white privilege", "white supremacy" and "micro aggressions" is an unacceptable ideology of lunacy just as an ideology of "black incompetence", "black victimhood" and "black inferiority" is. Blacks, whites, Asians and every other ethnicity should be held to the same standard. The woke doctrines of Critical Race Theory, Critical Gender Theory and its intrinsic hypocrisy need to be stamped out. If people defend the black "right" to talk of "white privilege", then whites should demand the "right" to talk of "black incompetence", after all what's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander, the hypocrisy manifests when the first perspective is justified and the second criticised as racist. Contrary to what that moron Ibram X. Kendi ( who even deceives the world with his name because his real name is Ibram Henry Rogers ), the delusional Robin diAngelo and various other mud sucking bottom feeding CRT supporters claim, prejudice can not be fought with more prejudice, having being prejudiced in the past does not give one the right to prejudice others in the present. Your biology does not define you as human and worthy of respect, it is purely dictated by your behaviour.

johnbpatson Jan 4, 2024, 10:06 AM

You have three hours to answer the question: "How can any work as a "political scientist" not include referencing a whole body of untraceable political knowledge, mores, practises and gossip which has been hashed over for centuries?" Apart from that little stone in the water I am sorry to say those three presidents got themselves so tied up in knots, at the end of a three hour oral exam, that all their common sense fled. Which begs the question, just what sort of interviews did they have to get the job?

Pieter van de Venter Jan 4, 2024, 12:27 PM

Very well put!! All three were absolutely pathetic and deserve to be investigated further. How did they get to the their positions?? Hopefully I am not going to be called sexist as all three are women??

Rehana Moola Jan 4, 2024, 10:29 AM

Larry Summers is a bigoted elitist. John Stewart exposed him for his views on inflation and interest rates. He was 'sickened' by Gay's lack of response, but his casual attitude towards sacrificing thousands of jobs and people losing their homes so that corporations can continue to make billions of dollars is sick. Unfortunately, his type is all too common in the USA.

Iam Fedup Jan 4, 2024, 11:04 AM

While I’m not a keen supporter of HBS’s elitist culture, nor its undeserved reputation for “superiority” in education, I’m delighted that sense has prevailed, that wholeness has been challenged, and her cheating has been exposed. In many ways, senior academics are even worse than politicians because they think they are intellectually superior, and hardly ever have to account to constituents. As a sessional lecturer at a number of SA’s top universities, I have seen this first hand. The recent controversy at UCT is just one example, and Wits is equally guilty. And these are the people we entrust our kids to?!

Iam Fedup Jan 4, 2024, 05:33 PM

*wokeness, not wholeness.

dexmoodley@gmail.com Jan 4, 2024, 12:00 PM

"Comments are free...Facts are sacred " C.P, Scott . When we as a society cannot agree on facts , but allow partisan politics to challenge facts . How does this end well anyone .

David Walker Jan 4, 2024, 12:45 PM

Your headline is misleading. What has been exposed is Claudine Gay's intellectual and moral bankruptcy.

staris32 Jan 5, 2024, 02:06 PM

not very good

Michael Coleman Jan 6, 2024, 12:42 PM

I suggest the administrators consider limiting commenters to a single post and a single reply, and also consider the abusive language used by repetitive commenters.

Denise Smit Jan 7, 2024, 07:31 AM

Agree 100

Robert Gornal Jan 25, 2024, 09:34 AM

I was about top post a similar comment, I think one comment is enough.

Paul T Jan 7, 2024, 08:02 AM

The Zionist machinery is indeed inpressive. They have succeeded in introducing and amplifying the label 'antisemitic' so successfully that just the mere attaching of that sticker to a person incapacitates them, sometimes permanently. Its a fantastic weapon. Reading further on the 'antisemitism' at Harvard, this seems to include things like Jews feeling less welcome, or intimidated by pro palestinian rights protests and calls for the Gaza conflict to be labelled genocide. Some also lament how Jewish intake to Harvard has dropped from 25% in the past to 10% now. Considering how only 2.2% of Americans identify themselves as Jews this is a surprising statistic indeed. With these Ivy league institutions pumping out so many 'Semites' into the leadership of corporate America one can only imagine the levers being pulled to prop up and defend the Zionist dream.

Johan Buys Jan 7, 2024, 10:00 PM

If she fails on the plagiarism accusation, she fails regardless of all the other politics of this stupid debate that will have absolutely zero influence on what tragedies unfold in Gaza next week. IF is what I said.

Tony Reilly Jan 24, 2024, 03:10 PM

Please read the post by Bill Ackman on this entire Harvard debacle..............an excellent summary of the vile DEI "methodology" that is filtering into our elite schools in Johannesburg.