Maverick Life


Sharpeville: new research on 1960 massacre shows number of dead and injured was massively undercounted

Sharpeville: new research on 1960 massacre shows number of dead and injured was massively undercounted
Members of the police are surrounded by the bodies of victims of the massacre. At the time, the apartheid government instituted an official inquiry into the events of the day and the death toll was put at 69. However, that number is now in dispute after new research. (Photo: Universal History Archive/UIG via Getty images)

Despite its historic importance, Sharpeville itself has remained unknown and its residents anonymous, yet they have a story to tell.

On 21 March 1960 at 1.40 in the afternoon, apartheid South Africa’s police opened fire on a peaceful crowd of about 4,000 residents of Sharpeville, who were protesting against carrying identity documents that restricted black people’s movement. The police minimised the number of victims by at least one third, and justified the shooting by claiming that the crowd was violent. This shocking story has been thus misrepresented for over 60 years.

Our new research retells the story of Sharpeville, about 70km south of Johannesburg, from the viewpoint of the victims themselves. As experienced historians who have undertaken archival research in South Africa since the 1970s we based our research on interviews with survivors and investigation into government records in both the police archives and the national archives in Pretoria. Our work reveals the true number of victims and the exact role of the police in the massacre.

The Sharpeville Massacre ignited international outrage and the birth of the Anti-Apartheid Movement worldwide. It also led to renewed political protests inside South Africa. These were met with the total suppression of political movements that lasted for 30 years. Despite its historic importance, Sharpeville as a place and a community has remained unknown to the wider public and its residents anonymous. Yet they have a story to tell.

Even though the Truth and Reconciliation Commission chose the 1960 Sharpeville massacre as the formal beginning of its investigation of apartheid crimes, its examination of the massacre itself was perfunctory. Only three witnesses from the community were invited to testify during just part of one day (out of 2,000 witnesses during five years of hearings).

People in Sharpeville believe that the lack of attention to their plight since democracy in 1994 is because the original protest was organised by the rival Pan-Africanist Congress of Azania, not the governing African National Congress (ANC).

Changing the narrative

Based on our research, the new book Voices of Sharpeville traces the long residence of Africans in the greater Sharpeville area, as far as the Cradle of Humankind World Heritage Site 100km north. It also emphasises the crucial industrial importance of the greater Vaal Triangle in which Sharpeville is located, from the 1930s onward.

Our work details the rich culture developed by urban Sharpeville residents in defiance of the attempts of Prime Minister HF Verwoerd’s attempts to control African life.

Read in Daily Maverick: What really happened in Sharpeville — new book reveals many more died in the massacre

Using the words of witnesses as recorded from their hospital beds within days of the shooting, and for weeks and months later, the events of 21 March 1960 are recounted in detail, increasing the number of victims to at least 91 dead, and 281 injured. The official police figures first published in 1960 and repeated endlessly ever since were 69 and 180 respectively.

The witness testimony places the responsibility for the shooting squarely with the police.

New evidence

The oral and documentary source material we used was previously off-limits to researchers, insufficiently examined, or largely ignored. Access to many records held by the previous apartheid government was absolutely restricted prior to 1994, and since then many of the records have not been properly registered. This makes it challenging for researchers to find important documents.

But with the help of archivists and librarians, we were able to locate rare and even hidden records of Sharpeville and its history, and record the voices of many of the town’s residents.

History of Sharpeville

The first settlement in the Sharpeville area – Top Location – was razed in the 1950s to make space for white people’s businesses and homes. Official records and aerial photographs reveal the previous existence of a large community on the now empty land. There is also an unmarked cemetery where about 3,500 residents were buried between around 1900 and 1938.

By the mid-20th century, apartheid officials began to plan a bigger settlement in the vicinity. Sharpeville and other places like it were designed in the 1950s to segregate Africans away from the cities, which were reserved for white people only.

Sharpeville’s housing construction became a “model” for the ubiquitous four-roomed NE 51/9 houses in black townships throughout the country, none of which they could own outright but rent only.

In almost 300 witness statements taken by the police immediately following the shooting, many of the everyday details of life in Sharpeville were revealed. These statements were recorded immediately after arrest and under oath by the police to determine guilt or innocence against the charges of “public violence and incitement” brought against them. They were also provided voluntarily in 1961 and 1962, also under oath, by survivors and family members to establish a basis for the compensation the victims unsuccessfully requested.

Details of family life – numbers of children, occupations, wages, and health – were recorded, providing a wealth of information about Sharpeville’s residents.

The massacre: Testimony, both from the official 1960 commission of enquiry into the massacre, and the criminal court trial of over 70 Sharpeville residents in 1960-1961, detailed the actions of both the crowd and the police.

The testimony by civilians and police alike, together with the claimants’ statements, provides a minute-by-minute narrative of the day. The testimonies of the residents, including all the Africans who worked for the municipality and as police officers in Sharpeville, unanimously attested to the fact that the crowd gathered peacefully to protest the pass law. According to these witnesses, by the time of the shooting, almost 300 policemen had been moved into the township, including at least 13 white policemen armed with Sten machine guns. There were five Saracen armoured vehicles.

Police testimony makes it clear that the officer in charge gave the order to shoot, with the machine gunners firing directly into the crowd from a distance of no more than 3-5 metres. As one white official noted:

It made me think of a wheat field, where a whirlwind had shaken it.

The crowd was taken utterly by surprise by the police fusillade. Over three quarters of them, dead and injured alike, were shot in the back as they fled.

The victims: Crucial to gaining an accurate understanding of the numbers of victims – their names, families, and injuries – were the autopsy and medical records detailing the exact causes of death and injury for the over 300 victims. These forms and narrative statements, filled out by the hospital physicians who treated the injured and performed autopsies on the dead, prove conclusively that the government under-counted the victims by at least one third.

This new information remained embargoed in police records throughout the apartheid years to 1994. Some of it was finally transferred to the national archives in the late 1990s and early 2000s. It details the injuries.


The people of Sharpeville wonder why the world has not listened to their stories even as they have told them from the day of the shooting to the present.

In 2023, residents were able to use the information uncovered in our research to update the Wall of Names Memorial (which lists the name of every person who gave their life fighting for freedom in South Africa) at Freedom Park in Pretoria to reflect accurately the number of victims killed on 21 March 1960. But still they have received no compensation for their injuries. DM

This story was first published on The Conversation. Nancy L Clark is the Dean and a Professor Emeritus at Louisiana State University. William H. Worger is Professor Emeritus of History at the University of California, Los Angeles.


Comments - Please in order to comment.

  • Ben Harper says:

    So what

  • Con Tester says:

    Whenever there’s a discussion about the events at Sharpeville on 21 March 1960, a quick check on the integrity and candour of those discussing it is whether they bother to mention the events at Cato Manor on 24 January 1960, eight weeks earlier.

    Almost invariably, that little detail is conveniently omitted, resulting in a less-than-objective confab.

    This is not to excuse what happened at Sharpeville, but the context of those events is incomplete without considering that prior incident, and the absence of a crucial contextual detail makes for a deficient discussion.

    • Ben Harper says:


    • M. Mabula says:

      How far back can your integrity and candour allow you to go Con, 6 April 1652 perhaps?

    • M. Mabula says:

      Whataboutism at its worst!

    • Con Tester says:

      The historical naïveté of M. Mabula’s input is quite astonishing. Hilarious and depressing, but no less astonishing for it. Mr Donald might want to factor the following into his empathy equation: Eight weeks before the Sharpeville shootings, nine police officers, including five black ones, were brutally slaughtered at Cato Manor by a raging mob that stormed the police station there. You don’t need Holmesian deductive powers to see that the police at Sharpeville would have been well aware of that incident and that that knowledge would have been at the forefront of their minds, adding to the tension of the situation. But to that epitome of perspicacity, M. Mabula, that’s “[w]hataboutism at its worst!” 🤡

      • John P says:

        Is your argument that opening fire on civilians at close range with automatic weapons and continuing to fire once they were running away is somehow justified by the events at Cato Manor?

        • Con Tester says:

          Reading comments with due attention will help avoid the making of fatuous and unsustainable inferences that reflect hugely more on the reader’s acuity than on that of the writer. Otherwise, it’s “way to go conclusion-jumping! Truly impressive. 👍👍👍”

          • John P says:

            Hopefully that meant something to you, is “way to go conclusion-jumping!” intended as some sort of new debate winning catch phrase?

          • Con Tester says:

            In answer to the original loaded question: “No.”

            In answer to the tendentious follow-up question about winning debates: “No.”

            So much for having to be explicit, Had the various pseudo-erudite detractors bothered to read the root comment in this particular thread, they may well have discovered the core of the argument, which reads: “This is not to excuse what happened at Sharpeville, but the context of those events is incomplete without considering that prior incident, and the absence of a crucial contextual detail makes for a deficient discussion.”

            But it is obviously hoping for far too much that pointing out such abysmally lazy and slanted readings will give them any pause for honest, objective re-examination.

  • James Donald says:

    I don’t know why I looked at the comments. I thought I’d see some empathy or appreciation, at least. We all know the complexity of our country and our history, but just like for those who have died and are dying in Israel and Gaza right now, the least we can do is pause our judgement and opinions for just a second and see them. And respect those who try to find some justice or meaning for them. People were killed. In plainly awful and undefendable circumstances. Someone has at least tried to hear from survivors and tell their story more accurately. To any readers who lost loved ones that day, I’m sorry.

  • ilike homophones says:

    sounds like Phoenix!!!!!

  • Jane Crankshaw says:

    One of many SouthAfrican shameful moments ….including the relatively recent Marikane killings.

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted

We would like our readers to start paying for Daily Maverick...

…but we are not going to force you to. Over 10 million users come to us each month for the news. We have not put it behind a paywall because the truth should not be a luxury.

Instead we ask our readers who can afford to contribute, even a small amount each month, to do so.

If you appreciate it and want to see us keep going then please consider contributing whatever you can.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options

Daily Maverick Elections Toolbox

Download the Daily Maverick Elections Toolbox.

+ Your election day questions answered
+ What's different this election
+ Test yourself! Take the quiz