Defend Truth


Former lottery boss’s Rolls Royce released from preservation order after being sold to ‘innocent third party’

Former lottery boss’s Rolls Royce released from preservation order after being sold to ‘innocent third party’
This photo of Alfred and Tshilidzi Nevhutanda is from their church’s website. (Photo: Copied for fair use, supplied by GroundUp)

Alfred Nevhutanda sold the car just three months after he bought it for R6.3-million.

A preservation order on former National Lotteries Commission (NLC) board chair Alfred Nevhutanda’s R6.3-million Rolls Royce Phantom has been lifted because the vehicle has fallen “into the hands of an innocent third party”.

In September, after the Asset Forfeiture Unit revealed how almost R4.6-million of the car’s purchase price was siphoned from dodgy Lottery grants, the Pretoria high court froze the vehicle.

“Even though it is irrefutable that the vehicle was bought with the proceeds of unlawful activities, it fell into the hands of an innocent owner,” said Gauteng National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) spokesperson Lumka Mahanjana.

Despite this, the NPA did not believe it would be successful if it pursued the forfeiture of the vehicle, Mahanjana said.

“We only realised on 17 October 2023 that it was sold … when the curator bonis sent us a communication from the attorney representing the innocent owner,” Mahanjana said.

The new owner, Rirhandzu Owner Siweya, is the CEO of a mining company “who used his dividends to pay for the vehicle … and is not involved in the fraud and corruption perpetrated against the NLC,” she said.

The NPA’s decision to withdraw the preservation order was based on the fact that Siweya paid “a price not significantly less than the market value of the property” and was unaware that it had originally been bought with “the proceeds of unlawful activity”.

Because of this, she said, it had become clear the NPA would not be “successful with an application to forfeit the vehicle. As such we had no choice but to release the vehicle from the preservation order”.

“It is obviously extremely frustrating for the AFU (Asset Forfeiture Unit) as we could clearly show that the vehicle was purchased with the proceeds of unlawful activity.”

Sold within months

Nevhutanda sold the Rolls Royce less than three months after he paid R6.3-million for it to Daytona Motors, a Sandton dealership, on 31 August 2016.

He sold it to Pcubed Exotica, an “exotic car rental, branding and chauffeur services company” on 17 November 2016.

Vivien Natasen, a director of Pcubed, appeared before the Zondo Commission in connection with allegedly corrupt transactions involving SA Express. Natasen told the Commission that he did not benefit from these transactions.

Natasen is also a director of Neo Solutions, renamed Neo Africa Advisory last year, which had paid R2-million towards Nevhutanda’s mansion. The company also scored over R26-million in NLC contracts while Nevhutanda was the Commission’s board chair.

Just over a year later, on 10 October 2017, Pcubed sold the Rolls Royce to Siweya, for R5.5-million, according to the NPA.

The NPA initially thought the vehicle had been bought from Nevhutanda by Malwandla Solly Siweya [unrelated to Rirhandzu], “who is implicated in fraud and corruption at the NLC”, the NPA said.

Dodgy mansion payments

As with his Rolls Royce, Nevhutanda’s Pretoria mansion was also paid for with money from Lottery grants intended for good causes.

Over a period of six months, payments running into millions of rands were made by several non-profits that had benefited from Lottery grants to attorneys handling the sale of the property.

Other payments, also amounting to millions, towards the house came from unrelated companies, including one linked to former NLC COO Phillemon Letwaba who resigned under a cloud, and consulting engineers and a construction company.

Red flags

Daytona received payments for the Rolls from several sources unrelated to Nevhutanda, a red flag for possible money laundering. But, in a response to questions sent to Daytona’s CEO, the company’s lawyers said that they were prohibited by law from disclosing whether the transaction had been reported to the Financial Intelligence Centre (FIC).

“For the avoidance of doubt ex abundanti cautela [out of abundant caution] the transaction foreshadowed in your enquiry was reconsidered by my client’s FIC compliance officer and is satisfied, as am I, that it has complied with each and every of its statutory obligations in regard thereto, and will continue to do so,” Alan Allschwang, Daytona’s lawyer said.

There are several sections of the Act under which Daytona might have been liable to report Nevhutanda’s purchase of the vehicle.

Because Nevhutanda was the NLC’s board chairperson at the time he bought the car and had previously held high office in the ANC as the party’s Limpopo regional chair, he was classified as a politically exposed person. As such, Daytona was likely legally bound to take measures, including ascertaining the source of the funds, before selling him the vehicle. There is also an obligation to report the sale of high-value goods valued at R100,000 or more to the FIC.

No responses from Natasen and Nevhutanda

Natasen failed to respond to questions, including additional questions sent to him via email. GroundUp received a receipt showing that he had opened both emails.

Nevhutanda also did not respond to questions sent to him via a WhatsApp number and an email address on which GroundUp had previously communicated with him. The WhatsApp number is registered as his with the Companies and Intellectual Property Commission (CIPC). A person responded to the same questions sent to a second number registered as Nevhutanda’s on the CIPC’s database saying it was not his [Nevhutanda’s] number.

The emailed questions bounced back with an auto-response stating that the account was “over quota”. DM

First published by GroundUp.


Comments - Please in order to comment.

  • jeanetteferreiravj says:

    So what does the following mean?

    GENERAL LAW AMENDMENT ACT, 1955 (ACT NO. 62 OF 1955).  Section 36 Any person who is found in possession of any goods to which there is reasonable suspicion that they have been stolen and is unable to give a satisfactory account of such possession, shall be guilty of an offence and liable on conviction to the penalties which may be imposed on a conviction of theft.  Section 37 Any person who in any manner, otherwise than at a public sale, acquires or receives into his or her possession from any other person stolen goods, without having reasonable cause for believing at the time of such acquisition or receipt that such goods are the property of the person from whom he or she receives them or that such person has been duly authorized by the owner thereof to deal with or to dispose of them, shall be guilty of an offence.

  • chris smit says:

    On this I reason that almost all of the land currently held by white farmers that can prove legal processes of ownership must be exempt from confiscation

  • Ajay San says:

    Innocent third party? Our jails are full of innocent third parties.

  • Mario Cremonte says:

    Try not to follow these shenanigans, but has Nevhutanda been jailed?

    • Lebitsi Leburu says:

      NPA is captured. Batohi is a big disappointment. How can the 2 Siweya’s not related? They both bought their cars from the people who stole from the NLC and yet the NPA says the guys are unrelated and the one Siwey is even not a suspect. And when is the crooked pastor going to be arrested?

  • Middle aged Mike says:

    I have completely lost faith in the NPA. I find it impossible to believe that everything they botch or leave unaddressed can be explained by incompetence alone.

  • Harry Mokabane says:

    “innocent owner”

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted


This article is free to read.

Sign up for free or sign in to continue reading.

Unlike our competitors, we don’t force you to pay to read the news but we do need your email address to make your experience better.

Nearly there! Create a password to finish signing up with us:

Please enter your password or get a sign in link if you’ve forgotten

Open Sesame! Thanks for signing up.

We would like our readers to start paying for Daily Maverick...

…but we are not going to force you to. Over 10 million users come to us each month for the news. We have not put it behind a paywall because the truth should not be a luxury.

Instead we ask our readers who can afford to contribute, even a small amount each month, to do so.

If you appreciate it and want to see us keep going then please consider contributing whatever you can.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options