Our Burning Planet

JUST ENERGY TRANSITION

Mantashe has NGOs in crosshairs (again) and wants them to declare their funding sources

Mantashe has NGOs in crosshairs (again) and wants them to declare their funding sources
Mineral Resources and Energy Minister Gwede Mantashe was lambasted by environmental NGOs after claiming that climate change was being used as a weapon by ‘foreign funded NGOs’ to block development in South Africa. (Photos: Hoseya Jubase / Adobe Stock)

Civil society groups have questioned why Mineral Resources and Energy Minister Gwede Mantashe continues to cast aspersions on environmental groups aiming to hold the government account, suggesting he doesn’t believe in accountability or transparency.

Mineral Resources and Energy Minister Gwede Mantashe has been chided by civil society after claiming that climate change was being used as a weapon by “foreign-funded NGOs” to block development in South Africa. 

At the 2023 Africa Oil Week in Cape Town on Tuesday, 10 October, Mantashe’s address for the most part stuck to his usual spiel for continued investment in fossil fuel projects in SA. However, this time he called for NGOs – particularly those opposing fossil fuel development in the country – to declare their sources of funding, just as political parties are mandated to do in South Africa.

Mantashe said: “Foreign-funded NGOs are being used to weaponise environmental preservation to block development in developing nations. This is a reality that we are faced with in South Africa, hence we demand that these NGOs be registered and be made to declare their source of funding as it is done with political parties.”

Under the Political Party Funding Act, which was signed into law in 2021, political parties in South Africa are required to disclose donations greater than R100,000.

The minister’s comments were considered a severe criticism of civil society for its willingness to participate in South Africa’s democratic processes, and importantly, a deflection from the real issues in the oil and gas industry – particularly as these NGOs have already registered and declared their funders on their websites where annual reports could also be found for some.

This was declared by a number of environmental NGOs who spoke to Daily Maverick.

Read more in Daily Maverick: Are environmental NGOs anti-development, as Gwede Mantashe claims? Wessa responds

Just outside the Cape Town International Convention Centre (CTICC), where Mantahshe gave his address on Tuesday, a protest was held by Extinction Rebellion (XR) Cape Town depicting a paper mache artwork of Mantashe in a bed – covered with rose petals – with a person wearing a gas mask, representing the fossil fuel industry.

Protesters said the demonstration was an expression of Mantashe’s “endless love” and unyielding defence of the fossil fuel industry, despite the country’s commitments to decarbonise.

XR Cape Town said: “It is time for South Africa to wake up to the fact that this seemingly cosy relationship with the fossil fuel industry is actually a toxic, exploitative, one-sided affair. It is time to ditch this relationship.”

In his address, Mantashe appeared to be itching to overcome the stumbling block of civil society’s opposition to his vision of reaping the benefits of exploiting Africa’s oil and gas deposits. He said that it was “deplorable that, despite this endowment, the developments in the globe are such that Africa does not benefit from this endowment”.

Manatshe said the constant pushback from environmental NGOs against oil and gas developments in the country resulted in some companies shifting their prospective projects in South Africa to neighbouring countries, such as Namibia.

NGOs fight back 

African Climate Alliance (ACA), a youth-led, grassroots group fighting for environmental, ecological and social justice, already publicly states on its website who its funders are as a measure of transparency, but does not believe it should have to be mandatory, as the minister is now calling for.

Read more on Daily Maverick: Mantashe’s fixation on NGO funding is a pretext to silence civil society’s voice as a watchdog of democracy

Sarah Farrell, ACA spokesperson, said: “We also only accept funding from international donors who do not have a say over the activities we choose to do/how we choose to do it. So this idea that international interests are guiding our work is false. This statement made by Mantashe is also part of a broader onslaught on NGOs in South Africa who are challenging the vested interests in keeping fossil fuels going and stalling the just transition at the expense of all South Africans.”

Farrell said these repetitive comments from Mantashe and the fossil fuel industry erased the many community voices speaking out against the neocolonial expansion of coal, oil and gas.

The Green Connection’s Liziwe McDaid added that as civil society, they not only had to uphold their constitutional right to have a safe and healthy environment, but also had to protect their right to have their voices heard. 

Read more in Daily Maverick: Mantashe calls environmental activism ‘colonialism and apartheid of a special type’ amid opposition to Shell Wild Coast survey

“This is not the same as opposing development. We also see that instead of implementing proper energy planning that is in the public’s interest, the Department of Mineral Resources and Energy (DMRE) continues to push fossil fuel projects, which we believe are not for the benefit of South Africans. Therefore, it has never been more critical to protect our civil society space.”

McDaid said the Green Connection was not opposed to sharing its financial information and that as NGOs, most organisations had already published this information on their websites.

However, she said the minister’s accusations were a distraction from the main issue, which was that government ministers were accountable to the people who elected them and that civil society had a right to scrutinise the sources of funding for political parties.

“When considering that South Africa does not have a proper energy plan, then we have to question the rationale for proposed pet projects of the energy minister. You can find information on our website,” McDaid said.

Francesca de Gasparis, executive director at the Southern African Faith Communities’ Environment Institute (SAFCEI), said: “The idea that we would want to weaponise our call for ethical governance is really an insult to those who fought for the freedom to express their views on decisions that will affect them in the long run.”

Read more in Daily Maverick: Closing the gates of hell – protesting against the fossil fuel industry is everybody’s business

De Gasparis was adamant that their activism was geared towards protecting the environment for future generations and ensuring that every South African had an opportunity to actively participate when appropriate.

“This is what makes a healthy democracy. Civil society, NGOs and the public reserve the right to critique and criticise – in peaceful ways and as often as possible – government policy that is not for the people or for the land … What the minister’s comments seem to reflect is his frustration over the opposition of his ‘solutions’, and that his plans are sometimes thwarted,” De Gasparis said.

The minister’s blame-shifting spoke volumes about the government’s willingness to be accountable and transparent, according to De Gasparis. 

SAFCEI and the Green Connection said that instead of criticising civil society for its willingness to participate in South Africa’s democratic processes, the government should instead seek to work with the people, for the people. That meant listening to the people. DM

Gallery
Absa OBP

Comments - Please in order to comment.

  • Michele Rivarola says:

    A true Stalinist that is what he is, if he could go ahead and reinstate the purges he would do it in a flash. The alleged miner who knows all about mining but never mined an ounce.

  • ylab says:

    Putting our dislike for our Bosasa funded Minister aside, as with political parties, we need to know who is funding who. Nobody is dishing out money without an agenda.

  • mzamo206 says:

    The minister is correct, how can we have unelected few individuals with overseas donors, some unknown have the power and financial muscle to determine the growth prospects and economic direction of our sovereign state. Something is definitely fishy around these NGOs and their funding.

    • Johan Buys says:

      MZamo : rather ask yourself how can we have such incompetent or corrupt cadres that they lose every court case that holds them to account. Any anyway, comrade Gwede pays their legal fees.

  • Matthew Quinton says:

    As much as I detest this minister, I agree with his question.

    NGO’s should be transparent about where their funding comes from.

    If it’s the DAVOS elite in their many many MANY private jets, then I would serisouly question the motivation.

    We need to shift to renewables, eventually, but ONLY fossil fuels will get us there in a realistic timeframe.

    It suites Western elites to stop the developing world from using our natural resources to uplift ourselves and to move ahead, after all, our fossil fuels are their long term energy stores.

    On the other side, Man-tach and the cANCer brigade are only capable of stealing and feasting on the dying corpse of SA, so best we keep the resources out of their fat little fingers for as long as possible.

    It’s a quandary… the good people of SA need our resources to move ahead, but between the “It’s my turn to eat” ANC, the Russia/China new dawn and the starving European hordes, what chance do we really have?

    • Lisbeth Scalabrini says:

      “We need to shift to renewables, eventually, but ONLY fossil fuels will get us there in a realistic timeframe”.
      If we continue to use fossil fuels we will never get there. Mantashe even wants to use coal. Other countries have managed to shift to renewables in less than two years, but first of all, we cannot have a minister who does not even want to try!

  • Hermann Funk says:

    I have no problem with NGOs having to declare where their funds are coming from. However, Mantashe is using this as a smokescreen to hide his own incompetence. The papers are full with news about the obstacles he is unwilling/incapable to remove for existing businesses, e.g. mining. Furthermore in none of the Sub-Saharan countries where oil and gas are produced has it been to the benefit of the population. Just have a look at Angola and Nigeria.

  • Johan Buys says:

    Please find a court case that an NGO won other than on the basis that Gwede and his cadres did not follow the applicable laws and regulations?

    NGO don’t get court orders because the judge doesn’t like fracking or whatever.

    By now the NGO probably get a chunk of their funding for battles from cost orders against Gwede & Cadres. They win, Gwede pays their legal fees, no funding required 😉

  • Senzo Moyakhe says:

    If it wasn’t for Greedy Mantashe making this call, it’s fairly reasonable. My Mom worked for ±10 years for USAID funded TB/HIV education programme. Driving USAID branded cars sorted out transparency.
    The problem here is where his arrows are pointed. Yes there may well be other entities with vested interests in African fossil fuel based industry not getting up & running, but the person who is making the call for them to take off their coats fills me with scepticism. Add to that the desk where he’s blowing his whistle and the questions the objectives. Someone is stepping on his toes and killing his ‘pension’. Tread carefully…

  • William Dryden says:

    Mantashe knows everything about nothing and nothing about everything.

  • David Pennington says:

    I am with Mantashe on this one

  • L Dennis says:

    Well said Hermann

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted

We would like our readers to start paying for Daily Maverick...

…but we are not going to force you to. Over 10 million users come to us each month for the news. We have not put it behind a paywall because the truth should not be a luxury.

Instead we ask our readers who can afford to contribute, even a small amount each month, to do so.

If you appreciate it and want to see us keep going then please consider contributing whatever you can.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options

Premier Debate: Gauten Edition Banner

Gauteng! Brace yourselves for The Premier Debate!

How will elected officials deal with Gauteng’s myriad problems of crime, unemployment, water supply, infrastructure collapse and potentially working in a coalition?

Come find out at the inaugural Daily Maverick Debate where Stephen Grootes will hold no punches in putting the hard questions to Gauteng’s premier candidates, on 9 May 2024 at The Forum at The Campus, Bryanston.