Sport

RUGBY

Springboks’ forward selections in the spotlight following breakdown blowout in Paris

Springboks’ forward selections in the spotlight following breakdown blowout in Paris
Tadhg Beirne of Ireland offloads to team mate Caelan Doris under pressure from Faf de Klerk of South Africa during the Rugby World Cup 2023 match between South Africa and Ireland at Stade de France, in Paris, on Saturday, 23 September. (Photo: Craig Mercer/MB Media/Getty Images)

Saturday’s 13-8 Pool B loss to Ireland will focus Bok minds on possible changes to the pack after losing the breakdown battle.

The Springbok coaches face a number of big decisions following an encouraging yet inadequate performance in the marquee pool match against Ireland in Paris.

While the need for a reliable goal-kicker is paramount, South Africa have to address the balance of their pack, their discipline, as well as their overall approach to the breakdown before they face the best teams in the do-or-die stage of the World Cup.

The latter statement needs to be viewed in context, though. The battle at the Stade de France was gladiatorial, and the Boks gave as good as they got at the collisions and breakdowns.

They matched the Irish for passion, speed and physicality, but not for accuracy and composure – and this often compromised their attacking momentum or gifted Ireland multiple penalties and entries into the South African 22.

Plan to stifle Ireland on point

Bok rethink after Ireland clash

Faf De Klerk was asked to kick two penalties from inside his own half and failed. Goal-kicking was an issue but the Boks also lost the breakdown battle. (Photo : Juan Jose Gasparini/Gallo Images)

Jacques Nienaber and Rassie Erasmus may feel like their plan to stifle Ireland – the most dangerous attacking team on the planet – largely worked.

South Africa competed fiercely at the breakdowns, and then rushed the Irish ball carriers to hit them well behind the gainline. For most of the game, Ireland struggled to generate the necessary ruck speed (typically three seconds or lower) needed to compromise the well-drilled Bok defence.

The Boks have employed this strategy against other attack-minded teams in the past, with great success. When they have controlled the set pieces and contested the breakdowns, they’ve dictated the flow of the contest.

But in Paris on Saturday, the Boks failed to implement that plan consistently and were rarely in control.

They made four times as many dominant tackles as the Irish, and forced a whopping 18 turnovers. But they didn’t dominate the set pieces as some expected they would, and they blew hot and cold in general play, with an outstanding carry or defensive hit often followed by an unforced handling error or breakdown penalty.

The goal-kicking stats are impossible to ignore, with four misses from the tee costing the Boks 11 points. You can understand why so many have called for a change in this department – and the Bok coaches will have to heed those calls sooner rather than later.

While Ireland didn’t produce their best performance, they were helped by the fact that Johnny Sexton and Jack Crowley were flawless in front of goal. Ireland were far from clinical on attack, scoring on just two of their 10 visits to the South African 22. Goal-kicking – and no small measure of grit – allowed them to claim a 13-8 win.

Own worst enemies

Goal-kicking is a major cause for concern, and yet, the Bok coaches may be more disappointed by how the game was managed in general play.

After securing the first kickoff, the Boks took an unnecessary risk and ended up defending an Irish lineout deep in their own 22. They rallied to repel Ireland for the better part of 20 minutes.

A lineout steal was followed by handling error. A breakdown penalty allowed them to exit, but then they conceded a breakdown penalty in the subsequent passage of play. This pattern persisted throughout the game.

The Boks conceded a total of 11 penalties – many of those at the breakdowns. The timing of those penalties, however, was significant.

The Boks won a lineout turnover in the eighth minute, then conceded a penalty after the ball was booted down field. They had a scrum in the middle of the field in the 16th minute, and after securing possession, conceded a penalty at the breakdown.

Damian de Allende made a powerful carry in the 22nd minute, but then got stripped in the tackle. They won another scrum towards the end of the first half, but that attacking march ended in yet another breakdown penalty against them. The second half continued in much the same manner.

Other World Cup title contenders such as France and New Zealand would have watched the game in Paris with interest.

The Boks provided the blueprint with how to beat Ireland – although the South Africans fell short of winning due to the inaccurate implementation of their plan. Likewise, Ireland showed how to disrupt and frustrate the Boks, and the Boks themselves showcased their weakness from the kicking tee.

Keeping key players, strategies back?

Eben Etzebeth, Ireland vs South Africa

Eben Etzebeth after South Africa’s victorious clash against Scotland at the Rugby World Cup. (Photo: Franco Arland / Quality Sport Images / Getty Images)

Did the Bok coaches get the selections right for this game?

Before the game, so much was made about the seven-one split on the bench. It came as a surprise to see the Boks using their maul so sparingly – just twice over the course of 80 minutes – and they weren’t particularly impressive at the breakdown in the final 15 minutes when all of their top fetchers – Deon Fourie, Marco van Staden, Kwagga Smith – were on the park.

It was always going to be a risk to include seven forwards on the bench. The Boks were fortunate that there were no serious backline injuries, as this may have necessitated a disruptive reshuffle and possibly a situation where a forward had to cover for a back. It’s debatable whether the extra forward made a difference against Ireland, and ultimately whether the risk is worth it going forward.

Duane Vermeulen – one of the senior players in the squad, and a specialist in areas such as breakdown, lineout and maul – watched the game from the coaches’ box.

A few eyebrows were raised after Vermeulen and Willie le Roux were completely omitted from the matchday 23, and it’s fair to say that the vastly experienced pair may have made a difference, particularly in the latter stages. By then, leaders such as Siya Kolisi, Eben Etzebeth and Bongi Mbonambi had all been replaced.

Will Vermeulen and Le Roux return for the playoffs? And have the Bok coaches been holding something back, in terms of specific plays and tactics?

Perhaps. The fact that they mauled from the lineout on just two occasions against Ireland suggests as much.

The inconsistencies at the scrum and breakdown, of course, were not planned, and neither was the high penalty count.

Ireland deserve credit for making life difficult for the Boks, but there is much to be learnt from how the South African players reacted to that specific challenge. Those lessons will undoubtedly shape the team’s preparations in the coming weeks. DM

Gallery

Comments - Please in order to comment.

  • Steve Davidson says:

    Sorry Jon, I agree more with Peter de Villiers who was in the panel on SABC and said that the Boks were actually in control, apart from their kicking (although I keep wondering if Rasnaber didn’t ask Manie to miss, seeing as how both his kicks, from virtually the same point, went on almost exactly the same line to avoid the SBs in the QF!) and also their ball catching when they missed two sure tries in the first half. In fact, it was the first time I’ve seen the Irish for a while and wasn’t really impressed apart from what Craig Ray said about their knowledge of the ‘Dark Arts’ which you’d expect them to have. But hey, who would know?

  • Coen Gous says:

    Good technical article. But the Boks have become their own worst enemy. And the coaches have become more important than the players themselves. Rassie Erasmus, the greatest coach I have ever seen, has become big-headed, opinion-inflated, obsessed, and using silly articles, gestures, coaching strategies, and media interviews/social media, to give himself relevance. The official coach, Nienaber, is purely there to fill the gaps, but he is purely a second rated coach, whom will depart to Ireland as an assistant coach to a club team post WC. The players themselves are the best I have ever seen, with enormous depth, talent, and self-believe. However, they have no means to express this enormous talent, simply because of over-inflated ego’s following 2019. but primarily because the coaches want to be the real heroes, captaining the players from the VIP pavillion with lights, etc.. Unless you unleash these players, the best 15, to do their own thing, and evoke their own passion, aggression, and self-believe, on the field of play, they will loose against France in the quarters, whom will bring a passion and will to win even bigger that the Irish.

    • Steve Davidson says:

      Test

    • Steve Davidson says:

      You obviously don’t know much about international rugby, no matter how much you think you do. The French (based on the ABs game, as well as losing Dupont) nor Irish (based on Saturday night’s game) are that great. Just for your information Rassie was using flags, and then lights, from the Free State grandstand roof way back when he was coach for the Cheetahs.

  • Gary De Sousa says:

    If the plan was not followed properly or incorrectly then one must ask who`s job on the field is it to make the changes to how they playing to impliment the plan? Like the 2 kicks both missed from identical spots,has he the abilitly to adjust his style?

  • Dick Binge Binge says:

    On the lighter side someone sent me an email this morning say that Naas Botha has just passed a fitness test.

  • Hari Seldon says:

    I was at the game and it was a fantastic game. Two evenly matched sides going at each other. It was very disappointing missing the kicks and not getting the maul over the line in the last few seconds. But the Irish are damn good and very technical at the break down. We need Dweba there as the replacement hooker. Fourie is a bit too small and not as effective at the breakdown against a team like Ireland. It was the same in the URC – he lacked punch and I think he may not have set the front row properly leading to critical lost scrums in the 2nd half. I think Duane should have been on the bench – he is just magnificent despite being at the end of his career. Manie was not lining up at 90 degrees to the post and hence kicked them left – it seems a schoolboy error and the boks should really have a specialist kicking consultant with the squad. Other than that it was nip and tuck and a fantastic game. We had the Irish under huge pressure and can take the next match against them.

  • daniel.theron says:

    Excellent article and analysis. The dust has now settled and it is easier to set the emotions aside. We were outplayed at the breakdowns – we also picked up half of our numerous penalties here. There was no breakdown specialist in the starting 15 (Marx covered this in the past). Rassie and Nienaber will fix this. Libbok lost confidence and the kicking duties should be given to someone else – lets support the coaching staff to come up with a solution with or without Pollard.
    All in all it was a great game between 2 excellent sides and it could have been won by either. In retrospect it may have been the perfect outcome. The expectations of the Boks prior to the game were too high and they will now realize that talent and reputation alone is not enough. I feel more confident since this weekend that we may pull this world cup off once again.

  • kingsleywent04 says:

    The Boks need Vermuelan at 8 and would be well advised to use van Staden’s bulk and turnover skills at hooker as the most obvious replacement for the brilliant Marx

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted

We would like our readers to start paying for Daily Maverick...

…but we are not going to force you to. Over 10 million users come to us each month for the news. We have not put it behind a paywall because the truth should not be a luxury.

Instead we ask our readers who can afford to contribute, even a small amount each month, to do so.

If you appreciate it and want to see us keep going then please consider contributing whatever you can.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options