Defend Truth


What’s the new National State Enterprises Bill about?

What’s the new National State Enterprises Bill about?
Public Enterprises Minister Pravin Gordhan. (Photo: Gallo Images / Brenton Geach)

The National State Enterprises Bill is being called the biggest reorganisation of state-owned companies in more than 20 years. The draft legislation has been published for public comment, but may not make it into law any time soon. We break down the details.

What does the Bill propose?

The headline detail is that the draft legislation would spell the closure of the Department of Public Enterprises, a ministry that few are likely to miss, given its patent failure to control the death spiral of most of South Africa’s state-owned enterprises (SOEs).

In its place would be a holding company to supervise the SOEs: the State Asset Management SOC Ltd.

What is the point of replacing the state’s Department of Public Enterprises with a new state-owned enterprise to manage the other state-owned enterprises?

That is indeed the question of the moment. But there is some optimistic thinking behind it, which the proposal’s major champion — Public Enterprises Minister Pravin Gordhan — explained to Parliament in May 2022.

Gordhan said at the time that the shake-up, which he is understood to have been working on for the past five years alongside the Presidential State-Owned Enterprises Council, would improve financial performance and reduce political meddling.

The minister told Parliament that the establishment of a holding company would “separate the state’s ownership functions from its policy and regulatory functions, minimise the scope for political interference, introduce greater professionalism, and manage state assets in a way that protects shareholder value”.

Who will the shareholders be?

The state. And only the state. The Bill proposes that the holding company be registered “under the name ‘State Asset Management SOC Limited’ with the state as its sole shareholder”.

And … why will there be less political interference?

Some scepticism is in order.

In an interview with News24 on Sunday, acting Public Enterprises director-general Jacky Molisane said the aim was to hire the “best of the best” and allow them to “run these entities professionally and insulate them from political interference”.

Molisane also said that corporate-style Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) would be set in advance to ensure a certain level of performance. (Although this sounds promising, we have heard this kind of pledge from the state before: most notably, in the performance contracts signed by President Cyril Ramaphosa’s Cabinet ministers in 2020 and apparently never referred to again.)

The Bill specifies that either the President or a Cabinet member — ie, a political leader — is the “sole representative of the holding company”, ie, the “shareholder” referred to in the draft legislation.

The board of directors will be appointed by the “shareholder”, the Bill states: in other words, by the President or a designated Cabinet minister. In other words, these will still be political appointments.

Any other worries?

The draft Bill is being greeted by multiple observers, including the DA, as a missed opportunity. The DA’s Ghaleb Cachalia said that the focus of the legislation should have been to “create pathways through which private investment could start flowing into the SOE sector”, either by entirely privatising the entities or opening them up to public-private partnerships.

This is, in fact, one of the more confusing aspects of the discourse around the new Bill. Molisane told News24 that the aim of the legislation was to “emulate best practices, such as in China, Malaysia and Singapore”. Yet in countries such as Singapore, often what is at play is a public-private partnership.

The government’s insistence on maintaining sole ownership of the holding company was described by Business Leadership CEO Busisiwe Mavuso in a Monday newsletter as a “disappointment”.

Wrote Mavuso: “Good examples of holding companies in the rest of the world are able to trade their interests in companies to realise the most value for the state.” 

Are there positive aspects?

“A great deal will depend on who is appointed to the board of the new company, and then what kind of executive management is appointed,” Mavuso said.

The DA’s Cachalia termed the Bill “well-intentioned”, but said it was spoiled by “the ANC government’s penchant for centralisation and control”.

Exactly which state-owned enterprises would fall under this proposed new holding company?

This is currently unclear, but News24 reports that the Presidential State-Owned Enterprises Council has “compiled a list of those entities that would be suitable for inclusion in the holdings company and noted those that should be disposed of or shut down”.

The Sunday Times reported recently that in a desperate move to cut costs, the National Treasury was recommending either slashing or merging entities including the Road Traffic Management Corporation, a number of human rights bodies and multiple tourism agencies.

The Road Traffic Management Corporation CEO received remuneration of almost R9.3-million in the 2020/21 financial year, making the position, by Daily Maverick’s calculations, the best-paid job in the South African public sector. Another hugely lucrative post is the CEO of another roads-related government agency, the Road Traffic Infringement Agency.

How many state-owned enterprises does South Africa actually have?

Wonderful question, and one that it is astonishingly difficult to find a clear answer to in 2023.

In 1994, there were about 300 SOEs employing about 300,000 people. By 2010, when the Presidential Review Committee was appointed to look into SOEs, it was established that there were “at least 715” SOEs — yet somehow employing under 160,000 people by this point.

Some weeks ago, Daily Maverick asked the Department of Public Enterprises how many “state-owned enterprises public institutions/ public entities/government agencies” South Africa has.

The response we received:

“The Department of Public Enterprises, as the government’s shareholder representative, has oversight of six state-owned enterprises, namely: Eskom (power utility), Transnet (rail, freight, logistics and ports), South African Airways (SAA) (aviation), Denel (defence and manufacturing), Safcol (forestry) and Alexkor (mining). These entities all combined, employ around 100,000 people (the majority of whom are in Eskom and Transnet, which each have about 40-50,000 employees).”

How close are we to this new Bill being made law?

Quite far off, it would appear. There’s a public consultation period on the Bill currently, after which it will go to Parliament. While the ANC obviously has the parliamentary majority needed to pass the Bill if it chooses to, one of the interesting political questions around it is what the party’s stance on it will be.

The ANC has proposed a different solution to the SOE problem: namely, that entities fall under control of the relevant departments, so it’s unclear whether Gordhan’s proposal will find favour there. Unions are also likely to have something to say about the job losses inherent in cutting or merging entities. And because that will become a political hot potato, the ruling party may want to boot this one beyond the general elections in 2024. DM


Comments - Please in order to comment.

  • Zamfoot 1 1 says:

    Why worry about cadre deployment to all SOE boards when you only have to corrupt one to get them all.

    • Graeme J says:

      The dark lord Sauron made 20 rings of power: three for the elves; seven for the dwarves; nine for the kings of men; and one, forged in Mount Doom, which will allow him to control them all.

    • Greeff Kotzé says:

      Well, on the other hand, then there would only be one board for the public to keep an eye on – which might very well make it easier for civil society as a whole. Currently we are being bamboozled by a myriad array of boards where we don’t know the majority of the players and don’t remember their past actions.

      But I don’t see the DPE reponse including the likes of the SABC and the Post Office, so such a move might not be as far-reaching as it at first appears to be.

  • Sydney Kaye says:

    Empolying the best of the best and let Iettng them run the companies without interference coukd be implinvented now without any structural changes. If the state is the sole shareholder and the ANC is the state/government there is noway they will keep out of policy or keep out of the till.

  • Alley Cat says:

    Deck chairs and titanic spring to mind. IDIOTS!! And Pravin has been working on this for 5 years? If a private company took five years to design a strategy they would already be bankrupt, but then I suppose our government is already bankrupt, both morally and financially so who gives a toss? BLAH, BLAH, BLAH!!!

  • Change is good sa says:

    Once again a ridiculous proposal that will not be adopted that has taken 5 years to formulate.
    This is what our departmental heads do all the time, instead of making sure that existing systems work for the citizens of South Africa.
    The ANC has to go in next years elections and we need to make more of a fuss about the Road Traffic Man. Corp. CEO salary. 9.3million for no performance. This looting has to stop. Who is he/she and what does they do all day ?

  • Hilary Morris says:


  • Hermann Funk says:

    Instead of tackling problems head on, they play in the sandpits like little children. What a bunch of useless individuals.

  • Beyond Fedup says:

    What a load of nonsense! Whilst Gordhan might be the best out of a rotten bunch, he is nevertheless a hardline communist who believes in rigid state control. Nothing will change however well-intentioned as he ignores the simple reality that in the anc, you have rapacious, corrupt and parasitic cadres from top to bottom, whose whole existence and purpose in life is self-serving It will still be BEE and cadre deployment in a different guise no matter how much they spin it. There is a simple solution to SA’s deep-rooted and self-imposed destruction – vote these criminal scumbags out of office!

  • Johan Buys says:

    1. Let Treasury run SOE as custodian of the investment in those SOE.

    2. To the extent that political appointees are involved in sub-board, hand them the same personal unlimited liability and duties of a director of any private sector company.

  • Frank Janssens says:

    So nothing changes!

  • Smudger Smiff says:

    What’s the new National State Enterprises Bill about?
    It’s another ANC scam to bleed SOEs dry with extra protection for the bleeders

  • There is nothing in this bill that suggests that the running of SOE’s will be improved. History of their management to date would suggest exactly the opposite. The State has just not got the expertise or the will to add any value. Corruption in their management has been an ongoing characteristic of their performance to date, with only suspension of non-performing corrupt employees, but with no prompt legal action to recover lost monies and apply penalties. I

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted


This article is free to read.

Sign up for free or sign in to continue reading.

Unlike our competitors, we don’t force you to pay to read the news but we do need your email address to make your experience better.

Nearly there! Create a password to finish signing up with us:

Please enter your password or get a sign in link if you’ve forgotten

Open Sesame! Thanks for signing up.

We would like our readers to start paying for Daily Maverick...

…but we are not going to force you to. Over 10 million users come to us each month for the news. We have not put it behind a paywall because the truth should not be a luxury.

Instead we ask our readers who can afford to contribute, even a small amount each month, to do so.

If you appreciate it and want to see us keep going then please consider contributing whatever you can.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options