Business Maverick


After the Bell: The Sanral dispute – a decoder

After the Bell: The Sanral dispute – a decoder
Road construction along the N2 in the Eastern Cape in Qunu, South Africa. (Photo: Gallo Images / Sowetan / Johnny Onverwacht)

There has been a lot of news this week about Sanral, the SA National Roads Agency. Allow me to try to decode it for you (as much as is humanly possible).

Sanral is responsible for South Africa’s national road network – any road with an N in its name as well as some provincial and regional roads. In total, it’s about 23,500km of roads, including a whole bunch of toll roads and some concessions, notably the Platinum Highway, the Maputo Corridor and the N3 toll concession.

The toll roads, about 14% of the total, are supposed to be self-funding and the rest are funded by the Department of Transport, its sole shareholder, with one huge transfer of around R21-billion a year from the fiscus. 

There are a lot of roads with enormous pothole problems, but these are usually the province of the provinces. Sanral’s roads are mostly pretty well maintained, and it estimates only about 100km of its roads are in a “very poor” condition, with 10% of its roads being in a poor condition. The rest they characterise as fair to very good. 

The news in the past about Sanral was focused on the battle between Outa, the Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse, and the Gauteng e-toll system. But more recently, a new battle has opened up over a new BEE scoring system. 

It goes without saying that road-building is a crucial part of a construction company’s business. So, to participate in road construction, construction companies jumped through all kinds of difficult and expensive hoops to comply. And for years, this has been more or less operating without major hitches.

But there was recently a change in management at Sanral and the new managers decided to change the BEE scoring system. Surprise! Previously, the system was operated in terms of the Preferential Procurement Policy Framework Act and regulations that set out how that system works. Under the Act, 20% of the points available are awarded on a BEE equity-ownership basis for small projects and 10% for large projects. A Level-1 operator, the highest ranking, would get the full 20 points for tenders up to R50-million, and the full 10 points for projects over R50-million.

These regulations were agreed upon a long time ago with the construction industry, and are generally a workable compromise between the financial demands of the construction business and government’s BEE requirements. This is mainly because Level-1 BEE status is possible with a 25% black ownership. That is low enough to be financially feasible and high enough to be meaningful.

But for the new management, this wasn’t good enough. 

They changed the rules so that the BEE allocation would only be granted if equity ownership was over 50%. 

This demand makes the whole system unworkable because it effectively means the profitability of road construction for the construction company has to be enormous for the project to be viable. 

It’s very similar to the debates that are taking place in the mining industry about the “once empowered, always empowered” system. And, by the way, this very intense level of BEE requirements is what Eskom imposed way back, and which, I suspect, is at least one of the reasons for load shedding.

So, what has happened is that two engineering construction companies, H&I Construction and Wilson Bayly Holmes-Ovcon (WBHO), have taken Sanral to court to challenge the board’s new scoring system on tenders. The case is still pending.

So now, as with Eskom before it and many other examples, the rot is beginning to set in and talented staff are leaving or being ejected if they raise objections to the unworkable ideological predilections of their politically appointed overseers who often know absolutely nothing about the job at hand. 

Sanral’s chief financial officer, Inge Mulder, and the head of supply chain management, Inba Thumbiran, have been suspended.

Sanral now claims these suspensions have nothing to do with the new, impractical and financially unfeasible BEE regulations. They result from a different issue. 

The Sanral board decided, in its deep wisdom, that a company designing the tenders is not allowed to adjudicate bids. The Sanral board claimed that doing so would be a conflict of interest, but in most circumstances, you would want the technical knowledge of the designer of the project to be front and centre of the bid adjudication process. Obvs.

How suspicious should we be about this? 

On historical evidence, pretty suspicious. Particularly since three Sanral megaprojects, which were reversed after the outrage of the bid designers being part of the adjudication process, have now been granted to Chinese construction companies. This includes a hugely expensive bridge in the former Transkei which goes from nowhere to nowhere. But it is big.

The battle within Sanral is a familiar one in SA at the moment. 

The political appointees of parastatals think they have only one job: Transformation. The industry tries to demonstrate they are in favour of transformation as long as financial and technical feasibility are not tossed out of the window in the process. The ideologues claim this is just “resistance” to transformation – and double down. With the impasse, huge projects simply don’t happen. 

Paging through Sanral’s most recent annual report, there is one very revealing statistic: the total infrastructure budget for the 2022 financial year was R34.2-billion. That’s much more than its budget from government, but their was a big rollover from the previous year partly, I presume partly because of the Covid pandemic but also because of disputes about the tender process. How much did it spend? As it happens, R7.2-billion.

QED. No wonder SA’s roads are such a mess. SANRAL’s response to this article is below in full. DM

*Story corrected to reflect Sanral’s total road responsibility is in fact 23,500km of roads, and the correct infrastructure budget.


Comments - Please in order to comment.

  • Evan Arendse says:

    I find this article a bit short on facts and big on sensationalism.

    A key fact which is overlooked is that the BEE environment changed at the end of 2022, with all state entities able to move away from the previous evaluation method. The change was brought about by the introduction of the Preferential Procurement Regulations 2022.

    We have seen almost all entities immediately change their policies to reflect their objectives. Even the DA run City of Cape Town has significantly deviated from the pervious system, with no bidders / service providers raising objections.

    I am happy to share an article which gives a bit of background to the changes brought about by the new regulations.

  • Peter Pyke says:

    SANRAL was the one parastatal that was still reasonably effective. These overpaid goons on SANRAL Board will now ensure that the remaining effective big contractors in SA will wither and die with the loss of jobs and local skills. We will then be left with no local contractors with the necessary skills to tackle large infrastructure jobs.
    Cry the beloved country and save us from incompetence.

  • Bert Kir says:

    What SANRAL is now said to be doing (trying to dodge around the provisions of the PPFA) is neither new nor confined to the construction industry. It’s being going on for years and in all sorts of procurement from bridge building to buying baked beans.

    What puzzles me is that no-one seems to take this to the constitutional court.

    Section 217(a) says Organs of State must take the lowest competent bid with Section 217(b) adding that this MUST be with the provisions of the PPFA being strictly applied.

    What SANRAL is doing falls outside what is allowed by the PPFA.

    It’s surely unconstitutional…?

  • Colleen Harding says:

    What are SANRAL doing about a bypass around Knysna? During the 2017 fires, Knysna was completely cut off from both Plettenberg and Sedgefield. We cannot have such a situation reoccur. I am aware that the bypass has been scoped and the plans are sitting in a cupboard at SANRAL in Cape Town.

    Knysna has the N2 going straight through the main street of the town. Huge logging trucks, motor vehicle trucks and other heavy vehicles destroy the town’s roads.

    Knysna would be a much better tourist destination with having the bypass. Those people who WANT to come to the town will do so and those that are passing through to Port Elizabeth or Cape Town will have a much easier journey!

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted


This article is free to read.

Sign up for free or sign in to continue reading.

Unlike our competitors, we don’t force you to pay to read the news but we do need your email address to make your experience better.

Nearly there! Create a password to finish signing up with us:

Please enter your password or get a sign in link if you’ve forgotten

Open Sesame! Thanks for signing up.

A South African Hero: You

There’s a 99.8% chance that this isn’t for you. Only 0.2% of our readers have responded to this call for action.

Those 0.2% of our readers are our hidden heroes, who are fuelling our work and impacting the lives of every South African in doing so. They’re the people who contribute to keep Daily Maverick free for all, including you.

The equation is quite simple: the more members we have, the more reporting and investigations we can do, and the greater the impact on the country.

Be part of that 0.2%. Be a Maverick. Be a Maverick Insider.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options