South Africa


Revealed: Putin agreed in June not to come to summit, but Ramaphosa had to consult BRICS partners before going public

Revealed: Putin agreed in June not to come to summit, but Ramaphosa had to consult BRICS partners before going public
Russian President Vladimir Putin during the Strong Ideas for a New Time forum on 29 June 2023 in Moscow, Russia. (Photo: Getty Images / STR) | President Cyril Ramaphosa. (Photo: EPA-EFE / Patrick Seeger)

President Cyril Ramaphosa has outlined in a court affidavit the tortuous and stressful diplomatic consultations Pretoria went through before announcing on Wednesday that Russian President Vladimir Putin would not, after all, attend next month’s BRICS Summit in Johannesburg.

An additional affidavit filed by President Cyril Ramaphosa in the DA’s court application demanding that South Africa should arrest Russian President Vladimir Putin if he comes to the country, reveals that Ramaphosa started consultations with BRICS heads of state about the issue after bilateral talks with Putin on the sidelines of the African Peace Mission in June in St Petersburg, Russia. 

Daily Maverick understands that is when Ramaphosa reached an agreement with Putin about not attending the summit in August, but he had to also consult with the other BRICS member states.

Ramaphosa first spoke to Brazilian President Lula da Silva about the matter on the sidelines of the Summit for a New Global Financing Pact in Paris, held on 22 and 23 June. However, the President wanted his affidavit to be kept confidential until after he spoke to the Chinese and Indian heads of state. 

“At this meeting, the President of Brazil agreed that the preferred option, being that President Putin would not attend the summit in person, had his support,” Ramaphosa said in his affidavit.

“This was soon after my trip to Russia as part of the Africa Heads of State Peace Mission on 19 June 2023.

“To sum up the position: I have had consultations with the President of Brazil, and the President of Russia. Dirco [Department of International Relations and Cooperation] has been making every effort to ensure that I get an audience with the President of China [Xi Jinping], as well as the Indian Prime Minister [Narendra Modi],” Ramaphosa’s affidavit reads.

Until I am able to, I ask this court and DA to please keep this affidavit confidential. The Brics works on the basis of consensus. Releasing the content of this affidavit before I have had the opportunity to speak with my India and Chinese counterparts may strain diplomatic relations between South Africa and those countries, and also be in violation of the consensus model of the Brics. I really do not wish for that to happen,” reads the affidavit, which Ramaphosa signed on July 18.

On Tuesday, the DA won its bid to unseal the President’s confidential affidavits along with all its supporting documents.

In the first affidavit, which was released on Tuesday, Ramaphosa set out that South Africa would have issues executing the request to arrest Putin and was aware of the dire implications — including the risk of war with Russia — if the country were to contribute towards his arrest. 

Ramaphosa explained that South Africa had initiated Article 97 proceedings of the Rome Statute, which allow for consultation with the International Criminal Court (ICC) if a problem is identified that could potentially impede or prevent the execution of an ICC request, such as one to arrest and surrender an ICC suspect. 

Fadi El Abdallah, who speaks on behalf of the ICC, refused to give Daily Maverick a comment on whether Pretoria had in fact consulted the court on trying to secure a waiver of the court’s request to SA to arrest Putin. 

The Presidency on Wednesday afternoon formally announced that Putin will not be attending the BRICS Summit. Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov will represent the country instead. 

Russia’s Tass news agency then reported that Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said that Putin would address the summit via video conference.

Putin’s party reacts

Speaking to the media on the sidelines of the BRICS Political Parties Dialogue in Johannesburg, Andrey Klimov, a senior United Russian Party member who is also a member of Russia’s State Duma and the co-chairman of the EU-Russia Parliamentary Cooperation Committee, said the decision for Putin not to attend had been taken unanimously.  

He told Daily Maverick that he had a conversation with Ramaphosa on the eve of the announcement and that Russian officials were aware that the South African government had been placed in an invidious position.

“Honestly, I am not surprised [that Putin will not be able to attend] … the situation is based on factors which are not from South Africa. This is about the environment of today’s world and of course, we need special confirmation from the official side of the presidential administration of the Russian Federation. 

“Before leaving Russia, I heard different scenarios of what would happen, but certainly we Russians, we Chinese, we Indians, we are guests here and it is up to the master of the house, the president of the country, to make decisions on this. The most important thing is that BRICS is still a powerful alliance of sovereign states. Russia is still a friend of South Africa,” Klimov said.

The SA Communist Party’s General Secretary, Solly Mapaila, believes it was inevitable that South Africa would give in to the ICC. Besides the legal implications, Mapaila explained that South Africa had a lot to lose had it allowed Putin to attend the summit. 

“What we need to say is that SA should take this lesson as the leader of their country to develop its own instruments. Just as a general speculation, we do not have public systems in place.

President Putin today has become the most important leader for a multipolar world system. He represents that. The West is trying to divert that vision so that we only see a man who is obsessed with power.”

Opposition parties react 

The DA welcomed the announcement by the Presidency that Putin wouldn’t attend the summit and deemed it a victory for the party.  

“By mutual agreement, Putin and Ramaphosa have now bent the knee before the DA’s fight for the rule of law. The DA firmly believes that no one, regardless of their position, should be above the law. Our commitment to the principles of justice, accountability and adherence to international treaties won the day against the ANC and their Russian ally.

“South Africa’s reputation on the international stage and its commitment to upholding the rule of law were at stake in this matter. By standing firm on the need to adhere to our obligations under the Rome Statute and other international conventions, we have demonstrated our unwavering dedication to justice and human rights,” said DA leader John Steenhuisen. 

Despite this development, the DA is going ahead with its court bid. Its application to ensure South Africa arrests Putin should he visit the country will be heard on Friday at the Pretoria High Court.

The EFF said, “In a typical Western imperialist fashion, South Africa faced threats of losing financial and political ties with the West unless they arrested President Putin. The United States of America even threatened to withdraw South Africa from the African Growth and Opportunity Act as a form of pressure.

“It must therefore be highlighted that President Putin’s withdrawal is a consequence of the South African state’s reluctance to be firm on international affairs and their inability to resist pressure from Nato. Further hypocrisy lies in the fact that the ICC has not prosecuted individuals like George Bush and Tony Blair for war crimes, raising questions about its impartiality, yet our government bows to its threats.” DM


Comments - Please in order to comment.

  • Fanie Rajesh Ngabiso says:

    From Russia with Lavrov

    • D'Esprit Dan says:

      Putin’s been Putout!

    • D'Esprit Dan says:

      First Putin tried to sink SA with a R1 trillion nuclear corrupt con job, then bombed Kyiv when Ramaphosa touched down, then threatened billions in preferential trade we have with countries that actually buy our goods through insisting on attending the BRICS Summit, and still the SACP and EFF and their ilk fawn over him and Russia, their sclerotic intellects incapable of moving beyond the ‘glory days’ of the Soviet Empire. For the SACP, EFF and Putin-sponsored elements of the ANC, jobs in South Africa are not important: the welfare of ordinary citizens is collateral damage in their windmill-tilting obsession with creating a new world order, where their own egos will take centre stage. History tells us it doesn’t end well for those who ignore the basic welfare of their citizens in pursuit of brutal political objectives.

  • Sydney Kaye says:

    Putin was never going to come here or even leave Russia. He knows what happened to Khrushchev in 1964 after he was called back from a vacation in Pitsunda, Georgia

  • Dennis Bailey says:

    Nothing but the same old same old predictable bluster from the opposition. SA is seriously in need of opposition that has something meaningfully pertinent to add to political space. Arise, Manzi, please!

    • Bryan Bailey says:

      Say Dennis, What if the “same old same old predictable bluster from the opposition”, did not try to keep the ANC in check, kindly speculate, where we would we be??

    • D'Esprit Dan says:

      Dennis, why do you want water levels to rise? I’m assuming only in a controlled manner into dams that can hold it?

  • Steve Davidson says:

    “What we need to say is that SA should take this lesson as the leader of their country to develop its own instruments. Just as a general speculation, we do not have public systems in place.”

    Say what?! I realise that Western fascist English language isn’t your first, but whichever one you used would still have resulted in a load of rubbish spewing out!

  • R IA says:

    I can’t believe Putin would ever have come. Has he even been out of Russia since the war with Ukraine? He’s too much of a coward.

  • Michael Ash says:

    Oh, Joy, the opportunity to hear the spoutings of Lavrov before an indulgent coterie of ANC sycophants who, whilst the funds roll in from Russia share the views of SA Communist Party’s General Secretary, Solly Mapaila – should be a very enlightening demonstration of political spin and drivel.

  • Graeme de Villiers says:

    ‘Tortuous and stressful’ diplomatic consultations? Oh shame, the poor dear. Welcome to the real world Mr Prez. It’s about time you feel the pain of the ordinary citizen that you and your party have thrust us into on a daily basis.
    How just saying NO to that merderous viper could be so stressful, is beyond me.

  • Dario Tanziani says:

    Fact of the matter is, the ANC were forcibly made aware of where the real financial power and interests of the country lie, as opposed to their own personal interests.

  • Dietmar Horn says:

    Given that thousands of tons of grain destined for Africa were destroyed in the most recent wave of attacks on Odessa, the question arises as to how the other BRICS leaders will continue to position themselves towards Russia. Ramaphosa’s diplomatic dilemma is actually of no interest to the rest of the world.

  • Stef Naude says:

    You read comments by the likes of Solly Mapayile and Julius Malema, and realise that they should be kept as far from the levers of power as possible (oh wait, Solly is the secretary-general of one arm of the tripartite alliance! Go figure…). The old adage of being known by the friends you keep (or wish you had), applies. They admire a man who is slowly killing his main political opponent by keeping him in jail in appalling conditions on trump-up charges. Whose other opponents, those who are still alive, know not to stay in hotels where windows can be opened, and know not to accept beverages from strangers. Who has launched an unprovoked war against a sovereign country, including countless direct attacks on civilians and civil infrastructure, which are objectively classified as war crimes. In Solly’s parallel universe, “the most important leader for a multipolar world system”. Such class.

  • Edwin Schultz says:

    If Cyril knew in June that the war criminal wasn’t coming to RSA, then why did he make the statement that to arrest him here would be tantamount to declaring war. All statements by ANC cadres and the Russian mafia should be taken with a pinch of salt and the DA is right to pursue a court directive to compel an arrest otherwise the criminal might just show up.

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted


This article is free to read.

Sign up for free or sign in to continue reading.

Unlike our competitors, we don’t force you to pay to read the news but we do need your email address to make your experience better.

Nearly there! Create a password to finish signing up with us:

Please enter your password or get a sign in link if you’ve forgotten

Open Sesame! Thanks for signing up.

We would like our readers to start paying for Daily Maverick...

…but we are not going to force you to. Over 10 million users come to us each month for the news. We have not put it behind a paywall because the truth should not be a luxury.

Instead we ask our readers who can afford to contribute, even a small amount each month, to do so.

If you appreciate it and want to see us keep going then please consider contributing whatever you can.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options