DM168

INVESTMENT OUTLOOK

Phala Phala saga puts South Africa’s economy on a knife-edge

Phala Phala saga puts South Africa’s economy on a knife-edge
Illustrative image | President Cyril Ramaphosa. (Photo: Carl Court / Getty Images) | Freepik | Rawpixel

Investors spooked by the uncertainty surrounding the fate of President Cyril Ramaphosa have pulled their money out of South Africa, with billions of rands already gone to greener pastures.

“It’s bad politics roiling financial markets. It’s like a lighter version of Nenegate all over again,” David Shapiro quipped as investors digested the Phala Phala report that hangs over President Cyril Ramaphosa’s fate in office.

Shapiro, a veteran money manager whose career spans five decades, has seen many moments that have shaken business, including the dark days of apartheid, the technology crash in the early 2000s, the global financial crisis of 2007, the firing of Finance Minister Nhlanhla Nene by then president Jacob Zuma (known as Nenegate) in 2015, and the Covid pandemic.

But the latest market decline — spurred by the Phala Phala saga — is a blow for Shapiro because it comes at a time when there are many green shoots for SA’s economy and a reform agenda in the state.

The economy is performing better than expected, as seen in the growth figures for the third quarter. Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana has presented a positive mid-term budget, with the government making headway on reducing debt and spending. Exchange rate movements have been caused by international developments rather than local trouble.

“But the Phala Phala saga has sent shivers down the spines of investors. It might have wiped out all the goodwill towards SA,” says Shapiro, who manages assets and investments worth more than R13-billion at Sasfin Securities.

Markets reflected shaken investor confidence in SA as the rand fell by 4% and yields on 10-year government bonds spiked to their highest since 2020 on 1 December, a day after the release of a report on the theft of $580,000 from Ramaphosa’s Phala Phala farm in Limpopo.

The impact on the JSE was also swift as foreign investors bailed out of companies exposed to SA. The local equity market saw outflows of nearly R4-billion, and roughly R9-billion left the local bond market.

To recap: a report by an independent panel found that Ramaphosa may have broken some of SA’s anti-corruption laws, violated his oath of office, and committed misconduct — fuelling concerns that he might resign or be impeached.


Visit Daily Maverick’s home page for more news, analysis and investigations


Succession concerns, impact on economy

The big worry in financial markets was about who would take over from Ramaphosa if he resigned, and whether his successor would ensure continuity in his economic policies, maintain the structural reform agenda and exercise prudence in public finances.

Although Ramaphosa didn’t resign, some investors are still spooked and will remain nervous until there is clarity on what will happen with the ANC’s leadership. That is unlikely to be resolved by year-end.

Regardless, the Phala Phala saga has heightened SA’s political uncertainty, which is harming the economy and scuppering investment.

Underscoring this is that within hours of the Phala Phala report’s release, food manufacturer Premier Group cancelled its JSE listing, which had been set for 8 December, citing uncertainty and volatile markets.  

Daily Maverick understands that Premier would have been worth more than R5-billion on the JSE and that the company had received support for its listing from institutional investors. But the market rout inspired by Phala Phala made some investors nervous, prompting them to pull out.  

Professor Raymond Parsons, an economist at North-West University’s Business School, has estimated that prolonged uncertainty and lower investment could shave as much as a percentage point off the SA Reserve Bank’s already low growth forecast of 1.1% in 2023.

Although some investors have long taken a negative view towards SA, Ramaphosa’s cash-in-the-couch fiasco prompted them to double down on their stance.

For example, Gryphon Asset Management, based in Cape Town, has been negative towards SA-based investments for the past three years.

“And we are getting more and more negative every day. SA carries considerable political risk and has stepped that up over the past few years following the Zuma years. We have a structural political problem,” says Cassie Treurnicht, an analyst at Gryphon. 

Big business is worried

Several business players canvassed by Daily Maverick have also expressed concerns. Business Unity SA CEO Cas Coovadia describes the uncertainty surrounding Ramaphosa’s future as a “significant crisis for our country”, adding that it “poses high risks that will see further erosion of confidence”, especially in the run-up to the ANC elective conference from 16 December.

“Our country can ill-afford further erosion of confidence and instability, at a time [when] business is committed to devoting resources and capacity to work with the government to address numerous crises in SA. Business needs policy and political certainty, with a capable government,” says Coovadia.

Big business rallied around Ramaphosa and supported his ANC presidential campaign in 2017. He is seen as business-friendly, pragmatic and a consensus-seeker — a big shift from his predecessor.

In the current ANC leadership, Ramaphosa is seen as irreplaceable, says businessman Sipho Pityana.

“The fact of the matter is that the nation’s hopes are on Cyril, even with all his shortcomings. Anything that raises questions on his integrity, credibility and ethical conduct is a huge blow,” says Pityana, who had many engagements with Ramaphosa when he was previously the president of Business Unity SA and had board roles at Anglo Gold Ashanti and Absa.

On the other hand, Pityana argues, Phala Phala sets an important precedent for strengthening SA’s democratic processes and holding a sitting president accountable for possible wrongdoing.

Critics have a mixed report card on Ramaphosa’s presidency.

Coovadia and Pityana have praised Ramaphosa for reforming institutions such as law enforcement, the SA Revenue Service and some state-owned enterprises. But he has also been criticised for not moving fast enough, especially on energy reforms, an area on which he is fixated on getting consensus among stakeholders, which gets in the way of speedy decision-making.

Businessman Reuel Khoza has joined a growing chorus of leaders who have criticised Ramaphosa for “not being decisive enough” when it comes to pulling SA back from the brink. DM168

This story first appeared in our weekly Daily Maverick 168 newspaper, which is available countrywide for R25.

Gallery

Comments - Please in order to comment.

  • Cunningham Ngcukana says:

    The notion that leadership is irreplaceable in a political party is not only a false narrative but very dangerous one. For any person to peddle this false notion is to say the country’s future depends on mortal individuals who can suddenly die and not institutions. The issues that Judith February eloquently raised that the fact the panel has arrived at a decision and has a report to be debated by parliament means that processes of accountability by a head of state and public officials can work are working. The fact that Cyril has approached courts to review the findings of the panel mean that the institutional framework is functioning. That the ANC has criminal elements contesting for leadership it is up to the electorate that this article insults including people like Pityana and Shapiro. Our country does not depend on an individual called Ramaphosa as it has shown in July last year and the economy has shown despite the failure of Eskom to provide the required energy and lack of a plan from the very Ramaphosa to have a plan to deal with rolling black outs. He has been a big disappointment to big business and as Froneman of Sibanye says, we are close to a failed state because of the indecision of the man. The concern of the markets is temporary as any change brings uncertainty but markets get calmed eventually.
    It happens everywhere and to make a crisis out of nothing is misleading. This country will exist with Ramaphosa or not.

  • Sid Peimer says:

    If a ship is sinking, does it matter who the captain is?
    There is a strong argument for the ship ‘not sinking’, based on the ‘better than expected’ results (of the private sector). But that’s not the yardstick. The real measure is the percentage of HNWI (high net worth individuals) whose children are overseas. The money that is here, must obviously get to them there. These lines from Ernest Hemingway’s novel The Sun Also Rises, perhaps warn us of the tipping point (where there will be no money here): “How did you go bankrupt?” Bill asked. “Two ways,” Mike said. “Gradually, then suddenly.”
    What then becomes the currency of the day? Probably the gun.

  • Andrew Blaine says:

    The market acts, or reacts, to rumour and emotion. If it only reacted to fact and evidence, it would be a great deal smoother and offer fewer opportunities.
    The Phala Phala story was based entirely on hearsay and rumour mongering and, it seems, the motives and actions of the investigating group are both open to question and bias.
    I suggest that, in the ling run, the whole saga will be found to be nothing more than malicious mischief, against which inaction is normally the most effective response?

    • Peter Dexter says:

      I totally agree with you Andrew. It is glaringly obvious that the RET faction represented by Arthur Fraser set up the entire Phala Phala “burglary” complete with “evidence” then withheld the information for 16 months, until the run up to the ANC elective conference. It appears the Section 89 panel didn’t test the allegations or evidence against Ramaphosa but regarded it as factual. One only has to read the Zondo report to understand the motives that both Fraser and his close friend Jacob Zuma have in removing CR, and Fraser had access to an entire network of illegal operatives. We know from the Zondo Commission that hundreds of millions of Rands disappeared via Fraser’s PAN operation, so setting this up would have been easy. Given the obvious motive, the timing of the charges being laid, the credibility of the person laying the charges, and the association with Zuma of one of the people in the “burglary,” I believe the verification of Fraser’s “evidence” done before the Section 89 panel even started their work.

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted

Get DM168 delivered to your door

Subscribe to DM168 home delivery and get your favourite newspaper delivered every weekend.

Delivery is available in Gauteng, the Western Cape, KwaZulu-Natal, and the Eastern Cape.

Subscribe Now→

Daily Maverick Elections Toolbox

Feeling powerless in politics?

Equip yourself with the tools you need for an informed decision this election. Get the Elections Toolbox with shareable party manifesto guide.