Newsdeck

Voting

New Zealand court rules voting age of 18 is discriminatory

New Zealand court rules voting age of 18 is discriminatory
New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern is seen casting her vote on the first day of advance voting during the New Zealand general election, in Auckland, New Zealand, 03 October 2020. EPA-EFE/DAVID ROWLAND

WELLINGTON, Nov 21 (Reuters) - New Zealand's highest court ruled on Monday that the country's current voting age of 18 was discriminatory, forcing parliament to discuss whether it should be lowered.

The case, which has been going through the courts since 2020, was bought by advocacy group Make It 16, which wants the age lowered to include 16 and 17 year olds.

The Supreme Court found that the current voting age of 18 was inconsistent with the country’s Bill of Rights, which gives people a right to be free from age discrimination when they have reached 16.

The decision triggers a process in which the issue must come before parliament for discussion and be reviewed by a parliamentary select committee. But it does not force parliament to change the voting age.

“This is history,” said Make It 16 co-director Caeden Tipler, adding: “The government and parliament cannot ignore such a clear legal and moral message. They must let us vote.”

The group says on its website there is insufficient justification to stop 16 year olds from voting when they can drive, work full time and pay tax.

New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern said the government would draft legislation to reduce the age to 16, which could then be put to a vote in parliament.

“I personally support a decrease in the voting age but it is not a matter simply for me or even the government, any change in electoral law of this nature requires 75% of parliamentarian support,” she said.

Political parties have mixed views on the subject. The Green Party wants immediate action to lower the voting age to 16, but the largest opposition party, the National party, does not support the shift.

“Obviously, we’ve got to draw a line somewhere,” said National party leader Christopher Luxon. “We’re comfortable with the line being 18. Lots of different countries have different places where the line’s drawn and from our point of view, 18’s just fine.”

By Lucy Craymer

(Reporting by Lucy Craymer; Editing by Bradley Perrett & Shri Navaratnam)

Gallery

Comments - Please in order to comment.

  • Rory Macnamara says:

    Really the Kiwis should be more concerned with critical matters. an age limit has been around for some centuries and no matter what age one makes it it will still be discriminatory! this will go around in never decreasing circles and huge amounts of energy will be wasted about a non event. Mandela tried to go the 16 route and was roundly and correctly brushed off.

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted

We would like our readers to start paying for Daily Maverick...

…but we are not going to force you to. Over 10 million users come to us each month for the news. We have not put it behind a paywall because the truth should not be a luxury.

Instead we ask our readers who can afford to contribute, even a small amount each month, to do so.

If you appreciate it and want to see us keep going then please consider contributing whatever you can.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options