Defend Truth

COALITIONS OP-ED

Ekurhuleni defeat sounds alarm bells for ANC and for democratic stability

Ekurhuleni defeat sounds alarm bells for ANC and for democratic stability
From left: An EFF supporter waves flags at the party’s manifesto launch in Ghandi Square, Johannesburg. (Photo: Shiraaz Mohamed) | A young supporter of the Democratic Alliance in Johannesburg, South Africa. (Photo: EPA / Ihsaan Haffejee) | African National Congress supporters at President Cyril Ramaphosa election campaign rally on 17 October 2021 in Phuthaditjhaba, Free State. (Photo: Gallo Images / Volksblad / Mlungisi Louw)

What happened in the Ekurhuleni mayoral vote could well happen in national government — that the ANC gets something like 40% of the vote and needs a significant number of seats to augment their numbers in order to govern. And if the other parties all agree to prevent that, it could well be that the DA becomes the ruling party with the tacit but unstable consent of the EFF.

It is well known that proportional representation (PR) voting systems are more likely to lead to coalitions than “first past the post”, pure constituency systems, found for example in the UK and Canada. In South Africa, we have pure PR at a national and provincial level, and a mix of PR and constituency systems at the local level, with the vote tally still put together in accordance with the proportion of the total vote that each party attains.

SA has limited experience with coalitions, in pre-1994 situations and in the Government of National Unity after 1994, later in the Western Cape and KwaZulu-Natal. This lack of experience relates to the post-1994 electoral dominance of the ANC until very recently. It remains dominant, but there are signs that it may fall below 50% in the 2024 national elections, as it has done in many local government elections. But it is almost certain to remain the strongest party.

A lot of people have claimed that the future of South Africa is coalition government.

Scholars have studied coalitions around the world and visited countries with long histories of coalition government. From this work, they have drawn conclusions about when coalitions work and when they don’t work. This scholarly work may well be founded on careful research, but, regrettably, it bears little relationship to what is possible and realisable in South Africa for the foreseeable future.

Most of the coalitions that work in Europe, Scandinavia, and other countries depend on a consensus between the parties or a minimum consensus on certain values and ideological agreement to a certain extent, or in some cases a common programme and a range of other similar qualities that have worked well for many years in Germany, and in some of the Scandinavian countries.

Scholars have distilled some basic features that favour successful coalitions and none of these is present in SA today, pointing to the likelihood of instability that exists in the present and is likely for the foreseeable future. Among the qualities that are referred to as components of successful coalitions are:

  • An agreed programme which binds the coalition parties. Although SA politics is currently fairly de-ideologised or depoliticised, the major parties have little to bind them together in a coalition. Some point to the convergence of the EFF with sections of the ANC — but neither the “Radical Economic Transformation” (RET) faction of the ANC nor the EFF can be relied on to carry out their promises, and there have been many inconsistencies and abrupt changes in the policies they advance; and
  • Common values/ideology: Related to agreeing on a common programme is sharing values or ideology. The question is not so easy to address now, mainly because South African politics no longer concerns serious debate over contending ideas.

Prior to 1994, the ANC and its allies did continually argue over positions that were adopted, especially in relation to strategies and tactics, but also over general programmes and policies. Some of these debates continued into the 1990s in the period of Nelson Mandela and Thabo Mbeki’s presidencies, notably with disagreements over macroeconomic policies, involving Cosatu and to some extent, the SACP.

That culture of debate disappeared from the ANC and its allies in the period of former president Jacob Zuma and State Capture, and many who are leaders of the ANC were themselves implicated in the frauds committed in this period. They and individuals at many other levels of the ANC devoted themselves to stealing from the fiscus rather than political ideas, something that continues into the post-Zuma period.

This also affects another feature of so-called successful coalition governments; their willingness to compromise. Insofar as there isn’t a willingness to compromise, it is not so much due to a difference on the need for an agreed programme. There is not an agreed programme, because of divergent ideas about various matters, though certainly the DA does have some positions that do not sit well with the ANC and the EFF.

The reason for not having a common programme may relate to the unwillingness of each of these parties to submerge their identities into an agreed common programme. In so doing, they may well lose many of their supporters and the electorate may well say, “Well, we voted for you on this, that and the other basis, and you’ve abandoned this in this coalition.”

It is said that there should also be an agreed mode of functioning as a collective. It doesn’t appear that many of the current coalitions get so far as to agree on this. They scramble to get enough votes to achieve a majority and generally do not survive long enough to relate to all the “dos and don’ts” and devote most of their energies to keeping all parties on board.

No doubt that will be better organised in a national coalition. However, there is not sufficient consensus on the way forward to easily find agreement on anything, even though functioning as a coalition is really a formal matter.

But the EFF stands outside the coalition parties and consequently is not able to be held to account by the coalition, and is very unreliable as a supporter of coalition governments.

And that is one of the reasons why the ANC initially lost power in Johannesburg and Ekurhuleni and the DA has regained power in Ekurhuleni. It relates to the voting patterns of the EFF that have not been easy to predict.

The character of coalition governments is a complicated mix of collaborating and competing and South African coalitions have not gone anywhere near achieving this.

Ekurhuleni vote

The ANC’s defeat in Ekurhuleni when Tania Campbell, who had only recently been removed from office as mayor, was re-elected must sound alarm bells for the organisation.

But it has national implications and does not bode well for stable democratic life, given that an unreliable EFF may well be a key component of any national or provincial coalition and easily provoke national crises.

When the ANC sought to form a relationship with the EFF to be able to return to the mayoralty, or be the dominant party in alliance with the EFF, the EFF demanded that its candidate be mayor of Ekurhuleni and the ANC and the EFF were not prepared to budge, with both parties claiming the office of mayor for themselves.

These results in Ekurhuleni may foreshadow what could well happen in national government in 2024 — that the ANC could emerge as the strongest party in the national government, but because of the strong animosity towards it, it may well be that the one thing all other parties will agree on is not to work with the ANC, except for a few very minuscule partners.

Now if both the EFF and the DA do not work with the ANC, it will be very hard for it to form a coalition government unless it only needs a handful of votes, in which case it may be that some of the smaller — sometimes disreputable — parties will be coaxed into working with the ANC in exchange for one or two rewards.

But what happened in Ekurhuleni could well happen in the national government — that the ANC gets something like 40% of the vote and needs a significant number of seats to augment their numbers in order to govern.

And if the other parties all agree to prevent that, it could well be that the DA becomes the ruling party with the tacit but unstable consent of the EFF. The EFF may be less likely to act this out where there is not a secret ballot, since some EFF leaders denied voting for the DA in Ekurhuleni, though the numbers show they must have done so.

My sense is that one cannot meet the conditions for successful coalition governments in a society like ours where very few parties have strong convictions about the policies they put before the public.

They do not have a sense of passion about bettering the lives of the people of South Africa and the ANC has retreated into a party that is very selfish; that doesn’t care about the poor and is in fact prepared to barter its policies for its narrow party benefits, as in not implementing various projects in order to remain in power, or to win over a coalition partner.

The main thing for the ANC, it seems, as with the president himself, is to retain office, not the content of programmes that they have, so that the minimum condition for a successful coalition government or two possible minimum conditions — common ideology and a common programme — are unrealisable in South Africa; not necessarily directly because there is strong opposition between the ANC and these parties, but because South African politics has become de-ideologised and there’s an absence of ideas and debate.

Bring back debate

How do we address this as the public?

Clearly the vote will not lead to a satisfactory result, but we need to bring back debate. There is some debate, but we need to find a way of returning to the culture where everything is up for debate and everyone is encouraged to participate.

That is insufficient, but it is part of rebuilding democratic life. DM

This article first appeared on Creamer Media’s polity.org.za

Gallery

Comments - Please in order to comment.

  • Glyn Morgan says:

    Great article, but nothing said about the DA. WHY? It is the ONLY party that is NOT de-ideologised and there ARE ideas and debate.

    This sad situation is due to THE MEDIA not giving the DA the support it is due!

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted

X

This article is free to read.

Sign up for free or sign in to continue reading.

Unlike our competitors, we don’t force you to pay to read the news but we do need your email address to make your experience better.


Nearly there! Create a password to finish signing up with us:

Please enter your password or get a sign in link if you’ve forgotten

Open Sesame! Thanks for signing up.

We would like our readers to start paying for Daily Maverick...

…but we are not going to force you to. Over 10 million users come to us each month for the news. We have not put it behind a paywall because the truth should not be a luxury.

Instead we ask our readers who can afford to contribute, even a small amount each month, to do so.

If you appreciate it and want to see us keep going then please consider contributing whatever you can.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options

Daily Maverick Elections Toolbox

Feeling powerless in politics?

Equip yourself with the tools you need for an informed decision this election. Get the Elections Toolbox with shareable party manifesto guide.