South Africa


‘Electricity is a public good,’ says Minister Gordhan, defending state ownership of Eskom

Eskom is necessary because providing electricity is a public good and the state should be involved in the provision of public goods, says Public Enterprises Minister Pravin Gordhan.

Public Enterprises Minister Pravin Gordhan was asked at the Financial Times Africa Summit on Tuesday why South Africa needed Eskom at all. A member of the audience put it to him that South Africa had been ahead of the curve in 1993 and 1994 in licensing mobile telephone companies and that had changed the country’s telecoms landscape.

“Given that history of trailblazing, why do you need Eskom?” was the question for Gordhan, who was participating in the London summit remotely.

“We consider electricity to be a public good,” he said. “And I think there is a reason for the state to be involved in the provision of public goods — although there are many different kinds of innovations and mechanisms which would allow for partnerships with the private sector.”

Gordhan suggested that placing the provision of electricity into private hands in other parts of the world had not worked out well, including because it had increased prices. One of those places was Britain, he said, noting that by 31 October Britons would hear whether they would be receiving some sort of assistance towards paying their energy bills. 

“There are other examples in the United States where some of the issues have relevance as well,” Gordhan added. 

He said there was a need for public goods and for the public sector to play an important part in the provision of those goods, but not necessarily the only part. He noted that the private sector in South Africa was spending “huge amounts of money” to provide electricity for public use through Eskom’s transmission network, but also for its own use in mining and other sectors. 

But, Gordhan asked, when the private sector came in to finance the provision of energy, “what will be the terms on which they will come in?” And could the private sector hold a country and its population hostage if it has an unregulated environment in which to operate? 

He said the multilateral financial institutions had to play an important part in financing African energy provision. Partnerships between the public and private sectors were also needed. 

“But in a way in which what is happening in some countries in the north doesn’t happen here eventually on the African continent as well; which is that renewable energy which came in fairly cheap — and that was its selling point — now the prices are being increased to match market prices for other forms of energy.  

“And that’s a risk the world needs to look at, let alone ourselves. The last point is that Africa and many other developing countries across the world have had this dubious honour of having promises made but promises not delivered upon. In many ways, I would refer to this as the Covid-19 vaccine phenomenon — ‘We look after our own first and the rest of you can wait until we’re finished.’”

Gordhan was asked whether he believed that South Africa’s international partners who have pledged $8.5-billion to help finance its Just Energy Transition Partnership (JETP) — the European Union, US, UK, France and Germany — would not deliver what they had promised. 

Visit Daily Maverick’s home page for more news, analysis and investigations

“Well, you know, there’s been talks going on for some time,” Gordhan said. “I think some countries must be lauded for their very constructive approach and their readiness to put their money on the table, so to speak. 

“And others are, regrettably, still in the narrative stage and the banknotes are still to be seen, to put it euphemistically. In the wider scheme, $8.5-billion … is a very small drop in the ocean compared to what each country is going to require, but more importantly, what the continent is going to require.” 

Gordhan was asked about the role of coal in South Africa’s transition to renewables. Would South Africa still be producing coal even after it had decarbonised, even after the domestic power stations had been closed?

He replied that coal’s long-term future was “a declining future. But it’s not a disappearing future, tomorrow morning, so to speak. And I think the war in Ukraine and its ripples across Europe is a very timeous reminder that there are going to be shocks in the global system, whether it’s energy-related or the economy.” These were having a serious spillover impact on developing countries. 

He noted that South Africa’s Integrated Resource Plan for energy, which was developed in 2019, contained a mix of renewables, hydro, nuclear and gas. 

“And there’s coal, because we’ve just built two huge new power stations that between them give us something like 7,200MW optimally and those are going to be around for the next 30 to 40 years. 

“So they will be an important component until we get our baseload right; until we get batteries that are going to be cheap enough to install not only in our country but elsewhere in the world and on the continent as well.

“And battery technology is also evolving … but it’s still costly at this point in time. There are projects in SA currently through Eskom where there are up to about 300MW of battery installations that are currently in development.”

Gordhan said the war in Ukraine had led to European countries that had shut down coal-fired power stations being forced to reopen some of them

“Gas is seen as the step down from both coal and other forms of fossil fuel. And is likely to play an important role in the next decade or so as well. To give us, if you like, a soft landing.”

Gordhan noted that South Africa’s just energy transition planning had begun before it signed the JETP at COP26 in Glasgow last year. Because electricity production contributes 41% of the country’s total carbon emission, the focus in the just energy transition had been on how to move away from Eskom’s coal fleet, which provides 80% of South Africa’s electricity. 

Eskom had created its own just energy transition path, which included repurposing coal-fired power stations, retraining workers and interacting with coal communities on how to ameliorate the impact on them of shutting down coal-fired plants. The Komati Power Station in Mpumalanga was the pilot for this programme. 

Gordhan said the priorities in how to spend the $8.5-billion of the JETP were Eskom’s just energy transition, helping the car industry move towards electric vehicles, and helping South Africa to become a powerhouse in renewable energy production. DM


Comments - Please in order to comment.

  • Brian Cotter says:

    Gordon – “And there’s coal, because we’ve just built two huge new power stations that between them give us something like 7,200MW optimally and those are going to be around for the next 30 to 40 years.” Pravin is obviously not very confident in the longevity of the new ANC Power Stations for only saying 30 to 40 years. Medupi Nameplate capacity: 4,800 MW + Kusile 4,800MW – 9,600MW.

  • Sydney Kaye says:

    The private sector holding the public hostage is a possibility but the ANC holding the public hostage is a fact.

    • R S says:

      While electricity is undoubtedly a public good, the state is failing to provide it, just as it is failing to provide many other things due to corruption, incompetence, and focus on political ideology over reality. Once the split of Eskom has taken place, government should look to offload its older coal power stations to companies that will be able to better manage them.

  • virginia crawford says:

    Electricity is a public good, but is a state more focussed on “the party” and cadre deployment a public good? I don’t usually support privatisation, but could it be worse than what we have? A 32% price increase when the power is off for up to 7 hours a day – not very different from private providers. If people stop paying a private company goes bankrupt, Eskom doesn’t. When theft, corruption and sabotage happen in a private company, they are legally obliged and motivated to deal with it. Eskom can’t apparently.

  • Dennis Bailey says:

    There is no accountability in any SOE, not least Eskom. It’s the basic travesty of SA’s version of democracy. It ain’t.

  • Jane Crankshaw says:

    Public participation could not possibly cost more than what the Eskom debt has become thanks to racist BEE policies that are destroying this country. How naive of Gordhan to suggest possible public partnerships – which go well until it doesn’t…just look at the Post Office and the Government Grants system ….. Mark Barnes and Net1 were working their magic until it no longer suited the politically connected and their feeding at the trough!

  • Nos Feratu says:

    Pravin is not only past his “sell by” date but past his “use by”date as well

  • In my home country Germany, production and long-distance distribution of electricity have never been in state hands. That fact has never been a problem with regard to security of supply or price. Problems came with erratic change of policies that disrupt long-term planning and erase billions of Euros with each power plant that is shut down prematurely due to one ideology or other.

  • Tim Price says:

    The dinosaur-esque ANC cadre to the end is our Pravin. The ANC’s policy approach is much like Putin’s. Keep on doing the same thing even though it doesn’t work, while failing to acknowledge things have moved on.

  • Malcolm McManus says:

    “We consider electricity to be a public good,”. Certainly when top ANC politicians don’t have to worry about not having it. Private competition is always good for stabilizing costs.

  • Hillbilly Hillbilly says:

    Oh dear he is loosing it as well. Perhaps chatting to Gwede. Nothing wrong with the government providing electricity but a legislated monopoly. Just like Transnet – a legal monopoly. When these monopolies fail the country tanks – they just don’t get it . I thought at least Pravin would have some common sense. I would like a choice of either buying expensive reliable electricity (read private sector supplier) or cheap non existent electricity.

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted


This article is free to read.

Sign up for free or sign in to continue reading.

Unlike our competitors, we don’t force you to pay to read the news but we do need your email address to make your experience better.

Nearly there! Create a password to finish signing up with us:

Please enter your password or get a sign in link if you’ve forgotten

Open Sesame! Thanks for signing up.

We would like our readers to start paying for Daily Maverick...

…but we are not going to force you to. Over 10 million users come to us each month for the news. We have not put it behind a paywall because the truth should not be a luxury.

Instead we ask our readers who can afford to contribute, even a small amount each month, to do so.

If you appreciate it and want to see us keep going then please consider contributing whatever you can.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options

Daily Maverick Elections Toolbox

Download the Daily Maverick Elections Toolbox.

+ Your election day questions answered
+ What's different this election
+ Test yourself! Take the quiz