South Africa


Zimbabweans trying to exit SA turned back by armed guards at Beitbridge border

Zimbabweans trying to exit SA turned back by armed guards at Beitbridge border
A group of Zimbabweans at Beitbridge border in Limpopo. (Photo: Bernard Chiguvare)

Home Affairs fails to provide any explanation or reasoning.

The six-month extension to June 2023 of the Zimbabwean Exemption Permit (ZEP) brings some relief to nearly 180,000 permit holders, but many families are still opting to voluntarily return to Zimbabwe. The ZEP was to expire at the end of December 2022, leaving almost all of these permit holders undocumented.

However, some Zimbabweans trying to leave South Africa at the Beitbridge border are being stopped from returning, because they don’t have valid documents.

This is possibly the result of the introduction of 200 armed Border Management Authority (BMA) guards in Musina, Limpopo. The guards are deployed at five “identified vulnerable parts” of the border and work with members of the South African National Defence Force. The BMA will be South Africa’s single authority for border management and is expected to be fully set up by April 2023.

We recently spent two days at the border.

“I cannot stand the current wave of vigilantism in South Africa,” an informal trader at Beitbridge told us. “The only possible option is going back home to Zimbabwe. The wave [of xenophobia] seems to be spreading to all provinces. It’s better I leave before this life-threatening situation is upon us.”

She used to travel home almost every two weeks to visit her two children. But since 2011, as the situation in Zimbabwe continued to deteriorate, she decided to stay in South Africa and run her informal business.

She wants to return home but cannot do so under the new border rules. We met her with a group trying to cross on foot. “We are ordered to go back to South Africa, but if we go back, we risk being arrested. We are really stuck,” she said.

We witnessed many people, carrying their belongings, trying to figure out how they could safely return to Zimbabwe through unlawful routes.

Visit Daily Maverick’s home page for more news, analysis and investigations

Another informal trader, in Musina since 2010, also did not have the required documents and had to travel home using an unlawful route. She said she moved to South Africa to work and support her elderly parents and her two children back in Zimbabwe. She said she worries about their quality of life now that she will no longer be sending cash home to support them.

Immigrant rights organisations, such as Scalabrini and the People Against Suffering, Oppression and Poverty (Passop), have criticised the way the South African government is managing immigration.

Victor Chikalogwe, of Passop, said, “I believe if people would like to go back to their respective countries they should be allowed to pass through the normal port of entry. If any unit of the government is denying them a chance, then they are risking the lives of these people.”

Dale McKinley, from the Kopanang Africa Against Xenophobia, said, “Are they going to arrest Zimbabweans and send them back to Lindela prison and deport them later? This could be a waste of taxpayers’ money. Forcing people to return through illegal routes will only make them more vulnerable.”

The Department of Home Affairs has been promising to respond to our questions for two weeks but did not do so.

James Chapman, of Scalabrini, referred us to a statement on its Facebook page: “We are concerned that while ZEPs have been extended, the barriers and challenges faced by ZEP holders who wish to access mainstream immigration visas remain in place. The requirements for mainstream visas are not attainable for most ZEP holders, and waivers of certain requirements are difficult to access and not readily issued. We continue to advocate for reducing the barriers encountered in trying to access immigration visas.” DM

First published by GroundUp.


Comments - Please in order to comment.

  • Jeroen Dubbelman says:

    Is it possible they have to pay for a “return permit”?

  • William Stucke says:

    A typical example of bureaucratic incompetence – following the letter of the law without consideration of whether it makes any sense in the context.

  • Ed Rybicki says:

    The Department of Home Affairs is actually completely incompetent, not to mention verging on the malicious, in their actions towards Zimbabweans and other foreigners. Stopping people LEAVING SA because they don’t have proper documents, when they almost certainly have Zimbabwean IDs? Simply ridiculous!!

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted


This article is free to read.

Sign up for free or sign in to continue reading.

Unlike our competitors, we don’t force you to pay to read the news but we do need your email address to make your experience better.

Nearly there! Create a password to finish signing up with us:

Please enter your password or get a sign in link if you’ve forgotten

Open Sesame! Thanks for signing up.

A South African Hero: You

There’s a 99.7% chance that this isn’t for you. Only 0.3% of our readers have responded to this call for action.

Those 0.3% of our readers are our hidden heroes, who are fuelling our work and impacting the lives of every South African in doing so. They’re the people who contribute to keep Daily Maverick free for all, including you.

The equation is quite simple: the more members we have, the more reporting and investigations we can do, and the greater the impact on the country.

Be part of that 0.3%. Be a Maverick. Be a Maverick Insider.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options

MavericKids vol 3

How can a child learn to read if they don't have a book?

81% of South African children aged 10 can't read for meaning. You can help by pre-ordering a copy of MavericKids.

For every copy sold we will donate a copy to Gift of The Givers for children in need of reading support.