CSA withdraws all disciplinary charges against Mark Boucher

CSA withdraws all disciplinary charges against Mark Boucher
From left: Lawson Naidoo, CSA Chairman, during the South Africa and India 30 year celebration at Boschendal Wine Estate on January 16, 2022 in Franschhoek, South Africa. (Photo: Roger Sedres/Gallo Images) | Mark Boucher (Coach) during the 3rd KFC T20 International match between South Africa and England at SuperSport Park on February 16, 2020 in Pretoria, South Africa. (Photo: Lee Warren/Gallo Images) | Graeme Smith during the CSA media briefing at Newlands Cricket Ground on December 14, 2019 in Cape Town, South Africa. (Photo: Bertram Malgas/Gallo Images)

Proteas coach Mark Boucher is in the clear after Cricket South Africa’s case collapsed when no witnesses would come forward. 

The leadership at Cricket South Africa (CSA) suffered another major embarrassment after it was forced to drop all charges in its disciplinary case against Proteas coach Mark Boucher.

CSA’s own lawyers concluded that “none of the three charges were sustainable”. They were contained in a seven-page charge sheet in January. 

After all material witnesses refused to come forward in the case against the coach, CSA had no option but to abandon what became a politicised witch hunt. But for Boucher, the scars are deep and the reputational damage massive.

 “Cricket South Africa (CSA) has concluded that there is no basis to sustain any of the disciplinary charges, including charges of racism, against Mark Boucher, the coach of the Proteas Men’s cricket team,” a statement from CSA read.

“CSA has formally and unreservedly withdrawn all of the charges and will make a contribution to Mr Boucher’s legal expenses.”

While the outcome will come as a relief to Boucher, who has guided the Proteas’ men’s team with success over the past two years, he has endured a torrid time.

“I welcome the decision of CSA to unreservedly withdraw all charges against me. The allegations of racism which were levelled against me were unjustified and have caused me considerable hurt and anguish,” Boucher said in a statement.

“The last few months have been extremely difficult to endure for me and my family. I am glad that the process has finally come to an end and that CSA has accepted that the charges against me are unsustainable.”

Flimsy basis

The basis for the charges stemmed from last year’s Social Justice and Nation Building (SJN) hearings where former spinner Paul Adams revealed that he was the victim of a team song containing racial slurs.

Adams, who named Boucher at SJN as one of the players who called him a “brown shit” in a team song more than 20 years ago, issued a statement on Sunday saying he had said his piece and would take no further part in pursuing Boucher.

Without Adams’ testimony the already weak case — as Adams had not been cross-examined — became untenable.

The SJN report, submitted to the CSA board last December, was criticised by many legal experts and cricket insiders as “flawed” and “weak.”

Despite objections to CSA accepting the SJN report in that form, the board decided to accept it. CSA then took a decision to pursue accusations against Boucher (and also former director of cricket Graeme Smith) that were flimsy and tenuous. Smith was cleared in an independent arbitration hearing last month, and CSA were ordered to pay his legal costs.

CSA board chairman Lawson Naidoo later claimed he had no option after the board accepted the SJN report, but to test the accusations. Which does raise questions about the judgement of the board after it was warned the SJN report was flawed, even internally. It appears the pursuit of Smith and Boucher was emotional rather than rational.

“In December 2021, the CSA Board received the report from the independent SJN Ombudsman, Adv Dumisa Ntsebeza SC,” CSA’s statement read.

“That report made adverse ‘tentative findings’ regarding Mr Boucher but because the Ombudsman stated that he was not in a position to make “definite findings”, he recommended that further formal processes take place to achieve finality on these issues.

“In line with their fiduciary and legal obligations, the CSA Board resolved to institute formal proceedings as per the SJN Report’s recommendations, which would give all parties, including Mr Boucher, a chance to respond to the allegations and fully state their case.

“CSA was advised by external lawyers that the appropriate formal process to follow in respect of Mr Boucher was a formal disciplinary hearing in front of an independent Chairperson.

“The charge sheet against Mr Boucher ultimately included the tentative finding made by the SJN Ombudsman against Mr Boucher, as well as issues arising from CSA’s own internal enquiry following the resignation of the Proteas assistant coach, Mr Enoch Nkwe. 

“Advocate Terry Motau SC, a well-respected senior counsel, was appointed as the Chairperson of the disciplinary enquiry.”

The disciplinary hearing against Boucher was supposed to start on 16 May.

“The CSA Board has now taken the decision to formally withdraw all of the disciplinary charges against Mr Boucher. This includes the charges arising from the SJN report and the charges arising from the investigation following Mr Nkwe’s resignation.  CSA has made this decision taking into account the following considerations:

  1. Mr Adams recently announced that he had withdrawn from testifying against Mr Boucher during the disciplinary hearing.  In doing so, Mr Adams stated that his concerns articulated during the SJN process were about the overall ‘culture’ in the Proteas team during the early 2000s, rather than being about any particular player. A copy of Mr Adams’ statement is attached.
  2. During the SJN process, Mr Boucher formally apologised to Mr Adams. After the SJN process, Mr Adams indicated to CSA’s lawyers that he accepts this apology.
  3. Mr Nkwe decided that he too did not wish to testify against Mr Boucher during the disciplinary hearing. In doing so, Mr Nkwe stated publicly that he did not intend to take sides regarding Mr Boucher and that ‘whatever happens in that process, I hope the outcome will be the one that’s best for the game’.
  4. CSA’s lawyers engaged with various other potential witnesses over the last month and concluded that none of the three charges were sustainable.
  5. The very recent ruling by Advocates Hamilton Maenetje SC and Michael Bishop in the Graeme Smith arbitration fortified the conclusion that the charges against Mr Boucher would be dismissed.”

 No formal apology

Despite the withdrawal of the case and the strain and stress Boucher endured, board chairperson Lawson Naidoo stuck to the line that CSA had little choice but to institute formal proceedings against Boucher. 

“CSA has at all times been committed to dealing with the SJN issues in a manner that treats them with utmost seriousness but also ensures fairness, due process and finality,” Naidoo said in a statement.

‘The decision to withdraw the charges brings about finality on these issues for CSA and Mark and allows the focus to return to the cricket field — where we trust that Mark and the Proteas will go from strength to strength.”

CSA CEO Pholetsi Moseki, at least had a more human and sympathetic view, coming closest to offering Boucher an apology.

“CSA appreciates that it has been very difficult for Mark to deal with these charges hanging over his head over the last few months,” Moseki conceded in his statement.

“CSA regrets this. CSA is also appreciative of the fact that Mark has at all times conducted himself properly and professionally — refusing to be drawn into public debates about the charges and carrying out his duties with commitment and dedication.

“The performance of the Proteas men’s team over this period has been extremely impressive, particularly in the Test arena, and this speaks to the efforts of Mark, his support staff and the players.”

Boucher is set to stay on as Proteas coach with 18 months left on his contract. Boucher’s relationship with the CSA board is damaged, but his relationship with Moseki, who is effectively his boss, is strong.

“I stand by my apology to Paul given during the SJN process for the hurt he felt during his time as a Proteas player,” Boucher said. “As I stated in my affidavit to the SJN process, some of the things that were said and done in those days were totally inappropriate and unacceptable and in retrospect, understandably offensive.

“I am proud to now be part of a team culture that is inclusive and whose objective is to be respectful to every person.

“I consider that the matter is now finalised and closed and I do not intend making further statements on this matter. I look forward to continuing to focus on my job and to taking the Proteas men’s team to even greater heights.” DM


[hearken id=”daily-maverick/9472″]


Comments - Please in order to comment.

  • Gerrie Pretorius Pretorius says:

    The pursuit of Smith and Boucher was neither rational nor emotional. It was purely a racial issue.

  • The Proven says:

    Lawson Naidoo should resign – he is the head of the team that has been found wanting – any person that stands at the helm of Cricket in South Africa with such questionable judgement should not be allowed to continue taking decisions on behalf of cricket in future.

    • Sue Grant-Marshall says:

      The entire CSA board should resign and Lawson Naidoo’s name should be first on the resignation sheet. That Mark Boucher has continued to coach our winning team – winning in spite of all the negativity – is a tribute to his professionalism. Now, let’s get on with the game.

  • blaxx47 says:

    If anyone in this sorry saga needs to apologize for his deep-seated racism, it is “Advocate” Dumisa Ntsebeza.
    Maybe half the legal costs of both parties brought on by his profoundly defective report should be paid by him in his personal capacity.
    Meantime, Bravo! Lawson and Pholetsi.

  • Colin Jennings says:

    Difficult to understand how no action is taken against those in, “privileged”, positions that have the ability to wreak havoc on another’s family, livelihood and honour of reputation.

  • Carsten Rasch says:

    “It appears the pursuit of Smith and Boucher was emotional rather than rational.” – indeed, and perhaps racial too. To legally pursue something that happened 20 years ago after appointing the man as the coach just two years ago seems unwise and impractical, and quite honestly, vengeful. This type of witch-hunt leaves everybody the poorer, especially the sport.

  • Andrew Wright says:

    Given that we now live on a society dedicated to hammering every succesful white South African because of the past, none of this is surprising at all. What is a surprise is that any white South African bothers to take any position wich involves any publicity at all. Leading or creating a successful national team is a privelege – in my view these guys are super brave because the nation has too any wannabees who will take any opportunity to shovel as much sh*t a possible, whether justified ot not, on to any South African white person doing a good job purely on the basis that he is the wrong colour. Racism at its best.. nothing has changed in that respect since 1994. Absolutely ludicrous & a total & utter repudiation of any rainbow nation concept.
    This, along with the many, many political moves to deny White South Africans any equal rights at all is simply self defeating & really stupid

    • Gerrie Pretorius Pretorius says:

      Bravo! Well said. Add EE, BEE, BBBEE, AA and you have the answer – the anc is an anti-white organisation who have no idea how to govern. Good at ‘ruling’ but govern they have no idea.

  • Lorinda Winter says:

    Our new Dali Mpofu, Adv Dumisa Ntsebeza. I predict his next appointment will be either to defend Zuma, Mkhwebane, Magashule, Mabuza or Mkhize. How on earth is it possible that Lawson Naidoo is still the chairman? Does he actually know the game of cricket or is he just another ‘cadre’ deployment destroying all good will in his wake?

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted

MavericKids vol 3

How can a child learn to read if they don't have a book?

81% of South African children aged 10 can't read for meaning. You can help by pre-ordering a copy of MavericKids.

For every copy sold we will donate a copy to Gift of The Givers for children in need of reading support.

A South African Hero: You

There’s a 99.8% chance that this isn’t for you. Only 0.2% of our readers have responded to this call for action.

Those 0.2% of our readers are our hidden heroes, who are fuelling our work and impacting the lives of every South African in doing so. They’re the people who contribute to keep Daily Maverick free for all, including you.

The equation is quite simple: the more members we have, the more reporting and investigations we can do, and the greater the impact on the country.

Be part of that 0.2%. Be a Maverick. Be a Maverick Insider.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options