X

This is not a paywall.

Register for free to continue reading.

We made a promise to you that we’ll never erect a paywall and we intend to keep that promise. We also want to continually improve your reading experience and you can help us do that by registering with us. It’s quick, easy and will cost you nothing.



Nearly there! Create a password to finish up registering with us:


Please enter your password or get a login link if you’ve forgotten


Open Sesame! Thanks for registering.

ANC chair Gwede Mantashe has no immediate comment on Zo...

South Africa

DAYS OF ZONDO, PART 2

Gwede Mantashe offers no immediate response to Zondo report branding his testimony ‘implausible’

President Cyril Ramaphosa. (Photo: Gallo Images / Jaco Marais) | Mineral Resources and Energy Minister Gwede Mantashe testifies at the State Capture inquiry in Johannesburg on 14 April 2021. (Photo: Gallo Images/Luba Lesolle)

The report states that Mantashe’s account before the State Capture Commission of the appointment of Siyabonga Gama as Transnet group CEO was ‘implausible and inconsistent with the facts’.

ANC chairperson Gwede Mantashe prefers to let the process run its course with the findings of the State Capture inquiry, rather than immediately respond to claims in Part 2 of the report which places him as one of those central to appointing a figure who favoured the Guptas. 

Mantashe, a key ally of President Cyril Ramaphosa ahead of his election as ANC president in 2017, said: “It is a report. The ANC is dealing with that.”

Part 2, which was handed to Ramaphosa’s office on Tuesday, deals with Transnet and Denel – state-owned enterprises that were run down and looted in the years that Jacob Zuma was president.

It outlines Siyabonga Gama’s appointment as group CEO of Transnet, even as this was met with resistance by then public enterprises minister Barbara Hogan. 

Members of Zuma’s Cabinet (Jeff Radebe and Siphiwe Nyanda, now ambassador to Mozambique) were named in addition to Mantashe – who was then in the key position of ANC secretary-general – as well as “other high-profile persons associated with the ANC, and presumably by the deployment committee of the ANC” as having supported Gama’s appointment

Gama was first appointed in 2009 but dismissed the following year after an inquiry found that three charges, including the irregular authorisation of a contract, one of these to a company owned by Nyanda, warranted dismissal.

He was reinstated in the year after his dismissal. The report noted that Gama was in the running for the job “despite the allegations of impropriety against him and the board of Transnet considering him unsuitable for the position”. 

According to the report, after his reinstatement, Gama “was centrally involved in key transactions that favoured the Gupta enterprise. The evidence on record gives rise to reasonable grounds to believe that Mr Gama was reinstated as a consequence of an instruction or direction by President Zuma.” 

Mantashe told the commission that he supported Gama “because it was appropriate to promote ‘black excellence’” and that Gama had demonstrated his abilities during his career at Transnet. 

He preferred Mr Gama above the white candidate favoured by the board and was concerned about racism,” according to the report. “He also held to the fiction that the board had initially favoured Mr Gama as second in line when it recommended the appointment of Mr [Pravin] Gordhan (now public enterprises minister), when it had in fact not made such a decision and twice had considered Mr Gama to be unsuitable.” 

The report states that Mantashe’s account before the commission was “implausible and inconsistent with the facts”, because there was never a white candidate in the running. The only one, Chris Wells, withdrew his application a few days after making it. The other two candidates were Sipho Maseko, whose appointment the board recommended, and Gordhan. 

Mantashe, during his testimony, claimed not to know this. According to the report this is not credible, “given his obvious contemporaneous interest and his role in deployments by the governing party”. 

Mantashe was also present when Zuma sacked Hogan on 31 October 2010 and informed her that she would be appointed as ambassador to Finland. She declined the position. Hogan at the time sought to secure the appointment of a new board after Gama was dismissed, but the appointment of Malusi Gigaba in her place cleared the way for Gama’s reappointment. 

“Hogan contends that she was removed because she resisted the repeated attempts to properly influence executive and board appointments at Transnet and other SOEs,” the report found. 

Radebe, Nyanda, the South African Communist Party, the South African Transport Workers Union and the ANC Youth League – under Julius Malema’s leadership at the time – all issued strong and harsh statements in support of Gama in the days following his suspension. 

The first part of the report already hinted at the role of Mantashe in supporting Gama. It also emerged in testimony, and is likely to be dealt with in the third part of the report, that Mantashe had home security upgrades done for him by Bosasa, which was liquidated following testimony of inflated security tenders and corruption. 

Mantashe told journalists on the sidelines of the party’s birthday party on 8 January in Polokwane that he himself hadn’t been charged, even though he testified before the commission on behalf of the ANC. 

“It doesn’t mean that therefore I am implicated,” he said. “I talk about the deployment committee, I talk about many things, that is the responsibility of the secretary-general. We will deal with that report.” 

He said it was up to the National Prosecuting Authority to deal with those who had been implicated, while ANC leaders had the task of dealing with fragmentation in the party. 

Mantashe said individuals shouldn’t be sought out in the report, and it shouldn’t be used to “settle our own scores internally”. Rather, it should be used to “correct the weaknesses, to correct the mistakes we have committed” and to rebuild the ANC. 

The ANC’s National Executive Committee has appointed a “mechanism” to deal with the report where it makes findings related to the party and its members and officials. It has been reported that Justice Minister Ronald Lamola, former Gauteng Speaker Lindiwe Maseko, and former policy heads Joel Netshitenzhe and Radebe are on the committee. DM

Gallery

Comments - share your knowledge and experience

Please note you must be a Maverick Insider to comment. Sign up here or sign in if you are already an Insider.

Everybody has an opinion but not everyone has the knowledge and the experience to contribute meaningfully to a discussion. That’s what we want from our members. Help us learn with your expertise and insights on articles that we publish. We encourage different, respectful viewpoints to further our understanding of the world. View our comments policy here.

All Comments 13

  • Inconceivable that someone like Mantashe is still in a senior leadership position in the governing party. Let’s how they turn on each other, no honour amongst thieves.

  • When they gonna steal they cry black excellence and condemn whites and then choose the worst black person they can find as if there is no black people full to the brim with integrity ……, same story at SABC with the latest news editor …. state capture in full swing still

  • “Mantashe said individuals shouldn’t be sought out in the report, and it shouldn’t be used to “settle our own scores internally”. Rather, it should be used to “correct the weaknesses, to correct the mistakes we have committed” and to rebuild the ANC. “….sounds like the words of a guilty man.

    • When you deliberately and explicitly plan, strategise & implement that strategy to plunder state coffers, to erode the security of the state, to protect your fellow criminals come what may, repeatedly, that is not a mistake. That is high treason.

  • It is an insult to all Black people to believe that Siyabonga Gama represents ‘ black excellence’! Jeff Radebe has been tainted since the 90’s …and yet like so many others, he clings on. And to call Gwede Mantashe utterances implausible is very, very polite. Let’s hope these thieving, unscrupulous old crooks are brought down once and for all.

    • ‘implausible and inconsistent with the facts’ is just a silly, cowardly way, not a polite way, of calling him what he actually is – a scurrilous liar.

    • Can you just imagine what he is getting up to now in his current position…. Yet another untouchable in ramasnoozers inner circle..

  • The report , couched as it is in legal terms , is actually quite explicit as far as Gwede Mantashe is concerned. And it is no longer viable, as he earlier said , before the second part was published, that it should not be used against members of the ANC but rather as a tool of rebuilding. He obviously knew what was coming, and tried to cover himself! However, it is too late as much is now in the open, including his enabling of certain people with criminal intent.

  • Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted