Maverick Life

Food Justice

VIDEO

How sugar became a substance of abuse

How sugar became a substance of abuse
Six year old Kenya Lord reaches up to a scale model of the Tate Modern made of sugar cubes at Bankside on June 29, 2010 in London, England. The model was made using 80,000 sugar cubes. The chimney is 1 metre high. (Photo by Peter Macdiarmid/Getty Images)

From the mid-20th century, the US’s Sugar Research Foundation launched an all-out offensive in defence of sugar, financing hundreds of studies that presented it in a favourable light. Now some of the latest research sheds light on how bad sugar is for weight gain, diabetes, dental health and so much more.

“We are in an era – almost unique in world history – when in the United States, and a certain few other favoured countries, there is more food available than people can eat. Each food industry has to get up and fight for its place in the limited human stomach… It is for these reasons that I am unhappy about advertising which implies that sugar is in some unique sense the cause of obesity.”

That era was the early fifties and the person talking at the eighth general meeting of the American Society of Sugar Beet Technologists, in Denver, Colorado, was 52-year-old Dr Henry Bohn Hass, a specialist in organic chemistry who would in 1969 be awarded the gold medal of the American Institute of Chemists.

Almost seven decades ago, as food industries fought for their “place in the limited human stomach”, it was (sort of) decided that the dietary villain would be fat, while sugar would emerge as a kinder fuel for the body thanks to ‘studies’ backed-by-the-then-newly-formed Sugar Research Foundation.

In this film, ‘For the love of sugar’, we explore how added sugar slowly but surely made its way into our food, what effects it has on the body, and why is it so addictive. DM/ ML

MORE ON FOOD JUSTICE…

The sugar tax is working. Now double it

Food advertising: Beware the puffery

The Oily Trinity: Big food, fast food and proximity

Image Map
Gallery

Comments - Please in order to comment.

  • Andrew Blaine says:

    Everything in moderation! This includes sugar, oxygen, fat and exercise! Attacking one of them simply imbalances the others which can be really dangerous!
    Marketing is the true criminal in this regard because it promotes bias and encourages excess?

  • Two Wrongs Aint No Right says:

    The main problem with sugar is that it has an early foot in the door – when a child grows. Often parents give it to children innocently to reward them or to calm them down. Alcohol and other addictive substances are normally introduced later in life.

  • Paul Heine says:

    Unbelievable! Sugar is attacked and labelled as dangerous to our health. At the same time, we legitimise the use of tobacco and marijuana. Parents are exposing their children to these dangerously addictive substances too, together with the abuse of alcohol. I agree with Andrew – proper education regarding the health benefits of a balanced diet should be taught in schools and clinics across the country.

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted

Premier Debate: Gauten Edition Banner

Join the Gauteng Premier Debate.

On 9 May 2024, The Forum in Bryanston will transform into a battleground for visions, solutions and, dare we say, some spicy debates as we launch the inaugural Daily Maverick Debates series.

We’re talking about the top premier candidates from Gauteng debating as they battle it out for your attention and, ultimately, your vote.

Daily Maverick Elections Toolbox

Feeling powerless in politics?

Equip yourself with the tools you need for an informed decision this election. Get the Elections Toolbox with shareable party manifesto guide.