X

This is not a paywall.

Register for free to continue reading.

We made a promise to you that we’ll never erect a paywall and we intend to keep that promise. We also want to continually improve your reading experience and you can help us do that by registering with us. It’s quick, easy and will cost you nothing.



Nearly there! Create a password to finish up registering with us:


Please enter your password or get a login link if you’ve forgotten


Open Sesame! Thanks for registering.

First Thing, Daily Maverick's flagship newsletter

Join the 230 000 South Africans who read First Thing newsletter.

We'd like our readers to start paying for Daily Maverick

More specifically, we'd like those who can afford to pay to start paying. What it comes down to is whether or not you value Daily Maverick. Think of us in terms of your daily cappuccino from your favourite coffee shop. It costs around R35. That’s R1,050 per month on frothy milk. Don’t get us wrong, we’re almost exclusively fuelled by coffee. BUT maybe R200 of that R1,050 could go to the journalism that’s fighting for the country?

We don’t dictate how much we’d like our readers to contribute. After all, how much you value our work is subjective (and frankly, every amount helps). At R200, you get it back in Uber Eats and ride vouchers every month, but that’s just a suggestion. A little less than a week’s worth of cappuccinos.

We can't survive on hope and our own determination. Our country is going to be considerably worse off if we don’t have a strong, sustainable news media. If you’re rejigging your budgets, and it comes to choosing between frothy milk and Daily Maverick, we hope you might reconsider that cappuccino.

We need your help. And we’re not ashamed to ask for it.

Our mission is to Defend Truth. Join Maverick Insider.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options

Tender Turmoil: EOH slaps former chief executive with R...

Business Maverick

BUSINESS MAVERICK

Tender Turmoil: EOH slaps former chief executive with R1.7bn damages lawsuit

Former EOH Holdings CEO Asher Bohbot. (Photo: Gallo Images / Business Day / Martin Rhodes)

EOH’s damages claim against Asher Bohbot runs to more than 40 pages and itemises in near-pointillist detail the losses it suffered due to the allegedly unlawful behaviour of its co-founder.

Listed information technology giant EOH Holdings is suing its former chief executive Asher Bohbot for R1.7-billion over material and reputational damages the firm says it suffered from allegedly corrupt contracts he oversaw during the latter years of his two-decade tenure.

In a statement, EOH said that it was also filing for damages against former CFO John King, former head of public sector Jehan Mackay, and the former head of EOH International, Ebrahim Laher, for a total of R6.4-billion.

The IT firm, with a market cap of close to R1.18-billion, was once a JSE darling, but its share price has tanked since 2018 as revelations of its involvement in suspicious contracts emerged, allegations it has partly admitted to at the State Capture Commission, as part of a deep-clean of its public profile.

EOH’s damages claim against Bohbot (68) runs to more than 40 pages and itemises in near-pointillist detail the losses it suffered due to the allegedly unlawful behaviour of its co-founder. That is even before EOH gets to its right to claw back the handsome salary and bonuses, more than R11-million and R70-million, respectively, it forked out for services it says Bohbot did not render. In all, it wants Bohbot to pay back a princely R1.7-billion.

In the civil lawsuit, filed at the Johannesburg High Court in late May, EOH says Bohbot “failed to ensure that all funds, resources, and assets were used for their intended purpose and not to facilitate corrupt and unlawful payments, and he failed to ensure that appropriate systems were in place to do this”.

In the court papers, EOH puts its reputational damage at R500-million, lost past and future profit at R300-million, and unlawful payments at more than R650-million.

EOH goes on to allege that Bohbot oversaw “unlawful and/or corrupt payments” in the form of bribes; allowed for tender-fixing; unlawfully obtained confidential tender information; engaged middlemen to influence tender processes; among a slew of other infractions. 

The firm claims Bohbot either intentionally or negligently failed to act within the prescripts of South African laws governing the conduct of CEOs, specifically the Public Finance Management Act, the Municipal Finance Management Act, the Preferential Procurement Policy Framework Act and the Prevention and Combating of Corrupt Activities Act.

Cracks in EOH’s once pristine facade began to appear in 2017 when Bohbot suddenly resigned as CEO and chairman, just days before Microsoft terminated a lucrative contract allowing EOH to resell its product locally. This was followed by evidence that EOH had overcharged the SA National Defence Force and the Department of Water and Sanitation for some services, leading to a probe by the Special Investigating Unit and an admission of debt by EOH.

The scandals caused the firm’s shares to sink to all-time lows, with clients heading for the exit and regulatory and law authorities circling. EOH’s new management under Group CEO Stephen van Coller has spent much of the past three years trying to remove the stink.

Van Coller’s contrite appearance at the State Capture Commission in late 2019 and other public gestures by the company to atone for its part it wrongdoing went some way towards mending the firm’s image and its share price, although testimony this week by former ANC spokesperson Zizi Kodwa about millions of rands “loaned” to him by EOH’s top brass has returned some of the taint.

Bohbot did not respond to an emailed request for comment. DM/BM 

Gallery

Comments - share your knowledge and experience

Please note you must be a Maverick Insider to comment. Sign up here or sign in if you are already an Insider.

Everybody has an opinion but not everyone has the knowledge and the experience to contribute meaningfully to a discussion. That’s what we want from our members. Help us learn with your expertise and insights on articles that we publish. We encourage different, respectful viewpoints to further our understanding of the world. View our comments policy here.

All Comments 10

  • If the State will not act (as it should), then the civil action against these individuals will at least see them brought before a court to answer for their alleged actions. I have greater faith in the attorneys acting for EOH than those who may represent the State.

  • All strength to van Coller and EOH! Only when these corporate corruptors paid the price and spend around 10 or 15 years in orange will the level of corruption fall.

    • Exactly! The criminal charges and jail time is the only satisfactory solution to this and many other state capture crimes.

    • I’m curious as to why you say the board. The board’s job is to represent the shareholders – not to be involved in the day-to-day running of the business. If the shareholders are dissatisfied with their board, they are voted out at the next AGM.

      • Andrew, you are wrong.
        The directors owe a fiduciary duty to the company, not the shareholders. They fulfil this duty, inter alia, by holding the executive directors to account. It would appear that the non executive directors on this board were asleep at the wheel !

  • Reminded me of Zizi Kodwa at the Zondo commission. His dealings with ” friends” at EOH is mind-boggling. If you missed this I’m sure it can still be accessed on Youtube. Believe me, you wont know whether to laugh or cry!

  • Is this the same Bobat that was Weekend Special Van Rooyen’s adviser??? Did Des ever get to Zondo Commission? Sorry if i missed that comic show.

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted