South Africa

JSC Day 3: Why does government prefer representation by white male lawyers?

By Rebecca Davis 15 April 2015

This week’s Judicial Service Commission interviews have concluded with the recommendation of two senior counsel to serve as judges on the Eastern Cape bench. One of the issues aired on the final day of interviews was the reluctance of both private practice and government to appoint black lawyers to appear for them – which experts say continues to delay transformation in the judiciary as well as the legal profession. By REBECCA DAVIS.

Grahamstown advocate Gerald Bloem, interviewed for one of two Eastern Cape High Court judge positions on Wednesday, was frank: “We do have a problem where the appointment of black counsel is concerned.”

Bloem told the JSC that in his experience, work was much less frequently passed on to black legal practitioners than to their white counterparts.

Chief Justice Mogoeng Mogoeng stressed that this was a serious problem. “Nobody talks about briefing patterns,” he said.

You don’t have to be intimately involved in the South African legal scene to have noticed that in some of the most high-profile court cases over the last few years, black senior counsel has been invisible – even when the client being represented is the government. This year, Parliament has thus far been represented in two cases by Advocate Jeremy Gauntlett and in one by Advocate Wim Trengove.

It’s an issue that Judge Dennis Davis chose to deal with on the latest edition of his eNCA debate show, Judge for Yourself. As Davis pointed out, it’s not just a question of the lion’s share of significant legal work going to white lawyers. There’s also the fact that this has an impact on the future makeup of the judiciary: “The more experience people gain at the bar, the more experienced they become for the bench,” Davis said.

Advocate Dumisa Ntsebeza – chairperson of Advocates for Transformation and a JSC commissioner – has been calling for change in this regard for some years.

“Look at just one case, the e-toll case, how many black practitioners were there?” Ntsebeza asked in 2013. “In the North Gauteng High Court when the e-toll thing was there, who were briefed?”

In March this year, Ntsebeza again expressed unhappiness, this time with Parliament’s choice of white male counsel. He told City Press that it was “unbelievable that the office with the highest authority in the legislature apparently thinks the only way to win cases is to appoint white advocates”.

On Judge for Yourself this week, Ntsebeza repeated his assertion that government has a special responsibility in its hiring practices because it is the largest consumer in the country of all services, meaning that by definition a great deal of legal work stems from it.

Justice Minister Michael Masutha responded that although the government was the biggest consumer as a single client, it was not the biggest sector. He added that the Justice Department had a good track record of distributing work to previously disadvantaged groups.

Later in the show, the Minister said that a number of policy interventions would be put through Cabinet later in the year “to give effect to some of these transformation initiatives”, including revamping the office of the state attorney.

The Institute for Accountability’s Paul Hoffman suggested that the government favoured white counsel for reasons of competition and efficiency. “It’s certainly not cost-effective to choose for yourself an advocate who you have no confidence will win the case for you,” Hoffman said – a viewpoint which Davis subsequently termed potentially offensive.

“You’re looking to win the case, you’re not looking to try out untried counsel,” Hoffman continued.

Hoffman also said that the pool of available and experienced legal practitioners continued to have too many white participants in it, and too few black participants.

The problem is not restricted to government; it afflicts the private sector too. Minister Masutha suggested that in some cases what is at the root of it is racism, and a lack of trust in black abilities.

“You find black successful captains of industry who still…despite they themselves having succeeded being black, don’t have confidence in other blacks,” Masutha said. Davis dubbed this “Margaret Thatcher syndrome” – an apparent reference to the former UK Prime Minister’s failure to meaningfully empower other women.

Ntsebeza urged government to push the private sector to change their briefing patterns, saying it should be incumbent on white senior counsel to bring in black and female counsel.

Back at the JSC interviews on Wednesday, Advocate Bloem got his nod from commissioners for appointment on the bench of the Eastern Cape High Court, together with fellow senior counsel Selby Mbenenge.

Earlier this week, judges Nambitha Dambuza and Rammaka Mathopo were recommended for the two vacant Supreme Court of Appeal positions. Judge Mampuru Makgoba won the recommendation for the position of judge president of the Limpopo High Court, and Judge Achmat Jappie earned the nod for the KwaZulu Natal judge president position.

If President Jacob Zuma accepts the JSC’s recommendations, it will mean that no white candidates succeeded in their bids for positions; but also only one woman.

On Wednesday, the JSC announced that the hearings for the new permanent member of the Constitutional Court will be held on 9 and 10 July, with the deadline for applications closing in just over a week. Legal advocacy groups have already expressed concern that this may be insufficient time to persuade able female candidates to make themselves available.

Photo: Chief Justice Mogoeng Mogoeng (Greg Nicolson)

Read more:


Watch Pauli van Wyk’s Cat Play The Piano Here!

No, not really. But now that we have your attention, we wanted to tell you a little bit about what happened at SARS.

Tom Moyane and his cronies bequeathed South Africa with a R48-billion tax shortfall, as of February 2018. It's the only thing that grew under Moyane's tenure... the year before, the hole had been R30.7-billion. And to fund those shortfalls, you know who has to cough up? You - the South African taxpayer.

It was the sterling work of a team of investigative journalists, Scorpio’s Pauli van Wyk and Marianne Thamm along with our great friends at amaBhungane, that caused the SARS capturers to be finally flushed out of the system. Moyane, Makwakwa… the lot of them... gone.

But our job is not yet done. We need more readers to become Maverick Insiders, the friends who will help ensure that many more investigations will come. Contributions go directly towards growing our editorial team and ensuring that Daily Maverick and Scorpio have a sustainable future. We can’t rely on advertising and don't want to restrict access to only those who can afford a paywall subscription. Membership is about more than just contributing financially – it is about how we Defend Truth, together.

So, if you feel so inclined, and would like a way to support the cause, please join our community of Maverick Insiders.... you could view it as the opposite of a sin tax. And if you are already Maverick Insider, tell your mother, call a friend, whisper to your loved one, shout at your boss, write to a stranger, announce it on your social network. The battle for the future of South Africa is on, and you can be part of it.


Please note you must be a Maverick Insider to comment. Sign up here or if you are already an Insider.


72 hours in late March: When Eskom pushed South Africa to the edge of financial collapse

By Marianne Merten


It’s the Unemployment, Stupid

Stephen Grootes 10 hours ago

Billionaire oil tycoon J Paul Getty had a pay phone in his home so he wouldn't have to pay for guests' calls.